[003]
MangaManiac
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Would anyone say LittleNicky is a CultClassic? I\'d say it was, though I might be a bit biased, as I if the cult exists I\'m one of them.
to:
Would anyone say LittleNicky is a CultClassic? I\\\'d say it was, though I might be a bit biased, as if the cult exists I\\\'m one of them.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
There seems to be a lot of people who liked it on [http://efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=1792&reviewer=416 eFilmCritic].
to:
There seems to be a lot of people who liked it on [[http://efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=1792&reviewer=416 eFilmCritic]].
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Perhaps when I last rewrote the \'\'CitizenKane\'\' entry, I didn\'t explain it properly. \'\'Kane\'\' wasn\'t just a victim of mockery at the Oscars ... it did lose money in its initial run, and was only supported by a thin margin of critics (the ones that weren\'t writing for Hearst\'s newspapers). The film was by and large forgotten until 1956, when television airings of it started and contemporary filmmakers like Francois Truffaut pointed to it as the prime example of auteur cinema. Anyway, the failure of \'\'Kane\'\' came very close to derailing the rest of Orson\'s career, forcing him from then on to struggle with his entire soul to executive his cinematic visions without studio-exec compromise.
to:
Perhaps when I last rewrote the \\\'\\\'CitizenKane\\\'\\\' entry, I didn\\\'t explain it properly. \\\'\\\'Kane\\\'\\\' wasn\\\'t just a victim of mockery at the Oscars ... it did lose money in its initial run, and was only supported by a thin margin of critics (the ones that weren\\\'t writing for Hearst\\\'s newspapers). The film was by and large forgotten until 1956, when television airings of it started and contemporary filmmakers like Francois Truffaut pointed to it as the prime example of auteur cinema. Anyway, the failure of \\\'\\\'Kane\\\'\\\' came very close to derailing the rest of Orson\\\'s career, forcing him from then on to struggle with his entire soul to execute his cinematic visions without corporate compromise.
