Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Narm is for specific moments only, this entry is too general. Plus, the below entry contradicts it.
Deleted line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) :
* {{Narm}}: Svetlana's corny (and inconsistent) Russian accent.
* NarmCharm: For those who like the 80's homage, Svetlana's corny accent adds to it.
* NarmCharm: For those who like the 80's homage, Svetlana's corny accent adds to it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Broken Base is for in-fandom examples. This is an in vs out-fandom debate.
Deleted line(s) 1 (click to see context) :
* BrokenBase: Some people hate the film and don't like the visual effects, others accept the film had a very low budget and makes it count and is a fun GenreThrowback film.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7,9 (click to see context) from:
* SpiritualAdaptation: Of ''VideoGame/ResidentEvilRevelations'', between its ship-based setting, its [[WasOnceAMan once-human]] aquatic monsters, and the twist of [[spoiler:a female spy aboard the ship getting infected and turned into a monster whose head opens up into a jaw]].
* SugarWiki/VisualEffectsOfAwesome: For many, the practical effects are extremely good given the film's budget was only ''380,000''. Keep in mind many Film/{{Syfy Channel Original Movie}}s have a budget approaching a ''million''.
* SugarWiki/VisualEffectsOfAwesome: For many, the practical effects are extremely good given the film's budget was only ''380,000''. Keep in mind many Film/{{Syfy Channel Original Movie}}s have a budget approaching a ''million''.
to:
* SpiritualAdaptation: Of In addition to its direct homage to ''Film/TheThing1982'', it can also be seen as this to ''VideoGame/ResidentEvilRevelations'', between its ship-based setting, its [[WasOnceAMan once-human]] aquatic monsters, and the shared twist of [[spoiler:a female spy aboard the ship getting infected and turned into a monster whose head opens up into a jaw]].
* SugarWiki/VisualEffectsOfAwesome: For many, the practical effects are extremely good given the film's budget was only''380,000''.''$380,000''. Keep in mind many Film/{{Syfy Channel Original Movie}}s have a budget approaching a ''million''.
* SugarWiki/VisualEffectsOfAwesome: For many, the practical effects are extremely good given the film's budget was only
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
* SugarWiki/VisualEffectsOfAwesome: For many, the practical effects are extremely good given the film's budget was only ''380,000''. Keep in mind many Film/{{Syfy Channel Original Movie}}s have a budget approaching a ''million''.
to:
* SpiritualAdaptation: Of ''VideoGame/ResidentEvilRevelations'', between its ship-based setting, its [[WasOnceAMan once-human]] aquatic monsters, and the twist of [[spoiler:a female spy aboard the ship getting infected and turned into a monster whose head opens up into a jaw]].
* SugarWiki/VisualEffectsOfAwesome: For many, the practical effects are extremely good given the film's budget was only ''380,000''. Keep in mind many Film/{{Syfy Channel Original Movie}}s have a budget approaching a''million''.''million''.
----
* SugarWiki/VisualEffectsOfAwesome: For many, the practical effects are extremely good given the film's budget was only ''380,000''. Keep in mind many Film/{{Syfy Channel Original Movie}}s have a budget approaching a
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* BrokenBase: Some people hate the film and don't like the visual effects, others accept the film had a very low budget and makes it count and is a fun GenreThrowback film.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
* VisualEffectsOfAwesome: For many, the practical effects are extremely good given the film's budget was only ''380,000''. Keep in mind many SyfyChannelOriginalMovies have a budget approaching a ''million''.
to:
* VisualEffectsOfAwesome: SugarWiki/VisualEffectsOfAwesome: For many, the practical effects are extremely good given the film's budget was only ''380,000''. Keep in mind many SyfyChannelOriginalMovies Film/{{Syfy Channel Original Movie}}s have a budget approaching a ''million''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* ClicheStorm: The film tries very little to distance itself from stereotypes: the black funny guy, the evil Soviet ice queen, and a ton of other elements from famous horror films from TheEighties. Even if it was done in purpose as a homage, it still has little redeeming value.
to:
* ClicheStorm: The film tries very little to distance itself from stereotypes: the black funny guy, the evil Soviet ice queen, and a ton of other elements from famous horror films from TheEighties. Even if Whether it was done in purpose as a homage, it still has little redeeming value.being an intentional homage works or not depends on the viewer.
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* SpecialEffectsFailure: For a film which was conceived in the first place to showcase the work of a renowned special effects team, the monsters's PFX are shockingly shoddy and cheap-looking (and even worse, the camera work obscuring them constantly implies the team knew it too), to the point a viewer who knows the story behind it might actually ''agree'' with the infamous executive decision to cover up with CGI their work in ''Film/TheThing2011''. In all honesty, it was probably a budget thing, as the kickstarter only raised maybe 350 thousand and the crew had to pay for all of the effects themselves, in comparison the budget for ''The Thing'' which was ''1000 times'' larger.
to:
* NarmCharm: For those who like the 80's homage, Svetlana's corny accent adds to it.
* SpecialEffectsFailure:For a film which was conceived in the first place to showcase the work of a renowned special effects team, the monsters's PFX are shockingly shoddy and cheap-looking (and even worse, the camera work obscuring them constantly implies the team knew it too), to the point a viewer who knows the story behind it might actually ''agree'' with the infamous executive decision to cover up with CGI their work in ''Film/TheThing2011''. In all honesty, it was probably a budget thing, as the kickstarter only raised maybe 350 thousand and the crew had to pay for all Some of the effects themselves, don't hold up too well, though in comparison part it's due to having an extremely low budget, even for an indie film. How ''well'' they work vary from person to person.
* VisualEffectsOfAwesome: For many, the practical effects are extremely good given the film's budgetfor ''The Thing'' which was ''1000 times'' larger.only ''380,000''. Keep in mind many SyfyChannelOriginalMovies have a budget approaching a ''million''.
* SpecialEffectsFailure:
* VisualEffectsOfAwesome: For many, the practical effects are extremely good given the film's budget
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* SpecialEffectsFailure: For a film which was conceived in the first place to showcase the work of a renowned special effects team, the monsters's PFX are shockingly shoddy and cheap-looking (and even worse, the camera work obscuring them constantly implies the team knew it too), to the point a viewer who knows the story behind it might actually ''agree'' with the infamous executive decision to cover up with CGI their work in ''Film/TheThing2011''. In all honesty, it was probably a budget thing, as the kickstarter only raised maybe 350 thousand, in comparison the budget for ''The Thing'' which was ''1000 times'' larger.
to:
* SpecialEffectsFailure: For a film which was conceived in the first place to showcase the work of a renowned special effects team, the monsters's PFX are shockingly shoddy and cheap-looking (and even worse, the camera work obscuring them constantly implies the team knew it too), to the point a viewer who knows the story behind it might actually ''agree'' with the infamous executive decision to cover up with CGI their work in ''Film/TheThing2011''. In all honesty, it was probably a budget thing, as the kickstarter only raised maybe 350 thousand, thousand and the crew had to pay for all of the effects themselves, in comparison the budget for ''The Thing'' which was ''1000 times'' larger.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4,5 (click to see context) from:
* SpecialEffectsFailure: For a film which was conceived in the first place to showcase the work of a renowned special effects team, the monsters's PFX are shockingly shoddy and cheap-looking (and even worse, the camera work obscuring them constantly implies the team knew it too), to the point a viewer who knows the story behind it might actually ''agree'' with the infamous executive decision to cover up with CGI their work in ''Film/TheThing2011''.
** In all honesty it was probably a budget thing, the kickstarter only raised maybe 350 thousand, in comparison the budget for ''Film/TheThing2011'' was ''1000 times'' larger than the goal, and it showed in the "making of" videos for ''Film/TheThing2011''
** In all honesty it was probably a budget thing, the kickstarter only raised maybe 350 thousand, in comparison the budget for ''Film/TheThing2011'' was ''1000 times'' larger than the goal, and it showed in the "making of" videos for ''Film/TheThing2011''
to:
* SpecialEffectsFailure: For a film which was conceived in the first place to showcase the work of a renowned special effects team, the monsters's PFX are shockingly shoddy and cheap-looking (and even worse, the camera work obscuring them constantly implies the team knew it too), to the point a viewer who knows the story behind it might actually ''agree'' with the infamous executive decision to cover up with CGI their work in ''Film/TheThing2011''.
**''Film/TheThing2011''. In all honesty honesty, it was probably a budget thing, as the kickstarter only raised maybe 350 thousand, in comparison the budget for ''Film/TheThing2011'' ''The Thing'' which was ''1000 times'' larger than the goal, and it showed in the "making of" videos for ''Film/TheThing2011''larger.
**
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* SpecialEffectsFailure: For a film which was conceived in the first place to showcase the work of a renowned special effects team, the monsters's PFX are shockingly shoddy and cheap-looking (and even worse, the camera work obscuring them constantly implies the team knew it too), to the point a viewer who knows the story behind it might actually ''agree'' with the infamous executive decision to cover up with CGI their work in ''Film/TheThing2011''.
to:
* SpecialEffectsFailure: For a film which was conceived in the first place to showcase the work of a renowned special effects team, the monsters's PFX are shockingly shoddy and cheap-looking (and even worse, the camera work obscuring them constantly implies the team knew it too), to the point a viewer who knows the story behind it might actually ''agree'' with the infamous executive decision to cover up with CGI their work in ''Film/TheThing2011''.''Film/TheThing2011''.
** In all honesty it was probably a budget thing, the kickstarter only raised maybe 350 thousand, in comparison the budget for ''Film/TheThing2011'' was ''1000 times'' larger than the goal, and it showed in the "making of" videos for ''Film/TheThing2011''
** In all honesty it was probably a budget thing, the kickstarter only raised maybe 350 thousand, in comparison the budget for ''Film/TheThing2011'' was ''1000 times'' larger than the goal, and it showed in the "making of" videos for ''Film/TheThing2011''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
About fans or critics praising it such audiences don't think it measures up. Not just disappointment.
Deleted line(s) 2 (click to see context) :
* HypeBacklash: ''Harbinger Down'' was created and advertised by Studio ADI to show off what they could do without CGI, so it's a given that people complained when the result was very far from being impressive in that field (or any other). Even fans of the studio are unanimous this is one of their worst works and a bad business move after all the fuss they made against the higher ups in ''Film/TheThing2011''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* {{Narm}}: Svetlana's corny (and inconsistent) Russian accent.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,3 (click to see context) from:
* HypeBacklash: ''Harbinger Down'' was created by Studio ADI to show off what they could do without CGI, so it's a given that people complained when the result was very far from being impressive. Even fans of the studio are unanimous this is one of their worst works.
* JustHereForGodzilla: The film's existence itself.
* SpecialEffectsFailure: For a film which was conceived in the first place to showcase the work of a renowned special effects team, the monsters's PFX are shockingly shoddy and cheap-looking, to the point a viewer who doesn't know Studio ADI's usual record might actually ''agree'' with the decision to cover up with CGI their work in ''Film/TheThing2011''.
* JustHereForGodzilla: The film's existence itself.
* SpecialEffectsFailure: For a film which was conceived in the first place to showcase the work of a renowned special effects team, the monsters's PFX are shockingly shoddy and cheap-looking, to the point a viewer who doesn't know Studio ADI's usual record might actually ''agree'' with the decision to cover up with CGI their work in ''Film/TheThing2011''.
to:
* ClicheStorm: The film tries very little to distance itself from stereotypes: the black funny guy, the evil Soviet ice queen, and a ton of other elements from famous horror films from TheEighties. Even if it was done in purpose as a homage, it still has little redeeming value.
* HypeBacklash: ''Harbinger Down'' was created and advertised by Studio ADI to show off what they could do without CGI, so it's a given that people complained when the result was very far from beingimpressive. impressive in that field (or any other). Even fans of the studio are unanimous this is one of their worst works.
works and a bad business move after all the fuss they made against the higher ups in ''Film/TheThing2011''.
* JustHereForGodzilla: The film's existenceitself.
itself was for the creatures and such.
* SpecialEffectsFailure: For a film which was conceived in the first place to showcase the work of a renowned special effects team, the monsters's PFX are shockingly shoddy andcheap-looking, cheap-looking (and even worse, the camera work obscuring them constantly implies the team knew it too), to the point a viewer who doesn't know Studio ADI's usual record knows the story behind it might actually ''agree'' with the infamous executive decision to cover up with CGI their work in ''Film/TheThing2011''.
* HypeBacklash: ''Harbinger Down'' was created and advertised by Studio ADI to show off what they could do without CGI, so it's a given that people complained when the result was very far from being
* JustHereForGodzilla: The film's existence
* SpecialEffectsFailure: For a film which was conceived in the first place to showcase the work of a renowned special effects team, the monsters's PFX are shockingly shoddy and
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* HypeBacklash: ''Harbinger Down'' was created by Studio ADI to show off what they could do without CGI, so it's a given that people complained when the result was very far from being impressive. Even fans of the studio are unanimous this is one of their worst works.
* JustHereForGodzilla: The film's existence itself.
* SpecialEffectsFailure: For a film which was conceived in the first place to showcase the work of a renowned special effects team, the monsters's PFX are shockingly shoddy and cheap-looking, to the point a viewer who doesn't know Studio ADI's usual record might actually ''agree'' with the decision to cover up with CGI their work in ''Film/TheThing2011''.
* JustHereForGodzilla: The film's existence itself.
* SpecialEffectsFailure: For a film which was conceived in the first place to showcase the work of a renowned special effects team, the monsters's PFX are shockingly shoddy and cheap-looking, to the point a viewer who doesn't know Studio ADI's usual record might actually ''agree'' with the decision to cover up with CGI their work in ''Film/TheThing2011''.