Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Main / FourTemperamentEnsemble

Go To

Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
My mind has made some kind of adjustment lately, back to the 2-factor, 4-direction model since it\'s popular. I don\'t see my 6-direction \
to:
My mind has made its adjustment back to the 2-factor, 4-direction model since it\\\'s popular. I don\\\'t see my 6-direction \\\"color wheel\\\" catching on anytime soon; and I honestly could go either way.

Plus, 4 directions to make an ensemble of five gives me an opportunity to use my newest-coined word \\\'\\\'\\\'galeucic\\\'\\\'\\\' (etymology: \\\'\\\'gala\\\'\\\' as \\\"milk\\\" or \\\'\\\'galanos\\\'\\\' as \\\"cyan-blue\\\", + \\\'\\\'leukos\\\'\\\' as \\\"white\\\") named for the plasm that is found in blood and in milk. Plus, \\\'\\\'\\\'galeucic\\\'\\\'\\\' is similar in sound to \\\'\\\'glucose\\\'\\\', which is very telling of how this temperament is. Breast milk is easily a symbol of motherhood -- and \\\'\\\'\\\'galeucic\\\'\\\'\\\' so naturally being a motherly temperament, this makes perfect sense.

As I\\\'ve said in previous comments, \\\'\\\'\\\'phlegmatic\\\'\\\'\\\' as the neutral-position temperament.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
My mind has made some kind of adjustment lately, back to the 2-factor, 4-direction model since it\'s popular. I don\'t see my 6-direction \
to:
My mind has made its adjustment back to the 2-factor, 4-direction model since it\\\'s popular. I don\\\'t see my 6-direction \\\"color wheel\\\" catching on anytime soon; and I honestly could go either way.

Plus, 4 directions to make an ensemble of five gives me an opportunity to use my newest-coined word \\\'\\\'\\\'galeucic\\\'\\\'\\\' (etymology: \\\'\\\'gala\\\'\\\' as \\\"milk\\\" or \\\'\\\'galanos\\\'\\\' as \\\"cyan-blue\\\", + \\\'\\\'leukos\\\'\\\' as \\\"white\\\") named for the plasm that is found in blood and in milk. Plus, \\\'\\\'\\\'galeucic\\\'\\\'\\\' is similar in sound to \\\'\\\'glucose\\\'\\\', which is very telling of how this temperament is. Breast milk is easily a symbol of motherhood -- and \\\'\\\'\\\'galeucic\\\'\\\'\\\' so naturally being a motherly temperament, this makes perfect sense.

As I\\\'ve said in previous comments, \\\'\\\'\\\'phlegmatic\\\'\\\'\\\' as the neutral-position temperament.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
My mind has made some kind of adjustment lately. Phlegm is not, as far as we know, a mix of all the other humors, nor the base component from which the other ones derive. So I\'m leaning toward pushing it back to the \'\'\'Phlegmatic I\'\'\' position, throwing out its apathetic, unemotional middle-of-the-road traits and leaving it a synonym for \'\'supine\'\'. Essentially, what I called \'\'\'melsang\'\'\' I now call \'\'\'phlegmatic\'\'\'. I also decided to split \'\'yellow bile\'\' into \'\'\'yellow-green bile\'\'\' (stomach acid) and \'\'\'orange bile\'\'\' (all other non-black bile functions). What I formerly termed \'\'\'cholermel\'\'\' could instead be the stomach acid one, now termed \'\'\'Choleric II\'\'\'. I\'ve decided that the former Choleric (with a minor sanguine side) be named for \'\'\'orange bile\'\'\', the new name being \'\'\'Pyrrcholic\'\'\'.

Remember the words \'\'leucine\'\' and \'\'leukine\'\' which are already coined medically (copyright I think)? But I could contract \'\'\'leucocytic\'\'\' into \'\'\'leucytic\'\'\'. It\'s now my temperament name for those who fit \'\'\'sanguine\'\'\' with a \'\'\'phlegmatic\'\'\' side. Meanwhile former \'\'\'sanguine\'\'\', whether with or without a hint of \'\'\'choleric\'\'\', I shall call \'\'\'Sanguine II\'\'\'.

The result is this: three of bile (orange, acid-yellow, and black) and three related to blood (phlegm, white plasm, and red blood). That makes for quite a symmetry!

\'\'\'Pyrrcholic\'\'\' narrows choleric to the strong, ambitious, \
to:
My mind has made some kind of adjustment lately, back to the 2-factor, 4-direction model since it\\\'s popular. I don\\\'t see my 6-direction \\\"color wheel\\\" catching on anytime soon; and I honestly could go either way.

Plus, 4 directions to make an ensemble of five gives me an opportunity to use my newest-coined word \\\'\\\'\\\'galeucic\\\'\\\'\\\' (etymology: \\\'\\\'gala\\\'\\\' as \\\"milk\\\" or \\\'\\\'galanos\\\'\\\' as \\\"cyan-blue\\\", + \\\'\\\'leukos\\\'\\\' as \\\"white\\\") named for the plasm that is found in blood and in milk. Plus, \\\'\\\'\\\'galeucic\\\'\\\'\\\' is similar in sound to \\\'\\\'glucose\\\'\\\', which is very telling of how this temperament is. Breast milk is easily a symbol of motherhood -- and \\\'\\\'\\\'galeucic\\\'\\\'\\\' so naturally being a motherly temperament, this makes perfect sense.

As I\\\'ve said in previous comments, \\\'\\\'\\\'phlegmatic\\\'\\\'\\\' as the neutral-position temperament.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
\'\'\'Pyrrcholic\'\'\' narrows choleric to the strong, ambitious, \
to:
\\\'\\\'\\\'Pyrrcholic\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows choleric to the strong, ambitious, \\\"drill sergeant\\\" type. \\\'\\\'\\\'Choleric II\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows choleric down to its more \\\'\\\'\\\'melancholic\\\'\\\'\\\' side -- the rational planner and instructor of the bunch. \\\'\\\'\\\'Melancholic\\\'\\\'\\\' stays the same as always. \\\'\\\'\\\'Phlegmatic\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows down to \\\'\\\'supine\\\'\\\'. \\\'\\\'\\\'Leucytic\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows sanguine down to empathy, compassion, and all the other things it has in common with supine/phlegmatic I. \\\'\\\'\\\'Sanguine II\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows sanguine down to what it has in common with pyrrcholic, cutting away the compassionate/sentimental side (not completely, as though it were \\\'\\\'\\\'choleric\\\'\\\'\\\' or \\\'\\\'\\\'pyrrcholic\\\'\\\'\\\') as distinct from \\\'\\\'\\\'leucytic\\\'\\\'\\\'.

Former \\\'\\\'\\\'leukine\\\'\\\'\\\' or \\\'\\\'\\\'phlegmatic II\\\'\\\'\\\' I would call the self-explanatory name \\\'\\\'\\\'eclectic\\\'\\\'\\\'.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
\'\'\'Pyrrcholic\'\'\' narrows choleric to the strong, ambitious, \
to:
\\\'\\\'\\\'Pyrrcholic\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows choleric to the strong, ambitious, \\\"drill sergeant\\\" type. \\\'\\\'\\\'Choleric II\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows choleric down to its more \\\'\\\'\\\'melancholic\\\'\\\'\\\' side -- the rational planner and instructor of the bunch. \\\'\\\'\\\'Melancholic\\\'\\\'\\\' stays the same as always. \\\'\\\'\\\'Phlegmatic\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows down to \\\'\\\'supine\\\'\\\'. \\\'\\\'\\\'Leucytic\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows sanguine down to empathy, compassion, and all the other things it has in common with supine/phlegmatic I. \\\'\\\'\\\'Sanguine II\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows sanguine down to what it has in common with pyrrcholic, cutting away the compassionate/sentimental side (not completely, as though it were \\\'\\\'\\\'choleric\\\'\\\'\\\' or \\\'\\\'\\\'pyrrcholic\\\'\\\'\\\') as distinct from \\\'\\\'\\\'leucytic\\\'\\\'\\\'.

Former \\\'\\\'\\\'leukine\\\'\\\'\\\' or \\\'\\\'\\\'phlegmatic II\\\'\\\'\\\' I would call the self-explanatory name \\\'\\\'\\\'eclectic\\\'\\\'\\\'.

As a result, the ensemble is fullest and least lopsided in groups of 3, 4, 6, 7, and several other numbers we can think up:
* 3-Temp Ensemble: A triad (regular triangle of temperaments), possible PowerTrio
* 4-Temp Ensemble: Temperament triad like above, plus an eclectic character.
* 6-Temp Ensemble: 2 triads -- all 6 temperaments in the color-wheel
* 7-Temp Ensemble: The above + eclectic = all 7 temperaments.
If some temperaments have 2 characters but not all, it should be either 2 eclectics or 2-each in a triad of 6.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Remember the words \'\'leucine\'\' and \'\'leukine\'\' which are already coined medically (copyright I think)? But \'\'\'leuxine\'\'\' is not. It\'s now my temperament name for those who fit \'\'\'sanguine\'\'\' with a \'\'\'phlegmatic\'\'\' side. Meanwhile former \'\'\'sanguine\'\'\', whether with or without a hint of \'\'\'choleric\'\'\', I shall call \'\'\'Sanguine II\'\'\'.
to:
Remember the words \\\'\\\'leucine\\\'\\\' and \\\'\\\'leukine\\\'\\\' which are already coined medically (copyright I think)? But I could contract \\\'\\\'\\\'leucocytic\\\'\\\'\\\' into \\\'\\\'\\\'leucytic\\\'\\\'\\\'. It\\\'s now my temperament name for those who fit \\\'\\\'\\\'sanguine\\\'\\\'\\\' with a \\\'\\\'\\\'phlegmatic\\\'\\\'\\\' side. Meanwhile former \\\'\\\'\\\'sanguine\\\'\\\'\\\', whether with or without a hint of \\\'\\\'\\\'choleric\\\'\\\'\\\', I shall call \\\'\\\'\\\'Sanguine II\\\'\\\'\\\'.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
\'\'\'Pyrrcholic\'\'\' narrows choleric to the strong, ambitious, \
to:
\\\'\\\'\\\'Pyrrcholic\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows choleric to the strong, ambitious, \\\"drill sergeant\\\" type. \\\'\\\'\\\'Choleric II\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows choleric down to its more \\\'\\\'\\\'melancholic\\\'\\\'\\\' side -- the rational planner and instructor of the bunch. \\\'\\\'\\\'Melancholic\\\'\\\'\\\' stays the same as always. \\\'\\\'\\\'Phlegmatic\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows down to \\\'\\\'supine\\\'\\\'. \\\'\\\'\\\'Leucytic\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows sanguine down to empathy, compassion, and all the other things it has in common with supine/phlegmatic I. \\\'\\\'\\\'Sanguine II\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows sanguine down to what it has in common with choleric, cutting away the compassionate/sentimental side (not completely, as though it were \\\'\\\'\\\'choleric\\\'\\\'\\\' or \\\'\\\'\\\'pyrrcholic\\\'\\\'\\\') as distinct from \\\'\\\'\\\'leucytic\\\'\\\'\\\'.

Former \\\'\\\'\\\'leukine\\\'\\\'\\\' or \\\'\\\'\\\'phlegmatic II\\\'\\\'\\\' I would call the self-explanatory name \\\'\\\'\\\'eclectic\\\'\\\'\\\'.

As a result, the ensemble is fullest and least lopsided in groups of 3, 4, 6, 7, and several other numbers we can think up:
* 3-Temp Ensemble: A triad (regular triangle of temperaments), possible PowerTrio
* 4-Temp Ensemble: Temperament triad like above, plus an eclectic character.
* 6-Temp Ensemble: 2 triads -- all 6 temperaments in the color-wheel
* 7-Temp Ensemble: The above + eclectic = all 7 temperaments.
If some temperaments have 2 characters but not all, it should be either 2 eclectics or 2-each in a triad of 6.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
My mind has made some kind of adjustment lately. Phlegm is not, as far as we know, a mix of all the other humors, nor the base component from which the other ones derive. So I\'m leaning toward pushing it back to the \'\'\'Phlegmatic I\'\'\' position, throwing out its apathetic, unemotional middle-of-the-road traits and leaving it a synonym for \'\'supine\'\'. Essentially, what I called \'\'\'melsang\'\'\' I now call \'\'\'phlegmatic\'\'\'. I also decided to split \'\'yellow bile\'\' into \'\'\'yellow-green bile\'\'\' (stomach acid) and \'\'\'orange bile\'\'\' (all other non-black bile functions). What I formerly termed \'\'\'cholermel\'\'\' could instead be the stomach acid one, now termed \'\'\'Choleric II\'\'\'. I\'ve decided that the former Choleric (with a minor sanguine side) be named for \'\'\'orange bile\'\'\', the new name being \'\'\'Pyrancholic\'\'\'.
to:
My mind has made some kind of adjustment lately. Phlegm is not, as far as we know, a mix of all the other humors, nor the base component from which the other ones derive. So I\\\'m leaning toward pushing it back to the \\\'\\\'\\\'Phlegmatic I\\\'\\\'\\\' position, throwing out its apathetic, unemotional middle-of-the-road traits and leaving it a synonym for \\\'\\\'supine\\\'\\\'. Essentially, what I called \\\'\\\'\\\'melsang\\\'\\\'\\\' I now call \\\'\\\'\\\'phlegmatic\\\'\\\'\\\'. I also decided to split \\\'\\\'yellow bile\\\'\\\' into \\\'\\\'\\\'yellow-green bile\\\'\\\'\\\' (stomach acid) and \\\'\\\'\\\'orange bile\\\'\\\'\\\' (all other non-black bile functions). What I formerly termed \\\'\\\'\\\'cholermel\\\'\\\'\\\' could instead be the stomach acid one, now termed \\\'\\\'\\\'Choleric II\\\'\\\'\\\'. I\\\'ve decided that the former Choleric (with a minor sanguine side) be named for \\\'\\\'\\\'orange bile\\\'\\\'\\\', the new name being \\\'\\\'\\\'Pyrrcholic\\\'\\\'\\\'.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
The word I coined earlier from the Greek leukos (white) and ikmos (liquid), Leucmine (white + liquid) is now my temperament name for those who fit \'\'\'sanguine\'\'\' with a \'\'\'phlegmatic\'\'\' side. Meanwhile, former \'\'\'sanguine\'\'\' with a slight hint of \'\'\'choleric\'\'\' I shall call \'\'\'Sanguine II\'\'\'.
to:
Remember the words \\\'\\\'leucine\\\'\\\' and \\\'\\\'leukine\\\'\\\' which are already coined medically (copyright I think)? But \\\'\\\'\\\'leuxine\\\'\\\'\\\' is not. It\\\'s now my temperament name for those who fit \\\'\\\'\\\'sanguine\\\'\\\'\\\' with a \\\'\\\'\\\'phlegmatic\\\'\\\'\\\' side. Meanwhile former \\\'\\\'\\\'sanguine\\\'\\\'\\\', whether with or without a hint of \\\'\\\'\\\'choleric\\\'\\\'\\\', I shall call \\\'\\\'\\\'Sanguine II\\\'\\\'\\\'.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
\'\'\'Pyrancholic\'\'\' narrows choleric to the strong, ambitious, \
to:
\\\'\\\'\\\'Pyrrcholic\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows choleric to the strong, ambitious, \\\"drill sergeant\\\" type. \\\'\\\'\\\'Choleric II\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows choleric down to its more \\\'\\\'\\\'melancholic\\\'\\\'\\\' side -- the rational planner and instructor of the bunch. \\\'\\\'\\\'Melancholic\\\'\\\'\\\' stays the same as always. \\\'\\\'\\\'Phlegmatic\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows down to \\\'\\\'supine\\\'\\\'. \\\'\\\'\\\'Leuxine\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows sanguine down to empathy, compassion, and all the other things it has in common with supine/phlegmatic I. \\\'\\\'\\\'Sanguine II\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows sanguine down to what it has in common with choleric, cutting away the sentimental side -- not making sanguine unemotional, for it is more emotional than \\\'\\\'\\\'choleric\\\'\\\'\\\' or \\\'\\\'\\\'pyrrcholic\\\'\\\'\\\' -- but with less sentiment than \\\'\\\'\\\'leuxine\\\'\\\'\\\'.

Former \\\'\\\'\\\'leukine\\\'\\\'\\\' or \\\'\\\'\\\'phlegmatic II\\\'\\\'\\\' I would call the self-explanatory name \\\'\\\'\\\'eclectic\\\'\\\'\\\'.

As a result, the ensemble is fullest and least lopsided in groups of 3, 4, 6, 7, and several other numbers we can think up:
* 3-Temp Ensemble: A triad (regular triangle of temperaments), possible PowerTrio
* 4-Temp Ensemble: Temperament triad like above, plus an eclectic character.
* 6-Temp Ensemble: 2 triads -- all 6 temperaments in the color-wheel
* 7-Temp Ensemble: The above + eclectic = all 7 temperaments.
If some temperaments have 2 characters but not all, it should be either 2 eclectics or 2-each in a triad of 6.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
The word I coined earlier from the Greek leukos and Latin aqua, Leuquine (white + water) is now my temperament name for those who fit \'\'\'sanguine\'\'\' with a \'\'\'phlegmatic\'\'\' side. Meanwhile, former \'\'\'sanguine\'\'\' with a slight hint of \'\'\'choleric\'\'\' I shall call \'\'\'Sanguine II\'\'\'.
to:
The word I coined earlier from the Greek leukos (white) and ikmos (liquid), Leucmine (white + liquid) is now my temperament name for those who fit \\\'\\\'\\\'sanguine\\\'\\\'\\\' with a \\\'\\\'\\\'phlegmatic\\\'\\\'\\\' side. Meanwhile, former \\\'\\\'\\\'sanguine\\\'\\\'\\\' with a slight hint of \\\'\\\'\\\'choleric\\\'\\\'\\\' I shall call \\\'\\\'\\\'Sanguine II\\\'\\\'\\\'.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
\'\'\'Pyrancholic\'\'\' narrows choleric to the strong, ambitious, \
to:
\\\'\\\'\\\'Pyrancholic\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows choleric to the strong, ambitious, \\\"drill sergeant\\\" type. \\\'\\\'\\\'Choleric II\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows choleric down to its more \\\'\\\'\\\'melancholic\\\'\\\'\\\' side -- the rational planner and instructor of the bunch. \\\'\\\'\\\'Melancholic\\\'\\\'\\\' stays the same as always. \\\'\\\'\\\'Phlegmatic\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows down to \\\'\\\'supine\\\'\\\'. \\\'\\\'\\\'Leucmine\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows sanguine down to empathy, compassion, and all the other things it has in common with supine/phlegmatic I. \\\'\\\'\\\'Sanguine II\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows sanguine down to what it has in common with choleric, cutting away the emotional side -- not making sanguine unemotional, for it is more emotional than \\\'\\\'\\\'choleric\\\'\\\'\\\' or \\\'\\\'\\\'pyrancholic\\\'\\\'\\\' -- but it\\\'s still not as emotional as \\\'\\\'\\\'leucmine\\\'\\\'\\\'.

The temperament I call \\\'\\\'\\\'Eclectic\\\'\\\'\\\' is quite self-explanatory, I think.

As a result, the ensemble is fullest and least lopsided in groups of 3, 4, 6, 7, and several other numbers we can think up:
* 3-Temp Ensemble: A triad (regular triangle of temperaments), possible PowerTrio
* 4-Temp Ensemble: Temperament triad like above, plus an eclectic character.
* 6-Temp Ensemble: 2 triads -- all 6 temperaments in the color-wheel
* 7-Temp Ensemble: The above + eclectic = all 7 temperaments.
If some temperaments have 2 characters but not all, it should be either 2 eclectics or 2-each in a triad of 6.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
\'\'\'Pyrancholic\'\'\' narrows choleric to the strong, ambitious, \
to:
\\\'\\\'\\\'Pyrancholic\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows choleric to the strong, ambitious, \\\"drill sergeant\\\" type. \\\'\\\'\\\'Choleric II\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows choleric down to its more \\\'\\\'\\\'melancholic\\\'\\\'\\\' side -- the rational planner and instructor of the bunch. \\\'\\\'\\\'Melancholic\\\'\\\'\\\' stays the same as always. \\\'\\\'\\\'Phlegmatic\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows down to \\\'\\\'supine\\\'\\\'. \\\'\\\'\\\'Leuquine\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows sanguine down to empathy, compassion, and all the other things it has in common with supine/phlegmatic I. \\\'\\\'\\\'Sanguine II\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows sanguine down to what it has in common with choleric, cutting away the emotional side -- not making sanguine unemotional, for it is more emotional than \\\'\\\'\\\'choleric\\\'\\\'\\\' or \\\'\\\'\\\'pyrancholic\\\'\\\'\\\' -- but it\\\'s still not as emotional as \\\'\\\'\\\'leuquine\\\'\\\'\\\'.

The temperament I call \\\'\\\'\\\'Eclectic\\\'\\\'\\\' is quite self-explanatory, I think.

As a result, the ensemble is fullest and least lopsided in groups of 3, 4, 6, 7, and several other numbers we can think up:
* 3-Temp Ensemble: A triad (regular triangle of temperaments), possible PowerTrio
* 4-Temp Ensemble: Temperament triad like above, plus an eclectic character.
* 6-Temp Ensemble: 2 triads -- all 6 temperaments in the color-wheel
* 7-Temp Ensemble: The above + eclectic = all 7 temperaments.
If some temperaments have 2 characters but not all, it should be either 2 eclectics or 2-each in a triad of 6.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
The result is this: two of bile (orange and acid-yellow), two of blood (white and red), and two bulky humors (black related to bile and phlegm related to blood). That makes for quite a symmetry!
to:
The result is this: three of bile (orange, acid-yellow, and black) and three related to blood (phlegm, white plasm, and red blood). That makes for quite a symmetry!
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
\'\'\'Pyrancholic\'\'\' narrows choleric to the strong, ambitious, \
to:
\\\'\\\'\\\'Pyrancholic\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows choleric to the strong, ambitious, \\\"drill sergeant\\\" type. \\\'\\\'\\\'Choleric II\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows choleric down to its more \\\'\\\'\\\'melancholic\\\'\\\'\\\' side -- the rational planner and instructor of the bunch. \\\'\\\'\\\'Melancholic\\\'\\\'\\\' stays the same as always. \\\'\\\'\\\'Phlegmatic\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows down to \\\'\\\'supine\\\'\\\'. \\\'\\\'\\\'Leuquine\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows sanguine down to empathy, compassion, and all the other things it has in common with supine/phlegmatic I. \\\'\\\'\\\'Sanguine II\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows sanguine down to what it has in common with choleric, cutting away the emotional side -- not making sanguine unemotional, for it is more emotional than \\\'\\\'\\\'choleric\\\'\\\'\\\' or \\\'\\\'\\\'pyrancholic\\\'\\\'\\\' -- but it\\\'s still not as emotional as \\\'\\\'\\\'leuquine\\\'\\\'\\\'.

The temperament I call \\\'\\\'\\\'Eclectic\\\'\\\'\\\' is quite self-explanatory, I think.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
\'\'\'Pyrancholic\'\'\' narrows choleric to the strong, ambitious, \
to:
The result is this: two of bile (orange and acid-yellow), two of blood (white and red), and two bulky humors (black related to bile and phlegm related to blood). That makes for quite a symmetry!

\\\'\\\'\\\'Pyrancholic\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows choleric to the strong, ambitious, \\\"drill sergeant\\\" type. \\\'\\\'\\\'Choleric II\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows choleric down to its more \\\'\\\'\\\'melancholic\\\'\\\'\\\' side -- the rational planner and instructor of the bunch. \\\'\\\'\\\'Melancholic\\\'\\\'\\\' stays the same as always. \\\'\\\'\\\'Phlegmatic\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows down to \\\'\\\'supine\\\'\\\'. \\\'\\\'\\\'Leuquine\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows sanguine down to empathy, compassion, and all the other things it has in common with supine/phlegmatic I. \\\'\\\'\\\'Sanguine II\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows sanguine down to what it has in common with choleric, cutting away the emotional side -- not making sanguine unemotional, for it is more emotional than \\\'\\\'\\\'choleric\\\'\\\'\\\' or \\\'\\\'\\\'pyrancholic\\\'\\\'\\\' -- but it\\\'s still not as emotional as \\\'\\\'\\\'leuquine\\\'\\\'\\\'.

The temperament I call \\\'\\\'\\\'Eclectic\\\'\\\'\\\' is quite self-explanatory, I think.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
\'\'\'Pyrancholic\'\'\' narrows choleric to the strong, ambitious, \
to:
\\\'\\\'\\\'Pyrancholic\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows choleric to the strong, ambitious, \\\"drill sergeant\\\" type. \\\'\\\'\\\'Choleric II\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows choleric down to its more \\\'\\\'\\\'melancholic\\\'\\\'\\\' side -- the rational planner and instructor of the bunch. \\\'\\\'\\\'Melancholic\\\'\\\'\\\' stays the same as always. \\\'\\\'\\\'Phlegmatic\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows down to \\\'\\\'supine\\\'\\\'. \\\'\\\'\\\'Leuquine\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows sanguine down to empathy, compassion, and all the other things it has in common with supine/phlegmatic I. \\\'\\\'\\\'Sanguine II\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows sanguine down to what it has in common with choleric, cutting away the emotional side -- not making sanguine unemotional, for it is more emotional than \\\'\\\'\\\'choleric\\\'\\\'\\\' or \\\'\\\'\\\'pyrancholic\\\'\\\'\\\' -- but it\\\'s still not as emotional as \\\'\\\'\\\'leuquine\\\'\\\'\\\'.

The temperament I call \\\'\\\'\\\'Eclectic\\\'\\\'\\\' is quite self-explanatory, I think.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
My mind has made some kind of adjustment lately. Phlegm is not, as far as we know, a mix of all the other humors, nor the base component from which the other ones derive. So I\'m leaning toward pushing it back to the \'\'\'Phlegmatic I\'\'\' position, throwing out its apathetic, unemotional middle-of-the-road traits and leaving it a synonym for \'\'supine\'\'. Essentially, what I called \'\'\'melsang\'\'\' I now call \'\'\'phlegmatic\'\'\'. I also decided to split \'\'yellow bile\'\' into \'\'\'yellow-green bile\'\'\' (stomach acid) and \'\'\'orange bile\'\'\' (all other non-black bile functions). What I formerly termed \'\'\'cholermel\'\'\' could instead be the stomach acid one, now termed \'\'\'Choleric II\'\'\'. I\'ve decided that the former Choleric (with a minor sanguine side) be named for \'\'\'orange bile\'\'\', the new name \'\'\'Pyrancholic\'\'\'.
to:
My mind has made some kind of adjustment lately. Phlegm is not, as far as we know, a mix of all the other humors, nor the base component from which the other ones derive. So I\\\'m leaning toward pushing it back to the \\\'\\\'\\\'Phlegmatic I\\\'\\\'\\\' position, throwing out its apathetic, unemotional middle-of-the-road traits and leaving it a synonym for \\\'\\\'supine\\\'\\\'. Essentially, what I called \\\'\\\'\\\'melsang\\\'\\\'\\\' I now call \\\'\\\'\\\'phlegmatic\\\'\\\'\\\'. I also decided to split \\\'\\\'yellow bile\\\'\\\' into \\\'\\\'\\\'yellow-green bile\\\'\\\'\\\' (stomach acid) and \\\'\\\'\\\'orange bile\\\'\\\'\\\' (all other non-black bile functions). What I formerly termed \\\'\\\'\\\'cholermel\\\'\\\'\\\' could instead be the stomach acid one, now termed \\\'\\\'\\\'Choleric II\\\'\\\'\\\'. I\\\'ve decided that the former Choleric (with a minor sanguine side) be named for \\\'\\\'\\\'orange bile\\\'\\\'\\\', the new name being \\\'\\\'\\\'Pyrancholic\\\'\\\'\\\'.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
\'\'\'Pyrancholic\'\'\' narrows choleric to the strong, ambitious, \
to:
\\\'\\\'\\\'Pyrancholic\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows choleric to the strong, ambitious, \\\"drill sergeant\\\" type. \\\'\\\'\\\'Choleric II\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows choleric down to the rational planner and instructor of the bunch. \\\'\\\'\\\'Melancholic\\\'\\\'\\\' stays the same as always. \\\'\\\'\\\'Phlegmatic\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows down to \\\'\\\'supine\\\'\\\'. \\\'\\\'\\\'Leuquine\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows sanguine down to empathy, compassion, and all the other things it has in common with supine/phlegmatic I. \\\'\\\'\\\'Sanguine II\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows sanguine down to what it has in common with choleric, cutting away the emotional side -- not making sanguine unemotional, for it is more emotional than \\\'\\\'\\\'choleric\\\'\\\'\\\' or \\\'\\\'\\\'pyrancholic\\\'\\\'\\\' -- but it\\\'s still not as emotional as \\\'\\\'\\\'leuquine\\\'\\\'\\\'.

The temperament I call \\\'\\\'\\\'Eclectic\\\'\\\'\\\' is quite self-explanatory, I think.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
My mind has made some kind of adjustment lately. Phlegm is not, as far as we know, a mix of all the other humors, nor the base component from which the other ones derive. So I\'m leaning toward pushing it back to the \'\'\'Phlegmatic I\'\'\' position, throwing out its apathetic, unemotional middle-of-the-road traits and leaving it a synonym for \'\'supine\'\'. Essentially, what I called \'\'\'melsang\'\'\' I now call \'\'\'phlegmatic\'\'\'. I also decided to split \'\'yellow bile\'\' into \'\'\'yellow-green bile\'\'\' (stomach acid) and \'\'\'orange bile\'\'\' (all other non-black bile functions). What I formerly termed \'\'\'colermel\'\'\' could instead be the stomach acid one, now termed \'\'\'Choleric II\'\'\'. I\'ve decided that the former Choleric (with a minor sanguine side) be named for \'\'\'orange bile\'\'\', the new name \'\'\'Pyrancholic\'\'\'.
to:
My mind has made some kind of adjustment lately. Phlegm is not, as far as we know, a mix of all the other humors, nor the base component from which the other ones derive. So I\\\'m leaning toward pushing it back to the \\\'\\\'\\\'Phlegmatic I\\\'\\\'\\\' position, throwing out its apathetic, unemotional middle-of-the-road traits and leaving it a synonym for \\\'\\\'supine\\\'\\\'. Essentially, what I called \\\'\\\'\\\'melsang\\\'\\\'\\\' I now call \\\'\\\'\\\'phlegmatic\\\'\\\'\\\'. I also decided to split \\\'\\\'yellow bile\\\'\\\' into \\\'\\\'\\\'yellow-green bile\\\'\\\'\\\' (stomach acid) and \\\'\\\'\\\'orange bile\\\'\\\'\\\' (all other non-black bile functions). What I formerly termed \\\'\\\'\\\'cholermel\\\'\\\'\\\' could instead be the stomach acid one, now termed \\\'\\\'\\\'Choleric II\\\'\\\'\\\'. I\\\'ve decided that the former Choleric (with a minor sanguine side) be named for \\\'\\\'\\\'orange bile\\\'\\\'\\\', the new name \\\'\\\'\\\'Pyrancholic\\\'\\\'\\\'.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
\'\'\'Pyrancholic\'\'\' narrows choleric to the strong, ambitious, \
to:
\\\'\\\'\\\'Pyrancholic\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows choleric to the strong, ambitious, \\\"drill sergeant\\\" type. \\\'\\\'\\\'Choleric II\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows choleric down to the rational planner and instructor of the bunch. \\\'\\\'\\\'Melancholic\\\'\\\'\\\' stays the same as always. \\\'\\\'\\\'Phlegmatic\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows down to \\\'\\\'supine\\\'\\\'. \\\'\\\'\\\'Leuquine\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows sanguine down to empathy, compassion, and all the other things it has in common with supine/phlegmatic I. \\\'\\\'\\\'Sanguine II\\\'\\\'\\\' narrows sanguine down to what it has in common with choleric, cutting away the emotional side -- not making sanguine unemotional, for it is more emotional than \\\'\\\'\\\'choleric\\\'\\\'\\\' or \\\'\\\'\\\'pyrancholic\\\'\\\'\\\' -- but it\\\'s still not as emotional as \\\'\\\'\\\'leuquine\\\'\\\'\\\'.

The temperament I call \\\'\\\'\\\'Eclectic\\\'\\\'\\\' is quite self-explanatory, I think.
Changed line(s) 9 from:
n
**If one goes by the text of Let It Go in the German version, Elsa wasn\'t just never bothered by the cold, which may as well be, but by the time she reached the North Mountain she admitted to having been changed as \
to:
**If one goes by the text of Let It Go in the German version, Elsa wasn\\\'t just never bothered by the cold, which may as well be, but by the time she reached the North Mountain she admitted to having been changed as \\\"the cold is a part of [her] now\\\", directly admitting to a change in her character.
*** The Latin American Spanish version is more blatant about it, called \\\"Libre soy\\\" (\\\"I am free\\\") with the last line being \\\"The cold is also a part of me\\\".
*** The French version of the song is similarly called \\\"Libérée, délivrée\\\" (\\\"Freed, released\\\").
*** Not the case for Japanese; \\\"sukoshi mo samukunai\\\" translates to \\\"I\\\'m not even a little bit cold\\\" - maybe looking even deeper into her character that she\\\'s not such an Ice Queen after all
** [[spoiler:Hans\\\'s]] real reasons for [[spoiler:wooing Anna]]. A man takes advantage of [[spoiler:a young woman\\\'s need for love, even asking for her hand in marriage]]. Then, due to one circumstance or another, he [[spoiler:doesn\\\'t need her anymore]. [[spoiler:Throwing her away after his use of her was over]].
** Many people interpret Elsa\\\'s story as an allegory of some kind. Few people agree on what that allegory is actually about.
** [[spoiler:Hans]] again, as to whether or to what extent he\\\'s faking his [[spoiler:adorkableness]]. Even if he\\\'s faking being nice he\\\'s either extremely good at reading people (so that he can convincingly emulate them, as when he [[spoiler:sings a fairly in sync duet with Anna]]) or he\\\'s [[spoiler:just as adorkable as Anna]], just happens to also be evil.
** The Trolls have become subject to this as they may be darker than they appear. For example, some wonder if they possibly kidnapped Kristoff when he was a child (Word of God says no), and if their magic may have darker results than shown, as evidenced by the King and Queen\\\'s fear of taking Anna and Elsa to them. It probably helps that the trolls in the original story were evil.
*** On the gripping hand, considering the characters are Genre Savvy to general Fairy Tales. The smoke doesn\\\'t show anything, but reveals what the characters are thinking. If they\\\'d asked...
** The ending. Was the [[spoiler:end of the eternal winter]] caused by [[spoiler:Elsa\\\'s control of her powers]], or [[spoiler:Anna discovering powers of her own]]?
** The Duke of Wesselton. Firstly, his desire to kill Elsa could be interpretted as either religious fanaticism, or a genuine attempt to save the World. Also, in-universe everyone seems to think that his concern for the wealth of the Kingdom makes him evil. This neglects the fact that he\\\'s the ruler of one of their major trading partners, and if they have nothing to trade his own people stand to suffer.

If you approve of it, I will put in on the page.

Edit: I corrected errors with the indention.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
* Alternative Character Interpretation: [[spoiler:Prince Hans]], mostly coming from a lot of Draco in Leather Pants. His actions at the beginning of the movie make him seem like a genuinely nice guy who [[spoiler:really likes Anna]] before the reveal, so a lot of fans think he [[spoiler:genuinely liked Anna at first and then got power hungry due to his childhood]]. Of course, considering the many hints that he [[spoiler:always just wanted the throne]] (see Rewatch Bonus below), as well as the fact that he [[spoiler:openly admitted he wanted to woo Elsa first to achieve that]], make this speculation largely inconsistent with canon.
to:
* Alternative Character Interpretation:
** [[spoiler:Prince Hans]], mostly coming from a lot of Draco in Leather Pants. His actions at the beginning of the movie make him seem like a genuinely nice guy who [[spoiler:really likes Anna]] before the reveal, so a lot of fans think he [[spoiler:genuinely liked Anna at first and then got power hungry due to his childhood]]. Of course, considering the many hints that he [[spoiler:always just wanted the throne]] (see Rewatch Bonus below), as well as the fact that he [[spoiler:openly admitted he wanted to woo Elsa first to achieve that]], make this speculation largely inconsistent with canon.
Changed line(s) 8 from:
n
*If one goes by the text of Let It Go in the German version, Elsa wasn\'t just never bothered by the cold, which may as well be, but by the time she reached the North Mountain she admitted to having been changed as \
to:
**If one goes by the text of Let It Go in the German version, Elsa wasn\\\'t just never bothered by the cold, which may as well be, but by the time she reached the North Mountain she admitted to having been changed as \\\"the cold is a part of [her] now\\\", directly admitting to a change in her character.
*** The Latin American Spanish version is more blatant about it, called \\\"Libre soy\\\" (\\\"I am free\\\") with the last line being \\\"The cold is also a part of me\\\".
*** The French version of the song is similarly called \\\"Libérée, délivrée\\\" (\\\"Freed, released\\\").
*** Not the case for Japanese; \\\"sukoshi mo samukunai\\\" translates to \\\"I\\\'m not even a little bit cold\\\" - maybe looking even deeper into her character that she\\\'s not such an Ice Queen after all
*[[spoiler:Hans\\\'s]] real reasons for [[spoiler:wooing Anna]]. A man takes advantage of [[spoiler:a young woman\\\'s need for love, even asking for her hand in marriage]]. Then, due to one circumstance or another, he [[spoiler:doesn\\\'t need her anymore]. [[spoiler:Throwing her away after his use of her was over]].
** Many people interpret Elsa\\\'s story as an allegory of some kind. Few people agree on what that allegory is actually about.
** [[spoiler:Hans]] again, as to whether or to what extent he\\\'s faking his [[spoiler:adorkableness]]. Even if he\\\'s faking being nice he\\\'s either extremely good at reading people (so that he can convincingly emulate them, as when he [[spoiler:sings a fairly in sync duet with Anna]]) or he\\\'s [[spoiler:just as adorkable as Anna]], just happens to also be evil.
** The Trolls have become subject to this as they may be darker than they appear. For example, some wonder if they possibly kidnapped Kristoff when he was a child (Word of God says no), and if their magic may have darker results than shown, as evidenced by the King and Queen\\\'s fear of taking Anna and Elsa to them. It probably helps that the trolls in the original story were evil.
*** On the gripping hand, considering the characters are Genre Savvy to general Fairy Tales. The smoke doesn\\\'t show anything, but reveals what the characters are thinking. If they\\\'d asked...
** The ending. Was the [[spoiler:end of the eternal winter]] caused by [[spoiler:Elsa\\\'s control of her powers]], or [[spoiler:Anna discovering powers of her own]]?
** The Duke of Wesselton. Firstly, his desire to kill Elsa could be interpretted as either religious fanaticism, or a genuine attempt to save the World. Also, in-universe everyone seems to think that his concern for the wealth of the Kingdom makes him evil. This neglects the fact that he\\\'s the ruler of one of their major trading partners, and if they have nothing to trade his own people stand to suffer.

If you approve of it, I will put in on the page.

Edit: I corrected errors with the indention.
Changed line(s) 8 from:
n
*If one goes by the text of Let It Go in the German version, Elsa wasn\'t just never bothered by the cold, which may as well be, but by the time she reached the North Mountain she admitted to having been changed as \
to:
*If one goes by the text of Let It Go in the German version, Elsa wasn\\\'t just never bothered by the cold, which may as well be, but by the time she reached the North Mountain she admitted to having been changed as \\\"the cold is a part of [her] now\\\", directly admitting to a change in her character.
**The Latin American Spanish version is more blatant about it, called \\\"Libre soy\\\" (\\\"I am free\\\") with the last line being \\\"The cold is also a part of me\\\".
** The French version of the song is similarly called \\\"Libérée, délivrée\\\" (\\\"Freed, released\\\").
** Not the case for Japanese; \\\"sukoshi mo samukunai\\\" translates to \\\"I\\\'m not even a little bit cold\\\" - maybe looking even deeper into her character that she\\\'s not such an Ice Queen after all
*[[spoiler:Hans\\\'s]] real reasons for [[spoiler:wooing Anna]]. A man takes advantage of [[spoiler:a young woman\\\'s need for love, even asking for her hand in marriage]]. Then, due to one circumstance or another, he [[spoiler:doesn\\\'t need her anymore]. [[spoiler:Throwing her away after his use of her was over]].
*Many people interpret Elsa\\\'s story as an allegory of some kind. Few people agree on what that allegory is actually about.
* [[spoiler:Hans]] again, as to whether or to what extent he\\\'s faking his [[spoiler:adorkableness]]. Even if he\\\'s faking being nice he\\\'s either extremely good at reading people (so that he can convincingly emulate them, as when he [[spoiler:sings a fairly in sync duet with Anna]]) or he\\\'s [[spoiler:just as adorkable as Anna]], just happens to also be evil.
* The Trolls have become subject to this as they may be darker than they appear. For example, some wonder if they possibly kidnapped Kristoff when he was a child (Word of God says no), and if their magic may have darker results than shown, as evidenced by the King and Queen\\\'s fear of taking Anna and Elsa to them. It probably helps that the trolls in the original story were evil.
** On the gripping hand, considering the characters are Genre Savvy to general Fairy Tales. The smoke doesn\\\'t show anything, but reveals what the characters are thinking. If they\\\'d asked...
* The ending. Was the [[spoiler:end of the eternal winter]] caused by [[spoiler:Elsa\\\'s control of her powers]], or [[spoiler:Anna discovering powers of her own]]?
* The Duke of Wesselton. Firstly, his desire to kill Elsa could be interpretted as either religious fanaticism, or a genuine attempt to save the World. Also, in-universe everyone seems to think that his concern for the wealth of the Kingdom makes him evil. This neglects the fact that he\\\'s the ruler of one of their major trading partners, and if they have nothing to trade his own people stand to suffer.

If you approve of it, I will put in on the page.

Edit: I corrected errors with the indention.
Changed line(s) 8 from:
n
If one goes by the text of Let It Go in the German version, Elsa wasn\'t just never bothered by the cold, which may as well be, but by the time she reached the North Mountain she admitted to having been changed as \
to:
*If one goes by the text of Let It Go in the German version, Elsa wasn\\\'t just never bothered by the cold, which may as well be, but by the time she reached the North Mountain she admitted to having been changed as \\\"the cold is a part of [her] now\\\", directly admitting to a change in her character.
**The Latin American Spanish version is more blatant about it, called \\\"Libre soy\\\" (\\\"I am free\\\") with the last line being \\\"The cold is also a part of me\\\".
** The French version of the song is similarly called \\\"Libérée, délivrée\\\" (\\\"Freed, released\\\").
** Not the case for Japanese; \\\"sukoshi mo samukunai\\\" translates to \\\"I\\\'m not even a little bit cold\\\" - maybe looking even deeper into her character that she\\\'s not such an Ice Queen after all
*[[spoiler:Hans\\\'s]] real reasons for [[spoiler:wooing Anna]]. A man takes advantage of [[spoiler:a young woman\\\'s need for love, even asking for her hand in marriage]]. Then, due to one circumstance or another, he [[spoiler:doesn\\\'t need her anymore]. [[spoiler:Throwing her away after his use of her was over]].
*Many people interpret Elsa\\\'s story as an allegory of some kind. Few people agree on what that allegory is actually about.
* [[spoiler:Hans]] again, as to whether or to what extent he\\\'s faking his [[spoiler:adorkableness]]. Even if he\\\'s faking being nice he\\\'s either extremely good at reading people (so that he can convincingly emulate them, as when he [[spoiler:sings a fairly in sync duet with Anna]]) or he\\\'s [[spoiler:just as adorkable as Anna]], just happens to also be evil.
* The Trolls have become subject to this as they may be darker than they appear. For example, some wonder if they possibly kidnapped Kristoff when he was a child (Word of God says no), and if their magic may have darker results than shown, as evidenced by the King and Queen\\\'s fear of taking Anna and Elsa to them. It probably helps that the trolls in the original story were evil.
** On the gripping hand, considering the characters are Genre Savvy to general Fairy Tales. The smoke doesn\\\'t show anything, but reveals what the characters are thinking. If they\\\'d asked...
* The ending. Was the end of the eternal winter caused by Elsa\\\'s control of her powers, or Anna discovering powers of her own?
* The Duke of Wesselton. Firstly, his desire to kill Elsa could be interpretted as either religious fanaticism, or a genuine attempt to save the World. Also, in-universe everyone seems to think that his concern for the wealth of the Kingdom makes him evil. This neglects the fact that he\\\'s the ruler of one of their major trading partners, and if they have nothing to trade his own people stand to suffer.

If you approve of it, I will put in on the page.

Edit: I corrected errors with the indention.
Top