TigerHunter
Since: Mar, 2010
Aug 6th 2014 at 1:40:51 PM
•••
Massive Trope Decay, editors seem to think this trope is "adding a new female to the cast for any reason".
Edited by 50.165.137.217 Hide / Show Replies
Larkmarn
Since: Nov, 2010
Aug 6th 2014 at 2:00:33 PM
•••
See, I thought this trope was "female is added to the cast and she's more competent than the guys."
I didn't realize it was just "female is added to cast that only has one girl."
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
SeptimusHeap
MOD
(Edited uphill both ways)
Aug 6th 2014 at 2:16:42 PM
•••
The trope is "adding a woman in order to even out sexes", as the description states. Women added for any reason wouldn't fit, but the issue would be to tell why someone was added.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
captainsandwich
Since: Jan, 2012
May 23rd 2012 at 4:27:10 AM
•••
Wait a sec. Wasn't Tex (in red vs blue) just introduced in episode that wasn't a new season, spin off or the like. just introduced gradually over 2 or 3 episodes? If so does she still count?
I'm for pro wrestling examples, but does TNA adding knockouts tag team titles really count? As I remember TNA had less women on the show when the belts were introduced than before and even if that wasn't the case, I'm pretty sure this is a trope about the number of cast members, not the number of roles available to them.
Similarly, women joining power stables is nice, but to me that isn't the same thing as joining the cast.
I think Wrestling Society X did something like only Lizzy Valentine, the Nic Grimes came, or vise versa, I know there is a valid example somewhere. I'm just not sure we've found it yet. If I'm wrong, please correct me.