Discussion History Main / RedOniBlueOni

So I\\\'ve noticed on the meta page that someone has spammed \\\"to put it one way, (blank) can be seen as a red oni and blank can be seen as a blue oni\\\" underneath examples that say the exact same thing but shorter (Blank is red, blank is blue). Not only is it extremely unnecessary and redundant, but I notice it seems to be mimicking what I wrote on Marvel and DC (\\\"To put it one way, Marvel can be looked at as a Blue Oni Universe with Red Oni characters and DC vice versa\\\"). I know me and this other person who wrote on Marvel and DC disagreed on which was which initially (which led me to include that third comparison/example as a compromise), but if this is what I think it is, that is extremely petty. Regardless all these redundant second examples need to be deleted. They are literally formatted like this:

* This show (Red) vs. This show (Blue).
** To put it one way, This show can be looked at as a Red Oni show, and this show can be looked at as a Blue Oni show.

You see what I mean?

So I\\\'ve noticed on the meta page that someone has spammed \\\"to put it one way, (blank) can be seen as a red oni and blank can be seen as a blue oni\\\" underneath examples that say the exact same thing but shorter (Blank is red, blank is blue). Not only is it extremely unnecessary and redundant, but I notice it seems to be mimicking what I wrote on Marvel and DC (\\\"To put it one way, Marvel can be looked at as a Blue Oni Universe with Red Oni characters and DC vice versa\\\"). I know me and this other person who wrote on Marvel and DC disagreed on which was which initially (which led me to include that third comparison/example as a compromise), but if this is what I think it is, that is extremely petty. Regardless all these redundant second examples need to be deleted. They are literally formatted like this:

* This show (Red) vs. This show (Blue).
** To put it one way, This show can be looked at as Red Oni show, and this show can be looked at as a Blue Oni show.

You see what I mean? Unnecessary and redundant.

So I\\\'ve noticed on the meta page that someone has spammed \\\"to put it one way, (blank) can be seen as a red oni and blank can be seen as a blue oni\\\" underneath examples that say the exact same thing but shorter (Blank is red, blank is blue). Not only is it extremely unnecessary and redundant, but I notice it seems to be mimicking what I wrote on Marvel and DC (\\\"To put it one way, Marvel can be looked at as a Blue Oni Universe with Red Oni characters and DC vice versa\\\"). I know me and this other person who wrote on Marvel and DC disagreed on which was which initially (which led me to include that third comparison/example as a compromise), but if this is what I think it is, that is extremely petty. Regardless all these redundant second examples need to be deleted. They are literal formatted like this:

* This show (Red) vs. This show (Blue).
** To put it one way, This show can be looked at as Red Oni show, and this show can be looked at as a Blue Oni show.

You see what I mean? Unnecessary and redundant.