[003]
Glowsquid
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The reason Software and Cars got cut is because they weren\'t even about narrative (which, y\'know, is the focus of the site) and the examples were terrible. About half of the examples on Software were bithching about general stupidity (the stuff about screensavers) and things that were fraudulent but not \'\'bad\'\' per say (the memory extension things). Cars listed the whole Saturn brand (which is kind of boogling considering that TheOtherWiki has an extensive section on \'\'\'[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturn_Corporation#Awards Awards]]\'\'\' received by it), and listed the Pontiac Aztek on the sole premise that it looked ugly, with \'\'\'the entry itlsef\'\'\' admitting it received posistive reviews. The rest were examples of the really unreliable and dangerous stuff, which can go under TheAllegedCar.
to:
The reason Software and Cars got cut is because they weren\\\'t even about narrative (which, y\\\'know, is the focus of the site) and the examples were terrible. About half of the examples on Software were bithching about general stupidity (the stuff about screensavers) and things that were fraudulent but not \\\'\\\'bad\\\'\\\' per say (the memory extension things). Cars listed the whole Saturn brand (which is kind of boogling considering that TheOtherWiki has an extensive section on \\\'\\\'\\\'[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturn_Corporation#Awards Awards]]\\\'\\\'\\\' received by it), and listed the Pontiac Aztek on the sole premise that it looked ugly, with \\\'\\\'\\\'the entry itself\\\'\\\'\\\' admitting it received posistive reviews. The rest were examples of the really unreliable and dangerous stuff, which can go under TheAllegedCar.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The reason Software and Cars got cut is because they weren\'t even about \'\'narrative\'\' (not the focus of the site) and the examples were terrible. About half of the examples on Software were bithching about general stupidity (the stuff about screensavers) and things that were fraudulent but not \'\'bad\'\' per say (the memory extension things). Cars listed the whole Saturn brand (which is kind of boogling considering that TheOtherWiki has an extensive section on \'\'\'[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturn_Corporation#Awards Awards]]\'\'\' received by it), and listed the Pontiac Aztek on the sole premise that it looked ugly, with \'\'\'the entry itlsef\'\'\' admitting it received posistive reviews. The rest were examples of the really unreliable and dangerous stuff, which can go under TheAllegedCar.
to:
The reason Software and Cars got cut is because they weren\\\'t even about narrative (which, y\\\'know, is the focus of the site) and the examples were terrible. About half of the examples on Software were bithching about general stupidity (the stuff about screensavers) and things that were fraudulent but not \\\'\\\'bad\\\'\\\' per say (the memory extension things). Cars listed the whole Saturn brand (which is kind of boogling considering that TheOtherWiki has an extensive section on \\\'\\\'\\\'[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturn_Corporation#Awards Awards]]\\\'\\\'\\\' received by it), and listed the Pontiac Aztek on the sole premise that it looked ugly, with \\\'\\\'\\\'the entry itlsef\\\'\\\'\\\' admitting it received posistive reviews. The rest were examples of the really unreliable and dangerous stuff, which can go under TheAllegedCar.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The reason Software and Cars got cut is because they weren\'t even about \'\'narrative\'\' and the examples were terrible. About half of the examples on Software were bithching about general stupidity (the stuff about screensavers) and things that were fraudulent but not \'\'bad\'\' per say (the memory extension things). Cars listed the whole Saturn brand (which is kind of boogling considering that TheOtherWiki has an extensive section on \'\'\'[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturn_Corporation#Awards Awards]]\'\'\' received by it), and listed the Pontiac Aztek on the sole premise that it looked ugly, with \'\'\'the entry itlsef\'\'\' admitting it received posistive reviews. The examples of the really unreliable and dangerous stuff can go under TheAlledgedCar.
to:
The reason Software and Cars got cut is because they weren\\\'t even about \\\'\\\'narrative\\\'\\\' (not the focus of the site) and the examples were terrible. About half of the examples on Software were bithching about general stupidity (the stuff about screensavers) and things that were fraudulent but not \\\'\\\'bad\\\'\\\' per say (the memory extension things). Cars listed the whole Saturn brand (which is kind of boogling considering that TheOtherWiki has an extensive section on \\\'\\\'\\\'[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturn_Corporation#Awards Awards]]\\\'\\\'\\\' received by it), and listed the Pontiac Aztek on the sole premise that it looked ugly, with \\\'\\\'\\\'the entry itlsef\\\'\\\'\\\' admitting it received posistive reviews. The rest were examples of the really unreliable and dangerous stuff, which can go under TheAllegedCar.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
I cutlisted the SPorts page because it was even more out of the focus of the site, and the overwhelming majority was complaing about bad trades (WallBanger, WhatAnIdiot... ect) and a bad run under a specific GM (DorkAge).
to:
I cutlisted the Sports page because it was even more out of the focus of the site, and the overwhelming majority was complaing about bad trades (WallBanger, WhatAnIdiot... ect) and a bad run under a specific GM (DorkAge).
