Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 9 (click to see context) from:
* MexicansLoveSpeedyGonzales: Despite it's negative depiction of General Motors, many [=GM=] employees and executives actually liked the movie due to their disillusionment with Roger Smith's leadership. By the time the film was released in Christmas 1989 [=GM=] was badly losing money and marketshare while fielding a lineup of "cookie cutter" cars that were struggling on the marketplace. Smith would actually retire less than a year after the film was released - nobody was sad to see him go.
to:
* MexicansLoveSpeedyGonzales: Despite it's negative depiction of General Motors, many [=GM=] employees and executives actually liked the movie due to their disillusionment with Roger Smith's leadership. By the time the film was released in Christmas 1989 [=GM=] was badly losing money and marketshare while fielding a lineup of "cookie cutter" cars that were struggling on the marketplace. Smith would actually retire less than a year after the film was released - nobody -- and hardly anybody was sad to see him go.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
** Knowing about the water crisis that affected the town 25 years later goes to show how things haven't changed.
to:
** Knowing about The situation in Flint has just gotten worse in the thirty years since the film's release, as the water crisis that affected the town 25 years later goes to show how things haven't changed.they suffered in TheNewTens showcased.
Changed line(s) 9 (click to see context) from:
* MexicansLoveSpeedyGonzales: Despite it's negative depiction of General Motors, many [=GM=] executives actually liked the movie. Largely because Roger Smith was a terrible businessman who brought the company to near ruin in the early 1990s with his bad policies.
to:
* MexicansLoveSpeedyGonzales: Despite it's negative depiction of General Motors, many [=GM=] employees and executives actually liked the movie. Largely because movie due to their disillusionment with Roger Smith's leadership. By the time the film was released in Christmas 1989 [=GM=] was badly losing money and marketshare while fielding a lineup of "cookie cutter" cars that were struggling on the marketplace. Smith would actually retire less than a year after the film was a terrible businessman who brought the company released - nobody was sad to near ruin in the early 1990s with his bad policies.see him go.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
"Really" in this context is Word Cruft of the "bogus intensifier" variety. Especially when used twice in the same sentence.
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
** Knowing about the water crisis that affected the town 25 years later really goes to show how things really haven't changed.
to:
** Knowing about the water crisis that affected the town 25 years later really goes to show how things really haven't changed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* MexicansLoveSpeedyGonzales: Despite it's negative depiction of General Motors, many [=GM=] executives actually liked the movie. Largely because Roger Smith was a terrible businessman who brought the company to near ruin in the early 1990s with his bad policies.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* HarsherInHindsight: Knowing about the water crisis that affected the town 25 years later really goes to show how things really haven't changed.
to:
* HarsherInHindsight: HarsherInHindsight:
** Knowing about the water crisis that affected the town 25 years later really goes to show how things really haven't changed.
** Knowing about the water crisis that affected the town 25 years later really goes to show how things really haven't changed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* AwardSnub: Despite being one of the most original documentaries at the time and being a box office success, it wasn't even nominated for an Academy Award.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
* OvershadowedByControversy: The rabbit killing scene has become a bone of contention, with some schools and teachers refusing to show this movie to students, despite it covering an important aspect of modern history, simply because of this one scene. Michael Moore is bewildered by this because the movie also shows a man being killed by police, but that scene never raised as much controversy. Though to be fair, the man killed by police was filmed at a distance, whereas the rabbit killing is up close and ''doesn't'' cut away after a few seconds.
to:
* OvershadowedByControversy: The rabbit killing scene has become a bone of contention, with some schools and teachers refusing to show this movie to students, despite it covering an important aspect of modern history, simply because of this one scene. Michael Moore is bewildered by this because the movie also shows a man being killed by police, but that scene never raised as much controversy. Though to be fair, the man killed by police was filmed at a distance, whereas the rabbit killing killing, skinning and gutting is up close and ''doesn't'' cut away after a few seconds.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added line(s) 7 (click to see context) :
** In a broader sense, the movie is (sadly) even more relevant today than 1989, as we've seen ''numerous'' situations like Flint's play out across the country, thanks to the Great Recession of 2007-2008 and, more recently, the COVID pandemic causing mass unemployment and closed businesses.
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
* OvershadowedByControversy: The rabbit killing scene has become a bone of contention, with some schools and teachers refusing to show this movie to students, despite it covering an important aspect of modern history, simply because of this one scene. Michael Moore is bewildered by this because the movie also shows a man being killed by police, but that scene never raised as much controversy.
to:
* OvershadowedByControversy: The rabbit killing scene has become a bone of contention, with some schools and teachers refusing to show this movie to students, despite it covering an important aspect of modern history, simply because of this one scene. Michael Moore is bewildered by this because the movie also shows a man being killed by police, but that scene never raised as much controversy. Though to be fair, the man killed by police was filmed at a distance, whereas the rabbit killing is up close and ''doesn't'' cut away after a few seconds.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* {{Tearjerker}}: To the point it might as well be called ''Tearjerker: The Movie''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
* NightmareFuel: The scenes with Rhonda Britton, who is [[DissonantSerenity disturbingly happy and unapologetic]] about the fact that she makes a living by killing animals. The early scenes where she discusses her job and how she does it are eerie enough, but then we actually get to see her slaughter and skin a rabbit. It's [[ViolenceIsDisturbing not glorified in any way]] and is probably the scariest moment in the film.
to:
* NightmareFuel: The scenes with Rhonda Britton, who is [[DissonantSerenity disturbingly happy and unapologetic]] quite happy]] about the fact that she makes a living by killing animals. The early scenes where she discusses her job and how she does it are eerie off-putting enough, but then we actually get to see her slaughter and skin a rabbit. It's rabbit, and it's [[ViolenceIsDisturbing not glorified in any way]] and is probably the scariest moment in the film.way]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* OvershadowedByControversy: The rabbit killing scene has become a bone of contention, with some schools and teachers refusing to show this movie to students, despite it covering an important aspect of modern history, simply because of this one scene. Michael Moore is bewildered by this because the movie also shows a man being killed by police, but that scene never raised as much controversy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
----
Added DiffLines:
* HarsherInHindsight: Knowing about the water crisis that affected the town 25 years later really goes to show how things really haven't changed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* NightmareFuel: The scenes with Rhonda Britton, who is [[DissonantSerenity disturbingly happy and unapologetic]] about the fact that she makes a living by killing animals. The early scenes where she discusses her job and how she does it are eerie enough, but then we actually get to see her slaughter and skin a rabbit. It's [[ViolenceIsDisturbing not glorified in any way]] and is probably the scariest moment in the film.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* GenreTurningPoint: Before ''Roger and Me'', documentaries (of a non-musical nature at least) had been mostly confined to film festivals. ''Roger and Me'' demonstrated that one could make a documentary that the masses would want to see, allowing other documentaries, including Moore's later films, to achieve widespread financial and critical success.
to:
* GenreTurningPoint: Before ''Roger and Me'', documentaries (of a non-musical nature at least) had been mostly confined to TV and film festivals. ''Roger and Me'' demonstrated that one could make a documentary that the masses would want to see, allowing other documentaries, including Moore's later films, to achieve widespread financial and critical success.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* HilariousInHindsight: Looks like [[Anime/TheBigO Roger Smith really is a louse]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* EnsembleDarkhorse: Rhonda Britton, the lady selling rabbits as "Pets or Meat". She even became of the focus of a PBS documentary in 1992.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Deleted line(s) 1 (click to see context) :
* DudeNotFunny: Bob Eubanks' antisemitic AIDS joke.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* ValuesResonance: Downsizing and outsourcing have only accelerated since the 1980s, as noted in the later film ''Film/CapitalismALoveStory''.
to:
* ValuesResonance: Downsizing and outsourcing have only accelerated since the 1980s, as Moore noted in the his later film ''Film/CapitalismALoveStory''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* ValuesResonance: Downsizing and outsourcing have only accelerated since the 1980s.
to:
* ValuesResonance: Downsizing and outsourcing have only accelerated since the 1980s.1980s, as noted in the later film ''Film/CapitalismALoveStory''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* ValuesResonance: Downsizing and outsourcing have only accelerated since the 1980s.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,3 (click to see context) from:
* DudeNotFunny: Pat Boone's anti-semitic AIDS joke.
* GenreTurningPoint: Before "Roger and Me" documentaries (of a non-musical nature at least) had been mostly confined to film festivals. Roger and Me demonstrated you could make a documentary that the masses would want to see, allowing other documentaries, including Moore's later ones, to achieve widespread box office and critical success.
* GenreTurningPoint: Before "Roger and Me" documentaries (of a non-musical nature at least) had been mostly confined to film festivals. Roger and Me demonstrated you could make a documentary that the masses would want to see, allowing other documentaries, including Moore's later ones, to achieve widespread box office and critical success.
to:
* DudeNotFunny: Pat Boone's anti-semitic Bob Eubanks' antisemitic AIDS joke.
* GenreTurningPoint: Before"Roger ''Roger and Me" Me'', documentaries (of a non-musical nature at least) had been mostly confined to film festivals. Roger ''Roger and Me Me'' demonstrated you that one could make a documentary that the masses would want to see, allowing other documentaries, including Moore's later ones, films, to achieve widespread box office financial and critical success.
success.
----
* GenreTurningPoint: Before
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* GenreTurningPoint: Before "Roger and Me" documentaries (of a non-musical nature at least) had been mostly confined to film festivals. Roger and Me demonstrating you could make a documentary that the masses would want to see.
to:
* DudeNotFunny: Pat Boone's anti-semitic AIDS joke.
* GenreTurningPoint: Before "Roger and Me" documentaries (of a non-musical nature at least) had been mostly confined to film festivals. Roger and Medemonstrating demonstrated you could make a documentary that the masses would want to see.see, allowing other documentaries, including Moore's later ones, to achieve widespread box office and critical success.
* GenreTurningPoint: Before "Roger and Me" documentaries (of a non-musical nature at least) had been mostly confined to film festivals. Roger and Me
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* GenreTurningPoint: Before "Roger and Me" documentaries (of a non-musical nature at least) had been mostly confined to film festivals. Roger and Me demonstrating you could make a documentary that the masses would want to see.