Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / LandOfOz

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* FranchiseZombie: Baum had only meant to write one or two ''Oz'' sequels (if any) and then move on to other projects[[note]]He even wrote a definitive ending with the sixth book[[/note]], but the popularity of the books, coupled with his own financial issues and the fact that all of his non-Oz books (apart from ''Father Goose'', which he wrote before the first Oz novel and which was his first success) were flops, forced him to keep writing Oz books for the rest of his life, long after he had lost interest in them. And after he died, publisher Reily & Lee weren't about to let that stop the series, and was continued by different writers until the 1960's. From there, once the books began to fall into the public domain, anyone could write their own Oz book (and just like with any fan fiction, the results [[SturgeonsLaw have varied widely]]).

to:

* FranchiseZombie: Baum had only meant to write one or two ''Oz'' sequels (if any) and then move on to other projects[[note]]He even wrote a definitive ending with the sixth book[[/note]], but the popularity of the books, coupled with his own financial issues and the fact that all of his non-Oz books (apart from ''Father Goose'', which he wrote before the first Oz novel and which was his first success) were flops, forced him to keep writing Oz books for the rest of his life, long after he had lost interest in them. And after he died, publisher Reily & Lee weren't about to let that stop the series, and was continued by different writers until the 1960's. From there, once the books began to fall into the public domain, anyone could write their own Oz book (and just like with any fan fiction, the results [[SturgeonsLaw have varied widely]]).widely).

Added: 277

Changed: 67

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* FanNickname: Publisher Reilly and Lee came up with “The Famous Forty” to describe the 40 official books published by their company. However there are further books that could be considered as canon, including Baum’s Trot and Cap’n Bill series and other fantasies he wrote (which crossover with Oz), a book of short Oz stories also by Baum, and Oz books by later authors in the series that did not get published by Reilly and Lee for various reasons, some of which would eventually be published by Books of Wonder (who rereleased the Oz books in the 1980s and '90s) and the International Wizard of Oz Club. With the addition of these arguably canon works, Oz publisher Joe Bongiorno coined two terms for this complete Oz series on his website, "The Soverign Sixty" or "The Supreme Seventy-Five".

to:

* FanNickname: {{Fanon}}: Publisher Reilly and Lee came up with “The Famous Forty” to describe the 40 official books published by their company. company, and this is considered the baseline for what is canon. However there are further books that could still arguably be considered as canon, including Baum’s Trot and Cap’n Bill series and other fantasies he wrote (which crossover with Oz), a book of short Oz stories also by Baum, and Oz books by later authors in the series that did not get published by Reilly and Lee for various reasons, some of which would eventually be published by Books of Wonder (who rereleased the Oz books in the 1980s and '90s) and the International Wizard of Oz Club. With the addition of these arguably canon works, Oz publisher Joe Bongiorno coined two terms for this complete Oz series on his website, "The Soverign Sixty" or "The Supreme Seventy-Five". Seventy-Five".
** If a modern Oz book is high quality and close enough to the original series it might earn an honorary place in “fanon” even if it has no ties to the authors of the original Famous Forty, such as most of the works of Eric Shanower, and books like ''Literature/ParadoxInOz''.

Added: 387

Removed: 373

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AudienceAlienatingEra: While Ruth Plumly Thompson has her defenders, a lot of Baum purists would consider her tenure in the series this. Almost every fan would consider Neill’s tenure as even worse though (a much better artist than a writer by most accounts, although to be fair Reilly & Lee’s editors did not help matters). The authors after Neill tried to emulate Baum’s style more.



* DorkAge: While Ruth Plumly Thompson has her defenders, a lot of Baum purists would consider her tenure in the series this. Almost every fan would consider Neill’s tenure as even worse though (a much better artist than a writer by most accounts, although to be fair Reilly & Lee’s editors did not help matters). The authors after Neill tried to emulate Baum’s style more.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* MarySuetopia: Creator/LFrankBaum envisioned Oz to be this. Even with Wicked Witches around, Dorothy never had to pay for anything. It gets more explicit in his later books when Ozma assumes the throne and everyone in Oz is granted functional {{Immortality}}. For the record, the Oz books don't have any bent toward then-contemporary politics or try to insist on proper way in which to run a county (Ozma's reign could be best described as a benevolent dictatorship), but exist primarily as whimsical escapism.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* DiagnosedByTheAudience: Several characters have been identified as possibly autistic-coded by modern readers, such as the Scarecrow, Jack Pumpkinhead, Scraps and Button-Bright.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
The Cowardly Lion has enough large roles in the sequels that I don't think he can be called a "very minor" character, just a secondary one.


** While it's easy to forget this due to being a main character in the first book and popularized by the MGM film, the Cowardly Lion becomes a very minor, almost forgotten character in the book sequels. Ruth Plumly Thompson gave him ADayInTheLimelight with his own book, but other than that he was never a main character again. These days he is a fan favorite and seen as just as important of a character as Dorothy, the Scarecrow and the Tin Woodman by fans, but this is mostly thanks to the MGM film and the comparative obscurity of the book sequels.

to:

** While it's easy to forget this due to being a main character in the first book and popularized by the MGM film, the Cowardly Lion becomes a very minor, secondary, almost forgotten minor character in the book sequels. He was entirely absent from the second book, but because children missed him he returned in the third one, and after that would generally make at least one substantial appearance in every subsequent book Baum wrote to show that he was still around. There would be a handful of books where he was a major or semi-major character; Ruth Plumly Thompson featured him heavily in her first book and eventually gave him ADayInTheLimelight with his own book, book -- but other than that for the most part he was never had a main character again.very reduced role. These days he is a fan favorite and seen as just as important of a character as Dorothy, the Scarecrow and the Tin Woodman by fans, but this is mostly thanks to the MGM film and the comparative obscurity of the book sequels.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Another plot point these stories often employ is that only some of the Oz books are based on true events and the rest were only written for the money; they might say only the first book or the first six books really happened. This is based on the fact that Baum was forced to write the sequels for the money in real life.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Dorothy Gale was a real life person, who L. Frank Baum met and interviewed, using her stories about Oz as the basis for his books. Whether or not Oz actually is real in stories with this plot element may vary (see ''Literature/{{Was}}'' for example, where it is not), but if it is real it may be a DystopianOz that Baum toned down for children. This may be rooted in Baum’s use of DirectLineToTheAuthor, where he claimed to be Oz’s “Royal Historian”. It can be combined with many other stock fan plots.

to:

** Dorothy Gale was a real life person, who L. Frank Baum met and interviewed, using her stories about Oz as the basis for his books. Whether or not Oz actually is real in stories with this plot element may vary (see ''Literature/{{Was}}'' for example, where it is not), but if it is real it may be a DystopianOz that Baum toned down for children. This may be rooted in Baum’s use of DirectLineToTheAuthor, where he claimed to be Oz’s “Royal Historian”.Historian”; as well as the fact that Baum did name Dorothy after his deceased niece who died in infancy. It can be combined with many other stock fan plots.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter: One unfortunate thing about the Oz series is that rather than use and further develop existing characters, newly introduced characters in each book will often be cast aside in the next installment and relegated to mere cameos if they're lucky to make way for even more new characters, who themselves will be cast aside in future installments, with few exceptions. This is the cause for the series having many characters, with Thompson really being not much worse than Baum about doing this (although she did attempt to rescue Ojo, the Hungry Tiger and Jack Pumpkinhead from obscurity by giving them [[ADayInTheLimelight their own books]]).

to:

* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter: One unfortunate thing about the Oz series is that rather than use and further develop existing characters, newly introduced characters in each book will often be cast aside in the next installment and relegated to mere cameos if they're lucky to make way for even more new characters, who themselves will be cast aside in future installments, with few exceptions. This is the cause for resulted in the series having too many characters, with Thompson really being not much worse than Baum about doing this (although she did attempt to rescue Ojo, the Hungry Tiger and Jack Pumpkinhead from obscurity by giving them [[ADayInTheLimelight their own books]]).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Loads And Loads Of Characters is no longer a trope


*** In fact, quite a few of the things Thompson's ''Oz'' books are often criticized for; LoadsAndLoadsOfCharacters, filler WackyWaysideTribe chapters, excessive pun-based humor and the like, are all things present in Baum's ''Oz'' books to varying degrees, especially the earlier ones. To what degree she is either being judged more harshly than Baum over many of the same things just because she replaced Baum, or she actually does over-accentuate the weaknesses already inherent in the series, may vary from book to book, and the reader's opinion.

to:

*** In fact, quite a few of the things Thompson's ''Oz'' books are often criticized for; LoadsAndLoadsOfCharacters, large numbers of characters, filler WackyWaysideTribe chapters, excessive pun-based humor and the like, are all things present in Baum's ''Oz'' books to varying degrees, especially the earlier ones. To what degree she is either being judged more harshly than Baum over many of the same things just because she replaced Baum, or she actually does over-accentuate the weaknesses already inherent in the series, may vary from book to book, and the reader's opinion.



* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter: One unfortunate thing about the Oz series is that rather than use and further develop existing characters, newly introduced characters in each book will often be cast aside in the next installment and relegated to mere cameos if they're lucky to make way for even more new characters, who themselves will be cast aside in future installments, with few exceptions. This is the cause for the series having LoadsAndLoadsOfCharacters, with Thompson really being not much worse than Baum about doing this (although she did attempt to rescue Ojo, the Hungry Tiger and Jack Pumpkinhead from obscurity by giving them [[ADayInTheLimelight their own books]]).

to:

* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter: One unfortunate thing about the Oz series is that rather than use and further develop existing characters, newly introduced characters in each book will often be cast aside in the next installment and relegated to mere cameos if they're lucky to make way for even more new characters, who themselves will be cast aside in future installments, with few exceptions. This is the cause for the series having LoadsAndLoadsOfCharacters, many characters, with Thompson really being not much worse than Baum about doing this (although she did attempt to rescue Ojo, the Hungry Tiger and Jack Pumpkinhead from obscurity by giving them [[ADayInTheLimelight their own books]]).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Ozma's personality is completely different from Tips. To explain this, a common interpretation is that she's [[TheWomanWearingTheQueenlyMask hiding her personality]] because that's what others expect from her. Alternatives are that either ''Tip'''s personality was [[BeneathTheMask the fake persona]] because she felt the need to act like a boy "should" be or that the spell Mombi put on Ozma changed her personality. Some adaptations even make Tip a separate person, who may have ceased to exist when the spell was broken.

to:

** Ozma's personality is completely different from Tips. To explain this, a common interpretation is that she's [[TheWomanWearingTheQueenlyMask hiding her personality]] because that's what others expect from her. Alternatives are that either ''Tip'''s personality was [[BeneathTheMask the fake persona]] because she felt the need to act like a boy "should" be or that the spell Mombi put on Ozma changed her personality. Some adaptations even make Tip a separate person, who [[DeathOfPersonality may have ceased to exist when the spell was broken.broken]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Dorothy Gale was a real life person, who L. Frank Baum met and interviewed, using her stories about Oz as the basis for his books. Whether or not Oz actually is real in stories with this plot element may vary (see ''Literature/{{Was}}'' for example), but if it is real it may be a DystopianOz that Baum toned down for children. This may be rooted in Baum’s use of DirectLineToTheAuthor, where he claimed to be Oz’s “Royal Historian”. It can be combined with many other stock fan plots.

to:

** Dorothy Gale was a real life person, who L. Frank Baum met and interviewed, using her stories about Oz as the basis for his books. Whether or not Oz actually is real in stories with this plot element may vary (see ''Literature/{{Was}}'' for example), example, where it is not), but if it is real it may be a DystopianOz that Baum toned down for children. This may be rooted in Baum’s use of DirectLineToTheAuthor, where he claimed to be Oz’s “Royal Historian”. It can be combined with many other stock fan plots.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Related to this, these stories will often have Oz facing some kind of crisis, and Dorothy's friends bring her back to Oz from Kansas because they think she’s the only one who can help them, for whatever reason. While a common plot in Oz adaptations this never happened in any of the books. These will usually disregard the sequels, or at the very least incorporate a few elements from them. (See for example ''Dorothy of Oz'' by Roger S. Baum, ''WesternAnimation/TomAndJerryBackToOz'', among many others; in fact ''Film/ReturnToOz'' managed to use something like this despite being based on the books.)

to:

*** Related to this, these stories will often have Oz facing some kind of crisis, and Dorothy's friends bring her back to Oz from Kansas because they think she’s the only one who can help them, for whatever reason. While a common plot in Oz adaptations this never happened in any of the books. These will usually disregard the sequels, or at the very least incorporate a few elements from them. (See for example ''Dorothy of Oz'' by Roger S. Baum, ''WesternAnimation/TheWizardOfOz'' cartoon series from 1990, ''WesternAnimation/TomAndJerryBackToOz'', among many others; in fact ''Film/ReturnToOz'' managed to use something like this despite being based on the books.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** In ''Lucky Bucky in Oz'' the protagonists visit a soap-themed WackyWaysideTribe ruled by a man made of soap named “Slippery Dick”.
Tabs MOD

Added: 797

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* FanNickname: Publisher Reilly and Lee came up with “The Famous Forty” to describe the 40 official books published by their company. However there are further books that could be considered as canon, including Baum’s Trot and Cap’n Bill series and other fantasies he wrote (which crossover with Oz), a book of short Oz stories also by Baum, and Oz books by later authors in the series that did not get published by Reilly and Lee for various reasons, some of which would eventually be published by Books of Wonder (who rereleased the Oz books in the 1980s and '90s) and the International Wizard of Oz Club. With the addition of these arguably canon works, Oz publisher Joe Bongiorno coined two terms for this complete Oz series on his website, "The Soverign Sixty" or "The Supreme Seventy-Five".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** [[ServileSnarker Jellia Jamb]] from the second book, who provides a SugarWiki/{{Funny Moment|s}} by [[{{Troll}} mistranslating]] Jack and the Scarecrow's dialogue since they're both too dimwitted to figure out they're speaking the same language, milking the situation for all its worth.

to:

** [[ServileSnarker Jellia Jamb]] from the second book, who provides a SugarWiki/{{Funny Moment|s}} by [[{{Troll}} mistranslating]] Jack and the Scarecrow's dialogue since they're both too dimwitted to figure out they're speaking the same language, milking the situation for all its worth. She eventually earned herself a big role in Ruth Plumly Thompson’s final book in the Famous Forty, ''Ozoplaning with the Wizard of Oz''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BrieferThanTheyThink: Baum’s run only lasted 14 books, but considering how influential his writing is along with the rarity of seeing a LongRunner book series switch authors midway, the uninformed may assume that he wrote the ''entirety'' of the Famous 40, rather then a small fraction of it.

to:

* BrieferThanTheyThink: Baum’s run only lasted 14 books, but considering how influential his writing is along with the rarity of seeing a LongRunner book series switch authors midway, the uninformed may assume that he wrote the ''entirety'' of the Famous 40, rather then than a small fraction of it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Nowadays Jack Pumpkinhead has been gaining quite a bit of popularity, thanks to appearing in the CultClassic ''Film/ReturnToOz''. This was the case when the books were first being written too; Baum strongly hinted in the second book that Jack died when his pumpkin finally spoiled, but because the fans loved him this was retconned to him simply replacing his heads when they spoil.

to:

** Nowadays Jack Pumpkinhead has been gaining gained quite a bit of popularity, thanks to appearing in the CultClassic ''Film/ReturnToOz''. This was the case when the books were first being written too; Baum strongly hinted in the second book that Jack died when his pumpkin finally spoiled, but because the fans loved him this was retconned to him simply replacing his heads when they spoil.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* LGBTFanbase: [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friend_of_Dorothy "Friend of Dorothy"]] originated with the gay male fanbase for Judy Garland, and {{Literature/Wicked}} added another surge, so the original books imported a hefty dose of it. It helps that there's a fair amount of HoYay and LesYay in the main cast, and that Ozma spent her first nine to twelve years or so as the incorrect gender. The plot of many of the books focus on someone strange or unusual finding acceptance in Oz, which may have attracted many LGBT youth to the series. One of several theories on the origin of the Pride Flag cites "Over the Rainbow" as inspiration. Add Gregory Maguire's ''Literature/TheWickedYears'' novels, which have explicit same-sex and polyamorous relationships as well as Elphaba herself being possibly intersex.

to:

* LGBTFanbase: [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friend_of_Dorothy "Friend of Dorothy"]] originated with the gay male fanbase for Judy Garland, and {{Literature/Wicked}} added another surge, so the original books imported a hefty dose of it. It helps that there's a fair amount of HoYay and LesYay in the main cast, and that Ozma spent her first nine to twelve years or so as the incorrect gender. The plot of many of the books focus on someone strange or unusual finding acceptance in Oz, which may have attracted many LGBT youth to the series.series (not to mention other traditional societal misfits, such as people with disabilities or autism, making up another large chunk of the modern book fandom). One of several theories on the origin of the Pride Flag cites "Over the Rainbow" as inspiration. Add Gregory Maguire's ''Literature/TheWickedYears'' novels, which have explicit same-sex and polyamorous relationships as well as Elphaba herself being possibly intersex.

Added: 385

Changed: 255

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** [[{{Cloudcuckoolander}} Scraps]], The Patchwork Girl (who's insane even by the series' standards) was very popular when she debuted, but nowadays Jack Pumpkinhead has been gaining quite a bit of popularity.

to:

** [[{{Cloudcuckoolander}} Scraps]], The Patchwork Girl (who's insane even by the series' standards) was very popular when she debuted, debuted. It was rare for newly-introduced characters to join the main cast by the 7th book, but nowadays she was popular enough to do so, while her co-stars didn’t fare nearly as well (Ojo at least got one more book in the Famous Forty).
** Nowadays
Jack Pumpkinhead has been gaining quite a bit of popularity.popularity, thanks to appearing in the CultClassic ''Film/ReturnToOz''. This was the case when the books were first being written too; Baum strongly hinted in the second book that Jack died when his pumpkin finally spoiled, but because the fans loved him this was retconned to him simply replacing his heads when they spoil.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Glinda is often interpreted as less benevolent (or at minimum, more creepy) than she initially seems. Though there is a Good Witch of the North, Glinda takes all the spotlight and is treated as the second ruler of Oz after Ozma. Glinda herself is an IncorruptiblePurePureness but she has shades of a TricksterMentor. Some have even called into question whether or not she knew about Dorothy’s arrival in Oz or even had a hand in causing it, and refrained from telling Dorothy how the silver slippers worked sooner in order for her to first assassinate Glinda’s political rivals; but this would depend on whether or not she had the Book of Records yet, which was never mentioned until book 6. This, combined with her [[TheWatcher ability to see anything in Oz]], makes her an [[AmbiguousInnocence Ambiguously Innocent]] figure. It doesn't help that [[TheFairFolk fairies are known for being ambiguous]].

to:

** Glinda is often interpreted as less benevolent (or at minimum, more creepy) than she initially seems. Though there is a Good Witch of the North, Glinda takes all the spotlight and is treated as the second ruler of Oz after Ozma. Glinda herself is an IncorruptiblePurePureness but she has shades of a TricksterMentor. Some have even called into question whether or not she knew about Dorothy’s arrival in Oz or even had a hand in causing it, and refrained from telling Dorothy how the silver slippers shoes worked sooner in order for her to first assassinate Glinda’s political rivals; but this would depend on whether or not she had the Book of Records yet, which was never mentioned until book 6. This, combined with her [[TheWatcher ability to see anything in Oz]], makes her an [[AmbiguousInnocence Ambiguously Innocent]] figure. It doesn't help that [[TheFairFolk fairies are known for being ambiguous]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Dorothy Gale was a real person in our world, who L. Frank Baum met and interviewed, using her stories about Oz as the basis for his books. Whether or not Oz actually is real in stories with this plot element may vary (see ''Literature/{{Was}}'' for example), but if it is real it may be a DystopianOz that Baum toned down for children. It can be combined with many other stock fan plots.

to:

** Dorothy Gale was a real person in our world, life person, who L. Frank Baum met and interviewed, using her stories about Oz as the basis for his books. Whether or not Oz actually is real in stories with this plot element may vary (see ''Literature/{{Was}}'' for example), but if it is real it may be a DystopianOz that Baum toned down for children. This may be rooted in Baum’s use of DirectLineToTheAuthor, where he claimed to be Oz’s “Royal Historian”. It can be combined with many other stock fan plots.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Ozma and Dorothy aging into adults. Often includes shipping.

to:

** Ozma and Dorothy aging into adults. Often includes shipping.adults, which naturally allows them to explore their relationship as a sexual romance.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Romantic Two Girl Friendship has been renamed to Pseudo Romantic Friendship. All misuse and ZC Es will be deleted and all other examples will be changed to the correct trope.


** Dorothy and Ozma's relationship is ambiguous to modern readers. They're very close and [[PlatonicKissing kiss]] often. What was intended as a RomanticTwoGirlFriendship can be easily reinterpreted as PuppyLove.

to:

** Dorothy and Ozma's relationship is ambiguous to modern readers. They're very close and [[PlatonicKissing kiss]] often. What was intended as a RomanticTwoGirlFriendship PseudoRomanticFriendship can be easily reinterpreted as PuppyLove.



** Dorothy/Ozma is by far the most supported ship. They get along well, have a lot of [[RomanticTwoGirlFriendship sweet interactions]], and outside of the classic characters from the first book, Dorothy's known her the longest. Some authors have tried to avert the romantic implications by giving them male love interests, but it never stuck.

to:

** Dorothy/Ozma is by far the most supported ship. They get along well, have a lot of [[RomanticTwoGirlFriendship [[PseudoRomanticFriendship sweet interactions]], and outside of the classic characters from the first book, Dorothy's known her the longest. Some authors have tried to avert the romantic implications by giving them male love interests, but it never stuck.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Related to this, these stories will often have Oz facing some kind of crisis, and Dorothy's former friends bring her back to Oz from Kansas because they think she’s the only one who can help them, for whatever reason. While a common plot in Oz adaptations this never happened in any of the books. These will usually disregard the sequels, or at the very least incorporate a few elements from them. (See for example ''Dorothy of Oz'' by Roger S. Baum, ''WesternAnimation/TomAndJerryBackToOz'', among many others; in fact ''Film/ReturnToOz'' managed to use something like this despite being based on the books.)

to:

*** Related to this, these stories will often have Oz facing some kind of crisis, and Dorothy's former friends bring her back to Oz from Kansas because they think she’s the only one who can help them, for whatever reason. While a common plot in Oz adaptations this never happened in any of the books. These will usually disregard the sequels, or at the very least incorporate a few elements from them. (See for example ''Dorothy of Oz'' by Roger S. Baum, ''WesternAnimation/TomAndJerryBackToOz'', among many others; in fact ''Film/ReturnToOz'' managed to use something like this despite being based on the books.)

Added: 388

Changed: 519

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* FanPreferredCouple: Dorothy/Ozma is by far the most supported ship. They get along well, have a lot of [[RomanticTwoGirlFriendship sweet interactions]], and outside of the classic characters from the first book, Dorothy's known her the longest. Some authors have tried to avert the romantic implications by giving them male love interests, but it never stuck.

to:

* FanPreferredCouple: FanPreferredCouple:
**
Dorothy/Ozma is by far the most supported ship. They get along well, have a lot of [[RomanticTwoGirlFriendship sweet interactions]], and outside of the classic characters from the first book, Dorothy's known her the longest. Some authors have tried to avert the romantic implications by giving them male love interests, but it never stuck.



* ItWasHisSled: The Wizard of Oz is a man behind a curtain.

to:

* ItWasHisSled: ItWasHisSled:
**
The Wizard of Oz is a man behind a curtain.



* TheWoobie:
** Ojo the Unlucky. He gets better, finally becoming "Ojo the Lucky".

to:

* TheWoobie:
**
TheWoobie: Ojo the Unlucky. He gets better, finally becoming "Ojo the Lucky".

Added: 355

Changed: 563

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AcceptableTargets: Several.

to:

* AcceptableTargets: Several. AcceptableTargets:



* AccidentalInnuendo: ''Handy Mandy in Oz'' has quite a few, such as when she accidentally "jerks off" Nox the Ox's horn.
** ''Ojo in Oz'' introduces us to Dicksyland, populated by the “queer” Dicks. Some Dicks are described as short and fat, others thin and handsome. Their leader, the Dicktator of Dicksyland, has a “Right Hand Man”. It goes on; the fact that “dick” and “queer” already had their current slang meaning in the 1930s makes one wonder if Thompson knew.

to:

* AccidentalInnuendo: ''Handy Mandy in Oz'' AccidentalInnuendo:
** ''Literature/HandyMandyInOz''
has quite a few, such as when she accidentally "jerks off" Nox the Ox's horn.
** ''Ojo in Oz'' ''Literature/OjoInOz'' introduces us to Dicksyland, populated by the “queer” Dicks. Some Dicks are described as short and fat, others thin and handsome. Their leader, the Dicktator of Dicksyland, has a “Right Hand Man”. It goes on; the fact that “dick” and “queer” already had their current slang meaning in the 1930s makes one wonder if Thompson knew.



* ArchivePanic: Fans who only know about the famous movie and might only be vaguely aware that it was a book first will often drop their jaws when told the original series consists of 40 books.

to:

* ArchivePanic: Fans who only know about the famous movie and might only be vaguely aware that it was a book first will often drop their jaws when told the original series consists of 40 books. And that's not even getting into the numerous later novels.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* DorkAge: While Ruth Plumly Thompson has her defenders, a lot of Baum purists would consider her tenure in the series this. Almost every fan would consider Neill’s tenure as even worse though (a much better artist than a writer by most accounts, although to be fair Reilly & Lee’s editors did not help matters). The authors after Neill tried to emulate Baum’s style more.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Another common variation; Dorothy never returns to Oz, but her [[SpinOffspring daughter or granddaughter]] does return to Oz many decades later, where she will be mistaken for Dorothy (it's nearly always a female; one notable aversion was in Philip Farmer's ''A Barnstormer in Oz'', where the main character is Dorothy's son). They may or may not know they're related to the ''real'' Dorothy Gale. If they know about the events of the first book they might think it was just a fictional story, and be amazed to learn it really happened. These adaptations always act as if there were no sequels; due both to the general public's unfamiliarity with them, and the fact that in canon, Dorothy moves to Oz permanently in the 6th book, which stops her aging and makes it impossible for her to even have offspring.

to:

*** Another common variation; Dorothy never returns to Oz, but her [[SpinOffspring daughter or granddaughter]] does return to Oz many decades later, where she will be mistaken for Dorothy (it's nearly always a female; one notable aversion was in Philip Farmer's Creator/PhilipJoseFarmer's ''A Barnstormer in Oz'', where the main character is Dorothy's son). They may or may not know they're related to the ''real'' Dorothy Gale. If they know about the events of the first book they might think it was just a fictional story, and be amazed to learn it really happened. These adaptations always act as if there were no sequels; due both to the general public's unfamiliarity with them, and the fact that in canon, Dorothy moves to Oz permanently in the 6th book, which stops her aging and makes it impossible for her to even have offspring.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Tin Woodman/Scarecrow shippers have something of a rivalry with Scraps/Scarecrow shippers. Some resolve this by shipping all three of them with each other.

Top