Tropes Media Browse Indexes Forums Videos Ask The Tropers Trope Finder Media Finder Trope Launch Pad Tech Wishlist Reviews Tools
Cut List New Edits Edit Reasons Launches Images List Crowner Activity Un-typed Pages Recent Page Type Changes Changelog
Tips
Creating New Redirects Cross Wicking Tips for Editing Text Formatting Rules Glossary Edit Reasons Handling Spoilers Word Cruft Administrivia FAQ
Tropes HQ
About Us Contact Us Advertise DMCA Notice Privacy Policy Report Bug
Go Ad-Free Changelog
  • Show Spoilers
  • Night Vision
  • Sticky Header
  • Highlight Links
 

Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Main / Creepypasta

Go To
[005] Wyldchyld Current Version
19th May '18 at 07:01:54 AM
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
I have read that Reddit Q&A that the writers did not long after the end of Volume 5. They've definitely picked up on the criticism, so it's definitely at a different level to Volume 5 than for other volumes, given the creators reactions to it -- they've taken some of that criticism on board, so I think fans are waiting to see if they deliver.
to:
I have read that Reddit Q&A that the writers did not long after the end of Volume 5. They\'ve definitely picked up on the criticism, so it\'s definitely at a different level to Volume 5 than for other volumes, given the creators reactions to it -- they\'ve taken some of that criticism on board, so I think fans are waiting to see if they deliver.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
I personally don't necessarily agree with all the criticism about Volume 5, and certainly don'y agree with all the fandom suggestions on how it could have been better. However, there's definitely enough of a change in criticism for that volume for me to say that I think a well-written entry under SeasonalRot - for Volume 5 only - would be appropriate.
to:
Personally, I don\'t necessarily agree with all the criticism about Volume 5, and certainly don\'t agree with all the fandom suggestions on how it could have been better. However, there\'s definitely enough of a change in criticism for that volume for me to say that I think a well-written entry under SeasonalRot - for Volume 5 only - would be appropriate.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
Remember, SeasonalRot can be a temporary trope about a brief dip in quality. So the entry won't be a reflection, or speculation, about what the show would be like in the future. It should simply be an assessment of how the fandom feels Volume 5 is a dip in quality compared to the previous four.
to:
Remember, SeasonalRot can be a temporary trope about a brief dip in quality. So the entry won\'t be a reflection, or speculation, about what the show would be like in the future. It should simply be an assessment of how the fandom feels Volume 5 is a dip in quality compared to the previous four.
[004] Wyldchyld
19th May '18 at 07:01:04 AM
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
I have read that Reddit Q&A that the writers did not long after the end of Volume 5. They've definitely picked up on the criticism, so it's definitely at a different level to Volume 5 than for other volumes, given the creators reactions to it -- they've taken some of that criticism on board, so I think fans are waiting to see if they deliver.
to:
I have read that Reddit Q&A that the writers did not long after the end of Volume 5. They\'ve definitely picked up on the criticism, so it\'s definitely at a different level to Volume 5 than for other volumes, given the creators reactions to it -- they\'ve taken some of that criticism on board, so I think fans are waiting to see if they deliver.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
I personally don't necessarily agree with all the criticism about Volume 5, and certainly don'y agree with all the fandom suggestions on how it could have been better. However, there's definitely enough of a change in criticism for that volume for me to say that I think a well-written entry under SeasonalRot - for Volume 5 only - would be appropriate.
to:
I personally don\'t necessarily agree with all the criticism about Volume 5, and certainly don\'y agree with all the fandom suggestions on how it could have been better. However, there\'s definitely enough of a change in criticism for that volume for me to say that I think a well-written entry under SeasonalRot - for Volume 5 only - would be appropriate.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
Remember, SeasonalRot can be a temporary trope about a brief dip in quality. So the entry won't be a reflection, or speculation, about what the show would be like in the future. It shouldn't simple be an assessment of how the fandom feels Volume 5 is a dip in quality compared to the previous four.
to:
Remember, SeasonalRot can be a temporary trope about a brief dip in quality. So the entry won\'t be a reflection, or speculation, about what the show would be like in the future. It should simply be an assessment of how the fandom feels Volume 5 is a dip in quality compared to the previous four.
[003] Wyldchyld
19th May '18 at 07:00:40 AM
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
I have read that Reddit Q&A that the writers did not long after the end of Volume 5. They've definitely picked up on the criticism, so it's definitely at a different level to Volume 5 than for other volumes, given the creators reactions to it -- they've taken some of that criticism on board, so I think fans are waiting to see if they deliver.
to:
I have read that Reddit Q&A that the writers did not long after the end of Volume 5. They\'ve definitely picked up on the criticism, so it\'s definitely at a different level to Volume 5 than for other volumes, given the creators reactions to it -- they\'ve taken some of that criticism on board, so I think fans are waiting to see if they deliver.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
I personally don't necessarily agree with all the criticism about Volume 5, and certainly don'y agree with all the fandom suggestions on how it could have been better. However, there's definitely enough of a change in criticism for that volume for me to say that I think a well-written entry under SeasonalRot - for Volume 5 only - would be appropriate.
to:
I personally don\'t necessarily agree with all the criticism about Volume 5, and certainly don\'y agree with all the fandom suggestions on how it could have been better. However, there\'s definitely enough of a change in criticism for that volume for me to say that I think a well-written entry under SeasonalRot - for Volume 5 only - would be appropriate.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
Remember, SeasonalRot can be a temporary trope about a brief dip in quality. So the entry won't be a reflection, or speculation, of what the show would be like in the future. It shouldn't simple be an assessment of how the fandom feels Volume 5 is a dip in quality compared to the previous four.
to:
Remember, SeasonalRot can be a temporary trope about a brief dip in quality. So the entry won\'t be a reflection, or speculation, about what the show would be like in the future. It shouldn\'t simple be an assessment of how the fandom feels Volume 5 is a dip in quality compared to the previous four.
[002] Wyldchyld
19th May '18 at 07:00:11 AM
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
I have read that Reddit Q&A that the writers did not long after the end of Volume 5. They've definitely picked up on the criticism, so it's definitely at a different level to Volume 5 than for other volumes, given the creators reactions to it -- they've taken some of that criticism on board, so I think fans are waiting to see if they deliver.
to:
I have read that Reddit Q&A that the writers did not long after the end of Volume 5. They\'ve definitely picked up on the criticism, so it\'s definitely at a different level to Volume 5 than for other volumes, given the creators reactions to it -- they\'ve taken some of that criticism on board, so I think fans are waiting to see if they deliver.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
I personally don't necessarily agree with all the criticism about Volume 5, and certainly don'y agree with all the fandom suggestions on how it could have been better. However, there's definitely enough of a change in criticism for that volume for me to say that I think a well-written entry under SeasonalRot - for Volume 5 only - would be appropriate.
to:
I personally don\'t necessarily agree with all the criticism about Volume 5, and certainly don\'y agree with all the fandom suggestions on how it could have been better. However, there\'s definitely enough of a change in criticism for that volume for me to say that I think a well-written entry under SeasonalRot - for Volume 5 only - would be appropriate.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
Remember, SeasonalRot can be a temporary trope, about a brief dip in quality. So the entry won't be a reflection, or speculation, of what the show would be like in the future. It shouldn't simple be an assessment of how the fandom feels Volume 5 is a dip in quality compared to the previous four.
to:
Remember, SeasonalRot can be a temporary trope about a brief dip in quality. So the entry won\'t be a reflection, or speculation, of what the show would be like in the future. It shouldn\'t simple be an assessment of how the fandom feels Volume 5 is a dip in quality compared to the previous four.
[001] Wyldchyld
19th May '18 at 06:59:43 AM
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
I have read that Reddit Q&A that the writers did not long after the end of Volume 5. They've definitely picked up on the criticism, so it's definitely at a different level to Volume 5 than for other volumes, given the creators reactions to it -- they've taken some of that criticism on board, so I think fans are waiting to see if they deliver.
to:
I have read that Reddit Q&A that the writers did not long after the end of Volume 5. They\'ve definitely picked up on the criticism, so it\'s definitely at a different level to Volume 5 than for other volumes, given the creators reactions to it -- they\'ve taken some of that criticism on board, so I think fans are waiting to see if they deliver.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
I personally don't necessarily agree with all the criticism about Volume 5, and certainly don'y agree with all the fandom suggestions on how it could have been better. However, there's definitely enough of a change in criticism for that volume for me to say that I think I goo well-written entry under SeasonalRot - for Volume 5 only - would be appropriate.
to:
I personally don\'t necessarily agree with all the criticism about Volume 5, and certainly don\'y agree with all the fandom suggestions on how it could have been better. However, there\'s definitely enough of a change in criticism for that volume for me to say that I think a well-written entry under SeasonalRot - for Volume 5 only - would be appropriate.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
Remember, SeasonalRot can be a temporary trope, about a brief dip in quality. So the entry won't be a reflection, or speculation, of what the show would be like in the future. It shouldn't simple be an assessment of how the fandom feels Volume 5 is a dip in quality compared to the previous four.
to:
Remember, SeasonalRot can be a temporary trope, about a brief dip in quality. So the entry won\'t be a reflection, or speculation, of what the show would be like in the future. It shouldn\'t simple be an assessment of how the fandom feels Volume 5 is a dip in quality compared to the previous four.

Important Links

Ask The Tropers Trope Finder Media Finder Trope Launch Pad Tech Wishlist Reviews Go Ad Free!
Crucial Browsing
Resources
Top