Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
* TruthInTelevision: While Knut Alvsson definitely aspired for royalty, claiming to be the last heir of the medieval kings, he never had that support, and as far as history shows, he was not close to call in all the nobles just like that.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
* TruthIntelevision: While Knut Alvsson definitely aspired for royalty, claiming to be the last heir of the medieval kings, he never had that support, and as far as history shows, he was not close to call in all the nobles just like that.
to:
* TruthIntelevision: TruthInTelevision: While Knut Alvsson definitely aspired for royalty, claiming to be the last heir of the medieval kings, he never had that support, and as far as history shows, he was not close to call in all the nobles just like that.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5,6 (click to see context) from:
* WastedAGoodPlot: It is, of course, possible to make Nils Stensson even funnier by making Olaf Skaktavl and/or Niels Lykke visibly {{face palm}} when he returns after losing all his men in the last act. Which, of course, is giving Olaf an extra reason for just killing him off (which he does).
to:
* WastedAGoodPlot: TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: It is, of course, possible to make Nils Stensson even funnier by making Olaf Skaktavl and/or Niels Lykke visibly {{face palm}} when he returns after losing all his men in the last act. Which, of course, is giving Olaf an extra reason for just killing him off (which he does).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5,6 (click to see context) from:
* MissedOpportunity: It is, of course, possible to make Nils Stensson even funnier by making Olaf Skaktavl and/or Niels Lykke visibly {{face palm}} when he returns after losing all his men in the last act. Which, of course, is giving Olaf an extra reason for just killing him off (which he does).
to:
* MissedOpportunity: WastedAGoodPlot: It is, of course, possible to make Nils Stensson even funnier by making Olaf Skaktavl and/or Niels Lykke visibly {{face palm}} when he returns after losing all his men in the last act. Which, of course, is giving Olaf an extra reason for just killing him off (which he does).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5,6 (click to see context) from:
* It is, of course, possible to make Nils Stensson even funnier by making Olaf Skaktavl and/or Niels Lykke visibly {{face palm}} when he returns after losing all his men in the last act. Which, of course, is giving Olaf an extra reason for just killing him off (which he does).
to:
* MissedOpportunity: It is, of course, possible to make Nils Stensson even funnier by making Olaf Skaktavl and/or Niels Lykke visibly {{face palm}} when he returns after losing all his men in the last act. Which, of course, is giving Olaf an extra reason for just killing him off (which he does).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5,6 (click to see context) from:
* It is, of course, possible to make Nils Stensson even funnier by making Olaf Skaktavl and/or Niels Lykke visibly {{face palm}} when he returns after losing all his men in the last act. Which, of course, giving Olaf an extra reason for just killing him off (which he does).
to:
* It is, of course, possible to make Nils Stensson even funnier by making Olaf Skaktavl and/or Niels Lykke visibly {{face palm}} when he returns after losing all his men in the last act. Which, of course, is giving Olaf an extra reason for just killing him off (which he does).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5,6 (click to see context) from:
* It is, of course, possible to make Nils Stensson even funnier by making Olaf Skaktavl and/or Niels Lykke visibly {{face palm}} when he returns after losing all his men in the last act.
to:
* It is, of course, possible to make Nils Stensson even funnier by making Olaf Skaktavl and/or Niels Lykke visibly {{face palm}} when he returns after losing all his men in the last act. Which, of course, giving Olaf an extra reason for just killing him off (which he does).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* TruthIntelevision: While Knut Alvsson definitely aspired for royalty, claiming to be the last heir of the medieval kings, he never had that support, and as far as history shows, he was not close to call in all the nobles just like that.
to:
* TruthIntelevision: While Knut Alvsson definitely aspired for royalty, claiming to be the last heir of the medieval kings, he never had that support, and as far as history shows, he was not close to call in all the nobles just like that.that.
* It is, of course, possible to make Nils Stensson even funnier by making Olaf Skaktavl and/or Niels Lykke visibly {{face palm}} when he returns after losing all his men in the last act.
--> '''Inger''': Where are your men?
--> '''Nils''': The lie slaughered along the road.
--> '''Olaf''': ({{face palm}}s).
* It is, of course, possible to make Nils Stensson even funnier by making Olaf Skaktavl and/or Niels Lykke visibly {{face palm}} when he returns after losing all his men in the last act.
--> '''Inger''': Where are your men?
--> '''Nils''': The lie slaughered along the road.
--> '''Olaf''': ({{face palm}}s).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
FridgeBrilliance: It is claimed in the play that Knut Alvsson actually had a lot of Norwegian nobles, if not ''all'' the nobility, assembled at the fortress of Akershus the day he was murdered. This could only mean calling a formal assembly for the purpose of making him king. History made a u-turn, and Knut was killed during negotiations. The assembled nobles quickly swore revenge. Which makes the backstory of Lady Inger the more tragic from a national point of view.
* TruthIntelevision: While Knut Alvsson definitely aspired for royalty, claiming to be the last heir of the medieval kings, he never had that support, and as far as history shows, he was not close to call in all the nobles just like that.
* TruthIntelevision: While Knut Alvsson definitely aspired for royalty, claiming to be the last heir of the medieval kings, he never had that support, and as far as history shows, he was not close to call in all the nobles just like that.
