lexicon
Since: May, 2012
Larkmarn
Since: Nov, 2010
Dec 27th 2016 at 2:09:20 PM
•••
Seems utterly arbitrary.
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
Eagal
This is a title.
Since: Apr, 2012
This is a title.
Dec 29th 2013 at 11:52:04 AM
•••
- Waldorf: I've always admired the classic struggle of brain vs brawn.
Statler: What's that got to do with this?
Waldorf: Who ever made this page obviously had neither!
Both: Do-ho-ho-ho-hoh!
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it against the rules to insult the wiki/tropers? If this doesn't qualify, feel free to readd it and call me a moron. :)
You fell victim to one of the classic blunders! Hide / Show Replies
Larkmarn
Since: Nov, 2010
Dec 29th 2013 at 12:18:16 PM
•••
... it's Statler and Waldorf. I don't think anyone's actually insulted.
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
Eagal
Since: Apr, 2012
Dec 29th 2013 at 12:25:56 PM
•••
I would be, but that's not relevant. Is it against the rules is my question.
You fell victim to one of the classic blunders!
Telcontar
MOD
Since: Feb, 2012
Dec 29th 2013 at 12:50:15 PM
•••
Insulting tropers, e.g. calling you a moron (which you're not), isn't allowed, but Self-Deprecating humor like this is fine.
That was the amazing part. Things just keep going.
DaibhidC
Wizzard
Since: Jan, 2001
Wizzard
Apr 2nd 2012 at 11:22:28 AM
•••
Pulled Delboy and Rodney from Only Fools And Horses, since neither of them are brawny, and it's arguable which of them is the brains; Del's guileful, takes control and calls Rodney a "plonker", but Rodders has common sense (sometimes) and a certificate in computers.
Edited by DaibhidC
Is it necessary to break up "heroic" and "villainous" examples? The trope has nothing to do with morality, and this just seems like an invitation for duplicate entries.
Hide / Show Replies