History YMMV / DinosaurSanctuary

** ''Franchise/JurassicPark'' still ended up being made in the manga's universe. How different would the book and film be than in our world, especially given, according to Chapter 11, ''Tyrannosaurus'' and ''Deinonychus'' are alive by 1990.

* FridgeBrilliance:
** In this universe, the ''Franchise/JurassicPark'' franchise exists [[InSpiteOfANail in spite of living dinosaurs being discovered in the 1940s and resurrection of extinct species becoming accomplished in the late 1980s]]. However, given the theme of ''Jurassic Park'' about science going wrong, it's probable that Creator/MichaelCrichton considered the project of resurrected dinosaurs controversial and wrote [[Literature/JurassicPark the novel]] to address it. Perhaps his views were considered to have been vindicated after the fateful incident in 2006.
** While it's never established for most species whether they come from the island or cloning, the ''Dilophosaurus'' is an exception that is explicitly stated to be one of the cloned animals. This makes sense, as it’s one of the oldest species seen in the park, and went extinct long before the Cretaceous came to an end. It would also explain why ''Jurassic Park'' still depicted it with a frill and venomous spit; the genus likely wasn't revived yet in the early 1990s.
*** Similarly, ''Tyrannosaurus'' is confirmed to be among the dinosaurs from the island (as Hanako was born a couple years before the breakthrough in genetic-engineering in 1987), fitting for one of the non-avian dinosaurs that lived at the end of the Cretaceous.
** The BAND ('''B'''irds '''A'''re '''N'''ot '''D'''inosaurs) movement is implied to still exist in this timeline, despite the presence of living dinosaurs providing more than enough evidence that birds are dinosaurs. Barakan Island was discovered 20 years after Gerhard Heilmann had written ''The Origin of Birds'' (the infamous book that caused scientists to push aside the dinosaur-bird connection theory for much of the 20th Century). The influence of the book would still be lingering on in the public's mind, along with TaxonomicTermConfusion.
* FridgeHorror: Given the ''Franchise/JurassicPark'' franchise exists in this universe, it would have lent a hand in the public opinion against dinosaur zoos that stirred as a result of the 2006 incident and instilled more fear of dinosaurs. Not to mention ''Film/JurassicWorld'' may have been based on this incident.

** The BAND ('''B'''irds '''A'''re '''N'''ot '''D'''inosaurs) movement is implied to still exist in this timeline, despite the presence of living dinosaurs providing more than enough evidence that birds are dinosaurs. Views of dinosaurs as {{Prehistoric Monster}}s aside, Barakan Island was discovered 20 years after Gerhard Heilmann had written his book ''The Origin of Birds'' (the infamous book that caused scientists to push aside the dinosaur-bird connection theory for much of the 20th Century). The influence of the book would still be lingering on in the public's mind.

** ''Franchise/JurassicPark'' still ended up being made in the manga's universe. How different would the book and film be than in our world, especially given, according to Chapter 11, ''Tyrannosaurus'' and ''Deinonychus'' have been revived by 1990.

** While it's never established for most species whether they come from the island or cloning, the ''Dilophosaurus'' is an exception that is explicitly stated to be one of the cloned animals. This makes sense, as it’s one of the oldest species seen in the park, and went extinct long before the Cretaceous came to an end.

** While it's never established for most species whether they come from the island or cloning, the ''Dilophosaurus'' is an exception that is explicitly stated to be one of the cloned animals. This makes sense, as it’s the oldest species seen in the park, and went extinct long before the Cretaceous came to an end.

** While it’s never established for most species whether they come from the island or cloning, the ''Dilophosaurus'' is an exception that is explicitly stated to be one of the cloned animals. This makes sense, as it’s the oldest species seen in the park, and went extinct long before the Cretaceous came to an end.

* HilariousInHindsight: The first chapter shows Enoshima Dinoland's ''Giganotosaurus'' being given a deer carcass to feed on. One year later after the manga's publication, ''Film/JurassicWorldDominion'' would have a ''Giganotosaurus'' fight off Rexy to claim a deer carcass for itself.

* FridgeBrilliance: In this universe, the ''Franchise/JurassicPark'' franchise exists [[InSpiteOfANail in spite of living dinosaurs being discovered in the 1940s and resurrection of extinct species becoming accomplished in the late 1980s]]. However, given the theme of ''Jurassic Park'' about science going wrong, it's probable that Creator/MichaelCrichton considered the project of resurrected dinosaurs controversial and wrote [[Literature/JurassicPark the novel]] to address it. Perhaps his views were considered to have been vindicated after the fateful incident in 2006.

* FridgeHorror: Given the ''Franchise/JurassicPark'' franchise exists in this universe, it would have lent a hand in the controversy against dinosaur zoos that stirred as a result of the 2006 incident and instilled more fear of dinosaurs. Not to mention ''Film/JurassicWorld'' may have been based on this incident.

* FridgeHorror: Given the ''Franchise/JurassicPark'' franchise exists in this universe, could it have lent a hand in the controversy against dinosaur zoos that stirred as a result of the 2006 incident? Would ''Film/JurassicWorld'' have been based on this incident?

** ''Franchise/JurassicPark'' still ended up being made in the manga's universe. How different would the book and film be than in our world, especially given, according to Chapter 11, ''Tyrannosaurus'' and ''Deinonychus'' have been revived by 1990. And could the franchise have lent a hand in the controversy against dinosaur zoos that stirred as a result of the 2006 incident?
* FridgeBrilliance: In this universe, the ''Franchise/JurassicPark'' franchise exists [[InSpiteOfANail in spite of living dinosaurs being discovered in the 1940s and resurrection of extinct species becoming accomplished in the late 1980s]]. However, given the theme of ''Jurassic Park'' about science going wrong, it's probable that Creator/MichaelCrichton considered the project of resurrected dinosaurs controversial and wrote [[Literature/JurassicPark the novel]] to address it. Perhaps his views were considered to have been vindicated after the fateful incident in 2006. Not to mention ''Film/JurassicWorld'' would have been [[VeryLooselyBasedOnATrueStory based on this incident]].

** ''Franchise/JurassicPark'' still ended up being made in the manga's universe. How different would the book and film be than in our world? And could the franchise have lent a hand in the controversy against dinosaur zoos that stirred as a result of the 2006 incident?

* FridgeBrilliance: In this universe, the ''Franchise/JurassicPark'' franchise exists [[InSpiteOfANail in spite of living dinosaurs being discovered in the 1940s and resurrection of extinct species becoming accomplished in the late 1980s]]. However, given the theme of ''Jurassic Park'' about science going wrong, it's probable that Creator/MichaelCrichton considered the project of resurrected dinosaurs controversial and wrote [[Literature/JurassicPark the novel]] to address it. Perhaps his views were considered to have been vindicated after the fateful incident in 2006. Not to mention ''Film/JurassicWorld'' would have been [[BasedOnATrueStory based on this incident]].

* FridgeBrilliance: In this universe, the ''Franchise/JurassicPark'' franchise exists [[InSpiteOfANail in spite of living dinosaurs being discovered in the 1940s and resurrection of extinct species becoming accomplished in the late 1980s]]. However, given the theme of ''Jurassic Park'' about science going wrong, it's probable that Creator/MichaelCrichton considered the project of resurrected dinosaurs controversial and wrote [[Literature/JurassicPark the novel]] to address it. Perhaps his views were considered to have been vindicated after the fateful incident in 2006.

* FridgeBrilliance: In this universe, the ''Franchise/JurassicPark'' franchise exists [[InSpiteOfANail in spite of living dinosaurs being discovered in the 1940s and resurrection of extinct species becoming accomplished in the late 1980s]]. However, given the theme of ''Jurassic Park'', it's probable that Creator/MichaelCrichton considered the project of resurrected dinosaurs controversial and wrote [[Literature/JurassicPark the novel]] to address it. Perhaps his views were considered to have been vindicated after the fateful incident in 2006.

** ''Franchise/JurassicPark'' still ended up being made in the manga's universe. How different would the book and film be than in our world? And could the franchise have lent a hand in the controversy that stirred as a result of the 2006 incident?

** ''Franchise/JurassicPark'' still ended up being made in the manga's universe. How different would the book and film be than in our world?

* FridgeBrilliance: In this universe, the ''Franchise/JurassicPark'' franchise exists [[InSpiteOfANail in spite of living dinosaurs being discovered in the 1940s and resurrection of extinct species becoming accomplished in the late 1980s]]. However, given the theme of ''Jurassic Park'', it's probable that Creator/MichaelCrichton considered the project of resurrected dinosaurs controversial and wrote [[Literature/JurassicPark the novel]] to address it.

** The discovery of living non-avian dinosaurs in 1946 opens a lot of speculation to how the paleontological consensus would have been affect as a result, like the Dinosaur Renaissance starting earlier in the late 1940s rather than the late 1960s as in our universe.

* FanficFuel: The discovery of living non-avian dinosaurs in 1946 opens a lot of speculation to how the paleontological consensus would have been affect as a result, like the Dinosaur Renaissance starting earlier in the late 1940s rather than the late 1960s as in our universe.