Ok, this is getting frustrating. Why isn't anyone opening up a discussion before doing major reformatting changes to the character pages? This is now the third time in less than 30 days.
to:
Ok, this is getting frustrating. Why isn\'t anyone opening up a discussion before doing major reformatting changes to the character pages? This is now the third time in less than 30 days.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
For the Main Characters subpage, what value is gained setting up a General section containing tropes that both Nick and Judy have in common but then still having to split them into a Judy section and a Nick section? It's adding an additional layer of complexity rather than clarity.
to:
For the Main Characters subpage, what value is gained setting up a General section containing tropes that both Nick and Judy have in common but then still having to split them into a Judy section and a Nick section? It\'s adding an additional layer of complexity rather than clarity.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
I can see a value in having a General section that contains those elements that summarize them as a couple and were repeated in each character's section like: Brains and Brawn; Brooding Boy, Gentle Girl; Female Flatfoot and Snarky Guy, Fire-Forged Friends, etc.
to:
I can see a possible value in having a General section that contains those elements that summarize them as a couple and were repeated in each character\'s section like: Brains and Brawn; Brooding Boy, Gentle Girl; Female Flatfoot and Snarky Guy, Fire-Forged Friends, etc.
Changed line(s) 9 from:
n
In the Zootopia Residents subpage, adding
to:
In the Zootopia Residents subpage, adding \"Header Groups\" that only have 2-3 members doesn\'t seem necessary. Also, Manchas is not a Tundratown resident, he lives in the Rainforest District.
EDIT: creader made this change and looking back through history, I see that they did a similar reorganization to Bonnie and Stu\'s section in Bunnyburrow residents. We didn\'t challenge it at the time because it was a relatively small change, but upon review, it split their tropes into Bonnie&Stu, Just Bonnie and Just Stu but the latter two only have 3 tropes each, so not much clarity added for such a reorg effort. If we revert changes here, I\'ll also revert that section so as not to encourage this type of couple trope partitioning in the future.
Ok, this is getting frustrating. Why isn't anyone opening up a discussion before doing major reformatting changes to the character pages? This is now the third time in less than 30 days.
to:
Ok, this is getting frustrating. Why isn\'t anyone opening up a discussion before doing major reformatting changes to the character pages? This is now the third time in less than 30 days.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
For the Main Characters subpage, what value is gained setting up a General section combining tropes that both Nick and Judy have in common but then still having to split them into a Judy section and a Nick section? It's adding an additional layer of complexity rather than clarity.
to:
For the Main Characters subpage, what value is gained setting up a General section containing tropes that both Nick and Judy have in common but then still having to split them into a Judy section and a Nick section? It\'s adding an additional layer of complexity rather than clarity.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
I can see a value in having a General section that contains those elements that summarize them as a couple and were repeated in each character's section like: Brains and Brawn; Brooding Boy, Gentle Girl; Female Flatfoot and Snarky Guy, Fire-Forged Friends, etc.
to:
I can see a value in having a General section that contains those elements that summarize them as a couple and were repeated in each character\'s section like: Brains and Brawn; Brooding Boy, Gentle Girl; Female Flatfoot and Snarky Guy, Fire-Forged Friends, etc.
Changed line(s) 9 from:
n
In the Zootopia Residents subpage, adding
to:
In the Zootopia Residents subpage, adding \"Header Groups\" that only have 2-3 members doesn\'t seem necessary. Also, Manchas is not a Tundratown resident, he lives in the Rainforest District.
EDIT: creader made this change and looking back through history, I see that they did a similar reorganization to Bonnie and Stu\'s section in Bunnyburrow residents. We didn\'t challenge it at the time because it was a relatively small change, but upon review, it split their tropes into Bonnie&Stu, Just Bonnie and Just Stu but the latter two only have 3 tropes each, so not much clarity added for such a reorg effort. If we revert changes here, I\'ll also revert that section so as not to encourage this type of couple trope partitioning in the future.
Ok, this is getting frustrating. Why isn't anyone opening up a discussion before doing major reformatting changes to the character pages? This is now the third time in less than 30 days.
to:
Ok, this is getting frustrating. Why isn\'t anyone opening up a discussion before doing major reformatting changes to the character pages? This is now the third time in less than 30 days.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
For the Main Characters subpage, what value is gained combining tropes that both Nick and Judy have in common but then still having to split them into a Judy section and a Nick section? It's adding an additional layer of complexity rather than clarity.
to:
For the Main Characters subpage, what value is gained setting up a General section combining tropes that both Nick and Judy have in common but then still having to split them into a Judy section and a Nick section? It\'s adding an additional layer of complexity rather than clarity.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
I can see a value in having a General section that contains those elements that summarize them as a couple and were repeated in each character's section like: Brains and Brawn; Brooding Boy, Gentle Girl; Female Flatfoot and Snarky Guy, Fire-Forged Friends, etc.
to:
I can see a value in having a General section that contains those elements that summarize them as a couple and were repeated in each character\'s section like: Brains and Brawn; Brooding Boy, Gentle Girl; Female Flatfoot and Snarky Guy, Fire-Forged Friends, etc.
Changed line(s) 9 from:
n
In the Zootopia Residents subpage, adding
to:
In the Zootopia Residents subpage, adding \"Header Groups\" that only have 2-3 members doesn\'t seem necessary. Also, Manchas is not a Tundratown resident, he lives in the Rainforest District.
EDIT: creader made this change and looking back through history, I see that they did a similar reorganization to Bonnie and Stu\'s section in Bunnyburrow residents. We didn\'t challenge it at the time because it was a relatively small change, but upon review, it split their tropes into Bonnie&Stu, Just Bonnie and Just Stu but the latter two only have 3 tropes each, so not much clarity added for such a reorg effort. If we revert changes here, I\'ll also revert that section so as not to encourage this type of couple trope partitioning in the future.
Ok, this is getting frustrating. Why isn't anyone opening up a discussion before doing major reformatting changes to the character pages? This is now the third time in less than 30 days.
to:
Ok, this is getting frustrating. Why isn\'t anyone opening up a discussion before doing major reformatting changes to the character pages? This is now the third time in less than 30 days.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
For the Main Characters subpage, what value is gained combining tropes that both Nick and Judy have in common but then still having to split them into a Judy section and a Nick section? It's adding an additional layer of complexity rather than clarity.
to:
For the Main Characters subpage, what value is gained combining tropes that both Nick and Judy have in common but then still having to split them into a Judy section and a Nick section? It\'s adding an additional layer of complexity rather than clarity.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
I can see a value in having a General section that contains those elements that summarize them as a couple and were repeated in each character's section like: Brains and Brawn; Brooding Boy, Gentle Girl; Female Flatfoot and Snarky Guy, Fire-Forged Friends, etc.
to:
I can see a value in having a General section that contains those elements that summarize them as a couple and were repeated in each character\'s section like: Brains and Brawn; Brooding Boy, Gentle Girl; Female Flatfoot and Snarky Guy, Fire-Forged Friends, etc.
Changed line(s) 9 from:
n
In the Zootopia Residents subpage, adding
to:
In the Zootopia Residents subpage, adding \"Header Groups\" that only have 2-3 members doesn\'t seem necessary. Also, Manchas is not a Tundratown resident, he lives in the Rainforest District.
EDIT: creader made this change and looking back through history, I see that they did a similar reorganization to Bonnie and Stu\'s section in Bunnyburrow residents. We didn\'t challenge it at the time because it was a relatively small change, but upon review, it split their tropes into Bonnie&Stu, Just Bonnie and Just Stu but the latter two only have 3 tropes each, so not much clarity added for such a reorg effort. If we revert changes here, I\'ll also revert that section so as not to encourage this type of couple trope partitioning in the future.
Ok, this is getting frustrating. Why isn't anyone opening up a discussion before doing major reformatting changes to the character pages? This is now the third time in less than 30 days.
to:
Ok, this is getting frustrating. Why isn\'t anyone opening up a discussion before doing major reformatting changes to the character pages? This is now the third time in less than 30 days.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
For the Main Characters subpage, what value is gained combining tropes that both Nick and Judy have in common but then still having to split them into a Judy section and a Nick section? It's adding an additional layer of complexity rather than clarity.
to:
For the Main Characters subpage, what value is gained combining tropes that both Nick and Judy have in common but then still having to split them into a Judy section and a Nick section? It\'s adding an additional layer of complexity rather than clarity.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
I can see a value in having a General section that contains those elements that summarize them as a couple and were repeated in each character's section like: Brains and Brawn; Brooding Boy, Gentle Girl; Female Flatfoot and Snarky Guy, Fire-Forged Friends, etc.
to:
I can see a value in having a General section that contains those elements that summarize them as a couple and were repeated in each character\'s section like: Brains and Brawn; Brooding Boy, Gentle Girl; Female Flatfoot and Snarky Guy, Fire-Forged Friends, etc.
Changed line(s) 9 from:
n
In the Zootopia Residents subpage, adding
to:
In the Zootopia Residents subpage, adding \"Header Groups\" that only have 2-3 members doesn\'t seem necessary. Also, Manchas is not a Tundratown resident, he lives in the Rainforest District.
EDIT: creader made this change and looking through history, I see that he did a similar reorganization to Bonnie and Stu\'s section in the Bunnyburrow residents. We didn\'t challenge it at the time because it was a relatively smaller change, but upon review, it split the tropes into Bonnie&Stu, Just Bonnie and Just Stu but the latter only have 3 tropes each, not much clarity added for such a reorg effort. If we revert changes here, I\'ll also revert that section so as not to encourage this type of partitioning in the future.
Ok, this is getting old. Why isn't anyone opening up a discussion before doing major reformatting changes to the character pages? This is now the third time in less than 30 days.
to:
Ok, this is getting frustrating. Why isn\'t anyone opening up a discussion before doing major reformatting changes to the character pages? This is now the third time in less than 30 days.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
For the Main Characters subpage, what value is gained combining tropes that both Nick and Judy have in common but then still having to split them into a Judy section and a Nick section? It's adding an additional layer of complexity rather than clarity.
to:
For the Main Characters subpage, what value is gained combining tropes that both Nick and Judy have in common but then still having to split them into a Judy section and a Nick section? It\'s adding an additional layer of complexity rather than clarity.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
I can see a value in having a General section that contains those elements that summarize them as a couple and were repeated in each character's section like: Brains and Brawn; Brooding Boy, Gentle Girl; Female Flatfoot and Snarky Guy, Fire-Forged Friends, etc.
to:
I can see a value in having a General section that contains those elements that summarize them as a couple and were repeated in each character\'s section like: Brains and Brawn; Brooding Boy, Gentle Girl; Female Flatfoot and Snarky Guy, Fire-Forged Friends, etc.
Changed line(s) 9 from:
n
In the Zootopia Residents subpage, adding
to:
In the Zootopia Residents subpage, adding \"Header Groups\" that only have 2-3 members doesn\'t seem necessary. Also, Manchas is not a Tundratown resident, he lives in the Rainforest District.
Ok, this is getting old. Why isn't anyone opening up a discussion before doing major reformatting changes to the character pages? This is now the third time in less than 30 days.
to:
Ok, this is getting old. Why isn\'t anyone opening up a discussion before doing major reformatting changes to the character pages? This is now the third time in less than 30 days.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
For the Main Characters subpage, what value is gained combining tropes that both Nick and Judy have in common but then still having to split them into a Judy section and a Nick section? It's adding an additional layer of complexity rather than clarity.
to:
For the Main Characters subpage, what value is gained combining tropes that both Nick and Judy have in common but then still having to split them into a Judy section and a Nick section? It\'s adding an additional layer of complexity rather than clarity.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
In the Zootopia Residents subpage, adding
to:
I can see a value in having a General section that contains those elements that summarize them as a couple and were repeated in each character\'s section like: Brains and Brawn; Brooding Boy, Gentle Girl; Female Flatfoot and Snarky Guy, Fire-Forged Friends, etc.
But if the trope has a very separate examples for Nick and Judy, then that trope should be in each characters own section.
In the Zootopia Residents subpage, adding \"Header Groups\" that only have 2-3 members doesn\'t seem necessary. Also, Manchas is not a Tundratown resident, he lives in the Rainforest District.
