History YMMV / BringMeTheHeadOfCharlieBrown

** Pig Pen vomiting in Violets face. It is never explained why he did this or what the purpose of this scene was.
** Then toward the end, the entire compilation of all the random destructive events happening. They bear no significance or make any sense to Charlie’s massacre.
** The scene of Little Red Haired Girl “appearing” with Charlie Brown in bed smoking a cigarette. When did she come? We were never sure what this scene was about considering Charlie just ''murdered everyone'' a couple seconds earlier.
* CatharsisFactor: Charlie Brown suffered so much abuse and mistreatment throughout the years, and it’s perfectly understandable to jump for joy when he finally stands up for himself here in this short film.

* ValuesDissonance: This cartoon features numerous violent murder attempts on a young boy, loads of sexual innuendo, profanity, and a ''mass-shooting of children'' before ultimately ending with implied sexual relations between two adultified kids. This cartoon was also made ''during school hours and using school resources'' at a University and it's animator faced no repercussions whatsoever aside from the creator of the characters simply stating not to do it again. Were a short of the exact same subject matter made today in the wake of Sandy Hook and other mass-shootings at schools, it's creator would be ''damn'' lucky if the consequences ended at explusion from the school.

** The toward the end, the entire compilation of all the random destructive events happening. They bear no significance or make any sense to Charlie’s massacre.

* NightmareFuel: The atmosphere is gritty and dirty. This short deliberately uses pencil and tracing paper to give it this look, which can look unsettling to viewers. All the violence doesn't help either.

* MemeticMutation: This short has been remixed on Youtube many times, and discussed by commentary YouTubers due to it's controversial nature.

* MemeticMutation: This short has been remixed on Youtube many times, and discussed by commentary Youtubers due to it's controversial nature.

* DefyingTheCensors: Discussed. Jim barely prevented himself from getting sued by Charles M. Schultz by adding this note at the end:
-> “The creator of this picture wishes to state that he does not in any way wish to tarnish or demean the beloved characters of Charles M. "Dutch" Schulz's comic strip, Peanuts. No malice or damage to their goodwill was intended. So please don't sue me, because it will drag through the courts for years, and I haven't got a lawyer – and besides, you've already got half the money in the world, and I haven't got any. OK?”