Welcome to the main discussion thread for the Marvel Cinematic Universe! I'm editing this OP and pinning it to establish some basic guidelines. All of the Media Forum rules still apply.
- This thread is for talking about the live-action films, TV shows, animated works, and related content that use the Marvel brand, currently owned by Disney.
- While mild digressions are okay, discussion of the comic books should go in this thread. Extended digressions may be thumped as off-topic.
- Spoilers for new releases should not be discussed for at least two weeks. Rather, each title should have a dedicated thread where that sort of conversation is held. We can mention new releases in a general sense, but please be courteous to people who don't want to be spoiled.
[Edited by Fighteer]
Edited by Fighteer on Dec 15th 2022 at 9:55:58 AM
It'd be fine if they put their foot down and say "Loki allowing the multiverse to exist means all forms of time travel retroactively always existed."
#IceBearForPresidentIsn't that TVA's job but now they're stuck with Multiverse clean up.
Mileena MadnessI haven't watched Loki, but is what people have said that Loki ends up creating the multiverse (so he's indirectly responsible for the X-men, Spider-Man, Amazing Spider-Man, Sony and Spider-Verse films) true? If so, that's cool.
Edited by king15 on Apr 24th 2024 at 8:05:39 AM
The thing about Loki "creating" the multiverse is that it was the only thing that established there wasn't a multiverse to begin with. So it's a net sum of zero.
In general, I’ve always found that as long as different types of time travel have different sources, it’s fine. Like, if you use a certain kind of magic you can change the past, if you use science you go to another timeline, etc
That said, I do think they shot themselves in the foot somewhat with how they had time travel work in Endgame. It’s definitely the easiest take on time travel for the audience to understand and allows the characters to get into timeline shenanigans without having to worry about any consequences whatsoever, but no consequences runs both ways and it’s one of the worst ways for having time travel have any drama or having the adventure really matter in itself, which may be why ever single later MCU time travel story has changed the rules either partially or entirely.
In any case, though, even if they hadn’t done that I don’t think they should’ve ever had to worry about Days of Future Past’s rules. They didn’t make that movie, nor did they make anything in the MCU to be beholden to that movie in the first place - they’ve only recently decided to use some of its characters.
So the best solution would be to just not bother.
"The difference between reality and fiction is that fiction has to make sense." - Tom Clancy, paraphrasing Mark Twain.Looking back, I realized how freakishly inconsistent xmen was as movies in a timeline. There are two Emma Frosts, somehow Sabretooth and Wolverine were on good terms until the first movie where the suddenly act like they never recognize each other, Prof X met Wolverine for the first time twice, and Peter Dinklage was definitely not a black man of average height in the original trilogy.
Not even mentioning the multiple timelines branching and even then, events from what are purported supposed to be part of the original timeline’s backstory are still like its set in an entirely different universe.
Pantheon server for all who click here. Freaking lost $410 and I am hunting down for a nuke to reign down.I'm still surprised that Loki became a true god, and wasn't just a low-level super with a huge ego.
Edited by Luisdalas on Apr 24th 2024 at 3:08:16 AM
Self-actualization is a wonderful thing
Forever liveblogging the AvengersTo be fair, that's straight out of the comics. Time travel in Marvel is supposed to create alternate timelines, although writers ignore this when something else suits the story.
If writers keep make different versions of it, then it's probably safe to say that time travel isn't "supposed' to do anything specific in the comics.
Cable and Bishop, for example, are two of Marvel's biggest time travelers, and if time travel only ever creates alternate timelines then most of their stories just stop making sense.
Edited by KnownUnknown on Apr 24th 2024 at 4:23:22 AM
"The difference between reality and fiction is that fiction has to make sense." - Tom Clancy, paraphrasing Mark Twain.Well comics days of future past is now an alternate universe with a numerical designation
Forever liveblogging the AvengersDon't move to South Dakota and change your name to Fred. Get rid of Cable.
Trust no one.Ooooh, I'm like, this close to remembering what it is you're referencing. A commerical, right?
"The difference between reality and fiction is that fiction has to make sense." - Tom Clancy, paraphrasing Mark Twain.Speaking of Cable I wish he came back to interact with the TVA.
Mileena MadnessYep. It was a series of DirectTV ads from 2012.
At some point, there'd be a TVA agent asking himself "Man, why does this dude sound like so many of the Thanos variants we've had to arrest?"
Trust no one.Hey, I remember those commercials! Deep cut there.
Disney100 Marathon | DreamWorks MarathonAll this stuff is why I don't like time travel as a plot device. It works when it's the main thing a story does, like Quantum Leap or Doctor Who.
But that ship sailed a long time ago. Time travel was established in Endgame, and it's here to stay.
Disgusted, but not surprisedI for one actually think time travel works best when it's a gameplay mechanic, something that, to mention Sonic CD really quick, nailed it, making it optional, and thus a great way of experiencing worldbuilding without words. Show, don't tell.
Going back into Marvel territory, more specifically Deadpool, I was not expecting Kevin Feige to be so... willing to allow himself to be implemented as a punchline... further than that giant robot thing in She-Hulk, that is. His last name's brought up, and it's about cocaine now being off the table, including "Building A Snowman".
Robin: Don't ever ask me to dock with you again. Serious...What about time travel being used for more diverse level themes?
That's kinda like Final Fantasy XIII-2
Mileena MadnessBut that ties back into my earlier point that it works best when the whole work revolves around it from the start as opposed to something introduced later.
Disgusted, but not surprisedThough, honestly, I don't think they even knew they were going to have an MCU at the beginning, when they did Iron Man 1. They've always added more shit incrementally, and let's be honest, if you're Marvel, needing to turn your fortunes around, being at rock bottom, the nadir of your existence, facing destruction and implosion... I don't think your first priority with the Robert Downey Jr. movie is gonna be "...So let's throw time travelling into the mix."
Robin: Don't ever ask me to dock with you again. Serious...I generally think people are too hard on time travel as a concept, mostly because writers have a habit of using it as a crutch to write badly or inconsistently, and viewers have long since kind of internalized the idea that the bad or inconsistent writing is the concept’s fault, rather than the writers’.
"The difference between reality and fiction is that fiction has to make sense." - Tom Clancy, paraphrasing Mark Twain.
Their approach to being beholden to the time travel rules from a completely different studio’s movies is probably going to… not to be beholden to those rules at all, yeah.
"The difference between reality and fiction is that fiction has to make sense." - Tom Clancy, paraphrasing Mark Twain.