Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / InspectorGadget1999

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
From what I read, the movie was actually a bomb. While $134.4 million to $75 to $90 million may seem like it broke even, when you take marketing and distribution costs as well, the true budget of the movie is closer to $180 to $225 million. Additionally wikipedia says that it lost around $30 million.


* CriticProof: It was poorly-reviewed by critics and ''Inspector Gadget'' fans alike, but still was a solid success at the box office.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* FirstInstallmentWins: While it isn't a good movie, it is loved by fans of late 1990s culture and some consider it better than its sequel.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HoYay: That [[AmbiguouslyGay Kramer]] ''really'' seems to get off on [[RomanticizedAbuse Claw's]] [[EvilIsSexy abuse]]... while Claw praises Kramer in comparison to constantly dumping on Sikes. Not to mention:

to:

* HoYay: That [[AmbiguouslyGay Kramer]] ''really'' seems to get off on [[RomanticizedAbuse Claw's]] [[EvilIsSexy abuse]]...abuse... while Claw praises Kramer in comparison to constantly dumping on Sikes. Not to mention:

Added: 545

Removed: 542

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Renamed one trope.


* QuestionableCasting:
** Of the directing variant, as David Kellogg was a ''commercial director'' whose only previous film effort was the critically panned ''Film/CoolAsIce''.
** Practically the entire cast has been hit with this, with Creator/RupertEverett and Creator/MatthewBroderick arguably being hit the hardest for their roles as Claw and Gadget, respectively. A less egregious case comes with Creator/MichelleTrachtenberg as Penny, who despite not being blonde at least attempts to make the most of the limited screentime she is afforded.



* WTHCastingAgency:
** Of the directing variant, as David Kellogg was a ''commercial director'' whose only previous film effort was the critically panned ''Film/CoolAsIce''.
** Practically the entire cast has been hit with this, with Creator/RupertEverett and Creator/MatthewBroderick arguably being hit the hardest for their roles as Claw and Gadget, respectively. A less egregious case comes with Creator/MichelleTrachtenberg as Penny, who despite not being blonde at least attempts to make the most of the limited screentime she is afforded.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
rocej and disney owns blank shoehorn


* HilariousInHindsight:
** As a few memes have pointed out, the "Sore Guru" bears more than a passing resemblance to UsefulNotes/OsamaBinLaden.
** Sikes was sleeping while ''WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons'' is on. 20 years later, Disney owns Fox.
** Both Sanford Scolex and [[Film/XMenOriginsWolverine Deadpool]] are two characters whom their first cinematic appearance was quite unfaithful. Even funnier is that Fox and Marvel are now owned by Disney.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
First bullet is too general, and neither one describes a dramatic thing that's funny instead, just jokes that don't land.


* {{Narm}}:
** Almost everyone's performance arguably falls under this, not helped by the peculiar casting choices. Outside of that, there's also that incredibly awkward fourth wall joke when Scolex and Kramer, along with the imprisoned Inspected Gadget, stare directly into the camera at the audience for no real good reason except for the sake of showing there's NoFourthWall. See BigLippedAlligatorMoment above.
** The entirety of the ''end credits'' becomes this when you sit through all of the random clips and dialogue from the Gadgetmobile [[EndingFatigue even after the bloody movie has ended]]. Even the ''casting credits'' could not turn down the opportunity at one last gag before finally concluding.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* {{Woolseyism}}: As lame as Gadget's "You should've quit while you were ahead" pun is, its Polish translation, taking advantage of a well-known if somewhat rarely used phrase that can be roughly rendered as "Dreams of a severed head" (meaning aspirations expressed long past deadline), can be pretty funny.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Of the directing variant, as David Kellogg was a ''commercial director'' who's only previous film effort was the critically panned ''Film/CoolAsIce''.

to:

** Of the directing variant, as David Kellogg was a ''commercial director'' who's whose only previous film effort was the critically panned ''Film/CoolAsIce''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The transitions between scenes which seem to showcase Gadget's various devices. Thoroughly parodied by WebVideo/TheNostalgiaCritic who mocked how random and jarring they were.

to:

** The transitions between scenes which seem to showcase Gadget's various devices. Thoroughly parodied by WebVideo/TheNostalgiaCritic who mocked how random and jarring they were.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


** Creator/RichardEpcar provided [=ADR=] for this film. Years before and after it, he voiced in ''Anime/LupinIII'', which notoriously has the misinformation about it being an influence for the cartoon.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Adorkable}}: John/Gadget might be a tad [[TheDitz airheaded]] or oblivious most of the time, but he's endearingly good-hearted and selfless.

to:

* {{Adorkable}}: John/Gadget might be a tad [[TheDitz airheaded]] or oblivious most of the time, but he's he manages to remain endearingly good-hearted and selfless.good-hearted.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* {{Adorkable}}: John/Gadget might be a tad [[TheDitz airheaded]] or oblivious most of the time, but he's endearingly good-hearted and selfless.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Uncanny Valley is IUEO now and the subjective version has been split; cleaning up misuse and ZCE in the process


* UncannyValley: Robo-Gadget. The shifty eyes and fake teeth are scary without trying. One could argue that Broderick made a better villain than a hero.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Doesn't belong here.


* {{Sequelitis}}: ''Film/InspectorGadget2'', a direct-to-video sequel that came out 4 years later. Even though it was closer to the cartoon, it was doomed from the start due to it being a sequel to a critically-panned movie, plus a sequel no one was asking for. Most of the cast of the previous film was either recast or their characters were replaced with similar stand-ins, the CGI is so bad it makes the CG in the first movie look like ''Film/JurassicPark'', and while the first film did have it's fans, the sequel has practically nothing to do with it. The writing is also incredibly lazy; clumsy, hand-waving explanations are all we get for why Brenda is now a male scientist or why Dr. Claw appears to have aged 40 years in only 4, plus Dr. Claw's big diabolical plan is basically [[Film/{{Goldfinger}} Auric Goldfinger]]'s plan for robbing Fort Knox, only with a laser that freezes time instead of knock-out gas. The sequel really would been better off had it just been a second adaptation of the cartoon with no ties to the first movie.

Added: 909

Changed: 359

Removed: 595

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HamAndCheese: Matthew Broderick played both Gadget and Robo-Gadget. He is quite clearly enjoying one of these roles way too much. [[EvilIsHammy Guess which one]].

to:

* HamAndCheese: HamAndCheese:
**
Matthew Broderick played both Gadget and Robo-Gadget. He is quite clearly enjoying one of these roles way too much. [[EvilIsHammy Guess which one]].



* TheScrappy: Sanford Scolex isn't well liked for having his face completely revealed and that he is more appropriate for a henchman of Dr. Claw rather than Dr. Claw himself.

to:

* TheScrappy: TheScrappy:
**
Sanford Scolex isn't well liked for having his face completely revealed and that he is more appropriate for a henchman of Dr. Claw rather than Dr. Claw himself.



* {{Sequelitis}}: Inspector Gadget 2, a direct-to-video sequel that came out 4 years later. Even though it was closer to the cartoon, it was doomed from the start due to it being a sequel to a critically-panned movie, plus a sequel no one was asking for. Most of the cast of the previous film was either recast or their characters were replaced with similar stand-ins, the CGI is so bad it makes the CG in the first movie look like Jurassic Park, and while the first film did have it's fans, the sequel has practically nothing to do with it. The writing is also incredibly lazy; clumsy, hand-waving explanations are all we get for why Brenda is now a male scientist or why Dr. Claw appears to have aged 40 years in only 4, plus Dr. Claw's big diabolical plan is basically Goldfinger's plan for robbing Fort Knox, only with a laser that freezes time instead of knock-out gas. The sequel really would been better off had it just been a second adaptation of the cartoon with no ties to the first movie.

to:

* {{Sequelitis}}: Inspector Gadget 2, ''Film/InspectorGadget2'', a direct-to-video sequel that came out 4 years later. Even though it was closer to the cartoon, it was doomed from the start due to it being a sequel to a critically-panned movie, plus a sequel no one was asking for. Most of the cast of the previous film was either recast or their characters were replaced with similar stand-ins, the CGI is so bad it makes the CG in the first movie look like Jurassic Park, ''Film/JurassicPark'', and while the first film did have it's fans, the sequel has practically nothing to do with it. The writing is also incredibly lazy; clumsy, hand-waving explanations are all we get for why Brenda is now a male scientist or why Dr. Claw appears to have aged 40 years in only 4, plus Dr. Claw's big diabolical plan is basically Goldfinger's [[Film/{{Goldfinger}} Auric Goldfinger]]'s plan for robbing Fort Knox, only with a laser that freezes time instead of knock-out gas. The sequel really would been better off had it just been a second adaptation of the cartoon with no ties to the first movie.



* TheyChangedItNowItSucks: Many diehard fans are clearly unhappy that Claw reveals his face throughout the film.
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter: You'd never know that Penny was the actual hero of the television series if you're going solely by this film, and she is noticeably absent throughout a lot of the action despite being a much more able detective than her uncle. This did not go unnoticed by fans and critics, which is perhaps why her role in the sequel is much more prominent.



* TrailerJokeDecay: Several of the jokes from the film including deleted scenes are used in the trailers.



* TheyChangedItNowItSucks: Many diehard fans are clearly unhappy that Claw reveals his face throughout the film.
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter: You'd never know that Penny was the actual hero of the television series if you're going solely by this film, and she is noticeably absent throughout a lot of the action despite being a much more able detective than her uncle. This did not go unnoticed by fans and critics, which is perhaps why her role in the sequel is much more prominent.
* TrailerJokeDecay: Several of the jokes from the film including deleted scenes are used in the trailers.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* {{Sequelitis}}: Inspector Gadget 2, a direct-to-video sequel that came out 4 years later. Even though it was closer to the cartoon, it was doomed from the start due to it being a sequel to a critically-panned movie, plus a sequel no one was asking for. Most of the cast of the previous film was either recast or their characters were replaced with similar stand-ins, the CGI is so bad it makes the CG in the first movie look like Jurassic Park, and while the first film did have it's fans, the sequel has practically nothing to do with it. The writing is also incredibly lazy; clumsy, hand-waving explanations are all we get for why Brenda is now a male scientist or why Dr. Claw appears to have aged 40 years in only 4, plus Dr. Claw's big diabolical plan is basically Goldfinger's plan for robbing Fort Knox, only with a laser that freezes time instead of knock-out gas. The sequel really would been better off had it just been a second adaptation of the cartoon with no ties to the first movie.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Asspull}}: Gadget's pen projectile trick that he uses to save Brenda and to disable Claw's helicopter. It comes out of absolutely nowhere and no explanation is given for whatever he did to make it work as he intended.

to:

* {{Asspull}}: Gadget's pen projectile trick that he uses to save Brenda and to disable Claw's helicopter. It comes out of absolutely nowhere and no explanation is given for whatever he did to make it work as he intended. That said, the refill of the pen hitting the BigRedButton on Scolex's claw, which crushes whatever he is holding, was actually foreshadowed, as he held Gadget's CPU in his claw and crushed it by pressing said button earlier in the film.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Removing the misuse.


** Similarly, Brain. In the cartoon, he was a super smart dog that could talk. In this film, he's a normal dog and only gains the ability to talk during the credits.
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: Claw gets his hands on the technology used to make Inspector Gadget and uses it to build an evil, completely robotic Gadget, built to cause destruction and chaos? It's a premise that could make for a legitimately interesting and entertaining movie. The film we got... was neither.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Lupin III didn't inspire Inspector Gadget, look it up more intensely.


** Creator/RichardEpcar provided [=ADR=] for this film. Years before and after it, he voiced in ''Anime/LupinIII'', which served as an inspiration for the cartoon.

to:

** Creator/RichardEpcar provided [=ADR=] for this film. Years before and after it, he voiced in ''Anime/LupinIII'', which served as notoriously has the misinformation about it being an inspiration influence for the cartoon.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* CriticProof: It was poorly-reviewed by critics and ''Inspector Gadget'' fans alike, but still was a solid success at the box office.

Changed: 27

Removed: 264

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
What an Idiot is now Flame Bait


* WhatAnIdiot: Not from Gadget, but instead from Scolex, who went out of his way to build a robotic version of Brenda who was programmed with a MotorMouth for reasons we dare not explore. She ends up blabbing everything to the real Brenda without a second thought.



** Practically the entire cast has been hit with this, with Rupert Everett and Matthew Broderick arguably being hit the hardest for their roles as Claw and Gadget, respectively. A less egregious case comes with Michelle Trachtenberg as Penny, who despite not being blonde at least attempts to make the most of the limited screentime she is afforded.

to:

** Practically the entire cast has been hit with this, with Rupert Everett Creator/RupertEverett and Matthew Broderick Creator/MatthewBroderick arguably being hit the hardest for their roles as Claw and Gadget, respectively. A less egregious case comes with Michelle Trachtenberg Creator/MichelleTrachtenberg as Penny, who despite not being blonde at least attempts to make the most of the limited screentime she is afforded.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The entire plot hinging on the theft of a ''very'' life-like robotic foot may have some wondering if somebody behind the scenes had an unhealthy foot fetish going on.

to:

** The entire plot hinging hinges on the theft of a ''very'' life-like robotic foot foot. As in, it may have some wondering if somebody behind the scenes had an unhealthy foot fetish going on. as well be a disembodied ''real'' one.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* NightmareFuel:
** Artemis Bradford's murder. We don't see it, but we see ''some'' sort of gun fire at him, and we get a GoryDiscretionShot of what it actually did to him.
** Gadget with all of his robotic parts exposed.
** The tarantula coming out of Robo Gadget.
** The guru's eyes ''popping out of his head'' when Gadget grabs the wrong set of balls.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Hindsight Misuse; Actor Mortality doesn't count under Hindsight


* HarsherInHindsight: Watching Artemis Bradford get zapped to death can be hard to watch today after his actor Rene Auberjonois passed away in 2019.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Also Rupert Everett who wastes no giving everybody a yummy ham and cheese sandwich as the evil Claw.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BrokenBase: The fans are divided between those who despised the first film for not being close enough to the cartoons, those who hated the second film for not being enough like the first, people who hated both and prefer to stick to the cartoons, and the people who liked both films. All of the above is ''without'' taking onto consideration the people who liked either of the movies, but disliked the cartoons.

to:

* BrokenBase: The fans are divided between those who despised the first film for not being close enough to the cartoons, those who hated the second film for not being enough like the first, people who hated both and prefer to stick to the cartoons, and the people who liked both films. All of the above is ''without'' taking onto consideration the people who liked either (or both) of the movies, but disliked the cartoons.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* FirstInstallmentWins: While it isn't a good movie, it is loved by fans of late 1990s culture.

to:

* FirstInstallmentWins: While it isn't a good movie, it is loved by fans of late 1990s culture.culture and some consider it better than its sequel.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Robo-Brenda's entire appearance. She only shows up in a couple of scenes where Brenda encounters her in Scolex's building, spouts some brief exposition about being cloned from the robotic foot stolen from Artemis Bradford, and then jumps off a rooftop and is never sceen again (besides one of the m-credits scenes).

to:

** Robo-Brenda's entire appearance. She only shows up in a couple of scenes where Brenda encounters her in Scolex's building, spouts some brief exposition about being cloned from the robotic foot stolen from Artemis Bradford, and then jumps off a rooftop and is never sceen seen again (besides one of the m-credits mid-credits scenes).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Robo-Brenda's entire appearance. She only shows up in a couple of scenes where Brenda encounters her in Scolex's building, spouts some brief exposition about being cloned from the robotic foot stolen from Artemis Bradford, and then jumps off a rooftop and is never sceen again (besides one of the m-credits scenes).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AntiClimaxBoss: After defeating Robo-Gadget and using the iconic Gadget Copter to fly to Scolex's headquarters, Gadget's battle with Claw... isn't. Claw destroys the Copter with a missile and hooks Gadget on the rung of his helicopter, Gadget uses an ImprovisedWeapon made from a pen to trigger Claw's claw to shatter the control stick, and then everyone bails out of the helicopter and Claw lands in the [=GadgetMobile=] to be caged and trapped. Gadget's chase of two nameless prison escapees earlier in the movie is longer and has more action than his confrontation with his archnemesis.
* {{Asspull}}: Gadget's pen projectile trick that he uses to save Brenda and to disable Claw's helicopter. It comes out of absolutely nowhere and no explanation is given for whatever he did to make it work as he intended.
* SugarWiki/AwesomeMusic:
** John Debney's BigBudgetBeefUp version of [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_bHfbbNH7uw the theme song]].
** [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xh_SGzJgauM "I'll be your everything/Fulfill your every dream..."]]
* BigLippedAlligatorMoment:
** The transitions between scenes which seem to showcase Gadget's various devices. Thoroughly parodied by WebVideo/TheNostalgiaCritic who mocked how random and jarring they were.
** Gadget's various [[ImagineSpot Imagine spots]] also are worthy of mention, usually of moments between him and Brenda that were seemingly cut from the main flow of the story.
** [[NoFourthWall The entire scene where Scolex, Gadget, and Kramer look directly into the camera to acknowledge the audience]], after Scolex had accused "somebody of watching too many Saturday Morning cartoons". Fittingly enough, Sikes is completely baffled at what they're staring at.
* BrokenBase: The fans are divided between those who despised the first film for not being close enough to the cartoons, those who hated the second film for not being enough like the first, people who hated both and prefer to stick to the cartoons, and the people who liked both films. All of the above is ''without'' taking onto consideration the people who liked either of the movies, but disliked the cartoons.
* EndingFatigue: Even after it's over, the end credits are littered with cutaway clips of what the characters have moved on to after catching Claw, complete with the Gadgetmobile's life story which carries on even when the credits finally conclude.
* FandomEnragingMisconception: Fans prefer not to call Sanford Scolex Dr. Claw simply because his face is shown and that he acts more like a henchman of him.
* FirstInstallmentWins: While it isn't a good movie, it is loved by fans of late 1990s culture.
* HamAndCheese: Matthew Broderick played both Gadget and Robo-Gadget. He is quite clearly enjoying one of these roles way too much. [[EvilIsHammy Guess which one]].
* HarsherInHindsight: Watching Artemis Bradford get zapped to death can be hard to watch today after his actor Rene Auberjonois passed away in 2019.
* HilariousInHindsight:
** As a few memes have pointed out, the "Sore Guru" bears more than a passing resemblance to UsefulNotes/OsamaBinLaden.
** Sikes was sleeping while ''WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons'' is on. 20 years later, Disney owns Fox.
** Both Sanford Scolex and [[Film/XMenOriginsWolverine Deadpool]] are two characters whom their first cinematic appearance was quite unfaithful. Even funnier is that Fox and Marvel are now owned by Disney.
** Creator/RichardEpcar provided [=ADR=] for this film. Years before and after it, he voiced in ''Anime/LupinIII'', which served as an inspiration for the cartoon.
* HoYay: That [[AmbiguouslyGay Kramer]] ''really'' seems to get off on [[RomanticizedAbuse Claw's]] [[EvilIsSexy abuse]]... while Claw praises Kramer in comparison to constantly dumping on Sikes. Not to mention:
--> '''Claw''': "Ok. Turn me on, Kramer..."
* InformedWrongness: Chief Quimby. Gadget wants to be assigned to Artemis Bradford's murder investigation, and Quimby coldly tells him that the Bradford case demands ''real'' police work, and Gadget is not a real inspector or even a real police officer, he's just a publicity stunt that Quimby has to put up with. While definitely mean, Quimby is absolutely right -- Gadget was only a security guard (and only for two years according to the opening scene) and has received no formal training as a police officer, so he has no business being put on a high-profile murder case.
* MoralEventHorizon: Scolex crosses it in his very first scene. Interestingly, John Brown (the future Gadget) thinks Scolex's MEH wasn't the murder of Dr. Artemus Bradford, but having his henchman track oil behind his limo, thus causing Brown's '87 Chevette to flip onto its roof and slide into a Yahoo! billboard. What makes that worse is that Scolex enjoys watching Brown suffer for going after him.
-->'''John Brown''': Now you've crossed the line! Pull over, you!\\
'''Sanford Scolex''': [[ForTheEvulz Stop the car, Sikes, I want to enjoy this.]]
* {{Narm}}:
** Almost everyone's performance arguably falls under this, not helped by the peculiar casting choices. Outside of that, there's also that incredibly awkward fourth wall joke when Scolex and Kramer, along with the imprisoned Inspected Gadget, stare directly into the camera at the audience for no real good reason except for the sake of showing there's NoFourthWall. See BigLippedAlligatorMoment above.
** The entirety of the ''end credits'' becomes this when you sit through all of the random clips and dialogue from the Gadgetmobile [[EndingFatigue even after the bloody movie has ended]]. Even the ''casting credits'' could not turn down the opportunity at one last gag before finally concluding.
* NeverLiveItDown: Despite its success at the box office, its unfaithfulness to the cartoon, its questionable casting, disjointed plot, overload of cartoon sound effects and the decision to reveal Dr. Claw's entire face have all remained huge sore points to fans of the bumbling Inspector Gadget. That's to say nothing of the equally baffling decision of [[DemotedToExtra reducing Penny to a side character]], which many saw as completely missing the point of the cartoon.
* NightmareFuel:
** Artemis Bradford's murder. We don't see it, but we see ''some'' sort of gun fire at him, and we get a GoryDiscretionShot of what it actually did to him.
** Gadget with all of his robotic parts exposed.
** The tarantula coming out of Robo Gadget.
** The guru's eyes ''popping out of his head'' when Gadget grabs the wrong set of balls.
* OneSceneWonder: The film saves the iconic Gadget-Copter until the climax.
* TheScrappy: Sanford Scolex isn't well liked for having his face completely revealed and that he is more appropriate for a henchman of Dr. Claw rather than Dr. Claw himself.
** Matthew Broderick's Inspector Gadget isn't well-regarded by most fans, with his performance being singled out as one of the film's major weak points.
* SignatureSong: "I'll Be Your Everything" by Youngstown.
* SpecialEffectFailure: The Gadgetmobile monitor in the film doesn't have a proper lip-sync. This was corrected in the sequel.
* {{Squick}}:
** The giggly, acquiescent, relatively dim, programmed-to-be-a-cheerleader Robo-Brenda was basically a sex doll.
** The entire plot hinging on the theft of a ''very'' life-like robotic foot may have some wondering if somebody behind the scenes had an unhealthy foot fetish going on.
* TaintedByThePreview: All of the marketing and trailers reveal Claw's face.
* TookTheBadFilmSeriously: D.L. Hughley's performance as the voice of the Gadgetmobile caught people's attention and got to voice him in the sequel as well as have his performance serve as a rewrite to future iterations of the Gadgetmobile.
* UncannyValley: Robo-Gadget. The shifty eyes and fake teeth are scary without trying. One could argue that Broderick made a better villain than a hero.
* SugarWiki/VisualEffectsOfAwesome: Say what you like about the film, but the creators ''really'' used their budget, and the whole thing is worth watching just for Creator/StanWinston's realizations of Inspector Gadget's gadgets. Also, Claw's... claw, is pretty damn impressive looking.
* TheyChangedItNowItSucks: Many diehard fans are clearly unhappy that Claw reveals his face throughout the film.
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter: You'd never know that Penny was the actual hero of the television series if you're going solely by this film, and she is noticeably absent throughout a lot of the action despite being a much more able detective than her uncle. This did not go unnoticed by fans and critics, which is perhaps why her role in the sequel is much more prominent.
** Similarly, Brain. In the cartoon, he was a super smart dog that could talk. In this film, he's a normal dog and only gains the ability to talk during the credits.
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: Claw gets his hands on the technology used to make Inspector Gadget and uses it to build an evil, completely robotic Gadget, built to cause destruction and chaos? It's a premise that could make for a legitimately interesting and entertaining movie. The film we got... was neither.
* TrailerJokeDecay: Several of the jokes from the film including deleted scenes are used in the trailers.
* WhatAnIdiot: Not from Gadget, but instead from Scolex, who went out of his way to build a robotic version of Brenda who was programmed with a MotorMouth for reasons we dare not explore. She ends up blabbing everything to the real Brenda without a second thought.
* WTHCastingAgency:
** Of the directing variant, as David Kellogg was a ''commercial director'' who's only previous film effort was the critically panned ''Film/CoolAsIce''.
** Practically the entire cast has been hit with this, with Rupert Everett and Matthew Broderick arguably being hit the hardest for their roles as Claw and Gadget, respectively. A less egregious case comes with Michelle Trachtenberg as Penny, who despite not being blonde at least attempts to make the most of the limited screentime she is afforded.
----

Top