History YMMV / Shaft2019

* CriticalDissonance: On Website/RottenTomatoes, the film scores a poor 33% with critics (the lowest for the ''Shaft'' franchise, below the 56% of ''Film/ShaftInAfrica'') but maintains an impressive 94% with audiences. It also scored an A from [=CinemaScore=] (above 2000's ''Film/{{Shaft|2000}}'''s A-) but it does have a fairly unimpressive 6.4 on Website/{{IMDb}} (though still above the 2000 ''Shaft'').

* AssPull: The HandWave explanation that Creator/RichardRoundtree's Shaft was merely ''claiming'' to be Creator/SamuelLJackson's Shaft's uncle instead of his father, even [[Film/Shaft2000 well into his son's adulthood]], can come across as a rather weak way to justify the "three generations of Shaft" marketing of this film. It very much comes off that everyone just forgot he wasn't Jackson's father in the previous film, and this was shoved in at the last second.

* AssPull: The HandWave explanation that Roundtree's Shaft was merely ''claiming'' to be Jackson's Shaft's uncle instead of his father, even [[Film/Shaft2000 well into his son's adulthood]], can come across as a rather weak way to justify the "three generations of Shaft" marketing of this film. It very much comes off that everyone just forgot he wasn't Jackson's father in the previous film, and this was shoved in at the last second.
* CriticalDissonance: On Website/RottenTomatoes, the film scores a poor 33% with critics (the lowest for the ''Shaft'' franchise, below the 56% of ''Shaft in Africa'') but maintains an impressive 94% with audiences. It also scored an A from [=CinemaScore=] (above 2000's ''Film/{{Shaft|2000}}'''s A-) but it does have a fairly unimpressive 6.4 on Website/{{IMDb}} (though still above the 2000 ''Shaft'').

* AssPull: The HandWave explanation that Roundtree's Shaft was merely ''claiming'' to be Jackson's Shaft's uncle instead of his father, even [[Film/Shaft2000 well into his son's adulthood]], can come across as a rather weak way to justify the "three generations of Shaft" marketing of this film.

* CriticalDissonance: On Website/RottenTomatoes, the film scores a poor 33% with critics (the lowest for the ''Shaft'' franchise, below the 56% of ''Shaft in Africa'') but maintains an impressive 94% with audiences. It also scored an A from [=CinemaScore=] (above 2000's ''Film/{{Shaft|2000}}'''s A-) but it does have a fairly unimpressive 6.4 on Website/{{IMDb}} (though still above than the previous ''Shaft'').

* CriticalDissonance: On Website/RottenTomatoes, the film scores a poor 33% with critics (the lowest for the ''Shaft'' franchise, below the 56% of ''Shaft in Africa'') but maintains an impressive 94% with audiences. It also scored an A from [=CinemaScore=] (above ''Film/Shaft2000'''s A-) but it does have a fairly unimpressive 6.4 on Website/{{IMDb}} (though still above than the previous ''Shaft'').

* CriticalDissonance: On Website/RottenTomatoes, the film scores a poor 33% with critics (the lowest for the ''Shaft'' franchise, below the 56% of ''Film/ShaftInAfrica'') but maintains an impressive 94% with audiences. It also scored an A from [=CinemaScore=] (above ''Film/Shaft2000'''s A-) but it does have a fairly unimpressive 6.4 on Website/{{IMDb}} (though still above than the previous ''Shaft'').

* CriticalDissonance: On Website/RottenTomatoes, the film scores a poor 33% with critics and a huge 94% with audiences.

* CriticalDissonance: On Website/RottenTomatoes, the film scores a poor 33% with critics and 94% with audiences.

* CriticalDissonnance: On Website/RottenTomatoes, the film scores a poor 33% with critics and 94% with audiences.

* CriticalDisonance: On Website/RottenTomatoes, the film scores a poor 33% with critics and 94% with audiences.

* CriticalDisonnance: On UsefulNotes/RottenTomatoes, the film scores a poor 33% with critics and 94% with audiences.