Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Adding link
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: While it still isn’t right or politically correct for Dorothy to have a problem with Michael and Lorraine’s union due to race (even if she states that that is ''her'' own problem and doesn’t object on those grounds), another reason she could think that way is the stigma mixed-race couples and children still faced in the 1980s (similar to what ''Film/GuessWhosComingToDinner'' touched on in the 1960s), as her later disliking the child being potentially named “Lamar Zbornak” hints at. The same thing could apply to Greta as well.
to:
* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: While it still isn’t right or politically correct for Dorothy to have a problem with Michael and Lorraine’s union due to race (even if she states that that is ''her'' own problem and doesn’t object on those grounds), another reason she could think that way is [[FridgeBrilliance the stigma mixed-race couples and children still faced faced]] in the 1980s (similar to what ''Film/GuessWhosComingToDinner'' touched on in the 1960s), as her later disliking the child being potentially named “Lamar Zbornak” hints at. The same thing could apply to Greta as well.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added example(s)
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: While it still isn’t right or politically correct for Dorothy to have a problem with Michael and Lorraine’s union due to race (even if she states that that is ''her'' own problem and doesn’t object on those grounds), another reason she could think that way is the stigma mixed-race children still faced in the 1980s (similar to what ''Film/GuessWhosComingToDinner'' touched on in the 1960s), as her later disliking the child being potentially named “Lamar Zbornak” hints at. The same thing could apply to Greta as well.
to:
* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: While it still isn’t right or politically correct for Dorothy to have a problem with Michael and Lorraine’s union due to race (even if she states that that is ''her'' own problem and doesn’t object on those grounds), another reason she could think that way is the stigma mixed-race couples and children still faced in the 1980s (similar to what ''Film/GuessWhosComingToDinner'' touched on in the 1960s), as her later disliking the child being potentially named “Lamar Zbornak” hints at. The same thing could apply to Greta as well.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added example(s)
Added DiffLines:
*AlternateCharacterInterpretation: While it still isn’t right or politically correct for Dorothy to have a problem with Michael and Lorraine’s union due to race (even if she states that that is ''her'' own problem and doesn’t object on those grounds), another reason she could think that way is the stigma mixed-race children still faced in the 1980s (similar to what ''Film/GuessWhosComingToDinner'' touched on in the 1960s), as her later disliking the child being potentially named “Lamar Zbornak” hints at. The same thing could apply to Greta as well.
*HilariousInHindsight: Greta’s comment about Diana Ross marrying white men, considering Ross’ marriages to Robert Ellis Silberstein and Arne Næss Jr. resulted in four children, two of them being Evan Ross and Creator/TraceeEllisRoss.
*HilariousInHindsight: Greta’s comment about Diana Ross marrying white men, considering Ross’ marriages to Robert Ellis Silberstein and Arne Næss Jr. resulted in four children, two of them being Evan Ross and Creator/TraceeEllisRoss.
