Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* EnsembleDarkHorse: Gigolo Jane only appears for a few seconds, [[MsFanservice but has gained a lot of attention from certain audience members due to being played by Ashley Scott in sexy spandex.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
To quote the page, "Do not link to this on the wiki, please. Not even under the YMMV tab."
Deleted line(s) 13 (click to see context) :
* SugarWiki/DevelopmentHeaven: Creator/JudeLaw worked with a choreographer for months to nail down Gigolo Joe's dancing and general mannerisms.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 29 (click to see context) from:
** Gigolo Jane, played by Creator/AshleyScott, only appears for barely a minute, but was featured a lot on the film's promotional materials and ads, and then on the dvd/blu-ray packaging and menu images.
to:
** Gigolo Jane, played by Creator/AshleyScott, only appears for barely a minute, minute but makes quite the impression and was featured a lot on the film's promotional materials and ads, and then on the dvd/blu-ray packaging and menu images.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 40 (click to see context) from:
* SugarWiki/VisualEffectsOfAwesome: As expected from a Spielberg sci-fi movie. The home video packaging emphasizes three cases, the secretary's RobotReveal, [[https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0212720/mediaviewer/rm384905216/ the FemMecha Nanny]], and the 'Vegas on steroids' that is Rouge City.
to:
* SugarWiki/VisualEffectsOfAwesome: As expected from a Spielberg sci-fi movie. The home video packaging emphasizes three cases, the secretary's RobotReveal, RoboticReveal, [[https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0212720/mediaviewer/rm384905216/ the FemMecha Nanny]], and the 'Vegas on steroids' that is Rouge City.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Uncanny Valley is IUEO now and the subjective version has been split; cleaning up misuse and ZCE in the process
Deleted line(s) 36,39 (click to see context) :
* UncannyValley:
** Turned on its head here, as most of the humanlike robots are played by live actors - but used to very good effect with CGI-enhanced, partially-broken androids, and many scenes where David just doesn't... seem... quite... human. Like the one where he "breaks" after eating human food.
** The main character's actions can be very unnerving sometimes, which gives a subtle indication that in spite of his emotions and fleshy exterior, he is still a machine. The thrown away, out-dated robots that are seen rummaging through a pile of leftover robotic parts in the forest also qualify, but most definitely the "nanny" robot, who happens to be missing 3/4s of her head.
** Creator/JudeLaw's face was sprayed with latex, and his hairline was painted to make it look like a seam, thus make him bizarrely too-perfect to look real.
** Turned on its head here, as most of the humanlike robots are played by live actors - but used to very good effect with CGI-enhanced, partially-broken androids, and many scenes where David just doesn't... seem... quite... human. Like the one where he "breaks" after eating human food.
** The main character's actions can be very unnerving sometimes, which gives a subtle indication that in spite of his emotions and fleshy exterior, he is still a machine. The thrown away, out-dated robots that are seen rummaging through a pile of leftover robotic parts in the forest also qualify, but most definitely the "nanny" robot, who happens to be missing 3/4s of her head.
** Creator/JudeLaw's face was sprayed with latex, and his hairline was painted to make it look like a seam, thus make him bizarrely too-perfect to look real.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
** Likewise the crowd at the Flesh Fair revolt when Lord Johnson-Johnson wants to destroy David, a robot who looks like a realistic human boy, but they didn't once feel remorse for [[WhatMeasureIsANonCute the non-cute and far less human looking robots]]. Is Brendan Gleeson correct when he says that David is another Robot and fair game for the fair regardless of how human he looks? Are the crowds awakened to the monstrosity of their appetites when they revolt to save David?
to:
** Likewise the crowd at the Flesh Fair revolt when Lord Johnson-Johnson wants to destroy David, a robot who looks like a realistic human boy, but they didn't once feel remorse for [[WhatMeasureIsANonCute the non-cute and far less human looking robots]]. Is Brendan Gleeson Johnson correct when he says that David is another Robot and fair game for the fair regardless of how human he looks? Are the crowds awakened to the monstrosity of their appetites when they revolt to save David?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
** Martin as a JerkassWoobie. Think about it: the kid comes out of the cryogenic coma he was in, only to find out his parents have replaced him with a RobotKid. JerkAss tendencies may well be justified there.
to:
** Martin as a JerkassWoobie. Think about it: the kid comes out of the cryogenic coma he was in, only to find out his parents have replaced him with a RobotKid. JerkAss tendencies may well be justified or at least understandable there.
Deleted line(s) 7 (click to see context) :
** Is Martin a cruel, selfish child, or is his reaction to David - and the notion that his parents had "replaced" him with a robot when they thought he was dying - largely understandable and easy to sympathize with?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
** Is Lord Johnson-Johnson just an impresario making a living by destroying advanced machinery (and preaching his [[{{Technophobe}} Luddite]] worldview), or is he a sadistic killer? It all depends on how "human", or at least how sentient, you think the mecha are.
to:
** Is Lord Johnson-Johnson just an impresario making a living by destroying advanced machinery (and preaching his [[{{Technophobe}} [[{{Technophobia}} Luddite]] worldview), or is he a sadistic killer? It all depends on how "human", or at least how sentient, you think the mecha are.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
** Is Lord Johnson-Johnson just an impresario making a living by destroying advanced machinery (and preaching his [[Technophobe Luddite]] worldview), or is he a sadistic killer? It all depends on how "human", or at least how sentient, you think the mecha are.
to:
** Is Lord Johnson-Johnson just an impresario making a living by destroying advanced machinery (and preaching his [[Technophobe [[{{Technophobe}} Luddite]] worldview), or is he a sadistic killer? It all depends on how "human", or at least how sentient, you think the mecha are.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5,6 (click to see context) from:
** Is Lord Johnson-Johnson just an impresario making a living by destroying advanced machinery (and preaching his [[Technophobe: Luddite]] worldview), or is he a sadistic killer? It all depends on how "human", or at least how sentient, you think the mecha are.
** Likewise the crowd at the Flesh Fair revolt when Lord Johnson-Johnson wants to destroy David, a robot who looks like a realistic human boy, but they didn't once feel remorse for [[WhatMeasureIsANonCute the non-cute and far less human looking robots]]. Is Brendan Gleeson correct when he says that David is another Robot and fair game for the fair regardless of how human he looks? Are the crowds awakened to the monstrosity of their appetites when they revolt to save David?
** Likewise the crowd at the Flesh Fair revolt when Lord Johnson-Johnson wants to destroy David, a robot who looks like a realistic human boy, but they didn't once feel remorse for [[WhatMeasureIsANonCute the non-cute and far less human looking robots]]. Is Brendan Gleeson correct when he says that David is another Robot and fair game for the fair regardless of how human he looks? Are the crowds awakened to the monstrosity of their appetites when they revolt to save David?
to:
** Is Lord Johnson-Johnson just an impresario making a living by destroying advanced machinery (and preaching his [[Technophobe: [[Technophobe Luddite]] worldview), or is he a sadistic killer? It all depends on how "human", or at least how sentient, you think the mecha are.
** Likewise the crowd at the Flesh Fair revolt when Lord Johnson-Johnson wants to destroy David, a robot who looks like a realistic human boy, but they didn't once feel remorse for [[WhatMeasureIsANonCute the non-cute and far less human looking robots]]. Is Brendan Gleeson correct when he says that David is another Robot and fair game for the fair regardless of how human he looks? Are the crowds awakened to the monstrosity of their appetites when they revolt to saveDavid? David?
** Is Martin a cruel, selfish child, or is his reaction to David - and the notion that his parents had "replaced" him with a robot when they thought he was dying - largely understandable and easy to sympathize with?
** Likewise the crowd at the Flesh Fair revolt when Lord Johnson-Johnson wants to destroy David, a robot who looks like a realistic human boy, but they didn't once feel remorse for [[WhatMeasureIsANonCute the non-cute and far less human looking robots]]. Is Brendan Gleeson correct when he says that David is another Robot and fair game for the fair regardless of how human he looks? Are the crowds awakened to the monstrosity of their appetites when they revolt to save
** Is Martin a cruel, selfish child, or is his reaction to David - and the notion that his parents had "replaced" him with a robot when they thought he was dying - largely understandable and easy to sympathize with?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
** Likewise the crowd at the Flesh Fair revolt when Brendan Gleeson's character wants to destroy David, a robot who looks like a realistic human boy, but they didn't once feel remorse for [[WhatMeasureIsANonCute the non-cute and far less human looking robots]]. Is Brendan Gleeson correct when he says that David is another Robot and fair game for the fair regardless of how human he looks? Are the crowds awakened to the monstrosity of their appetites when they revolt to save David?
to:
** Is Lord Johnson-Johnson just an impresario making a living by destroying advanced machinery (and preaching his [[Technophobe: Luddite]] worldview), or is he a sadistic killer? It all depends on how "human", or at least how sentient, you think the mecha are.
** Likewise the crowd at the Flesh Fair revolt whenBrendan Gleeson's character Lord Johnson-Johnson wants to destroy David, a robot who looks like a realistic human boy, but they didn't once feel remorse for [[WhatMeasureIsANonCute the non-cute and far less human looking robots]]. Is Brendan Gleeson correct when he says that David is another Robot and fair game for the fair regardless of how human he looks? Are the crowds awakened to the monstrosity of their appetites when they revolt to save David?
** Likewise the crowd at the Flesh Fair revolt when
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Approved by the thread.
Added DiffLines:
*CompleteMonster: [[FantasticRacism Lord Johnson-Johnson]] is the host of the Flesh Fair, an event where [[WhatMeasureIsANonHuman mechas are ripped apart and destroyed for the entertainment of human spectators]]. He is [[EstablishingCharacterMoment introduced]] hunting down mechas for the Fair, capturing David in the process. When the people in the crowd refuse to hurt David due to him heavily resembling and emoting like a real boy, Lord Johnson-Johnson tries to encourage the crowd to do so under the pretext of "destroying artificiality".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 40 (click to see context) from:
** Notably, Creator/RogerEbert initially gave it a score of 3 stars out of 4, and criticized the ending, but since included it in his "Great Movies" list.
to:
** Notably, Creator/RogerEbert initially gave it a score of 3 stars out of 4, and criticized the ending, but since included it in his "Great Movies" list. Ebert admitted he struggled with the premise since as a Catholic he felt David and the other robots couldn’t have souls.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not YMMV; appears to be misuse, so cutting
Deleted line(s) 33 (click to see context) :
* SnicketWarningLabel: Stopping with either of the two scenes listed in EndingFatigue would give you an ending sad enough.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 26,27 (click to see context) from:
* OneSceneWonder: Gigolo Jane, played by Creator/AshleyScott, only appears for barely a minute, but was featured a lot on the film's promotional materials and ads, and then on the dvd/blu-ray packaging and menu images.
** Sheila, the mecha secretary who appears in the opening scene, played by Creator/SabrinaGrdevich, is remembered by many for having her face open up, [[RoboticReveal revealing that she's not actually human]], in a scene [[SugarWiki/VisualEffectsOfAwesome that is completely impresive for a 2001 film and still holds up very well many years later]].
** Sheila, the mecha secretary who appears in the opening scene, played by Creator/SabrinaGrdevich, is remembered by many for having her face open up, [[RoboticReveal revealing that she's not actually human]], in a scene [[SugarWiki/VisualEffectsOfAwesome that is completely impresive for a 2001 film and still holds up very well many years later]].
to:
* OneSceneWonder: OneSceneWonder:
** Gigolo Jane, played by Creator/AshleyScott, only appears for barely a minute, but was featured a lot on the film's promotional materials and ads, and then on the dvd/blu-ray packaging and menu images.
** Sheila, the mecha secretary who appears in the opening scene, played byCreator/SabrinaGrdevich, Sabrina Grdevich, is remembered by many for having her face open up, [[RoboticReveal revealing that she's not actually human]], in human]].
** Dr. Know, played with the typical Creator/RobinWilliams enthusiasm.
** A case that returns for a second scene[[SugarWiki/VisualEffectsOfAwesome that is completely impresive for a 2001 film and still holds up very well many years later]].Creator/WilliamHurt as the creator of the robots with feelings.
** Gigolo Jane, played by Creator/AshleyScott, only appears for barely a minute, but was featured a lot on the film's promotional materials and ads, and then on the dvd/blu-ray packaging and menu images.
** Sheila, the mecha secretary who appears in the opening scene, played by
** Dr. Know, played with the typical Creator/RobinWilliams enthusiasm.
** A case that returns for a second scene
Changed line(s) 40 (click to see context) from:
* TheWoobie: Oh, come on. Who didn't want to reach through the screen and give poor little David a hug?
to:
* TheWoobie: SugarWiki/VisualEffectsOfAwesome: As expected from a Spielberg sci-fi movie. The home video packaging emphasizes three cases, the secretary's RobotReveal, [[https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0212720/mediaviewer/rm384905216/ the FemMecha Nanny]], and the 'Vegas on steroids' that is Rouge City.
*TheWoobie: Oh, come on. Who didn't want to reach through the screen and give poor little David a hug?
*TheWoobie: Oh, come on. Who didn't want to reach through the screen and give poor little David a hug?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 16 (click to see context) from:
** The machine entities at the end [[CommonKnowledge Are not aliens.]] They're robots who have evolved through upgrading themselves continuously over the course of 2000 years until they're so advanced that they're practically living beings.
to:
** The machine entities at the end [[CommonKnowledge Are are not aliens.]] They're robots who have evolved through upgrading themselves continuously over the course of 2000 years until they're so advanced that they're practically living beings.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
No need for the caps.
Changed line(s) 16 (click to see context) from:
** The machine entities at the end [[CommonKnowledge ARE NOT FUCKING ALIENS, GODDAMNIT.]] They're robots who have evolved through upgrading themselves continuously over the course of 2000 years until they're so advanced that they're practically living beings.
to:
** The machine entities at the end [[CommonKnowledge ARE NOT FUCKING ALIENS, GODDAMNIT.Are not aliens.]] They're robots who have evolved through upgrading themselves continuously over the course of 2000 years until they're so advanced that they're practically living beings.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Sheila, the mecha secretary who appears in the opening scene, played by Creator/SabrinaGrdevich, is remembered by many for having her face open up, [[RoboticReveal revealing that she's not actually human]], in a scene [[SugarWiki/VisualEffectsOfAwesome that is completely impresive for a 2001 film and still holds up very well many years later]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
* SugarWiki/DevelopmentHeaven: Creator/JudeLaw worked with a choreographer for months to nail down Gigolo Joe's dancing and general mannerisms.
Changed line(s) 17 (click to see context) from:
* FunnyAneurysmMoment: Scenes of frozen, distant-future New York City include the twin towers of the World Trade Center poking out of the ice. Spielberg made a conscious decision to leave them in, knowing he would take flak for it either way. Cinemas though (including outside America - the UK was affected) did have signs put up making them aware that footage of the towers featured in case of accidental offense.
to:
* FunnyAneurysmMoment: HarsherInHindsight: Scenes of frozen, distant-future New York City include the twin towers of the World Trade Center poking out of the ice. Spielberg made a conscious decision to leave them in, knowing he would take flak for it either way. Cinemas though (including outside America - the UK was affected) did have signs put up making them aware that footage of the towers featured in case of accidental offense.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 24 (click to see context) from:
* OlderThanTheyThink: ''Pinocchio'' with robots? The idea's been done as early as the 1950s, thanks to [[Creator/OsamuTezuka Osamu Tezuka's]] ''Manga/AstroBoy''.
to:
* OlderThanTheyThink: ''Pinocchio'' with robots? The idea's been done as early as the 1950s, thanks to [[Creator/OsamuTezuka Osamu Tezuka's]] ''Manga/AstroBoy''.''Manga/AstroBoy'', which Kubrick was a fan of.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Changed line(s) 36 (click to see context) from:
** Notably, Creator/RogerEbert initially gave it a score of 3 stars out of 4, and criticized the ending, but since included it in his "[[RogerEbertGreatMoviesList Great Movies]]" list.
to:
** Notably, Creator/RogerEbert initially gave it a score of 3 stars out of 4, and criticized the ending, but since included it in his "[[RogerEbertGreatMoviesList Great Movies]]" "Great Movies" list.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 25 (click to see context) from:
* OneSceneWonder: Gigolo Jane, played by Ashley Scott, only appears for barely a minute, but was featured a lot on the film's promotional materials and ads, and then on the dvd/blu-ray packaging and menu images.
to:
* OneSceneWonder: Gigolo Jane, played by Ashley Scott, Creator/AshleyScott, only appears for barely a minute, but was featured a lot on the film's promotional materials and ads, and then on the dvd/blu-ray packaging and menu images.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
*** This also can make the whole movie frustrating, as its premise appears to be that David is "more human" than other robots, but in many ways he seems less able to understand and adapt to circumstances than Gigolo Joe and Teddy are. Which could be a thematic point, the less-human-internally character being treated as more human simply because he can replicate certain cues that inspire sympathy, but doesn't seem to be the angle the movie is taking, given the ending which goes to ridiculous lengths to reward David.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 26 (click to see context) from:
** [[Creator/ClarkGregg Agent Coulson]] working for [[Creator/WilliamHurt Thaddeus "Thunder" Ross]].
to:
** [[Creator/ClarkGregg Agent Coulson]] and [[Creator/KenLeung Miles Straume]] working for [[Creator/WilliamHurt Thaddeus "Thunder" Ross]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 13 (click to see context) from:
* FandomEnragingMisconception: The machine entities at the end [[CommonKnowledge ARE NOT FUCKING ALIENS, GODDAMNIT.]] They're robots who have evolved through upgrading themselves continuously over the course of 2000 years until they're so advanced that they're practically living beings.
to:
* FandomEnragingMisconception: FandomEnragingMisconception:
** The machine entities at the end [[CommonKnowledge ARE NOT FUCKING ALIENS, GODDAMNIT.]] They're robots who have evolved through upgrading themselves continuously over the course of 2000 years until they're so advanced that they're practically living beings.
** The machine entities at the end [[CommonKnowledge ARE NOT FUCKING ALIENS, GODDAMNIT.]] They're robots who have evolved through upgrading themselves continuously over the course of 2000 years until they're so advanced that they're practically living beings.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 20,22 (click to see context) from:
* MisBlamed:
** Surprisingly, Kubrick was the mastermind behind the fuzzy Pinocchio subplot, while Spielberg introduced the dark grittiness of stuff like the Flesh Fair.
** Oh, and that sappy ending? Yeah, all Kubrick. Spielberg went through with it because Kubrick was his friend and he wanted to keep his vision alive, even if it meant he'd be given all the blame for it.
** Surprisingly, Kubrick was the mastermind behind the fuzzy Pinocchio subplot, while Spielberg introduced the dark grittiness of stuff like the Flesh Fair.
** Oh, and that sappy ending? Yeah, all Kubrick. Spielberg went through with it because Kubrick was his friend and he wanted to keep his vision alive, even if it meant he'd be given all the blame for it.
to:
* MisBlamed:
** Surprisingly,MisBlamed: Many believe that Kubrick was intended the mastermind behind the fuzzy Pinocchio subplot, while film to be a very dark and moody story, and that Spielberg introduced rewrote it into a lighthearted "Pinnochio with robots" story after his death. In reality, the dark grittiness bulk of stuff the story, including the infamous ending, was written by Kubrick, while the darker segments like the Flesh Fair.
** Oh,Fair were added by Spielberg. Indeed, the two were close friends, and it's theorized that sappy ending? Yeah, all Kubrick. Spielberg went through with it because Kubrick was his friend and he wanted both were attempting to keep his vision alive, even if it meant he'd be given all emulate the blame for it.other's SignatureStyle as a tribute.
** Surprisingly,
** Oh,
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
*** An ''intentional'' example for David: is his childlish innocence a genuine act of free will or is he innocent simply because he is programmed to be that way?
to:
*** An ''intentional'' example for David: David himself: is his childlish childish innocence a genuine act of free will or is he innocent simply because he is programmed ''programmed'' to be that way?
Changed line(s) 13,15 (click to see context) from:
* FandomEnragingMisconception: The machine entities at the end [[CommonKnowledge ARE NOT FUCKING ALIENS GODDAMNIT.]] They're robots who have evolved through upgrading themselves continuously over the course of 2000 years until they're so advanced that they're practically living beings.
** Another is that for the last time '''Spielberg DID NOT add that infamous final part!''' As later on revealed, ''Kubrick'' was the one who wanted the film to have that particular ending and Spielberg keeping it the way it was to honor his deceased friend.
* FunnyAneurysmMoment: Scenes of frozen, distant-future New York City include the twin towers of the World Trade Center poking out of the ice. Spielberg made a conscious decision to leave them in, knowing he would take flak for it either way. Cinemas though (including outside America - the UK was affected) did have signs put up making them aware that footage of the towers featured in case of accidental offence.
** Another is that for the last time '''Spielberg DID NOT add that infamous final part!''' As later on revealed, ''Kubrick'' was the one who wanted the film to have that particular ending and Spielberg keeping it the way it was to honor his deceased friend.
* FunnyAneurysmMoment: Scenes of frozen, distant-future New York City include the twin towers of the World Trade Center poking out of the ice. Spielberg made a conscious decision to leave them in, knowing he would take flak for it either way. Cinemas though (including outside America - the UK was affected) did have signs put up making them aware that footage of the towers featured in case of accidental offence.
to:
* FandomEnragingMisconception: The machine entities at the end [[CommonKnowledge ARE NOT FUCKING ALIENS ALIENS, GODDAMNIT.]] They're robots who have evolved through upgrading themselves continuously over the course of 2000 years until they're so advanced that they're practically living beings.
** Another isthat that, for the last time time, '''Spielberg DID NOT add that infamous final part!''' As later on revealed, ''Kubrick'' was the one who wanted the film to have that particular ending and Spielberg keeping it the way it was to honor his deceased friend.
* FunnyAneurysmMoment: Scenes of frozen, distant-future New York City include the twin towers of the World Trade Center poking out of the ice. Spielberg made a conscious decision to leave them in, knowing he would take flak for it either way. Cinemas though (including outside America - the UK was affected) did have signs put up making them aware that footage of the towers featured in case of accidentaloffence.offense.
** Another is
* FunnyAneurysmMoment: Scenes of frozen, distant-future New York City include the twin towers of the World Trade Center poking out of the ice. Spielberg made a conscious decision to leave them in, knowing he would take flak for it either way. Cinemas though (including outside America - the UK was affected) did have signs put up making them aware that footage of the towers featured in case of accidental
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Another is that for the last time '''Spielberg DID NOT add that infamous final part!''' As later on revealed, ''Kubrick'' was the one who wanted the film to have that particular ending and Spielberg keeping it the way it was to honor his deceased friend.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 13 (click to see context) from:
* FandomBerserkButton: The machine entities at the end [[CommonKnowledge ARE NOT FUCKING ALIENS GODDAMNIT.]] They're robots who have evolved through upgrading themselves continuously over the course of 2000 years until they're so advanced that they're practically living beings.
to:
* FandomBerserkButton: FandomEnragingMisconception: The machine entities at the end [[CommonKnowledge ARE NOT FUCKING ALIENS GODDAMNIT.]] They're robots who have evolved through upgrading themselves continuously over the course of 2000 years until they're so advanced that they're practically living beings.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 13 (click to see context) from:
** FandomBerserkButton: The machine entities at the end [[CommonKnowledge ARE NOT FUCKING ALIENS GODDAMNIT.]] They're robots who have evolved through upgrading themselves continuously over the course of 2000 years until they're so advanced that they're practically living beings.
to: