Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Main / AdaptationalVillainy

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
MrStranger616 Since: Feb, 2020
Aug 2nd 2021 at 5:46:51 AM •••

What about Nostalgia Critic and his portrayal of Wilkins from Wilkins coffee? That depiction is arguably FAR more evil, and darker than the original commercials.

Edited by MrStranger616
Snicka Since: Jun, 2011
May 29th 2017 at 5:03:14 AM •••

Now that Adaptational Jerkass got launched, characters who are becoming less pleasant in the adaptation, but remain on their respective (heroic or neutral) alignment shoudl be moved there.

Hide / Show Replies
manhandled Since: Feb, 2012
Feb 15th 2020 at 6:27:58 PM •••

While I get the point, it kinda takes the bite out of the transformation, in cases like a villain becoming a worse villain, with the actions to back up the cred, "Adaptational Jerkass" just feels like a complete understatement, the words lack "punch". Unless it could be a split difference, Adaptational Jerkass for personality/temperament and Adaptational Villainy for the additional or changed actions.

I got my political views from reddit and that's bad
superboy313 Since: May, 2015
Mar 6th 2016 at 3:24:11 PM •••

Does it count as this trope is a villain is portrayed as far more malicious than what he/she was in his/her original source? (like a Harmless Villain being turned into a Complete Monster)

Hide / Show Replies
SharkToast Since: Mar, 2013
Mar 21st 2016 at 12:06:10 PM •••

Yes, I think so. As long as the adaptation shows the character being worse than they are in canon.

Snicka Since: Jun, 2011
May 29th 2017 at 5:04:21 AM •••

It's up to discussion whether those belong to (the newly launched) Adaptational Jerkass or this trope.

SharkToast Since: Mar, 2013
Mar 21st 2016 at 12:19:42 PM •••

What if an adaptation has a character doing something they wouldn't do in canon, but did so unwillingly? Like, let's say an adaptation has a character kill someone, but then has that character show remorse or they only did it out of self-defense. Would that still count as this trope or at least maybe a subversion?

Edited by SharkToast Hide / Show Replies
NNinja Since: Sep, 2015
Apr 24th 2017 at 3:15:54 PM •••

Tropes Are Not Narrow. If character is more evil in adaptation that in source material it fits. If someone has extremely strickt Thou Shall Not Kill rule, but kills in adaptiations if he has to i'd say it qualifies, maybe as downplayed example.

SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Jun 4th 2015 at 3:21:29 AM •••

Adaptation tropes aren't usually classed as Trivia.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
SeaRover Since: Mar, 2012
Mar 23rd 2015 at 8:13:48 AM •••

What is the name of the trope if someone who was good in canon is turned bad in any fanfic not related to canon?

To name a few Lucky Star examples, we have The Library, in which Tsukasa manipulates Konata and Hiyori into assisting her in a school shooting. Or, take Fists of Rage, in which Kagami, Tsukasa, and Misao run a mass gang that rules their school with an iron fist.

You're probably thinking "Ron the Death Eater", but again, let me mention that these stories are not in the same continuity with the anime or the manga.

Can anyone tell me what I'm thinking of?

Hide / Show Replies
Larkmarn Since: Nov, 2010
Mar 23rd 2015 at 8:25:21 AM •••

Pretty sure that's still Ron the Death Eater.

Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
SWFMax Since: Apr, 2014
Oct 9th 2014 at 3:54:53 PM •••

I wrote a fan-fic for the Origami Yoda series, where I turned Harvey, a Jerk with a Heart of Gold, into a total Jerkass. Does a fan-fic count as an adaptation?

Hide / Show Replies
MagBas Since: Jun, 2009
Oct 9th 2014 at 4:08:15 PM •••

Why not? Fanfic is not official, but Hercules is not either.

Edited by 200.187.118.2
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Oct 10th 2014 at 12:59:37 AM •••

That seems more like Ron the Death Eater to me. And fanworks don't usually count as adaptations, the mythology ones nonwithstanding.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
AndyLA Real Wild Child (Old as dirt)
Real Wild Child
Aug 25th 2012 at 9:26:56 PM •••

Is there a trope that goes in reverse from this one? Like, a guy who was an evil puppy-kicking son of a bitch in the original becomes a sort of Anti-Hero or something in an adaptation?

One Nation Under WiFi
biznizz Since: Jan, 2001
Jul 18th 2012 at 3:57:15 AM •••

While Vegeta was plenty evil in his early appearances in all incarnations of Dragon Ball, the anime takes him beyond everyday villainy in a Filler episode that portrays him as a Complete Monster Omnicidal Maniac who enjoys Trolling innocent alien races before wiping out the lot of them. Naturally, when he pulled a Heel Face Turn later on, it felt cheap and confusing to viewers who were unaware that this sequence was not part of the original story.

Well... even if that was Filler, the manga did pretty much say that he still was an unrepentant bad guy prior to the Namek Saga. Does this really count in this trope?

Sometimes life just sucks. You have to learn to take the good with the bad. Why should you expect anything different in the mediums?
Top