[001]
DevonKennedy2
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
It looks like there\'s some disagreement about how TheBeatles line up. Before I\'ve seen John (choleric), Paul (sanguine), George (melancholic), and Ringo (phlegmatic). Now it\'s John (melancholic), Paul (choleric), George (phlegmatic), and Ringo (sanguine). I\'m a big Beatles fan and I personally agree with the first line-up: John was bold and independent (which led to his peace activism in later years), Paul was the cheerful one who was more concerned with social interaction (just listen to all his love songs), George was the reflective and thoughtful one who pursued his love for Indian philosophy, and Ringo was the amiable but mostly quiet one (he doesn\'t say much if you watch interviews with the band).
to:
It looks like there\\\'s some disagreement about how TheBeatles line up. Before I\\\'ve seen John (choleric), Paul (sanguine), George (melancholic), and Ringo (phlegmatic). Now it\\\'s John (melancholic), Paul (choleric), George (phlegmatic), and Ringo (sanguine). I\\\'m a big Beatles fan and I personally agree with the first line-up: John was bold and independent (which led to his peace activism in later years), Paul was the cheerful one who was more concerned with social interaction (just listen to all his love songs), George was the reflective and thoughtful one who pursued his love for Indian philosophy, and Ringo was the amiable but mostly quiet one (he doesn\\\'t say much if you watch interviews with the band). What do you guys think?
