Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Main / AliceAndBob

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
MrStranger616 Since: Feb, 2020
Aug 10th 2021 at 8:44:50 AM •••

Bob and Alice each have twelve candies. If Bob eats six of his candies, and Alice eats three, how many do they each have left, and what is the remaining total?

NimmerStill Since: Mar, 2012
May 16th 2012 at 6:01:55 PM •••

"When the interaction between two hypothetical characters is needed to explain or describe some system, they are nearly always called Alice and Bob."

Nearly always where? Everywhere? Just in This Very Wiki?

Hide / Show Replies
Telcontar MOD Since: Feb, 2012
NimmerStill Since: Mar, 2012
May 17th 2012 at 9:56:29 AM •••

Well I ask because this is the first I've heard of it, and I'm in a field where we have to give examples like this all the time. It's not the case in linguistics, philosophy, logic, or as far as I can tell, computer science.

VVK Since: Jun, 2009
Dec 17th 2015 at 12:13:59 AM •••

I've seen it in philosophy. Not everywhere but somewhere.

Larkmarn Since: Nov, 2010
Dec 17th 2015 at 6:14:26 AM •••

Necro-ing, but for future reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_and_Bob

Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
VVK Since: Jun, 2009
Dec 17th 2015 at 12:15:35 AM •••

What's the reason this isn't supposed to be used in trope descriptions and what is to be done instead? Use A and B?

Edited by VVK Hide / Show Replies
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Dec 17th 2015 at 2:17:41 AM •••

Or better yet, not use specific names at all. The reason we don't like the format is because it gets repetitive and not all tropes can be explained well in this way.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Larkmarn Since: Nov, 2010
Dec 17th 2015 at 6:12:43 AM •••

Using specific examples for the description is problematic because if people only do that, the trope is poorly defined. It becomes impossible to tell if the trope only applies to that specific situation or if it's a bit more flexible, for example.

Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
VVK Since: Jun, 2009
Dec 28th 2015 at 2:15:04 PM •••

I see. I used this in "Yes"/"No" Answer Interpretation, and I didn't make up a specific example and I think it worked fine to explain it since I specifically needed characters A and B. I can't say it's not repetitive, but I can't really think of a better option for that one, since "A and B" just sounds clumsy.

MrStranger616 Since: Feb, 2020
Aug 10th 2021 at 8:42:25 AM •••

What's the matter with it? We use these names all the time!

StongRadd Since: Feb, 2010
Feb 22nd 2011 at 9:02:15 PM •••

We need a character sheet for this trope; there are a crapload of genericly named characters:

Edited by StongRadd Hide / Show Replies
MrStranger616 Since: Feb, 2020
Jun 18th 2021 at 12:35:23 PM •••

Emperor Evulz is the Big Bad. Also, you forgot "Karen", the entitled soccer mom.

MrStranger616 Since: Feb, 2020
Jun 30th 2021 at 1:06:12 PM •••

Also, that'd only work if their personalities were consistent, which they aren't.

MrStranger616 Since: Feb, 2020
Jun 18th 2021 at 12:34:03 PM •••

For people who don't exist, they sure get a lot of mentions. Like Alan Smithee.

Edited by MrStranger616
MrStranger616 Since: Feb, 2020
Jun 16th 2021 at 5:09:06 PM •••

For a while I thought "Alice and Bob" was an actual comic series or something, or a movie.

CrystalGlacia Since: May, 2009
Mar 8th 2013 at 10:38:07 AM •••

Is this page supposed to do indexing?

"Jack, you have debauched my sloth." Hide / Show Replies
Top