Follow TV Tropes

Following

Analysis / Internet Safety Aesop

Go To

Depending on the situation, both sides can have a legitimate point about their activities online and the consequences.

What the poster thinks about their situation:

  • Everyone makes mistakes and simply didn't know how they could have upset someone with their activities. They just need a chance to explain their side of the story and explain how their actions were a result of stupidity and incompetence, not malice.
  • Users may have bad social skills; whether due to a condition, a poor choice of words, using a second language, or because they're from a place with different etiquette standards than the people reading the posts.
  • The posts were made in the past and the user simply forgot about them. They didn't really expect someone to dig it up in the future for the sake of an argument. They also weren't the ones who uploaded that embarrassing picture, video, or message.
  • They may have been venting online or venting privately and underestimated the consequences.
  • Critics are thin-skinned and easily offended so they may have just overreacted or tried to overcorrect what they saw as an injustice.
  • They really didn't know who they were talking to and didn't expect the outcome of their activities.
  • Users may be too young and/or naïve to understand the weight of their words and actions online.
  • Users simply don't know how to identify and then avoid scammers, fake accounts, and cybercriminals.
  • Other users can be too hard on them for making a bad decision.
  • Other users are obsessed with them and won't respect their boundaries or won't take "no" for an answer.

How people criticise the poster for their online activities:

  • It's a content creator's responsibility to set a good example for their audience.
  • People do need to acknowledge how their own behaviour could have caused their problems. As they should have known by now that there are some things you just shouldn't post online.note 
  • You need to look at a post from outside your own head; what's funny to one person may be grossly offensive or damaging to another. You need to be careful about what you post online because you don't know who could be watching. note 
  • You should have enough self-control to not add strangers online, to not encourage a certain behaviour from your audience, and you shouldn't present yourself online as something you don't identify with. You should make your boundaries clear and put up safeguards to protect your identity.
  • You should not have been on that website or forum in the first place.
  • You could have just walked away or logged off if someone is antagonizing you online. You can't let them get to you and they should have better things to do. note 
  • You need to evaluate your relationship with the person you're talking to. note 
  • Venting online is not a healthy way to handle a problem, therapy is a healthy alternative if it's serious enough and there are people you can privately talk to in real life.note 
  • You should have asked for permission before you uploaded that picture of your friend and family member. Children aren't mature enough to recognise how they are being presented online and lack a personal filter of what is and isn't appropriate to talk about. Under the Federal Wiretap Act, it's actually illegal to record conversations and while it is legal to record someone in public, it can violate their expectation of privacy.note 
  • Posting memes and fanworks of your favourite content creator can be flattering but you need to respect a creator's personal boundaries once they've established it.
  • Exposing someone online can have very serious consequences if done in the wrong way and without a warranty. note 
  • If a relationship or friendship ended on a really bad note, you should have blocked their accounts immediately so they can't access any of your personal information. note 

How the situation may be beyond their control.

  • Websites and apps have rules and regulations in place to protect a user's privacy and personal safety, the websites themselves may have been hacked, not the accounts.
  • Users can be a victim of doxxing, identity theft, revenge porn, hacking, malware, etc. so it's not their fault and they may have to take legal action.
  • A creator can't force their fanbase to do anything, and can't control every member of their audience. Someone acting in a way that reflects badly on the creator isn't their fault if they never told anybody to act that way.invoked
  • A creator may not know how they are perceived on the Internet. Some creators can be embarrassed, uncomfortable, or outright disturbed by how people react to their content and can give very strong responses in turn. Especially since the erotic fanworks can be easily found online by a young audience or the creator's family members.invoked
  • Internet celebrities, content creators, and users may not know how to handle success and popularity in a healthy way because they were continuously venerated online. Being spoiled and enabled online will affect their behaviour, their personal businesses, and their careers because nobody ever told them what they were doing wrong in the first place.

Top