[002]
MajinGojira
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Wait, What? You\'re kidding? I\'ve been sitting here waiting to get your counter-argument before I do anything really drastic and what you come up with is \
to:
Wait, What? You\\\'re kidding? I\\\'ve been sitting here waiting to get your counter-argument before I do anything really drastic and what you come up with is \\\"No one gets to change it now\\\"?
I may have an agenda to get rid of that section/reduce it as much as possible. However, I am refraining from doing anything truly drastic until a consensus is reached. Otherwise, I would have been trying to remove even more of it yesterday. Our concepts of drastic steps do not seem to differ that much because you locked the trope, but retained the edits I made. Since you are generally the one making the argument to retain the disputed section, I have waited for your reply to see if an argument can be effectively countered or a compromise be reached.
And I wake up to find this.
While it is fully your right to lock it, and I fully admit to having an \\\"Agenda\\\" (IE: an goal to which I am working towards to what I feel is the betterment of the article), I find your reasoning specious and hollow. The Edit history does not support your action, IMO.
It\\\'s your choice and right to do so, but it\\\'s also my right to not like it and bitch in impotence. ;)
I may have an agenda to get rid of that section/reduce it as much as possible. However, I am refraining from doing anything truly drastic until a consensus is reached. Otherwise, I would have been trying to remove even more of it yesterday. Our concepts of drastic steps do not seem to differ that much because you locked the trope, but retained the edits I made. Since you are generally the one making the argument to retain the disputed section, I have waited for your reply to see if an argument can be effectively countered or a compromise be reached.
And I wake up to find this.
While it is fully your right to lock it, and I fully admit to having an \\\"Agenda\\\" (IE: an goal to which I am working towards to what I feel is the betterment of the article), I find your reasoning specious and hollow. The Edit history does not support your action, IMO.
It\\\'s your choice and right to do so, but it\\\'s also my right to not like it and bitch in impotence. ;)
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Wait, What? You\'re kidding? I\'ve been sitting here waiting to get your counter-argument before I do anything really drastic and what you come up with is \
to:
Wait, What? You\\\'re kidding? I\\\'ve been sitting here waiting to get your counter-argument before I do anything really drastic and what you come up with is \\\"No one gets to change it now\\\"?
I may have an agenda to get rid of that section/reduce it as much as possible, I am refraining from doing anything truly drastic until a consensus is reached. Otherwise, I would have been trying to remove it all of yesterday. Our concepts of drastic steps do not seem to differ that much because you locked the trope, but retained the edits I made. Since you are generally the one making the argument to retain the disputed section, I have waited for your reply to see if an argument can be effectively countered or a compromise be reached.
And I wake up to find this.
While it is fully your right to lock it, and I fully admit to having an \\\"Agenda\\\" (IE: an goal to which I am working towards to what I feel is the betterment of the article), I find your reasoning specious and hollow. The Edit history does not support your action, IMO.
It\\\'s your choice and right to do so, but it\\\'s also my right to not like it and bitch in impotence. ;)
I may have an agenda to get rid of that section/reduce it as much as possible, I am refraining from doing anything truly drastic until a consensus is reached. Otherwise, I would have been trying to remove it all of yesterday. Our concepts of drastic steps do not seem to differ that much because you locked the trope, but retained the edits I made. Since you are generally the one making the argument to retain the disputed section, I have waited for your reply to see if an argument can be effectively countered or a compromise be reached.
And I wake up to find this.
While it is fully your right to lock it, and I fully admit to having an \\\"Agenda\\\" (IE: an goal to which I am working towards to what I feel is the betterment of the article), I find your reasoning specious and hollow. The Edit history does not support your action, IMO.
It\\\'s your choice and right to do so, but it\\\'s also my right to not like it and bitch in impotence. ;)
