Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Literature / TheChroniclesOfAmber

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
LBHills Since: Jun, 2012
Feb 21st 2013 at 5:07:34 PM •••

The Shapeshifting entry mentions that the beings from the Courts have the ability. Then it adds, "Also, the Unicorn." I'd be pretty confident in saying the Unicorn can change its shape, but I sure don't remember it actually demonstrating that ability at any point. Anybody remember that happening?

Hide / Show Replies
Xtifr Since: Jan, 2001
Feb 21st 2013 at 5:40:53 PM •••

I don't, but I've only read the novels, not any of the short stories.

Speaking words of fandom: let it squee, let it squee.
KageLupus Since: Oct, 2011
Apr 23rd 2013 at 11:39:00 AM •••

Pretty sure whoever added the bit about the Unicorn was confused. Corwin and Gerard (I think) see the Unicorn when they bury Caine. I believe it is later revealed that this was in fact Oberon shapeshifted into the Unicorn.

Edited by 216.99.32.45
Xtifr World's Toughest Milkman Since: Jan, 2001
World's Toughest Milkman
Jul 22nd 2012 at 8:02:42 PM •••

This used to be at Main.Book Of Amber, but that's a term I'd never heard. There is an omnibus called The Great Book of Amber, but that's not exactly the same, and in any case, The Chronicles of Amber is what most other reference sites call it, including The Other Wiki. So, since I was moving it to the Literature/ namespace, I figured I'd give it the more standard name at the same time. (Just in case anyone was wondering.)

eta: cleaning up the wicks, I've found a whole bunch of cases where [[BookOfAmber The Chronicles of Amber]] appeared, so I'm obviously not the only one who thought the old name was wrong.

Edited by Xtifr Speaking words of fandom: let it squee, let it squee. Hide / Show Replies
LBHills Since: Jun, 2012
Feb 6th 2013 at 10:46:02 AM •••

Should there be a Tabletop Games page for the RPG? It does have its own set of odd tropes.

Xtifr Since: Jan, 2001
Feb 6th 2013 at 11:53:35 AM •••

There most certainly could be. It would need someone familiar with the game to make the page, though. A possible first step could be to soft-split the game examples.

Speaking words of fandom: let it squee, let it squee.
Xtifr Since: Jan, 2001
Mar 12th 2013 at 1:04:48 PM •••

Excellent!

Now there's a choice: you could make TabletopGame.Amber Diceless Roleplaying into a redirect that points back here. That would help people find the page, and set up wicks properly, but might make it trickier if someone wants to make the page, since not everyone knows how to edit a redirect.

Edited by Xtifr Speaking words of fandom: let it squee, let it squee.
LBHills Since: Jun, 2012
Mar 13th 2013 at 10:09:44 AM •••

I have no clue how to do either. I only set myself up for an editing account so I could correct certain spelling and grammatical errors that hurt my stomach to look at. Alas, like others before me, I got sucked into the time-sink that is TV Tropes...

Telcontar MOD Since: Feb, 2012
Mar 13th 2013 at 10:57:32 AM •••

Heh, I think everyone knows what that feels like. I've set up the redirect for now by adding [[redirect:Literature/TheChroniclesOfAmber]] to that page; the long explanation of how to make redirects can be found here. Thanks for the work you've already done!

That was the amazing part. Things just keep going.
LBHills Since: Jun, 2012
Mar 19th 2013 at 4:56:12 PM •••

Transferred a lot of tropes specific to individual characters to the Characters page. Also deleted a few of my own trope-referents that were just not all that important to the series. Should make the main page a more manageable length despite the split.

Xtifr Since: Jan, 2001
Mar 19th 2013 at 8:09:07 PM •••

No, no, you shouldn't remove tropes because they're "unimportant". The wiki is all about tropes, and any trope, no matter how minor to the overall story, should be documented. What you really want to avoid is shoehorning—tropes that don't fit shouldn't be added—and the dread Zero Context Example, which defeats the whole purpose of the wiki.

Speaking words of fandom: let it squee, let it squee.
LBHills Since: Jun, 2012
Mar 20th 2013 at 4:50:17 PM •••

I thought one of the guide pages, for the sake of brevity, recommended restricting oneself to tropes that the subject features rather than ones that merely pop up here and there... Perhaps I merely over-interpreted the warning against shoehorning.

Top