[005]
50.51.211.29
Current Version
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
I\'d ask Septimus directly whether or not it would be okay to re-add the InternetBackdraft trope to the YMMV page without speaking of Dina or any other team member in particular. If I get a \
to:
I\\\'m asking Septimus directly whether or not it would be okay to re-add the InternetBackdraft trope to the YMMV page without speaking of Dina or any other team member in particular. If I get a \\\"no\\\" on that, then very well. I\\\'m not a mod, so I won\\\'t argue.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
There is still insistence that the bannings did happen, and there was a backlash against the dev team because of it. A simple google search will bring up forum topic after forum topic from across the internet, along with a few articles detailing the issue.
to:
There is still insistence that the bannings did happen, and there was a backlash against the dev team because of it. A simple google search will bring up forum topic after forum topic from across the internet, along with a few articles detailing the issue.
I\\\'d ask Septimus directly whether or not it would be okay to re-add the InternetBackdraft trope to the YMMV page without speaking of Dina or any other team member in particular. If I get a \\\"no\\\" on that, then very well. I\\\'m not a mod, so I won\\\'t argue.
I\\\'d ask Septimus directly whether or not it would be okay to re-add the InternetBackdraft trope to the YMMV page without speaking of Dina or any other team member in particular. If I get a \\\"no\\\" on that, then very well. I\\\'m not a mod, so I won\\\'t argue.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
The fact remains that the bannings did happen, and there was a backlash against the dev team because of it. A simple google search will bring up forum topic after forum topic from across the internet, along with a few articles detailing the issue.
to:
There is still insistence that the bannings did happen, and there was a backlash against the dev team because of it. A simple google search will bring up forum topic after forum topic from across the internet, along with a few articles detailing the issue.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
This is not limited to Gamer Gate, and I would like to reiterate that such behavior (shadow banning members of the forum without giving a reason why beyond dissenting opinion) is not immunized simply because a controversial/polarizing movement like Gamer Gate opposes it.
to:
This is not limited to Gamer Gate, and I would like to reiterate that such behavior (shadow banning members of the forum without giving a reason why beyond dissenting opinion) is not immunized simply because a controversial/polarizing movement like Gamer Gate opposes it.
The fact remains that the bannings did happen, and there was a backlash against the dev team because of it. A simple google search will bring up forum topic after forum topic from across the internet, along with a few articles detailing the issue.
The fact remains that the bannings did happen, and there was a backlash against the dev team because of it. A simple google search will bring up forum topic after forum topic from across the internet, along with a few articles detailing the issue.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
This is not limited to Gamer Gate, and I would like to reiterate that such behavior (shadow banning members of the forum without giving a reason why beyond dissenting opinion) is not immunized simply because a controversial movement like Gamer Gate opposes it.
to:
This is not limited to Gamer Gate, and I would like to reiterate that such behavior (shadow banning members of the forum without giving a reason why beyond dissenting opinion) is not immunized simply because a controversial/polarizing movement like Gamer Gate opposes it.
