Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Literature / WatershipDown

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
Tropegod Since: Aug, 2017
Jul 2nd 2020 at 11:13:16 AM •••

I just added the fact that the does at efrafa were implied sexual slaves your thoughts?

65.185.140.232 Since: Dec, 1969
75.46.72.251 Since: Dec, 1969
Aug 4th 2010 at 5:46:22 PM •••

It's rated PG, but ought to be PG-13. I think ratings weren't as strict in the late 70s. I remember watching it as a child when my mother specifically rented it for me, and it was serious nightmare fuel. Even as an adult, I find the asphyxiation scene and the surreal, eyeless black rabbit highly disturbing. As a child, I was afraid to sleep because I thought the black rabbit would kill me in the night. The book is much less frightening.

alcockell Since: Apr, 2009
Nov 18th 2010 at 12:19:07 PM •••

It had (and i think still has) a U rating this side of the pond... generally the crossmatch between MPAA and BBFC seems to be...

G = Uc PG = U and PG PG 13 = 12...

CritterKeeper Since: Jul, 2012
Jun 10th 2018 at 4:51:59 PM •••

PG-13 didn't exist when the movie was rated (1978); it was G, PG, or R, and it certainly wasn't really an R. Movies like this are the main reason the PG-13 rating was created in 1984.

FoolsEditAccount (he/him) Since: Oct, 2010
(he/him)
Aug 11th 2011 at 4:18:41 AM •••

I disagree that this is High Fantasy. The page for that says that the typical elements of High Fantasy are that they are set in a world other than ours, have an epic scale in terms of events, has an unnatural enemy that is evil incarnate, and victory is not achieved through combat. Watership Down is pretty much the opposite of all those; it's set on Earth, has a very small scale by our standards, and though the enemy is clearly evil, he is a natural rabbit, not some horrific monstrosity. Victory over him is also achieved, at least in part, through a climactic final battle. So, Watership Down really has no elements of High Fantasy. I'd say Low Fantasy is probably a better label (and even that's being generous, since the only supernatural elements are prophetic powers, which are vague and not really focused on).

Edited by FoolsEditAccount Hide / Show Replies
RobinZimm Since: Jan, 2001
Feb 2nd 2012 at 9:33:46 PM •••

...and rabbits being sapient creatures. I agree that High Fantasy is dubious, but I think Low Fantasy is actually an excellent fit.

FoolsEditAccount (he/him) Since: Oct, 2010
(he/him)
Aug 11th 2011 at 7:03:31 AM •••

So, on the character page, I removed Alternative Character Interpretation and What An Idiot from El's entry, since they aren't self-explanatory. Could whoever added them please give a more detailed explanation? I'll gladly put them back in if one is provided.

Top