Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Literature / LetTheRightOneIn

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
Ithilgore Since: Jan, 2001
Oct 2nd 2010 at 1:49:40 PM •••

So now that Let Me In is released, should tropes from it be put on this pages, mixed in, or in a new page?

Considering the book and film are already mixed together, I think any new tropes should just stay on this page.

Hide / Show Replies
AnonymousMcCartneyfan Since: Jan, 2001
Oct 2nd 2010 at 2:07:43 PM •••

I recommend the opposite. The new film Let Me In should get its own page. Americanizations tend to change things a lot.

If there is significant divergence between the film and the book of Let the Right One In, then there should be a page for the film in the Film namespace, a page for the book in the Literature namespace, and a disambiguation page here.

There is a fine line between recklessness and courage — Paul McCartney
Ithilgore Since: Jan, 2001
Oct 3rd 2010 at 5:20:09 AM •••

To be honest, there's no a lot of difference between the film and book, the only difference is things that are left out of the film.

Let Me In is similar to that, it sticks fairly closely to both the original film and book, with the only major differences being, again, things left out and one new character added. Well, that and it now being set in America with new names. Other than those superficial differences (it looks the same overall, snowy isolated town), it's very similar.

Eleanore Since: Jul, 2009
Oct 3rd 2010 at 7:46:08 AM •••

Why not just make different sections on the same page? Like just a header of "Tropes applying to the original film/novel" and "Tropes applying to the remake"

MacPhisto Since: Jul, 2009
Oct 14th 2010 at 4:49:30 PM •••

I agree with Eleanore

don't create a whole new page, just make a line-break

Tell Me A Lie... And Say That You Won't Go...
Bannef Since: May, 2011
Aug 1st 2011 at 7:55:32 PM •••

It would be awesome if someone could do something - I had only seem the original movie and was really confused. If I get around to reading the book I will try...

KainLupus Since: Apr, 2009
Nov 23rd 2010 at 3:08:58 AM •••

I've only seen the 2010 remake, can someone explain the whole "Abby isn't a girl" thing for me? I get that his balls were cut off, but why?

Hide / Show Replies
Getheren Since: May, 2010
Nov 30th 2010 at 12:41:41 PM •••

Not balls, everything, all of it. The book is pretty clear that it happened at hir becoming (using a gender-neutral pronoun because Eli never explicitly claims a gender), but isn't too clear about why. It seems to have been a whim, or a quirk, of the one who made hir. (I suspect Lindqvist wrote material fleshing out that part of the story, but it got cut from what was undoubtedly a gigantic manuscript. That a common reason for story points that could go somewhere, but don't, and leave a 'thereby hangs a tale' feeling.)

ElleWednesday Since: May, 2011
Jul 21st 2011 at 11:46:59 PM •••

For the record, while Eli (from the book and Swedish film) is a castrated male, Abby (from the remake) might not be: a deleted scene showing her becoming a vampire suggests that she is, in fact, a female.

Top