Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,5 (click to see context) from:
* BrokenBase: Exo has a few reviews that cause a divide amongst audiences
** His review on ''Sonic the Hedgehog 2'' is possibly the most divisive videos on his channel. People are divided on whether Exo's issues with the game's level design, lack of a save feature, and method to enter the special stage are justified and well-deserved criticisms or a result of him being unwilling to learn from his mistakes and adjust his playstyle. Not helping matters is that it's at points unclear how much of the review is Exo talking about his problems the first time playing and how much is stuff he still believes. It got to the point where Exo removed all his Classic Sonic videos from Summer 2020 to Spring 2021 due to not wanting those videos to be the first impression to new viewers, only relisting the videos upon massive demand.
** His collab with J's reviews on ''Mega Man & Bass'' has divided viewers as the game is considered controversial amongst Classic Mega Man fans. Are Exo and J correct in that the game's boss and weapons provide more variety and replayability than the other games in the series? Or are they minimizing the issues of the game and demonstrating to how much prior knowledge affects player experience while ironically not giving other games in the series that advantage while acting smug and overly defensive about their enjoyment? Not helping matters is that J was going through a self-admitted AudienceAlienatingEra at the time.
** His ''Ocarina of Time'' ROR. Are his points on the game's age in terms of the N64 version's visuals and text speed well thought out or a result of him being overly critical and impatient? And amongst those who do agree with his critisisms, there's a divide on whether or not he spent too much time dwelling on it
** The ''Remake or Rebreak'' episode on ''Banjo-Tooie'' seems to be one of his most divided videos, and the most divided one of the series. Either you agree with Exo that the game suffers from many issues and should have been designed in a different way when it comes to its gameplay and its structure, or you think he's nitpicking through the entire episode, making mountains out of molehills, while not understanding how the game works at all. There's also a third camp who belives that while his complaints about the original are justified, it was unrealistic for him to expect a remaster to overhaul so much of the level design and mechanics
** His review on ''Sonic the Hedgehog 2'' is possibly the most divisive videos on his channel. People are divided on whether Exo's issues with the game's level design, lack of a save feature, and method to enter the special stage are justified and well-deserved criticisms or a result of him being unwilling to learn from his mistakes and adjust his playstyle. Not helping matters is that it's at points unclear how much of the review is Exo talking about his problems the first time playing and how much is stuff he still believes. It got to the point where Exo removed all his Classic Sonic videos from Summer 2020 to Spring 2021 due to not wanting those videos to be the first impression to new viewers, only relisting the videos upon massive demand.
** His collab with J's reviews on ''Mega Man & Bass'' has divided viewers as the game is considered controversial amongst Classic Mega Man fans. Are Exo and J correct in that the game's boss and weapons provide more variety and replayability than the other games in the series? Or are they minimizing the issues of the game and demonstrating to how much prior knowledge affects player experience while ironically not giving other games in the series that advantage while acting smug and overly defensive about their enjoyment? Not helping matters is that J was going through a self-admitted AudienceAlienatingEra at the time.
** His ''Ocarina of Time'' ROR. Are his points on the game's age in terms of the N64 version's visuals and text speed well thought out or a result of him being overly critical and impatient? And amongst those who do agree with his critisisms, there's a divide on whether or not he spent too much time dwelling on it
** The ''Remake or Rebreak'' episode on ''Banjo-Tooie'' seems to be one of his most divided videos, and the most divided one of the series. Either you agree with Exo that the game suffers from many issues and should have been designed in a different way when it comes to its gameplay and its structure, or you think he's nitpicking through the entire episode, making mountains out of molehills, while not understanding how the game works at all. There's also a third camp who belives that while his complaints about the original are justified, it was unrealistic for him to expect a remaster to overhaul so much of the level design and mechanics
to:
* BrokenBase: Exo has a few reviews that cause a divide amongst audiences
BrokenBase:
** His review on''Sonic the Hedgehog 2'' ''VideoGame/SonicTheHedgehog2'' is possibly the most divisive videos on his channel. People are divided on whether Exo's issues with the game's level design, lack of a save feature, and method to enter the special stage are justified and well-deserved criticisms or a result of him being unwilling to learn from his mistakes and adjust his playstyle. Not helping matters is that it's at points unclear how much of the review is Exo talking about his problems the first time playing and how much is stuff he still believes. It got to the point where Exo removed all his Classic Sonic videos from Summer 2020 to Spring 2021 due to not wanting those videos to be the first impression to new viewers, only relisting the videos upon massive demand.
** Hiscollab collaborative review with J's reviews on ''Mega Man & Bass'' covering ''VideoGame/MegaManAndBass'' has divided viewers as the game is considered controversial amongst Classic Mega Man fans. Are Exo and J correct in that the game's boss and weapons provide more variety and replayability than the other games in the series? Or are they minimizing the issues of the game and demonstrating to how much prior knowledge affects player experience while ironically not giving other games in the series that advantage while acting smug and overly defensive about their enjoyment? Not helping Complicating matters is that J was going through a self-admitted AudienceAlienatingEra at [[CreatorBacklash has disowned]] the time.vast majority of videos he created before [[GrowingTheBeard the Summer of 2020]], with it being unclear how much of the video’s script comes from him.
** His''Ocarina ''[[VideoGame/TheLegendOfZeldaOcarinaOfTime Ocarina of Time'' Time]]'' ROR. Are his points on the game's age in terms of the N64 version's visuals and text speed well thought out or a result of him being overly critical and impatient? And amongst those who do agree with his critisisms, there's a divide on whether or not he spent too much time dwelling on it
** The ''Remake or Rebreak'' episode on''Banjo-Tooie'' seems to be ''VideoGame/BanjoTooie'' is one of his most divided videos, and the most divided one of the series.divisive videos. Either you agree with Exo that the game suffers from many issues and should have been designed in a different way when it comes to its gameplay and its structure, or you think he's nitpicking through the entire episode, making mountains out of molehills, while not understanding how the game works at all. There's also a third camp who belives that while his complaints about the original are justified, it was unrealistic for him to expect a remaster to overhaul so much of the level design and mechanics
** His review on
** His
** His
** The ''Remake or Rebreak'' episode on
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Dork Age was renamed
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
** His collab with J's reviews on ''Mega Man & Bass'' has divided viewers as the game is considered controversial amongst Classic Mega Man fans. Are Exo and J correct in that the game's boss and weapons provide more variety and replayability than the other games in the series? Or are they minimizing the issues of the game and demonstrating to how much prior knowledge affects player experience while ironically not giving other games in the series that advantage while acting smug and overly defensive about their enjoyment? Not helping matters is that J was going through a self-admitted DorkAge at the time.
to:
** His collab with J's reviews on ''Mega Man & Bass'' has divided viewers as the game is considered controversial amongst Classic Mega Man fans. Are Exo and J correct in that the game's boss and weapons provide more variety and replayability than the other games in the series? Or are they minimizing the issues of the game and demonstrating to how much prior knowledge affects player experience while ironically not giving other games in the series that advantage while acting smug and overly defensive about their enjoyment? Not helping matters is that J was going through a self-admitted DorkAge AudienceAlienatingEra at the time.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
* HilariousInHindsight: In his first ''Sonic Adventure'' video, he mentions that he's structuring the review the way he is (one video each for the original games followed by a comparison video for both of the remakes) because he doesn't want the videos to balloon into the 50-minute zone. He has since made multiple ROR episodes far longer than that, including two ''Spyro'' reviews that were over 100 minutes. Exo acknowledges this in the postscript video for the ''Spyro'' reviews, calling back to a similar comment he made in one of the ''Donkey Kong Country'' reviews, and says that he plans to do separate videos like the ''Sonic Adventure'' reviews from now on.
to:
* HilariousInHindsight: In his first ''Sonic Adventure'' video, he mentions that he's structuring the review the way he is (one video each for the original games followed by a comparison video for both of the remakes) because he doesn't want the videos to balloon into the 50-minute zone. He has since made multiple feature-length ROR episodes far longer than that, including two ''Spyro'' reviews that were over 100 minutes. Exo acknowledges this in the postscript video for the ''Spyro'' reviews, calling back to a similar comment he made in one of the ''Donkey Kong Country'' reviews, and says that he plans to do separate videos like the ''Sonic Adventure'' reviews from now on.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2,5 (click to see context) from:
** His review on Sonic the Hedgehog 2 is possibly the most divisive videos on his channel. People are divided on whether Exo's issues with the game's level design, lack of a save feature, and method to enter the special stage are justified and well-deserved criticisms or a result of him being unwilling to learn from his mistakes and adjust his playstyle. Not helping matters is that it's at points unclear how much of the review is Exo talking about his problems the first time playing and how much is stuff he still believes. It got to the point where Exo removed all his Classic Sonic videos from Summer 2020 to Spring 2021 due to not wanting those videos to be the first impression to new viewers, only relisting the videos upon massive demand.
** His collab with J's reviews on Mega Man & Bass has divided viewers as the game is considered controversial amongst Classic Mega Man fans. Are Exo and J correct in that the game's boss and weapons provide more varity and replayability than the other games in the series? Or are they minimizing the issues of Mega Man and Bass and demonstrating to how much prior knowledge affects player experience while ironically not giving other games in the series that advantage while acting smug and overly defensive about their enjoyment? Not helping matters is that J was going through a self-admitted Dork Age at the time.
** His Ocarina of Time ROR. Are his points on the game's age in terms of the N64 version's visuals and text speed well thought out or a result of him being overly critical and impatient? And amongst those who do agree with his critisisms there's a divide on whether or not he spent too much time dwelling on it
** The ''Remake or Rebreak'' episode on ''Banjo-Tooie'' seems to be one of his most divided videos, and the most divided one of the series. Either you agree with Exo that the game suffers from many issues and should have been designed in a different way when it comes to its gameplay and its structure, or you think he's nitpicking through the entire episode, making mountains out of molehills, while not understanding how the game works at all. There's also a third camp who belives that while his complaints about the original are justified it was unrealistic for him to expect a remaster to overhaul so much of the level design and mechanics
** His collab with J's reviews on Mega Man & Bass has divided viewers as the game is considered controversial amongst Classic Mega Man fans. Are Exo and J correct in that the game's boss and weapons provide more varity and replayability than the other games in the series? Or are they minimizing the issues of Mega Man and Bass and demonstrating to how much prior knowledge affects player experience while ironically not giving other games in the series that advantage while acting smug and overly defensive about their enjoyment? Not helping matters is that J was going through a self-admitted Dork Age at the time.
** His Ocarina of Time ROR. Are his points on the game's age in terms of the N64 version's visuals and text speed well thought out or a result of him being overly critical and impatient? And amongst those who do agree with his critisisms there's a divide on whether or not he spent too much time dwelling on it
** The ''Remake or Rebreak'' episode on ''Banjo-Tooie'' seems to be one of his most divided videos, and the most divided one of the series. Either you agree with Exo that the game suffers from many issues and should have been designed in a different way when it comes to its gameplay and its structure, or you think he's nitpicking through the entire episode, making mountains out of molehills, while not understanding how the game works at all. There's also a third camp who belives that while his complaints about the original are justified it was unrealistic for him to expect a remaster to overhaul so much of the level design and mechanics
to:
** His review on Sonic ''Sonic the Hedgehog 2 2'' is possibly the most divisive videos on his channel. People are divided on whether Exo's issues with the game's level design, lack of a save feature, and method to enter the special stage are justified and well-deserved criticisms or a result of him being unwilling to learn from his mistakes and adjust his playstyle. Not helping matters is that it's at points unclear how much of the review is Exo talking about his problems the first time playing and how much is stuff he still believes. It got to the point where Exo removed all his Classic Sonic videos from Summer 2020 to Spring 2021 due to not wanting those videos to be the first impression to new viewers, only relisting the videos upon massive demand.
** His collab with J's reviews onMega ''Mega Man & Bass Bass'' has divided viewers as the game is considered controversial amongst Classic Mega Man fans. Are Exo and J correct in that the game's boss and weapons provide more varity variety and replayability than the other games in the series? Or are they minimizing the issues of Mega Man and Bass the game and demonstrating to how much prior knowledge affects player experience while ironically not giving other games in the series that advantage while acting smug and overly defensive about their enjoyment? Not helping matters is that J was going through a self-admitted Dork Age DorkAge at the time.
** HisOcarina ''Ocarina of Time Time'' ROR. Are his points on the game's age in terms of the N64 version's visuals and text speed well thought out or a result of him being overly critical and impatient? And amongst those who do agree with his critisisms critisisms, there's a divide on whether or not he spent too much time dwelling on it
** The ''Remake or Rebreak'' episode on ''Banjo-Tooie'' seems to be one of his most divided videos, and the most divided one of the series. Either you agree with Exo that the game suffers from many issues and should have been designed in a different way when it comes to its gameplay and its structure, or you think he's nitpicking through the entire episode, making mountains out of molehills, while not understanding how the game works at all. There's also a third camp who belives that while his complaints about the original arejustified justified, it was unrealistic for him to expect a remaster to overhaul so much of the level design and mechanics
** His collab with J's reviews on
** His
** The ''Remake or Rebreak'' episode on ''Banjo-Tooie'' seems to be one of his most divided videos, and the most divided one of the series. Either you agree with Exo that the game suffers from many issues and should have been designed in a different way when it comes to its gameplay and its structure, or you think he's nitpicking through the entire episode, making mountains out of molehills, while not understanding how the game works at all. There's also a third camp who belives that while his complaints about the original are
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2,3 (click to see context) from:
** His review on the classic Sonic games are likely the most divisive videos on his channel aided but especially his video on Sonic 2. People are divided on whether Exo's issues with the game's level design, lack of a save feature, and method to enter the special stage are justified and well-deserved criticisms or a result of him being unwilling to learn from his mistakes and adjust his playstyle. Not helping matters is that it's at points unclear how much of the review is Exo talking about his problems the first time playing and how much is stuff he still believes. It got to the point where Exo removed the videos from Summer 2020 to Spring 2021 due to not wanting those videos to be the first impression to new viewers, only relisting the videos upon massive demand.
** His collab with J's reviews on Mega Man & Bass has divided viewers as the game is considered controversial amongst Classic Mega Man fans. Are Exo and J correct in that the game's boss and weapons provide more varity and replayability than the other games in the series? Or are they minimizing the issues of Mega Man and Bass and demonstrating to how much prior knowledge affects player experience while ironically not giving other games in the series that advantage while acting smug and overly defensive about their enjoyment? Not helping matters is that J was going through a self-admitted Dork Age at the time
** His collab with J's reviews on Mega Man & Bass has divided viewers as the game is considered controversial amongst Classic Mega Man fans. Are Exo and J correct in that the game's boss and weapons provide more varity and replayability than the other games in the series? Or are they minimizing the issues of Mega Man and Bass and demonstrating to how much prior knowledge affects player experience while ironically not giving other games in the series that advantage while acting smug and overly defensive about their enjoyment? Not helping matters is that J was going through a self-admitted Dork Age at the time
to:
** His review on the classic Sonic games are likely the Hedgehog 2 is possibly the most divisive videos on his channel aided but especially his video on Sonic 2.channel. People are divided on whether Exo's issues with the game's level design, lack of a save feature, and method to enter the special stage are justified and well-deserved criticisms or a result of him being unwilling to learn from his mistakes and adjust his playstyle. Not helping matters is that it's at points unclear how much of the review is Exo talking about his problems the first time playing and how much is stuff he still believes. It got to the point where Exo removed the all his Classic Sonic videos from Summer 2020 to Spring 2021 due to not wanting those videos to be the first impression to new viewers, only relisting the videos upon massive demand.
** His collab with J's reviews on Mega Man & Bass has divided viewers as the game is considered controversial amongst Classic Mega Man fans. Are Exo and J correct in that the game's boss and weapons provide more varity and replayability than the other games in the series? Or are they minimizing the issues of Mega Man and Bass and demonstrating to how much prior knowledge affects player experience while ironically not giving other games in the series that advantage while acting smug and overly defensive about their enjoyment? Not helping matters is that J was going through a self-admitted Dork Age at thetime time.
** His collab with J's reviews on Mega Man & Bass has divided viewers as the game is considered controversial amongst Classic Mega Man fans. Are Exo and J correct in that the game's boss and weapons provide more varity and replayability than the other games in the series? Or are they minimizing the issues of Mega Man and Bass and demonstrating to how much prior knowledge affects player experience while ironically not giving other games in the series that advantage while acting smug and overly defensive about their enjoyment? Not helping matters is that J was going through a self-admitted Dork Age at the
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
** His collab with J's reviews on Mega Man & Bass has divided viewers as the game is considered controversial amongst Classic Mega Man fans. Are Exo and J correct in that the game's boss and weapons provide more varity and replayability than the other games in the series. Or are they minimizing the issues of Mega Man and Bass and demonstrating to how much prior knowledge effects player experience while ironically not giving other games in the series that advantage
** His Ocarina of Time ROR. Are his points on the game's age in terms of the N64 version's visuals and text speed well thought out or a result of him being overly critical and impatient? And amongst those who do agree with his critisisms there's divide on whether or not he spent too much time dwelling on it
** His Ocarina of Time ROR. Are his points on the game's age in terms of the N64 version's visuals and text speed well thought out or a result of him being overly critical and impatient? And amongst those who do agree with his critisisms there's divide on whether or not he spent too much time dwelling on it
to:
** His collab with J's reviews on Mega Man & Bass has divided viewers as the game is considered controversial amongst Classic Mega Man fans. Are Exo and J correct in that the game's boss and weapons provide more varity and replayability than the other games in the series. series? Or are they minimizing the issues of Mega Man and Bass and demonstrating to how much prior knowledge effects affects player experience while ironically not giving other games in the series that advantage
advantage while acting smug and overly defensive about their enjoyment? Not helping matters is that J was going through a self-admitted Dork Age at the time
** His Ocarina of Time ROR. Are his points on the game's age in terms of the N64 version's visuals and text speed well thought out or a result of him being overly critical and impatient? And amongst those who do agree with his critisisms there's a divide on whether or not he spent too much time dwelling on it
** His Ocarina of Time ROR. Are his points on the game's age in terms of the N64 version's visuals and text speed well thought out or a result of him being overly critical and impatient? And amongst those who do agree with his critisisms there's a divide on whether or not he spent too much time dwelling on it
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* BrokenBase: His ''Remake or Rebreak'' episode on ''Banjo-Tooie'' seems to be one of his most divided videos, and the most divided one of the series. Either you agree with Exo that the game suffers from many issues and should have been designed in a different way when it comes to its gameplay and its structure, or you think he's nitpicking through the entire episode, making mountains out of molehills, while not understanding how the game works at all.
to:
* BrokenBase: Exo has a few reviews that cause a divide amongst audiences
**His review on the classic Sonic games are likely the most divisive videos on his channel aided but especially his video on Sonic 2. People are divided on whether Exo's issues with the game's level design, lack of a save feature, and method to enter the special stage are justified and well-deserved criticisms or a result of him being unwilling to learn from his mistakes and adjust his playstyle. Not helping matters is that it's at points unclear how much of the review is Exo talking about his problems the first time playing and how much is stuff he still believes. It got to the point where Exo removed the videos from Summer 2020 to Spring 2021 due to not wanting those videos to be the first impression to new viewers, only relisting the videos upon massive demand.
**His collab with J's reviews on Mega Man & Bass has divided viewers as the game is considered controversial amongst Classic Mega Man fans. Are Exo and J correct in that the game's boss and weapons provide more varity and replayability than the other games in the series. Or are they minimizing the issues of Mega Man and Bass and demonstrating to how much prior knowledge effects player experience while ironically not giving other games in the series that advantage
** His Ocarina of Time ROR. Are his points on the game's age in terms of the N64 version's visuals and text speed well thought out or a result of him being overly critical and impatient? And amongst those who do agree with his critisisms there's divide on whether or not he spent too much time dwelling on it
** The ''Remake or Rebreak'' episode on ''Banjo-Tooie'' seems to be one of his most divided videos, and the most divided one of the series. Either you agree with Exo that the game suffers from many issues and should have been designed in a different way when it comes to its gameplay and its structure, or you think he's nitpicking through the entire episode, making mountains out of molehills, while not understanding how the game works at all. There's also a third camp who belives that while his complaints about the original are justified it was unrealistic for him to expect a remaster to overhaul so much of the level design and mechanics
**His review on the classic Sonic games are likely the most divisive videos on his channel aided but especially his video on Sonic 2. People are divided on whether Exo's issues with the game's level design, lack of a save feature, and method to enter the special stage are justified and well-deserved criticisms or a result of him being unwilling to learn from his mistakes and adjust his playstyle. Not helping matters is that it's at points unclear how much of the review is Exo talking about his problems the first time playing and how much is stuff he still believes. It got to the point where Exo removed the videos from Summer 2020 to Spring 2021 due to not wanting those videos to be the first impression to new viewers, only relisting the videos upon massive demand.
**His collab with J's reviews on Mega Man & Bass has divided viewers as the game is considered controversial amongst Classic Mega Man fans. Are Exo and J correct in that the game's boss and weapons provide more varity and replayability than the other games in the series. Or are they minimizing the issues of Mega Man and Bass and demonstrating to how much prior knowledge effects player experience while ironically not giving other games in the series that advantage
** His Ocarina of Time ROR. Are his points on the game's age in terms of the N64 version's visuals and text speed well thought out or a result of him being overly critical and impatient? And amongst those who do agree with his critisisms there's divide on whether or not he spent too much time dwelling on it
** The ''Remake or Rebreak'' episode on ''Banjo-Tooie'' seems to be one of his most divided videos, and the most divided one of the series. Either you agree with Exo that the game suffers from many issues and should have been designed in a different way when it comes to its gameplay and its structure, or you think he's nitpicking through the entire episode, making mountains out of molehills, while not understanding how the game works at all. There's also a third camp who belives that while his complaints about the original are justified it was unrealistic for him to expect a remaster to overhaul so much of the level design and mechanics
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
* BrokenBase: His ''Remake or Rebreak'' episode on ''Banjo-Tooie'' seems to be one of his most divided videos, and the most divided one of the series. Either you agree with Exo that the game suffers from many issues and should have been in a different way when it comes to its gameplay and its structure, or you think he's nitpicking through the entire episode, making mountains out of molehills, while not understanding how the game works at all.
* HilariousInHindsight: In his first ''Sonic Adventure'' video, he mentions that he's structuring the review the way he is because he doesn't want the videos to balloon into the 50-minute zone. He has since made multiple ROR episodes far longer than that, including two ''Spyro'' reviews that were over 100 minutes.
* HilariousInHindsight: In his first ''Sonic Adventure'' video, he mentions that he's structuring the review the way he is because he doesn't want the videos to balloon into the 50-minute zone. He has since made multiple ROR episodes far longer than that, including two ''Spyro'' reviews that were over 100 minutes.
to:
* BrokenBase: His ''Remake or Rebreak'' episode on ''Banjo-Tooie'' seems to be one of his most divided videos, and the most divided one of the series. Either you agree with Exo that the game suffers from many issues and should have been designed in a different way when it comes to its gameplay and its structure, or you think he's nitpicking through the entire episode, making mountains out of molehills, while not understanding how the game works at all.
* HilariousInHindsight: In his first ''Sonic Adventure'' video, he mentions that he's structuring the review the way he is (one video each for the original games followed by a comparison video for both of the remakes) because he doesn't want the videos to balloon into the 50-minute zone. He has since made multiple ROR episodes far longer than that, including two ''Spyro'' reviews that were over 100 minutes. Exo acknowledges this in the postscript video for the ''Spyro'' reviews, calling back to a similar comment he made in one of the ''Donkey Kong Country'' reviews, and says that he plans to do separate videos like the ''Sonic Adventure'' reviews from now on.
* HilariousInHindsight: In his first ''Sonic Adventure'' video, he mentions that he's structuring the review the way he is (one video each for the original games followed by a comparison video for both of the remakes) because he doesn't want the videos to balloon into the 50-minute zone. He has since made multiple ROR episodes far longer than that, including two ''Spyro'' reviews that were over 100 minutes. Exo acknowledges this in the postscript video for the ''Spyro'' reviews, calling back to a similar comment he made in one of the ''Donkey Kong Country'' reviews, and says that he plans to do separate videos like the ''Sonic Adventure'' reviews from now on.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* BrokenBase: His ''Remake or Rebreak'' episode on ''Banjo-Tooie'' seems to be one of his most divided videos, and the most divided one of the series. Either you agree with Exo that the game suffers from many issues and should have been in a different way when it comes to its gameplay and its structure, or you think he's nitpicking through the entire episode, making mountains out of molehills, while not understanding how the game works at all.
to:
* BrokenBase: His ''Remake or Rebreak'' episode on ''Banjo-Tooie'' seems to be one of his most divided videos, and the most divided one of the series. Either you agree with Exo that the game suffers from many issues and should have been in a different way when it comes to its gameplay and its structure, or you think he's nitpicking through the entire episode, making mountains out of molehills, while not understanding how the game works at all.all.
* HilariousInHindsight: In his first ''Sonic Adventure'' video, he mentions that he's structuring the review the way he is because he doesn't want the videos to balloon into the 50-minute zone. He has since made multiple ROR episodes far longer than that, including two ''Spyro'' reviews that were over 100 minutes.
* HilariousInHindsight: In his first ''Sonic Adventure'' video, he mentions that he's structuring the review the way he is because he doesn't want the videos to balloon into the 50-minute zone. He has since made multiple ROR episodes far longer than that, including two ''Spyro'' reviews that were over 100 minutes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* BrokenBase: His ''Remake or Rebreak'' episode on ''Banjo-Tooie'' seems to be one of his most divided videos, and the most divided one of the series. Either you agree with Exo that the game suffers from many issues and should have been in a different way when it comes to its gameplay and its structure, or you think he's nitpicking through the entire episode, making mountains out of molehills, while not understanding how the game works at all.
