[037]
ZarbiNerada
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Does it still count if the doom part was certainly NOT intended? Because the Teacher in Space Project turned into this in NASA\'s despite when an O-ring on one of the solid rocket boosters failed, wind shear dislodged a solid-fuel plug that had formed in the resulting gap, and a jet of flame started cutting into the fuel tank...
to:
Does it still count if the doom part was certainly NOT intended? Because the Teacher in Space Project turned into this in UsefulNotes/{{NASA}}\\\'s despite when an O-ring on one of the solid rocket boosters failed, wind shear dislodged a solid-fuel plug that had formed in the resulting gap, and a jet of flame started cutting into the fuel tank...
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Does it still count if the doom part was certainly NOT intended? Because the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teacher_in_Space_Project Teacher in Space Project]] turned into this in NASA\'s despite when an O-ring on one of the solid rocket boosters failed, wind shear dislodged a solid-fuel plug that had formed in the resulting gap, and a jet of flame started cutting into the fuel tank...
to:
Does it still count if the doom part was certainly NOT intended? Because the Teacher in Space Project turned into this in NASA\\\'s despite when an O-ring on one of the solid rocket boosters failed, wind shear dislodged a solid-fuel plug that had formed in the resulting gap, and a jet of flame started cutting into the fuel tank...
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \'\'Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\
to:
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \\\'\\\'Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\\\\\"actual maliace\\\\\\\" on top of the other defamation requirements\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (and his not-insignificant fanbase keeps bragging about how haters lost and his career\\\'s bigger than ever) so that\\\'s another major hurdle if he tries to appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth. So technically, he\\\'s not fired, nor is he entitled to any damages or severance pay after they cut ties.
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove they were obligated to pay him.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
\\\'\\\'\\\'UPDATE:\\\'\\\'\\\' In the November 21, 2019 Sanctions Hearing (page 99 of transcript), Vic Mignogna claimed to not know his own net worth or how much money he\\\'s made this year. How can you prove damage to finances if you don\\\'t know your own finances?
https://twitter.com/shane_holmberg/status/1213194848741863429
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (and his not-insignificant fanbase keeps bragging about how haters lost and his career\\\'s bigger than ever) so that\\\'s another major hurdle if he tries to appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth. So technically, he\\\'s not fired, nor is he entitled to any damages or severance pay after they cut ties.
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove they were obligated to pay him.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
\\\'\\\'\\\'UPDATE:\\\'\\\'\\\' In the November 21, 2019 Sanctions Hearing (page 99 of transcript), Vic Mignogna claimed to not know his own net worth or how much money he\\\'s made this year. How can you prove damage to finances if you don\\\'t know your own finances?
https://twitter.com/shane_holmberg/status/1213194848741863429
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \'\'Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\
to:
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \\\'\\\'Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\\\\\"actual maliace\\\\\\\" on top of the other defamation requirements\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (and his not-insignificant fanbase keeps bragging about how haters lost and his career\\\'s bigger than ever) so that\\\'s another major hurdle if he tries to appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth. So technically, he\\\'s not fired, nor is he entitled to any damages or severance pay after they cut ties.
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove they were obligated to pay him.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
\\\'\\\'\\\'UPDATE:\\\'\\\'\\\' In the November 21, 2019 Sanctions Hearing (page 99 of transcript), Vic Mignogna claimed to not know his own net worth or how much money he\\\'s made this year. How can you prove damage to finances if you don\\\'t know your own finances? \\\\\\\\
https://twitter.com/shane_holmberg/status/1213194848741863429
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (and his not-insignificant fanbase keeps bragging about how haters lost and his career\\\'s bigger than ever) so that\\\'s another major hurdle if he tries to appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth. So technically, he\\\'s not fired, nor is he entitled to any damages or severance pay after they cut ties.
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove they were obligated to pay him.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
\\\'\\\'\\\'UPDATE:\\\'\\\'\\\' In the November 21, 2019 Sanctions Hearing (page 99 of transcript), Vic Mignogna claimed to not know his own net worth or how much money he\\\'s made this year. How can you prove damage to finances if you don\\\'t know your own finances? \\\\\\\\
https://twitter.com/shane_holmberg/status/1213194848741863429
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \'\'Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\
to:
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \\\'\\\'Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\\\\\"actual maliace\\\\\\\" on top of the other defamation requirements\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (and his not-insignificant fanbase keeps bragging about how haters lost and his career\\\'s bigger than ever) so that\\\'s another major hurdle if he tries to appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth. So technically, he\\\'s not fired, nor is he entitled to any damages or severance pay after they cut ties.
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove they were obligated to pay him.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
\\\'\\\'\\\'UPDATE:\\\'\\\'\\\' In the November 21, 2019 Sanctions Hearing (page 99 of transcript), Vic Mignogna claimed to not know his own net worth or how much money he\\\'s made this year. How do you prove damage to finances if you don\\\'t know your own finances?
https://twitter.com/shane_holmberg/status/1213194848741863429
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (and his not-insignificant fanbase keeps bragging about how haters lost and his career\\\'s bigger than ever) so that\\\'s another major hurdle if he tries to appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth. So technically, he\\\'s not fired, nor is he entitled to any damages or severance pay after they cut ties.
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove they were obligated to pay him.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
\\\'\\\'\\\'UPDATE:\\\'\\\'\\\' In the November 21, 2019 Sanctions Hearing (page 99 of transcript), Vic Mignogna claimed to not know his own net worth or how much money he\\\'s made this year. How do you prove damage to finances if you don\\\'t know your own finances?
https://twitter.com/shane_holmberg/status/1213194848741863429
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \'\'Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\
to:
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \\\'\\\'Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\\\\\"actual maliace\\\\\\\" on top of the other defamation requirements\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (and his not-insignificant fanbase keeps bragging about how haters lost and his career\\\'s bigger than ever) so that\\\'s another major hurdle if he tries to appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth. So technically, he\\\'s not fired, nor is he entitled to any damages or severance pay after they cut ties.
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove they were obligated to pay him.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
\\\'\\\'\\\'UPDATE:\\\'\\\'\\\' In the November 21, 2019 Sanctions Hearing (page 99 of transcript), Vic Mignogna claimed to not know his own net worth or how much money he\\\'s made this year. How do you prove damage to finances when you don\\\'t know your own finances?
https://twitter.com/shane_holmberg/status/1213194848741863429
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (and his not-insignificant fanbase keeps bragging about how haters lost and his career\\\'s bigger than ever) so that\\\'s another major hurdle if he tries to appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth. So technically, he\\\'s not fired, nor is he entitled to any damages or severance pay after they cut ties.
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove they were obligated to pay him.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
\\\'\\\'\\\'UPDATE:\\\'\\\'\\\' In the November 21, 2019 Sanctions Hearing (page 99 of transcript), Vic Mignogna claimed to not know his own net worth or how much money he\\\'s made this year. How do you prove damage to finances when you don\\\'t know your own finances?
https://twitter.com/shane_holmberg/status/1213194848741863429
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \'\'Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\
to:
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \\\'\\\'Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\\\\\"actual maliace\\\\\\\" on top of the other defamation requirements\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (and his not-insignificant fanbase keeps bragging about how haters lost and his career\\\'s bigger than ever) so that\\\'s another major hurdle if he tries to appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth. So technically, he\\\'s not fired, nor is he entitled to any damages or severance pay after they cut ties.
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove they were obligated to pay him.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
\\\'\\\'\\\'UPDATE:\\\'\\\'\\\' In the November 21, 2019 Sanctions Hearing (page 99 of transcript), Vic Mignogna claimed to not know his own net worth or how much money he\\\'s made this year. How was he supposed to prove damage to finances?
https://twitter.com/shane_holmberg/status/1213194848741863429
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (and his not-insignificant fanbase keeps bragging about how haters lost and his career\\\'s bigger than ever) so that\\\'s another major hurdle if he tries to appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth. So technically, he\\\'s not fired, nor is he entitled to any damages or severance pay after they cut ties.
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove they were obligated to pay him.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
\\\'\\\'\\\'UPDATE:\\\'\\\'\\\' In the November 21, 2019 Sanctions Hearing (page 99 of transcript), Vic Mignogna claimed to not know his own net worth or how much money he\\\'s made this year. How was he supposed to prove damage to finances?
https://twitter.com/shane_holmberg/status/1213194848741863429
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \'\'Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\
to:
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \\\'\\\'Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\\\\\"actual maliace\\\\\\\" on top of the other defamation requirements\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (and his not-insignificant fanbase keeps bragging about how haters lost and his career\\\'s bigger than ever) so that\\\'s another major hurdle if he tries to appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth. So technically, he\\\'s not fired, nor is he entitled to any damages or severance pay after they cut ties.
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove they were obligated to pay him.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
\\\'\\\'\\\'UPDATE:\\\'\\\'\\\' In the November 21, 2019 Sanctions Hearing, Vic Mignogna claimed to not know his own net worth or how much money he\\\'s made this year. How was he planning to prove damage to finances? (page 99 of transcript)
https://twitter.com/shane_holmberg/status/1213194848741863429
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (and his not-insignificant fanbase keeps bragging about how haters lost and his career\\\'s bigger than ever) so that\\\'s another major hurdle if he tries to appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth. So technically, he\\\'s not fired, nor is he entitled to any damages or severance pay after they cut ties.
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove they were obligated to pay him.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
\\\'\\\'\\\'UPDATE:\\\'\\\'\\\' In the November 21, 2019 Sanctions Hearing, Vic Mignogna claimed to not know his own net worth or how much money he\\\'s made this year. How was he planning to prove damage to finances? (page 99 of transcript)
https://twitter.com/shane_holmberg/status/1213194848741863429
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \'\'Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\
to:
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \\\'\\\'Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\\\\\"actual maliace\\\\\\\" on top of the other defamation requirements\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (and his not-insignificant fanbase keeps bragging about how haters lost and his career\\\'s bigger than ever) so that\\\'s another major hurdle if he tries to appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth. So technically, he\\\'s not fired, nor is he entitled to any damages or severance pay after they cut ties.
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove they were obligated to pay him.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
\\\'\\\'\\\'UPDATE:\\\'\\\'\\\' In the November 21, 2019 Sanctions Hearing, Vic Mignogna claimed to not know his own net worth or how much money he\\\'s made this year. How was he planning to prove damage to finances?
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (and his not-insignificant fanbase keeps bragging about how haters lost and his career\\\'s bigger than ever) so that\\\'s another major hurdle if he tries to appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth. So technically, he\\\'s not fired, nor is he entitled to any damages or severance pay after they cut ties.
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove they were obligated to pay him.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
\\\'\\\'\\\'UPDATE:\\\'\\\'\\\' In the November 21, 2019 Sanctions Hearing, Vic Mignogna claimed to not know his own net worth or how much money he\\\'s made this year. How was he planning to prove damage to finances?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \'\'Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\
to:
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \\\'\\\'Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\\\\\"actual maliace\\\\\\\" on top of the other defamation requirements\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (and his not-insignificant fanbase keeps bragging about how haters lost and his career\\\'s bigger than ever) so that\\\'s another major hurdle if he tries to appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth. So technically, he\\\'s not fired, nor is he entitled to any damages or severance pay after they cut ties.
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove they were obligated to pay him.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (and his not-insignificant fanbase keeps bragging about how haters lost and his career\\\'s bigger than ever) so that\\\'s another major hurdle if he tries to appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth. So technically, he\\\'s not fired, nor is he entitled to any damages or severance pay after they cut ties.
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove they were obligated to pay him.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \'\'Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\
to:
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \\\'\\\'Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\\\\\"actual maliace\\\\\\\" on top of the other defamation requirements\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (and his not-insignificant fanbase keeps bragging about how haters lost and his career\\\'s bigger than ever) so that\\\'s another major hurdle if he tries to appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth. So technically, he\\\'s not fired, nor is he entitled to any damages or severance pay after they cut ties.
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove they were obligated to pay him.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (and his not-insignificant fanbase keeps bragging about how haters lost and his career\\\'s bigger than ever) so that\\\'s another major hurdle if he tries to appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth. So technically, he\\\'s not fired, nor is he entitled to any damages or severance pay after they cut ties.
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove they were obligated to pay him.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \'\'Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\
to:
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \\\'\\\'Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\\\\\"actual maliace\\\\\\\" on top of the other defamation requirements\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (and his not-insignificant fanbase keeps bragging about how haters lost and his career\\\'s bigger than ever) so that\\\'s another major hurdle if he tries to appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth. So technically, he\\\'s not fired, nor is he is not entitled to any damages or severance pay after they cut ties.
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove they were obligated to pay him.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (and his not-insignificant fanbase keeps bragging about how haters lost and his career\\\'s bigger than ever) so that\\\'s another major hurdle if he tries to appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth. So technically, he\\\'s not fired, nor is he is not entitled to any damages or severance pay after they cut ties.
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove they were obligated to pay him.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \'\'Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\
to:
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \\\'\\\'Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\\\\\"actual maliace\\\\\\\" on top of the other defamation requirements\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (and his not-insignificant fanbase keeps bragging about how haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle if he tries to appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth. So technically, he\\\'s not fired, nor is he is not entitled to any damages or severance pay after they cut ties.
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove they were obligated to pay him.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (and his not-insignificant fanbase keeps bragging about how haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle if he tries to appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth. So technically, he\\\'s not fired, nor is he is not entitled to any damages or severance pay after they cut ties.
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove they were obligated to pay him.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \'\'Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\
to:
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \\\'\\\'Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\\\\\"actual maliace\\\\\\\" on top of the other defamation requirements\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (and his not-insignificant fanbase keeps bragging about how haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle if he tries to appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth. So technically, he\\\'s not fired He is not entitled to any damages or severance pay after they cut ties.
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove they were obligated to pay him.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (and his not-insignificant fanbase keeps bragging about how haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle if he tries to appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth. So technically, he\\\'s not fired He is not entitled to any damages or severance pay after they cut ties.
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove they were obligated to pay him.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \'\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\
to:
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \\\'\\\'Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\\\\\"actual maliace\\\\\\\" on top of the other defamation requirements\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (and his not-insignificant fanbase keeps bragging about how haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle if he tries to appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth. He is not entitled to any damages or severance pay after they cut ties.
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove they were obligated to pay him.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (and his not-insignificant fanbase keeps bragging about how haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle if he tries to appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth. He is not entitled to any damages or severance pay after they cut ties.
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove they were obligated to pay him.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \'\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\
to:
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \\\'\\\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\\\\\"actual maliace\\\\\\\" on top of the other defamation requirements]]\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (and his not-insignificant fanbase keeps bragging about how haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle if he tries to appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth. He is not entitled to any damages or severance pay after they cut ties.
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove they were obligated to pay him.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (and his not-insignificant fanbase keeps bragging about how haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle if he tries to appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth. He is not entitled to any damages or severance pay after they cut ties.
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove they were obligated to pay him.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \'\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\
to:
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \\\'\\\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\\\\\"actual maliace\\\\\\\" on top of the other defamation requirements]]\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (and his not-insignificant fanbase keeps bragging about how haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle if he tries to appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth (which are located in an at-will employment state, so they don\\\'t need a reason to fire him). He is not entitled to any damages or severance pay after they\\\'ve cut ties.
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove they were obligated to pay him.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (and his not-insignificant fanbase keeps bragging about how haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle if he tries to appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth (which are located in an at-will employment state, so they don\\\'t need a reason to fire him). He is not entitled to any damages or severance pay after they\\\'ve cut ties.
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove they were obligated to pay him.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \'\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\
to:
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \\\'\\\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\\\\\"actual maliace\\\\\\\" on top of the other defamation requirements]]\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (and his not-insignificant fanbase keeps bragging about how haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle if he tries to appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractor) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth, which are located in an at-will employment state anyway (i.e. They don\\\'t need a reason to fire him).
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove they were obligated to pay him.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (and his not-insignificant fanbase keeps bragging about how haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle if he tries to appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractor) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth, which are located in an at-will employment state anyway (i.e. They don\\\'t need a reason to fire him).
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove they were obligated to pay him.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \'\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\
to:
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \\\'\\\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\\\\\"actual maliace\\\\\\\" on top of the other defamation requirements]]\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (and his not-insignificant fanbase keeps bragging about how haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle if he tries to appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth, which are located in an at-will employment state anyway (i.e. They don\\\'t need a reason to fire him).
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove they were obligated to pay him.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (and his not-insignificant fanbase keeps bragging about how haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle if he tries to appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth, which are located in an at-will employment state anyway (i.e. They don\\\'t need a reason to fire him).
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove they were obligated to pay him.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \'\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\
to:
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \\\'\\\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\\\\\"actual maliace\\\\\\\" on top of the other defamation requirements]]\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (and his not-insignificant fanbase keeps bragging about how the haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle if he tries to appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth, which are located in an at-will employment state anyway (i.e. They don\\\'t need a reason to fire him).
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove they were obligated to pay him.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (and his not-insignificant fanbase keeps bragging about how the haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle if he tries to appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth, which are located in an at-will employment state anyway (i.e. They don\\\'t need a reason to fire him).
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove they were obligated to pay him.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \'\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\
to:
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \\\'\\\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\\\\\"actual maliace\\\\\\\" on top of the other defamation requirements]]\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (and his not-insignificant fanbase keeps bragging about how the haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle if he tries to appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth, which are located in an at-will employment state anyway (i.e. They don\\\'t need a reason to fire him).
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove he was obligated to any payments for con appearances.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (and his not-insignificant fanbase keeps bragging about how the haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle if he tries to appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth, which are located in an at-will employment state anyway (i.e. They don\\\'t need a reason to fire him).
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove he was obligated to any payments for con appearances.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \'\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\
to:
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \\\'\\\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\\\\\"actual maliace\\\\\\\" on top of the other defamation requirements]]\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (and his not-insignificant fanbase keeps bragging about how the haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle to pass if he files an appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth, which are located in an at-will employment state anyway (i.e. They don\\\'t need a reason to fire him).
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove he was obligated to any payments for con appearances.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (and his not-insignificant fanbase keeps bragging about how the haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle to pass if he files an appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth, which are located in an at-will employment state anyway (i.e. They don\\\'t need a reason to fire him).
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove he was obligated to any payments for con appearances.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \'\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\
to:
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \\\'\\\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\\\\\"actual maliace\\\\\\\" on top of the other defamation requirements]]\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (his fans keep bragging about how the haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle to pass if he files an appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth, which are located in an at-will employment state anyway (i.e. They don\\\'t need a reason to fire him).
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove he was obligated to any payments for con appearances.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (his fans keep bragging about how the haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle to pass if he files an appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth, which are located in an at-will employment state anyway (i.e. They don\\\'t need a reason to fire him).
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove he was obligated to any payments for con appearances.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these posts?)\\\'\\\'
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \'\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\
to:
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \\\'\\\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\\\\\"actual maliace\\\\\\\" on top of the other defamation requirements]]\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (his fans keep bragging about how the haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle to pass if he files an appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth, which are located in an at-will employment state anyway (i.e. They don\\\'t need a reason to fire him).
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove he was obligated to any payments for con appearances.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these things?)\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (his fans keep bragging about how the haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle to pass if he files an appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth, which are located in an at-will employment state anyway (i.e. They don\\\'t need a reason to fire him).
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove he was obligated to any payments for con appearances.
\\\'\\\'(How do you reply/quote on these things?)\\\'\\\'
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \'\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\
to:
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \\\'\\\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\\\\\"actual maliace\\\\\\\" on top of the other defamation requirements]]\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (his fans keep bragging about how the haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle to pass if he files an appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth, which are located in an at-will employment state anyway (i.e. They don\\\'t need a reason to fire him).
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove he was obligated to any payments for con appearances.
\\\'\\\'How do you reply/quote on these things?\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (his fans keep bragging about how the haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle to pass if he files an appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth, which are located in an at-will employment state anyway (i.e. They don\\\'t need a reason to fire him).
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove he was obligated to any payments for con appearances.
\\\'\\\'How do you reply/quote on these things?\\\'\\\'
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \'\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\
to:
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \\\'\\\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\\\\\"actual maliace\\\\\\\" on top of the other defamation requirements]]\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (his fans keep bragging about how the haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle to pass if he files an appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth, which are located in an at-will employment state anyway (i.e. They don\\\'t need a reason to fire him).
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove he was obligated to any payments for con appearances.
[-\\\'\\\'How do you reply/quote on these things?\\\'\\\'-]
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (his fans keep bragging about how the haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle to pass if he files an appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth, which are located in an at-will employment state anyway (i.e. They don\\\'t need a reason to fire him).
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove he was obligated to any payments for con appearances.
[-\\\'\\\'How do you reply/quote on these things?\\\'\\\'-]
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \'\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\
to:
-->{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \\\'\\\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\\\\\"actual maliace\\\\\\\" on top of the other defamation requirements]]\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (his fans keep bragging about how the haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle to pass if he files an appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth, which are located in an at-will employment state anyway (i.e. They don\\\'t need a reason to fire him).
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove he was obligated to any payments for con appearances.
--->How do you reply/quote on these things?
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (his fans keep bragging about how the haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle to pass if he files an appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth, which are located in an at-will employment state anyway (i.e. They don\\\'t need a reason to fire him).
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove he was obligated to any payments for con appearances.
--->How do you reply/quote on these things?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \'\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\
to:
{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \\\'\\\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\\\\\"actual maliace\\\\\\\" on top of the other defamation requirements]]\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (his fans keep bragging about how the haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle to pass if he files an appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth, which are located in an at-will employment state anyway (i.e. They don\\\'t need a reason to fire him).
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove he was obligated to any payments for con appearances.
--->How do you reply/quote on these things?
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (his fans keep bragging about how the haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle to pass if he files an appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth, which are located in an at-will employment state anyway (i.e. They don\\\'t need a reason to fire him).
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove he was obligated to any payments for con appearances.
--->How do you reply/quote on these things?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \'\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\
to:
{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \\\'\\\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\\\\\"actual maliace\\\\\\\" on top of the other defamation requirements]]\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (his fans keep bragging about how the haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle to pass if he files an appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth, which are located in an at-will employment state anyway (i.e. They don\\\'t need a reason to fire him).
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove he was obligated to any payments for con appearances.
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (his fans keep bragging about how the haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle to pass if he files an appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'employed\\\'\\\' (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth, which are located in an at-will employment state anyway (i.e. They don\\\'t need a reason to fire him).
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove he was obligated to any payments for con appearances.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \'\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\
to:
{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \\\'\\\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\\\\\"actual maliace\\\\\\\" on top of the other defamation requirements]]\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (his fans keep bragging about how the haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle to pass if he files an appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\"employed\\\" (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth, which are located in an at-will employment state anyway (i.e. They don\\\'t need a reason to \\\"fire\\\" him).
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove he was obligated to any payments for con appearances.
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (his fans keep bragging about how the haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle to pass if he files an appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\"employed\\\" (voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth, which are located in an at-will employment state anyway (i.e. They don\\\'t need a reason to \\\"fire\\\" him).
And since he never had any contracts with cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove he was obligated to any payments for con appearances.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \'\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\
to:
{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \\\'\\\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\\\\\"actual maliace\\\\\\\" on top of the other defamation requirements]]\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (his fans keep bragging about how the haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle to pass if he files an appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\"employed\\\"(voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth, which are located in an at-will employment state anyway (i.e. They don\\\'t need a reason to \\\"fire\\\" him).
And since he never had any contracts from cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove he was obligated to any payments for con appearances.
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (his fans keep bragging about how the haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle to pass if he files an appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\"employed\\\"(voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth, which are located in an at-will employment state anyway (i.e. They don\\\'t need a reason to \\\"fire\\\" him).
And since he never had any contracts from cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove he was obligated to any payments for con appearances.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \'\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\
to:
{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \\\'\\\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\\\\\"actual maliace\\\\\\\" on top of the other defamation requirements]]\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (his fans keep bragging about how the haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle to pass if he files an appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\"employed\\\"(voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth, which are located in an at-will employment state anyway (i.e. They don\\\'t need a reason to \\\"fire\\\" him).
And since he never had any contracts from cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove he was obligated to any payments for con appearances.
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (his fans keep bragging about how the haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle to pass if he files an appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\"employed\\\"(voice actors are contractors) by Funimation or Rooster Teeth, which are located in an at-will employment state anyway (i.e. They don\\\'t need a reason to \\\"fire\\\" him).
And since he never had any contracts from cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove he was obligated to any payments for con appearances.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \'\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\
to:
{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \\\'\\\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\\\\\"actual maliace\\\\\\\" on top of the other defamation requirements]]\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (his fans keep bragging about how the haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle to pass if he files an appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\"employed\\\"\\\'\\\'\\\'[[note]]voice actors are contractors[[/note]] by Funimation or Rooster Teeth, which are located in an at-will employment state anyway[[labelnote:i.e.]]They don\\\'t need a reason to \\\"fire\\\" him[[/note]]. And since he never had any contracts from cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove he was obligated to any payments for con appearances.
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (his fans keep bragging about how the haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle to pass if he files an appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\"employed\\\"\\\'\\\'\\\'[[note]]voice actors are contractors[[/note]] by Funimation or Rooster Teeth, which are located in an at-will employment state anyway[[labelnote:i.e.]]They don\\\'t need a reason to \\\"fire\\\" him[[/note]]. And since he never had any contracts from cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove he was obligated to any payments for con appearances.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \'\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\
to:
{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \\\'\\\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\\\\\"actual maliace\\\\\\\" on top of the other defamation requirements]]\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (his fans keep bragging about how the haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle to pass if he files an appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\"employed\\\"\\\'\\\'\\\'[[note]]voice actors are contractors[[/note]] by Funimation or Rooster Teeth, which are located in an at-will employment state anyway[[labelnote:i.e.]]They don\\\'t need a reason to \\\"fire\\\" him[[/note]]. And since he never had any contracts from cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove he was obligated to any payments for con appearances.
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (his fans keep bragging about how the haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle to pass if he files an appeal.
Not to mention, Vic was never \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\"employed\\\"\\\'\\\'\\\'[[note]]voice actors are contractors[[/note]] by Funimation or Rooster Teeth, which are located in an at-will employment state anyway[[labelnote:i.e.]]They don\\\'t need a reason to \\\"fire\\\" him[[/note]]. And since he never had any contracts from cons that cancelled him, he can\\\'t prove he was obligated to any payments for con appearances.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \'\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\
to:
{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \\\'\\\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\\\\\"actual maliace\\\\\\\" on top of the other defamation requirements]]\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (his fans keep bragging about how the haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle to pass if he files an appeal.
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Not either/or.\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (his fans keep bragging about how the haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle to pass if he files an appeal.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
[[quoteblock]]{{Tropers/Shaoken}} Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\
to:
{{Tropers/Shaoken}}: \\\'\\\'[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Creator.VicMignogna#comment-117525-124542 Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\\\\\"actual maliace\\\\\\\" on top of the other defamation requirements]]\\\'\\\'
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. Not either/or.
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (his fans keep bragging about how the haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle to pass if he files an appeal.
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. Not either/or.
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (his fans keep bragging about how the haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle to pass if he files an appeal.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
[[quoteblock]]{{Tropers/Shaoken}}
Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\
Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\
to:
[[quoteblock]]{{Tropers/Shaoken}} Also important to note that the Judge determined that Vic was a Limited Purpose Public Figure (LPPF), meaning that he has to prove \\\\\\\"actual maliace\\\\\\\" on top of the other defamation requirements[[/quoteblock]]
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. Not either/or.
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (his fans keep bragging about how the haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle to pass if he files an appeal.
Another thing a public figure has to prove (after the \\\"actual malice\\\" standard) is that the defamation hurt their reputation \\\'\\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\'\\\' their finances. Not either/or.
Vic is still getting acting roles and con invites (his fans keep bragging about how the haters lost or failed to end his career) so that\\\'s another major hurdle to pass if he files an appeal.
