[003]
VVK
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
[[i]]JustifiedTrope per Victoria Zdrok, stating in her book ''Dr. Z on Scoring'' that
to:
\'\'JustifiedTrope per Victoria Zdrok, stating in her book \'\'Dr. Z on Scoring\'\' that \"equity theory\" is at work with Kavorka Man, compensating for his obvious deficiencies with intangible qualities due to women being more cerebral than they\'re given credit for.\'\'
First, JustifiedTrope means it makes sense in some particular fictional world though not otherwise.
Second, while that statement I\'m removed is pretty vague in the first place so it\'s hard to tell what exactly it means, the fact that the undescribed deficiencies (looks?) are compensated by undescribed intangible qualities means that anyhow, the man has good intangible qualities of some sort. But point with the Kavorka Man seems to be that there isn\'t some such good reason for his attractiveness. The unattractiveness isn\'t said to be only about looks either.
First, JustifiedTrope means it makes sense in some particular fictional world though not otherwise.
Second, while that statement I\'m removed is pretty vague in the first place so it\'s hard to tell what exactly it means, the fact that the undescribed deficiencies (looks?) are compensated by undescribed intangible qualities means that anyhow, the man has good intangible qualities of some sort. But point with the Kavorka Man seems to be that there isn\'t some such good reason for his attractiveness. The unattractiveness isn\'t said to be only about looks either.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
[i]JustifiedTrope per Victoria Zdrok, stating in her book ''Dr. Z on Scoring'' that
to:
[[i]]JustifiedTrope per Victoria Zdrok, stating in her book \'\'Dr. Z on Scoring\'\' that \"equity theory\" is at work with Kavorka Man, compensating for his obvious deficiencies with intangible qualities due to women being more cerebral than they\'re given credit for.[[/i]]
First, JustifiedTrope means it makes sense in some particular fictional world though not otherwise.
Second, while that statement I\'m removed is pretty vague in the first place so it\'s hard to tell what exactly it means, the fact that the undescribed deficiencies (looks?) are compensated by undescribed intangible qualities means that anyhow, the man has good intangible qualities of some sort. But point with the Kavorka Man seems to be that there isn\'t some such good reason for his attractiveness. The unattractiveness isn\'t said to be only about looks either.
First, JustifiedTrope means it makes sense in some particular fictional world though not otherwise.
Second, while that statement I\'m removed is pretty vague in the first place so it\'s hard to tell what exactly it means, the fact that the undescribed deficiencies (looks?) are compensated by undescribed intangible qualities means that anyhow, the man has good intangible qualities of some sort. But point with the Kavorka Man seems to be that there isn\'t some such good reason for his attractiveness. The unattractiveness isn\'t said to be only about looks either.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Kukui using a starter that is strong against yours is a fact. What isn't a fact is whether it's the same starter from the trio of starters that Hala offers at the start of the game, as opposed to simply his own starter from his own island challenge X years ago. Reasonable or not, speculation is speculation.
to:
Kukui using a starter that is strong against yours is a fact. What isn\'t a fact is whether it\'s the same starter from the trio of starters that Hala offers at the start of the game, as opposed to simply his own starter from his own island challenge X years ago that coincidentally is strong against the type you chose. Reasonable or not, speculation is speculation.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
If it is a point of enjoyment that Kukui uses a starter evolution that's strong against yours, the example should be phrased to reflect that. It needn't mention the possibility that it is the starter than the MC and Hau did not choose.
to:
If it is a point of enjoyment that Kukui uses a starter evolution that\'s strong against yours, the example should be phrased to reflect that. It needn\'t mention the possibility that it is the starter than the MC and Hau did not choose.
