YMMV / Case 63

• Alternative Character Interpretation: Dr Knight doesn't seem like that great of a psychiatrist. She's rather rude, dismissive, and argumentative with her patient. Let's imagine for a moment that Case 63 actually was a delusional man: Would her treatment of him have been appropriate? The question, then: Is she not a very good psychiatrist across the board? Or is her treatment of Case 63 fairly unique and singular, because she thinks he's lying, and because he rattles her?
• Hilarious in Hindsight: Peter describes something very close to the United States Congress hearings on UFOs.
  Peter: Irrefutable proof that we are not alone in the universe—although we already did know that from declassified files the Pentagon released.
  Eliza: Excuse me, when was this?
  Peter: In, uh, 20—actually next year, actually. 2023.
  Eliza: Next year.
  Peter: Oh yes. But—well, it turns out that, y'know, a few boring documents confirming what conspiracy theorists have been yelling about for years didn't exactly turn the world upside down.
• Viewer Pronunciation Confusion: Inverted Trope. As an exclusively audio product, spelling is just assumed. Is it Roiter or Reuter?