Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Misuse
Deleted line(s) 4 (click to see context) :
* MisaimedMarketing: Many people were deceived, mistakenly thinking the 1971 film was a western because of the cover.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* MememticMutation: The "old enough for kisses" scene had second life as a meme format for anything regarding {{Memetic Molester}}s.
to:
* MememticMutation: MemeticMutation: The "old enough for kisses" scene had second life as a meme format for anything regarding {{Memetic Molester}}s.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* MememticMutation: The "old enough for kisses" scene had second life as a meme format for anything regarding {{Memetic Molester}}s.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 1 (click to see context) :
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: A popular one is that the women ended up [[spoiler: killing [=McBurney=]]] out of self-defense (in both versions), since he was a very dangerous individual, who continuously put their lives in danger, but they had nowhere to go, let alone anybody to turn to for help.
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* SugarWiki/HeartwarmingMoments: The friendship between John and Amy in the 2017 version, noticeably because she's one of the few ''not'' romantically interested in him. [[SanitySlippage Their friendship doesn't last long though]].
to:
Changed line(s) 5,6 (click to see context) from:
* ValuesDissonance: The original novel and the first film can very easily be regarded as offensive to women, portraying them as very insidious and spiteful, including those who are ready to cripple or even kill a male for showing interest in another girl. And that's not to mention the fact that the first film supports an offensive stereotype that people in Southern states are incestuous {{Lovable Sex Maniac}}s. The second film averted it, being pro-feminist. [[BrokenBase Though that last parts a bit debatable]], because it essentially has the same running theme and message: don't take advantage of women. Which one does it better is up to the viewer.
* TheWoobie: In both versions, Amy is such a kind-hearted young girl, who cares dearly for wounded animals, and is the first one to find the wounded [=McBurney=] and bring him in, in spite of being a Yankee. But even she isn't spared when [=McBurney=] loses his mind, and hurts her, and kills her beloved pet turtle.
* TheWoobie: In both versions, Amy is such a kind-hearted young girl, who cares dearly for wounded animals, and is the first one to find the wounded [=McBurney=] and bring him in, in spite of being a Yankee. But even she isn't spared when [=McBurney=] loses his mind, and hurts her, and kills her beloved pet turtle.
to:
* ValuesDissonance: The original novel and the first film can very easily be regarded as offensive to women, portraying them as very insidious and spiteful, including those who are ready to cripple or even kill a male for showing interest in another girl. And that's not to mention the fact that the first film supports an offensive stereotype that people in Southern states are incestuous {{Lovable Sex Maniac}}s. The second film averted it, being pro-feminist. [[BrokenBase Though that last parts a bit debatable]], because it essentially has the same running theme and message: don't take advantage of women. Which one does it better is up to the viewer.
Maniac}}s.
* TheWoobie: In both versions, Amy is such a kind-hearted young girl, who cares dearly for wounded animals, and is the first one to find the wounded [=McBurney=] and bring him in, in spite of him being a Yankee. But even she isn't spared when [=McBurney=] loses his mind, hurting her andhurts her, and kills killing her beloved pet turtle.
* TheWoobie: In both versions, Amy is such a kind-hearted young girl, who cares dearly for wounded animals, and is the first one to find the wounded [=McBurney=] and bring him in, in spite of him being a Yankee. But even she isn't spared when [=McBurney=] loses his mind, hurting her and
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Deleted line(s) 2 (click to see context) :
* FamilyUnfriendlyAesop: Never deceive girls, because women are very vindictive and cunning creatures who will deceive and kill you if they find out about it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
* TheWoobie: In both versions, Amy is such a kind-hearted young girl, who cares dearly for wounded animals, and is the first one to find the wounded [=McBurney=] and bring him in, in spite of being a Yankee. But even she isn't spared when McBurney loses his mind, and hurts her, and kills her beloved pet turtle.
to:
* TheWoobie: In both versions, Amy is such a kind-hearted young girl, who cares dearly for wounded animals, and is the first one to find the wounded [=McBurney=] and bring him in, in spite of being a Yankee. But even she isn't spared when McBurney [=McBurney=] loses his mind, and hurts her, and kills her beloved pet turtle.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added line(s) 6 (click to see context) :
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: A popular one is that the women ended up [[spoiler: killing [=McBurney=]]] out of self-defense (in both versions), since he was a very dangerous individual, who continuously put their lives in danger, but they had nowhere to go, let alone anybody to turn to for help.
Deleted line(s) 6 (click to see context) :
** An AlternativeCharacterInterpretation is that these women ended up [[spoiler: killing [=McBurney=]]] out of self-defense (in both versions), since he was a very dangerous individual, who continuously put their lives in danger, but they had nowhere to go, let alone anybody to turn to for help.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* SugarWiki/HeartwarmingMoments: The friendship between John and Amy in the 2017 version, noticeably because she's one of the few ''not'' romantically interested in him. [[Main/SanitySlippage Their friendship doesn't last long though]].
to:
* GermansLoveDavidHasselhoff: The original film received major recognition in France, and was proposed by Pierre Rissient to the Cannes Film Festival, and while agreed to by Creator/ClintEastwood and Don Siegel, the producers declined. It would be widely screened in France later and is considered one of Eastwood's finest works by the French.
* SugarWiki/HeartwarmingMoments: The friendship between John and Amy in the 2017 version, noticeably because she's one of the few ''not'' romantically interested in him.[[Main/SanitySlippage [[SanitySlippage Their friendship doesn't last long though]].
* SugarWiki/HeartwarmingMoments: The friendship between John and Amy in the 2017 version, noticeably because she's one of the few ''not'' romantically interested in him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4,7 (click to see context) from:
* ValuesDissonance: The original novel and the first film can very easily be regarded as offensive to women, portraying them as very insidious and spiteful, including those who are ready to cripple or even kill a male for showing interest in another girl. And that's not to mention the fact that the first film supports an offensive stereotype that people in Southern states are incestuous {{Lovable Sex Maniac}}s. The second film averted it, being pro-feminist. [[Main/BrokenBase Though that last parts a bit debatable]], because it essentially has the same running theme and message: don't take advantage of women. Which one does it better is up to the viewer.
** An AlternativeCharacterInterpretation is that these women ended up [[spoiler: killing McBurney]] out of self-defense (in both versions), since he was a very dangerous individual, who continuously put their lives in danger, but they had nowhere to go, let alone anybody to turn to for help.
* TheWoobie: In both versions, Amy is such a kind-hearted young girl, who cares dearly for wounded animals, and is the first one to find the wounded McBurney and bring him in, in spite of being a Yankee. But even she isn't spared when McBurney loses his mind, and hurts her, and kills her beloved pet turtle.
---
** An AlternativeCharacterInterpretation is that these women ended up [[spoiler: killing McBurney]] out of self-defense (in both versions), since he was a very dangerous individual, who continuously put their lives in danger, but they had nowhere to go, let alone anybody to turn to for help.
* TheWoobie: In both versions, Amy is such a kind-hearted young girl, who cares dearly for wounded animals, and is the first one to find the wounded McBurney and bring him in, in spite of being a Yankee. But even she isn't spared when McBurney loses his mind, and hurts her, and kills her beloved pet turtle.
---
to:
* ValuesDissonance: The original novel and the first film can very easily be regarded as offensive to women, portraying them as very insidious and spiteful, including those who are ready to cripple or even kill a male for showing interest in another girl. And that's not to mention the fact that the first film supports an offensive stereotype that people in Southern states are incestuous {{Lovable Sex Maniac}}s. The second film averted it, being pro-feminist. [[Main/BrokenBase [[BrokenBase Though that last parts a bit debatable]], because it essentially has the same running theme and message: don't take advantage of women. Which one does it better is up to the viewer.
** An AlternativeCharacterInterpretation is that these women ended up [[spoiler: killingMcBurney]] [=McBurney=]]] out of self-defense (in both versions), since he was a very dangerous individual, who continuously put their lives in danger, but they had nowhere to go, let alone anybody to turn to for help.
* TheWoobie: In both versions, Amy is such a kind-hearted young girl, who cares dearly for wounded animals, and is the first one to find the woundedMcBurney [=McBurney=] and bring him in, in spite of being a Yankee. But even she isn't spared when McBurney loses his mind, and hurts her, and kills her beloved pet turtle.
-------
** An AlternativeCharacterInterpretation is that these women ended up [[spoiler: killing
* TheWoobie: In both versions, Amy is such a kind-hearted young girl, who cares dearly for wounded animals, and is the first one to find the wounded
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
** TheWoobie: In both versions, Amy is such a kind-hearted young girl, who cares dearly for wounded animals, and is the first one to find the wounded McBurney and bring him in, in spite of being a Yankee. But even she isn't spared when McBurney loses his mind, and hurts her, and kills her beloved pet turtle.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** TheWoobie: In both versions, Amy is such a kind-hearted young girl, who cares dearly for wounded animals, and is the first one to find the wounded McBurney and bring him in, in spite of being a Yankee. But even she isn't spared when McBurney loses his mind, and hurts her, and kills her beloved pet turtle.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
----
to:
---
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Deleted line(s) 1 (click to see context) :
* CrowningMomentOfHeartwarming: The friendship between John and Amy in the 2017 version, noticeably because she's one of the few ''not'' romantically interested in him. [[Main/SanitySlippage Their friendship doesn't last long though]].
Added line(s) 4 (click to see context) :
* SugarWiki/HeartwarmingMoments: The friendship between John and Amy in the 2017 version, noticeably because she's one of the few ''not'' romantically interested in him. [[Main/SanitySlippage Their friendship doesn't last long though]].
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* ValuesDissonance: The original novel and the first film can very easily be regarded as offensive to women, portraying them as very insidious and spiteful, including those who are ready to cripple or even kill a male for showing interest in another girl. And that's not to mention the fact that the first film supports an offensive stereotype that people in Southern states are incestuous {{Lovable Sex Maniac}}s. The second film averted it, being pro-feminist. [[Main/BrokenBase Though that last parts a bit debatable]], because it essentially has the same running theme and message: don't take advantage of women. Which one does it better is up to the viewer.
to:
* ValuesDissonance: The original novel and the first film can very easily be regarded as offensive to women, portraying them as very insidious and spiteful, including those who are ready to cripple or even kill a male for showing interest in another girl. And that's not to mention the fact that the first film supports an offensive stereotype that people in Southern states are incestuous {{Lovable Sex Maniac}}s. The second film averted it, being pro-feminist. [[Main/BrokenBase Though that last parts a bit debatable]], because it essentially has the same running theme and message: don't take advantage of women. Which one does it better is up to the viewer.viewer.
----
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* MisaimedMarketing: Many people were deceived, mistakenly thinking the film was a western because of the cover.
to:
* MisaimedMarketing: Many people were deceived, mistakenly thinking the 1971 film was a western because of the cover.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
* MisaimedMarketing: Many people were deceived, mistakenly taking the film for the western because of the cover.
* ValuesDissonance: The original novel and the first film can very easily be regarded as offensive to women, portraying them as very insidious and spiteful, including those who are ready to cripple or even kill a male for showing interest in another girl. And that's not to mention the fact that the first film supports an offensive stereotype that people in the southern states are incestuous LovableSexManiac. The second film basically averted it, being pro-feminist. [[Main/BrokenBase Though that last parts a bit debatable]]. Both essentially have the same running theme and message: don't take advantage of women. Whichever one does it better is up to the viewer.
* ValuesDissonance: The original novel and the first film can very easily be regarded as offensive to women, portraying them as very insidious and spiteful, including those who are ready to cripple or even kill a male for showing interest in another girl. And that's not to mention the fact that the first film supports an offensive stereotype that people in the southern states are incestuous LovableSexManiac. The second film basically averted it, being pro-feminist. [[Main/BrokenBase Though that last parts a bit debatable]]. Both essentially have the same running theme and message: don't take advantage of women. Whichever one does it better is up to the viewer.
to:
* MisaimedMarketing: Many people were deceived, mistakenly taking thinking the film for the was a western because of the cover.
* ValuesDissonance: The original novel and the first film can very easily be regarded as offensive to women, portraying them as very insidious and spiteful, including those who are ready to cripple or even kill a male for showing interest in another girl. And that's not to mention the fact that the first film supports an offensive stereotype that people inthe southern Southern states are incestuous LovableSexManiac. {{Lovable Sex Maniac}}s. The second film basically averted it, being pro-feminist. [[Main/BrokenBase Though that last parts a bit debatable]]. Both debatable]], because it essentially have has the same running theme and message: don't take advantage of women. Whichever Which one does it better is up to the viewer.
* ValuesDissonance: The original novel and the first film can very easily be regarded as offensive to women, portraying them as very insidious and spiteful, including those who are ready to cripple or even kill a male for showing interest in another girl. And that's not to mention the fact that the first film supports an offensive stereotype that people in
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added line(s) 3 (click to see context) :
* CrowningMomentOfHeartwarming: The friendship between John and Amy in the 2017 version, noticeably because she's one of the few ''not'' romantically interested in him. [[Main/SanitySlippage Their friendship doesn't last long though]].
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* ValuesDissonance: The original novel and the first film can very easily be regarded as offensive to women, portraying them as very insidious and spiteful, including those who are ready to cripple or even kill a male for showing interest in another girl. And that's not to mention the fact that the first film supports an offensive stereotype that people in the southern states are incestuous LovableSexManiac. The second film basically averted it, being pro-feminist.
to:
* ValuesDissonance: The original novel and the first film can very easily be regarded as offensive to women, portraying them as very insidious and spiteful, including those who are ready to cripple or even kill a male for showing interest in another girl. And that's not to mention the fact that the first film supports an offensive stereotype that people in the southern states are incestuous LovableSexManiac. The second film basically averted it, being pro-feminist. [[Main/BrokenBase Though that last parts a bit debatable]]. Both essentially have the same running theme and message: don't take advantage of women. Whichever one does it better is up to the viewer.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* FamilyUnfriendlyAesop: Never deceive girls, because women are very vindictive and cunning creatures who will deceive and kill you if they find out about it.
* MisaimedMarketing: Many people were deceived, mistakenly taking the film for the western because of the cover.
* ValuesDissonance: The original novel and the first film can very easily be regarded as offensive to women, portraying them as very insidious and spiteful, including those who are ready to cripple or even kill a male for showing interest in another girl. And that's not to mention the fact that the first film supports an offensive stereotype that people in the southern states are incestuous LovableSexManiac. The second film basically averted it, being pro-feminist.
* MisaimedMarketing: Many people were deceived, mistakenly taking the film for the western because of the cover.
* ValuesDissonance: The original novel and the first film can very easily be regarded as offensive to women, portraying them as very insidious and spiteful, including those who are ready to cripple or even kill a male for showing interest in another girl. And that's not to mention the fact that the first film supports an offensive stereotype that people in the southern states are incestuous LovableSexManiac. The second film basically averted it, being pro-feminist.
