I edited the paragraph to clean up the wording just because it was so clunky. That was before I saw your post here so my edit does not take account of your post.
As for your post, I agree. The link also ties in with what I've been hearing while listening to the DVD Commentaries. They're offering their advice where they can on what's compatible with the canon, but there are reasons why that advice may not be taken: examples they cite include language barriers, availability of time, and their advice not being taken on that occasion.
So, really, the creators are advising on canon, but it's hit-or-miss as to whether that advice is adopted.
I agree with changing the description to 'canon-compliant' instead of 'canon'.
Edited by Wyldchyld If my post doesn't mention a giant flying sperm whale with oversized teeth and lionfish fins for flippers, it just isn't worth reading.
https://www.reddit.com/r/RWBY/wiki/wordofgod#wiki_the_rwby_manga_anthologies_are_canon.
This doesn't sound like a confirmation of the manga anthologies being canon, it just sounds like they were keeping them canon-compliant. The latter does not necessarily imply the former.
Edited by Twiddler Hide / Show Replies