[003]
EmeraldSky
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Links apparently don\'t work. The discussion is called \
to:
Links apparently don\\\'t work. The discussion is called \\\"A Concerning Trend\\\" over on ATT. Long story short, vidkid and I discussed the swath of entries/parts of entries deleted here and on Shigaraki\\\'s page. vid agrees they might have been a bit hasty in deleting them and we\\\'ve talked about the [[BrokenBase contentiousness]] and possible [[SpeculativeTroping speculation]] of some of the entries on both pages. We\\\'re hoping to discuss it to try to lessen the cycle of add-delete-added by someone else. As such, some entries may be due for re-addition and/or rewording.
(Spoiler tags apparently do not work in discussions so watch out for unmarked spoilers I guess.)
(Spoiler tags apparently do not work in discussions so watch out for unmarked spoilers I guess.)
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Links apparently don\'t work. The discussion is called \
to:
Links apparently don\\\'t work. The discussion is called \\\"A Concerning Trend\\\" over on ATT. Long story short, vidkid and I discussed the swath of entries/parts of entries deleted here and on Shigaraki\\\'s page. vid agrees they might have been a bit hasty in deleting them and we\\\'ve talked about the [[BrokenBase contentiousness]] and possible [[SpeculativeTroping speculation]] of some of the entries on both pages. We\\\'re hoping to discuss it to try to lessen the cycle of add-delete-added by someone else. As such, some entries may be due for re-addition and/or rewording.
(Spoiler tags apparently do not work in discussions so watch out for unmarked spoilers I guess.)
(Spoiler tags apparently do not work in discussions so watch out for unmarked spoilers I guess.)
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Links apparently don\'t work. The discussion is called \
to:
Links apparently don\\\'t work. The discussion is called \\\"A Concerning Trend\\\" over on ATT. Long story short, vidkid and I discussed the swath of entries/parts of entries deleted here and on Shigaraki\\\'s page. vid agrees they might have been a bit hasty in deleting them and we\\\'ve talked about the [[BrokenBase contentiousness]] and possible [[SpeculativeTroping speculation]] of some of the entries on both pages. We\\\'re hoping to discuss it to try to lessen the cycle of add-delete-added by someone else. As such, some entries may be due for re-addition and/or rewording.
(Spoiler tags apparently do not work in discussions so watch out for unmarked spoilers I guess.)
(Spoiler tags apparently do not work in discussions so watch out for unmarked spoilers I guess.)
