Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / JewSuss1940

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Veit Harlan claimed that he actually tried to soften the antisemitism of the film and make Suss into a TragicVillain, but Goebbels bullied him into making Suss as despicable as possible, a claim that is disputed by historians who believe Harlan was trying to absolve himself of responsibility.

to:

** Veit Harlan claimed that he actually tried to soften the antisemitism of the film and make Suss into a TragicVillain, but Goebbels UsefulNotes/JosephGoebbels bullied him into making Suss as despicable as possible, a claim that is disputed by historians who believe Harlan was trying to absolve himself of responsibility.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CondemnedByHistory: Upon its release, the movie was a major critical and commercial success, grossing more than three times its budget and earning the top award at the 1940 Venice Film Festival. Opinions of it quickly soured in the aftermath of UsefulNotes/WorldWarII and UsefulNotes/TheHolocaust, however, for a simple reason: its rampant anti-Semitic content. Commissioned by UsefulNotes/{{Nazi|Germany}} propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels for the explicit purpose of stoking hatred of Jews, the film's VillainProtagonist Josef Süss Oppenheimer is a purely malevolent GreedyJew stereotype with no redeeming qualities, and every other Jewish character is also depicted in a resoundingly negative light. The film was screened for concentration camp guards and reportedly triggered multiple instances of anti-Semitic violence, which only further soured its postwar reputation. Today, the movie is seen not as a legitimate work of art or entertainment, but as a hateful screed that subjects an entire ethno-religious group to horrific {{demonization}}, and one would be hard-pressed to find anybody talking about it except in the context of bigotry and [[PropagandaPiece propaganda]].

to:

* CondemnedByHistory: Upon its release, the movie was a major critical and commercial success, grossing more than three times its budget and earning the top award at the 1940 Venice Film Festival. Opinions of it quickly soured in the aftermath of UsefulNotes/WorldWarII and UsefulNotes/TheHolocaust, however, for a simple reason: its rampant anti-Semitic content. Commissioned by UsefulNotes/{{Nazi|Germany}} propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels UsefulNotes/JosephGoebbels for the explicit purpose of stoking hatred of Jews, the film's VillainProtagonist Josef Süss Oppenheimer is a purely malevolent GreedyJew stereotype with no redeeming qualities, and every other Jewish character is also depicted in a resoundingly negative light. The film was screened for concentration camp guards and reportedly triggered multiple instances of anti-Semitic violence, which only further soured its postwar reputation. Today, the movie is seen not as a legitimate work of art or entertainment, but as a hateful screed that subjects an entire ethno-religious group to horrific {{demonization}}, and one would be hard-pressed to find anybody talking about it except in the context of bigotry and [[PropagandaPiece propaganda]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Trope was cut/disambiguated due to cleanup


* EvilIsSexy: See the DracoInLeatherPants entry above. If that was the case, then it was also a quite ironic (and hilarious) case of MisaimedFandom.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
grammar, added link to Propaganda Piece.


* CondemnedByHistory: Upon its release, the movie was a major critical and commercial success, grossing more than three times its budget and earning the top award at the 1940 Venice Film Festival. Opinions of it quickly soured in the aftermath of UsefulNotes/WorldWarII and UsefulNotes/TheHolocaust, however, for a simple reason: its rampant antisemitic content. Commissioned by UsefulNotes/{{Nazi|Germany}} propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels for the explicit purpose of stoking hatred of Jews, the film's VillainProtagonist Josef Süss Oppenheimer is a purely malevolent GreedyJew stereotype with no redeeming qualities, and every other Jewish character is also depicted in a resoundingly negative light. The film was screened for concentration camp guards and reportedly triggered multiple instances of antisemitic violence, which only further soured its postwar reputation. Today, the movie is seen not as a legitimate work of art or entertainment, but as a hateful screed that subjects an entire ethnoreligious group to horrific {{demonization}}, and one would be hard-pressed to find anybody talking about it except in the context of bigotry and propaganda.

to:

* CondemnedByHistory: Upon its release, the movie was a major critical and commercial success, grossing more than three times its budget and earning the top award at the 1940 Venice Film Festival. Opinions of it quickly soured in the aftermath of UsefulNotes/WorldWarII and UsefulNotes/TheHolocaust, however, for a simple reason: its rampant antisemitic anti-Semitic content. Commissioned by UsefulNotes/{{Nazi|Germany}} propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels for the explicit purpose of stoking hatred of Jews, the film's VillainProtagonist Josef Süss Oppenheimer is a purely malevolent GreedyJew stereotype with no redeeming qualities, and every other Jewish character is also depicted in a resoundingly negative light. The film was screened for concentration camp guards and reportedly triggered multiple instances of antisemitic anti-Semitic violence, which only further soured its postwar reputation. Today, the movie is seen not as a legitimate work of art or entertainment, but as a hateful screed that subjects an entire ethnoreligious ethno-religious group to horrific {{demonization}}, and one would be hard-pressed to find anybody talking about it except in the context of bigotry and propaganda.[[PropagandaPiece propaganda]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SpiritualAntithesis: Goebbels intended this movie partly as a response of sorts to [[Film/JewSuss1934 the 1934 British film of the same name]], which [[TruerToTheText adapted the original book more faithfully]] and ''condemned'' antisemitism. Notably, both movies include a rape victim who drowns herself, but while it happens to Sü&szlig's daughter at the hands of the Duke in the earlier film, this movie makes ''Sü&szlig himself'' the rapist who forces himself on an unwilling gentile woman.

to:

* SpiritualAntithesis: Goebbels intended this movie partly as a response of sorts to [[Film/JewSuss1934 the 1934 British film of the same name]], which [[TruerToTheText adapted the original book more faithfully]] and ''condemned'' antisemitism. Notably, both movies include a rape victim who drowns herself, but while it happens to Sü&szlig's Süss's daughter at the hands of the Duke in the earlier film, this movie makes ''Sü&szlig ''Süss himself'' the rapist who forces himself on an unwilling gentile woman.

Added: 1658

Changed: 22

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CondemnedByHistory: Upon its release, the movie was a major critical and commercial success, grossing more than three times its budget and earning the top award at the 1940 Venice Film Festival. Opinions of it quickly soured in the aftermath of UsefulNotes/WorldWarII and UsefulNotes/TheHolocaust, however, for a simple reason: its rampant antisemitic content. Commissioned by UsefulNotes/{{Nazi|Germany}} propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels for the explicit purpose of stoking hatred of Jews, the film's VillainProtagonist Josef Süss Oppenheimer is a purely malevolent GreedyJew stereotype with no redeeming qualities, and every other Jewish character is also depicted in a resoundingly negative light. The film was screened for concentration camp guards and reportedly triggered multiple instances of antisemitic violence, which only further soured its postwar reputation. Today, the movie is seen not as a legitimate work of art or entertainment, but as a hateful screed that subjects an entire ethnoreligious group to horrific {{demonization}}, and one would be hard-pressed to find anybody talking about it except in the context of bigotry and propaganda.



** The movie has, as its "happy ending", Suss being lynched and Jews being expelled from Württemberg. The following years would see Jews expelled from their communities, lynched in pogroms, and finally subjected to industrial genocide. Tragically the film was quite effective at indoctrinating people into the Nazi's racist ideology.

to:

** The movie has, as its "happy ending", "[[EsotericHappyEnding happy ending]]", Suss being lynched and Jews being expelled from Württemberg. The following years would see Jews expelled from their communities, lynched in pogroms, and finally subjected to industrial genocide. Tragically the film was quite effective at indoctrinating people into the Nazi's racist ideology.


Added DiffLines:

* SpiritualAntithesis: Goebbels intended this movie partly as a response of sorts to [[Film/JewSuss1934 the 1934 British film of the same name]], which [[TruerToTheText adapted the original book more faithfully]] and ''condemned'' antisemitism. Notably, both movies include a rape victim who drowns herself, but while it happens to Sü&szlig's daughter at the hands of the Duke in the earlier film, this movie makes ''Sü&szlig himself'' the rapist who forces himself on an unwilling gentile woman.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SpiritualSuccessor: The film can also be seen as a [[SettingUpdate German version]] of ''Theatre/TheMerchantOfVenice'', which carries similar themes (YMMV on how it does so either with or without much of the sympathetic reading that's possible with Shylock, however).

to:

* SpiritualSuccessor: The film can also be seen as a [[SettingUpdate German version]] of ''Theatre/TheMerchantOfVenice'', which carries similar themes (YMMV on how it does so either with or without much of the sympathetic reading that's possible in Creator/WilliamShakespeare's play with Shylock, however).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ValuesDissonance: This is a film that depicts the Nazi ideology in full force, with the antagonist being a [[GreedyJew dastardly Jew]] who corrupts society. Yeah, this isn't a movie that would carry over well in the present day.

to:

* ValuesDissonance: This is a film that depicts the Nazi applied UsefulNotes/{{Nazi|Germany}} ideology in full force, with the antagonist being a [[GreedyJew dastardly Jew]] who corrupts society. Yeah, this isn't a movie No wonder it's accompanied by messages that would carry over well in warn about the present day. context in which it was made.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AlternateAesopInterpretation: While the film's intended message is "Jews are parasites," the film can also be interpreted as a condemnation of unbridled greed and ambition. The Duke's dream to build Wurttemberg is what allows him to be manipulated by Suss. Suss' inability to control his greed and lust for power is what drives many people against him, with his rabbi warning him that his greed and lust for power will be his downfall.

to:

* AlternateAesopInterpretation: While the film's intended message is "Jews are parasites," the film can also be interpreted as a condemnation of unbridled greed and ambition. The Duke's dream to build Wurttemberg is what allows him to be manipulated by Suss. Suss' Süss. Süss' inability to control his greed and lust for power is what drives many people against him, with even his rabbi warning him that his greed and lust for power will be his downfall.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
was a "bad link." I hope it's better now


* DracoInLeatherPants: According to Website/{{Wikipedia}}, [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jud_S%C3%BC%C3%9F#Effectiveness_of_the_film "Marian's portrayal of Süß was considered to be quite sympathetic; so much so that he received fan mail from women who had become infatuated with his character."]]

to:

* DracoInLeatherPants: According to Website/{{Wikipedia}}, [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jud_S%C3%BC%C3%9F#Effectiveness_of_the_film org/wiki/Jud_Süß#Effectiveness_of_the_film "Marian's portrayal of Süß was considered to be quite sympathetic; so much so that he received fan mail from women who had become infatuated with his character."]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AlternateAesopInterpretation: While the film's intended message is "Jews are parasites," the film's other message seems to be the dangers of unbridled greed and ambition. The Duke's ambition to build Wurttemberg allows him to be manipulated by Suss. Suss is warned by his rabbi that his greed and lust for power will be his downfall.

to:

* AlternateAesopInterpretation: While the film's intended message is "Jews are parasites," the film's other message seems to film can also be the dangers interpreted as a condemnation of unbridled greed and ambition. The Duke's ambition dream to build Wurttemberg is what allows him to be manipulated by Suss. Suss Suss' inability to control his greed and lust for power is warned by what drives many people against him, with his rabbi warning him that his greed and lust for power will be his downfall.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AccidentalAesop: While the film's intended message is "Jews are parasites", the film's other message seems to be the dangers of unbridled greed and ambition. The Duke's ambition to build Wurttemberg is what allows him to be manipulated by Suss. Suss himself is warned by his own rabbi that his greed and lust for power will be his downfall.

to:

* AccidentalAesop: AlternateAesopInterpretation: While the film's intended message is "Jews are parasites", parasites," the film's other message seems to be the dangers of unbridled greed and ambition. The Duke's ambition to build Wurttemberg is what allows him to be manipulated by Suss. Suss himself is warned by his own rabbi that his greed and lust for power will be his downfall.

Top