Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Main / StraightGay

Go To

[003] nkerklaan Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
William Lee in the Naked Lunch movie is neither an AuthorAvatar (the movie was written by David Cronenberg, though based on the novel by William Burroughs in which \
to:
William Lee in the \\\'\\\'Naked Lunch\\\'\\\' movie is neither an AuthorAvatar (the movie was written by David Cronenberg, though based on the novel by William Burroughs in which \\\"William Lee\\\" is probably closer to a vague SelfInsert) nor a StraightGay. While his sexuality is actually somewhat ambiguous (he has sex with two women and one man in the movie) his reason for having sex with a man (and the context in which he delivers the quote cited in the entry) is that he is ostensibly using homosexuality as a \\\"cover\\\" for his \\\"secret agent mission\\\". It seems to me that he is, at most, bisexual (the novel, and indeed the real life man, are a different story).

I\\\'m new here so I\\\'m not sure if it\\\'s my place to delete the entry or not but it definitely doesn\\\'t fit.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
William Lee in the Naked Lunch movie is neither an AuthorAvatar (the movie was written by David Cronenberg, though based on the novel in which William Lee is probably closer to a SelfInsert) nor a StraightGay. While his sexuality is actually somewhat ambiguous (he has sex with two women and one man in the movie) his reason for having sex with a man (and the context in which he delivers the quote cited in the entry) is that he is ostensibly using homosexuality as a \
to:
William Lee in the Naked Lunch movie is neither an AuthorAvatar (the movie was written by David Cronenberg, though based on the novel by William Burroughs in which \\\"William Lee\\\" is probably closer to a vague SelfInsert) nor a StraightGay. While his sexuality is actually somewhat ambiguous (he has sex with two women and one man in the movie) his reason for having sex with a man (and the context in which he delivers the quote cited in the entry) is that he is ostensibly using homosexuality as a \\\"cover\\\" for his \\\"secret agent mission\\\". It seems to me that he is, at most, bisexual (the novel, and indeed the real life man, are a different story).

I\\\'m new here so I\\\'m not sure if it\\\'s my place to delete the entry or not but it definitely doesn\\\'t fit.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
William Lee in the Naked Lunch movie is neither an AuthorAvatar (the movie was written by David Cronenberg, though based on the novel in which William Lee is probably closer to a SelfInsert than anything) nor a StraightGay. While his sexuality is actually somewhat ambiguous (he has sex with two women and one man in the movie) his reason for having sex with a man (and the context in which he delivers the quote cited in the entry) is that he is ostensibly using homosexuality as a \
to:
William Lee in the Naked Lunch movie is neither an AuthorAvatar (the movie was written by David Cronenberg, though based on the novel in which William Lee is probably closer to a SelfInsert) nor a StraightGay. While his sexuality is actually somewhat ambiguous (he has sex with two women and one man in the movie) his reason for having sex with a man (and the context in which he delivers the quote cited in the entry) is that he is ostensibly using homosexuality as a \\\"cover\\\" for his \\\"secret agent mission\\\". It seems to me that he is, at most, bisexual (the novel, and indeed the real life man, are a different story).

I\\\'m new here so I\\\'m not sure if it\\\'s my place to delete the entry or not but it definitely doesn\\\'t fit.
Top