Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
* FanonDiscontinuity: Many fans disowned it ''before it was even released'', considering that many of the regular actors were either too old or dead at the time. The ones that watched it ''did'' eventually disown it, mostly convinced that the replacement actors seemed to be imitating how the regulars would have performed the characters if they were available. The film has since been, like ''Series/CarryOnLaughing'', quietly released on DVD and was (surprisingly) removed from the movie series boxset.
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter: Creator/JonPertwee is shockingly wasted in a blink-and-you'll-miss-him cameo. Also, Creator/RikMayall is a delight, but is only in the opening scene.
* TookTheBadFilmSeriously: Poor Creator/JimDale is really trying his damndest.
* TookTheBadFilmSeriously: Poor Creator/JimDale is really trying his damndest.
to:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter: Creator/JonPertwee is shockingly wasted in a blink-and-you'll-miss-him cameo. Also, Creator/RikMayall is a delight, delight but is only in the opening scene.
* TookTheBadFilmSeriously: Poor Creator/JimDale is really trying hisdamndest.damnedest.
* TookTheBadFilmSeriously: Poor Creator/JimDale is really trying his
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Contested Sequel is not applicable is the movie is generally considered bad.
Deleted line(s) 1 (click to see context) :
* ContestedSequel: Only in the sense that fans argue whether this film is better or worse than the late 1970s entries, which went full steam ahead into AwfulBritishSexComedy territory. It is still considered a very poor film either way.
Added DiffLines:
* {{Sequelitis}}: Though fans argue whether this film is better or worse than the late 1970s entries, which went full steam ahead into AwfulBritishSexComedy territory, it is still considered a very poor film either way.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* ContestedSequel: Only in the sense that fans argue whether this film is better or worse than the late 1970s entries, which went full steam ahead into AwfulBritishSexComedy territory. It's still considered a very poor film either way.
to:
* ContestedSequel: Only in the sense that fans argue whether this film is better or worse than the late 1970s entries, which went full steam ahead into AwfulBritishSexComedy territory. It's It is still considered a very poor film either way.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* ContestedSequel: Only in the sense that fans argue whether this film is better or worse than the late 1970s entries, which went full steam ahead into AwfulBritishSexComedy territory. It's still considered a very poor film either way.
to:
* ContestedSequel: Only in the sense that fans argue whether this film is better or worse than the late 1970s entries, which went full steam ahead into AwfulBritishSexComedy territory. It's still considered a very poor film either way.way.
* OneSceneWonder: Creator/RikMayall is clearly having a blast.
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter: Creator/JonPertwee is shockingly wasted in a blink-and-you'll-miss-him cameo. Also, Creator/RikMayall is a delight, but is only in the opening scene.
* TookTheBadFilmSeriously: Poor Creator/JimDale is really trying his damndest.
----
* OneSceneWonder: Creator/RikMayall is clearly having a blast.
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter: Creator/JonPertwee is shockingly wasted in a blink-and-you'll-miss-him cameo. Also, Creator/RikMayall is a delight, but is only in the opening scene.
* TookTheBadFilmSeriously: Poor Creator/JimDale is really trying his damndest.
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* ContestedSequel: Only in the sense that fans argue whether this film is better or worse than the late 1970s entries, which went full steam ahead into AwfulBritishSexComedy territory. It's still considered a very poor film either way.
