A bit late, but that's also not correct. He got a protection order against one woman, who was one of many who had accused him and defended herself in court (which historically has been an absolutely stupid idea). Nothing about the accusations was settled because that wasn't what the court was deciding, and it's suspect that he framed things the way he did.
I've removed the line about it from the article; it reads like "the courts found he was innocent against this one woman (and therefore all those other women are lying too), rather than "he sued one woman who was harassing him, and he won because she was her own lawyer and that never ends well for people anyway but whether or not the allegations were true wasn't addressed by the court." Happy if somebody could make something more accurate that's not very wordy, but I think it might be best just to leave it out or put it in a note
https://twitter.com/quintonflynn/status/1384197994120028171?s=20
Apparently according to his Twitter, the accusations against Quinton were false and he settled them in a court of law. Does this mean we should remove or edit all the wicks surrounding the controversy?
Hide / Show Replies