[004]
KingZeal
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
See, the Luke Cage issue brings my point: there\'s always an excuse. Regardless of how well I make my case, if this argument boils down to me trying to convince you of an example of how JustEatGilligan works, there are an infinite number of justifications you can come up with to counter it. Also: when did Luke say he thought he could resist Kilgrave? Why would he try to sneak up on Kilgrave if he thought he could \
to:
See, the Luke Cage issue brings my point: there\\\'s always an excuse. Regardless of how well I make my case, if this argument boils down to me trying to convince you of an example of how JustEatGilligan works, there are an infinite number of justifications you can come up with to counter it. Also: when did Luke say he thought he could resist Kilgrave? Why would he try to sneak up on Kilgrave if he thought he could \\\"resist\\\" him? Your saying he tried to bum rush Kilgrave \\\'\\\'because\\\'\\\' he thought he was immune makes no sense, because tried to do it while Kilgrave \\\'\\\'didn\\\'t see him\\\'\\\'.
Also, \\\"why WOULD anyone try this\\\" is not a relevant question to JustEatGilligan. Why would anyone kill/eat Gilligan? Why not just tie him up? Keep him imprisoned? (Then, someone says \\\"because he can escape as RuleOfFunny\\\", to which someone else says \\\"in that case, he might survive a murder via RuleOfFunny too\\\" and on and on and on. The fact that we\\\'re here arguing woulda-coulda on ONE example is just proving my point.)
Thing is, I\\\'m not missing the point. I totally get your point, but it doesn\\\'t work here.
Also, \\\"why WOULD anyone try this\\\" is not a relevant question to JustEatGilligan. Why would anyone kill/eat Gilligan? Why not just tie him up? Keep him imprisoned? (Then, someone says \\\"because he can escape as RuleOfFunny\\\", to which someone else says \\\"in that case, he might survive a murder via RuleOfFunny too\\\" and on and on and on. The fact that we\\\'re here arguing woulda-coulda on ONE example is just proving my point.)
Thing is, I\\\'m not missing the point. I totally get your point, but it doesn\\\'t work here.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
See, the Luke Cage issue brings my point: there\'s always an excuse. Regardless of how well I make my case, if this argument boils down to me trying to convince you of an example of how JustEatGilligan works, there are an infinite number of justifications you can come up with to counter it. Also: when did Luke say he thought he could resist Kilgrave?
to:
See, the Luke Cage issue brings my point: there\\\'s always an excuse. Regardless of how well I make my case, if this argument boils down to me trying to convince you of an example of how JustEatGilligan works, there are an infinite number of justifications you can come up with to counter it. Also: when did Luke say he thought he could resist Kilgrave? Why would he try to sneak up on Kilgrave if he thought he could \\\"resist\\\" him? Your saying he tried to bum rush Kilgrave \\\'\\\'because\\\'\\\' he thought he was immune makes no sense, because tried to do it while Kilgrave \\\'\\\'didn\\\'t see him\\\'\\\'.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Also, \
to:
Also, \\\"why WOULD anyone try this\\\" is not a relevant question to JustEatGilligan. Why would anyone kill/eat Gilligan? Why not just tie him up? Keep him imprisoned? (Then, someone says \\\"because he can escape as RuleOfFunny\\\", to which someone else says \\\"in that case, he might survive a murder via RuleOfFunny too\\\" and on and on and on.
Thing is, I\\\'m not missing the point. I totally get your point, but it doesn\\\'t work here.
Thing is, I\\\'m not missing the point. I totally get your point, but it doesn\\\'t work here.
