[002]
TripleElation
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
No, it\'s not a \
to:
No, it\\\'s not a \\\"villain nobody cares about\\\". The definition of the trope is right there in the first line- \\\"an overpowering antagonist without a believable goal, motive or plan\\\".
The fandom can cheer for this character, or hate them, or be indifferent to them, or write slash fanfic of them. It doesn\\\'t matter. Yeah, the issue of \\\"we just don\\\'t care\\\" gets brought up later as something typical of this trope, but treating it as a proper part of the definition -- let alone the \\\'\\\'main\\\'\\\' part of the definition -- will only lead to tears.
The fandom can cheer for this character, or hate them, or be indifferent to them, or write slash fanfic of them. It doesn\\\'t matter. Yeah, the issue of \\\"we just don\\\'t care\\\" gets brought up later as something typical of this trope, but treating it as a proper part of the definition -- let alone the \\\'\\\'main\\\'\\\' part of the definition -- will only lead to tears.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
No, it\'s not a \
to:
No, it\\\'s not a \\\"villain nobody cares about\\\". The definition of the trope is right there in the first line- \\\"an overpowering antagonist without a believable goal, motive or plan\\\".
The fandom can cheer for this character, or hate them, or be indifferent to them, or write slash fanfic of them. It doesn\\\'t matter. Yeah, the issue of \\\"we just don\\\'t care\\\" gets brought up later as something typical of this trope, but treating it as a part of the definition /proper/ is a bad idea that will only lead to tears.
The fandom can cheer for this character, or hate them, or be indifferent to them, or write slash fanfic of them. It doesn\\\'t matter. Yeah, the issue of \\\"we just don\\\'t care\\\" gets brought up later as something typical of this trope, but treating it as a part of the definition /proper/ is a bad idea that will only lead to tears.
