Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / AIArtificialIntelligence

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** FandomBerserkButton: The machine entities at the end [[CommonKnowledge ARE NOT FUCKING ALIENS GODDAMNIT.]] They're robots who have evolved through upgrading themselves continuously over the course of 2000 years until they're so advanced that they're practically living beings.


Added DiffLines:

** Gigolo Joe's [[UncannyValleyMakeup deliberately over-the-top]] makeup job was designed to make him look [[UncannyValley unnaturally perfect]], like a Ken doll, so that his job as a prostitute would come across as [[FetishRetardant intentionally creepy]]. Fast forward 18 years, and he's a dead ringer for "male beauty" cosmetics icon James Charles, whose makeup is, if anything, [[NotSoCrazyAnymore even campier than Joe's.]]
** On a similar note, it's also been pointed out that Joe also looks ''uncannily'' similar to a young [[Series/LazyTown Robbie Rotten]], right down to the hairstyle.


Added DiffLines:

* UglyCute: Or ugly, uh, perhaps more than ''cute''. Jude Law was slathered in UncannyValleyMakeup to make Gigolo Joe look like a creepy life-sized Ken doll, but watch the movie with a group of straight women, and count how many of them say something to the effect of "[[PerverseSexualLust I want one]]" or "I wish he was real."

Changed: 152

Removed: 14

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BrokenBase: Among fans of the film, there is a disagreement whether the time-skip ending improves the film or weakens it.
%%* CargoShip:

to:

* BrokenBase: Among fans of the film, there is a disagreement whether the time-skip ending improves the film or weakens it.
%%* CargoShip:
it. The film itself was this for the longest time in regards to Spielberg's work and a huge amount of {{Misblamed}} over how he "screwed" Kubrick's vision.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HeReallyCanAct: Haley Joel Osment seamlessly transitions from an UncannyValley robot to a lost and unstable child desperate to find his mother.

to:

* HeReallyCanAct: SugarWiki/HeReallyCanAct: Haley Joel Osment seamlessly transitions from an UncannyValley robot to a lost and unstable child desperate to find his mother.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** [[Creator/ClarkGregg Agent Coulson]] working for [[Creator/WilliamHurt Thaddeus "Thunder" Ross]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Oh, and that sappy ending? Yeah, all Kubrick. Spielberg went through with it because [[SugarWiki/HeartwarmingMoments Kubrick was his friend and he wanted to keep his vision alive, even if it meant he'd be given all the blame for it]].

to:

** Oh, and that sappy ending? Yeah, all Kubrick. Spielberg went through with it because [[SugarWiki/HeartwarmingMoments Kubrick was his friend and he wanted to keep his vision alive, even if it meant he'd be given all the blame for it]].it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Oh, and that sappy ending? Yeah, all Kubrick. Spielberg went through with it because Kubrick was his friend and he wanted to keep his vision alive.

to:

** Oh, and that sappy ending? Yeah, all Kubrick. Spielberg went through with it because [[SugarWiki/HeartwarmingMoments Kubrick was his friend and he wanted to keep his vision alive.alive, even if it meant he'd be given all the blame for it]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Spelling fix.


*** An ''intentional'' example for David: is his childlish innocence an genuine act of free will or is he innocent simply because he is programmed to be that way?

to:

*** An ''intentional'' example for David: is his childlish innocence an a genuine act of free will or is he innocent simply because he is programmed to be that way?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** [[spoiler:The implication appears to be that he dies once the fantasy ends, thus the lights going out as a cut to black.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* NightmareFuel:
** When David eats spinach, his face starts to droop and sag in the most '''unsettling''' way imaginable.
** The Flesh Fair scene; both the graphic destruction of the mechas and the unabashed sadistic glee displayed by the patrons as the violence unfolds.
** David finding another prototype of himself and smashing it with a lamp.
** One of the boxes they package the David robots moved for a moment.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not YMMV


* VillainHasAPoint: Something that seems to have been left deliberately ambiguous with Brendon Gleeson's character, the Ringmaster at the Flesh Fair. Sure, he combines all of the most despicable qualities of a revival-tent faith-healing huckster, an AmoralAttorney, and a barker at a house of ill repute; and the audience ultimately denounces him as [[YouMonster a monster]] while [[ProducePelting showering him with projectiles]]. However, a question raised by his little speech warning his audience not to let the exceptional artistry by which David was crafted fool them into mistaking him for a real boy continues to linger: what if he's ''right''? Even if one can still make a case that pandering to one's baser instincts (blood-lust, sadism, and vandalism) by trashing robots is an utterly despicable occupation, doesn't his claim that David is just another robot replacement for real humans and that such replacements degrade humanity ("God's children") stand up pretty well to philosophical scrutiny, especially in view of what the story indicates ultimately happened to humanity?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* OneSceneWonder: Gigolo Jane, played by Ashley Scott, only appears for barely a minute, but was featured a lot on the film's promotional materials and ads, and then on the dvd/blu-ray packaging and menu images.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HeCanReallyAct: Haley Joel Osment seamlessly transitions from an UncannyValley robot to a lost and unstable child desperate to find his mother.

to:

* HeCanReallyAct: HeReallyCanAct: Haley Joel Osment seamlessly transitions from an UncannyValley robot to a lost and unstable child desperate to find his mother.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* HeCanReallyAct: Haley Joel Osment seamlessly transitions from an UncannyValley robot to a lost and unstable child desperate to find his mother.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* VillainHasAPoint: Something that seems to have been left deliberately ambiguous with Brendon Gleeson's character, the Ringmaster at the Flesh Fair. Sure, he combines all of the most despicable qualities of a revival-tent faith-healing huckster, an AmoralAttorney, and a barker at a house of ill repute; and the audience ultimately denounces him as [[YouMonster a monster]] while [[ProducePelting showering him with projectiles]]. However, a question raised by his little speech warning his audience not to let the exceptional artistry by which David was crafted fool them into mistaking him for a real boy continues to linger: what if he's ''right''? Even if one can still make a case that pandering to one's baser instincts (blood-lust, sadism, and vandalism) by trashing robots is an utterly despicable occupation, doesn't his claim that David is just another robot replacement for real humans and that such replacements degrade humanity ("God's children") stand up pretty well to philosophical scrutiny, especially in view of what the story indicates ultimately happened to humanity?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** One of the David boxes moved for a moment.

to:

** One of the boxes they package the David boxes robots moved for a moment.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** An ''intentional'' example for David: is his childlish innocence an genuine act of free will or is he innocent simply because he is programmed to be that way?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Its not hard to see David during his tantrums and struggles, as less of [[NotAllowedToGrowUp a tragic victim of circumstance]], and more of a ''spoiled brat'' when his "love-centric programming" is thwarted. The ending cements [[ItsAllAboutMe his total selfishness]] [[spoiler: when he drags the long-dead woman (he's supposed to love), back to life, ''[[ResurrectionSickness for a mere 24 hours before she dies again]]''. Damned be the consequences]].

to:

** Its It's not hard to see David during his tantrums and struggles, as less of [[NotAllowedToGrowUp a tragic victim of circumstance]], and more of a ''spoiled brat'' when his "love-centric programming" is thwarted. The ending cements [[ItsAllAboutMe his total selfishness]] [[spoiler: when he drags the long-dead woman (he's supposed to love), back to life, ''[[ResurrectionSickness for a mere 24 hours before she dies again]]''. Damned be the consequences]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* FreudWasRight: David's entire journey is ultimately about winning the unconditional love of his mommy and when he does, he goes "to that place where dreams are born".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* RetroactiveRecognition: Know why [[http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0004978/ that one kid]] in the car that picked up David and Joe looked so familiar? Because [[Series/{{Entourage}} Vince is doing the movie, yo!]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Its not hard to see David during his tantrums and struggles, as less of [[NotAllowedToGrowUp a tragic victim of circumstance]], and more of a ''spoiled brat'' when his "love-centric programming" is thwarted. The ending cements [[ItsAllAboutMe his total selfishness]] [[spoiler: when he drags the long-dead woman (he's supposed to love), back to life, ''[[ResurrectionSickness for a mere 24 hours before she dies again]]''. Damned be the consequences]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CargoShip: Just a little?

to:

* CargoShip: Just a little?%%* CargoShip:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Unfortunate Implications require citations.


* UnfortunateImplications: The Flesh Fair is essentially the lynch mob of the future, which, in the hands of an American filmmaker, makes it a little uncomfortable that the first robot executed onscreen resembles [[BlackDudeDiesFirst a black man]]. In what was probably a preemptive AuthorsSavingThrow, Spielberg includes a shot of a black human family cheering on the robot's demise from the stands.

Added: 485

Changed: 415

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Likewise the crowd at the Flesh Fair revolt when Brendan Gleeson's character wants to destroy David, a robot who looks like a realistic human boy, but they didn't once feel remorse for [[WhatMeasureIsANonCute the non-cute and far less human looking robots]]. Is Brendan Gleeson correct when he says that David is another Robot and fair game for the fair regardless of how human he looks? Are the crowds awakened to the monstrosity of their appetites when they revolt to save David?



* EndingFatigue: Some believe that the movie should have ended [[spoiler: with David continuously wishing to be a real boy to the carnival Blue Fairy underwater]] (and still others feel it should have ended [[spoiler: with David committing suicide]])... but it kept going... and going... AND GOING.

to:

* EndingFatigue: Some believe that the movie should have ended [[spoiler: with David continuously wishing to be a real boy to the carnival Blue Fairy underwater]] (and still others feel it should have ended [[spoiler: with David committing suicide]])... but it kept going... and going... AND GOING.going. In either case the ending fits the general picaresque narrative structure of the film (which Kubrick insisted on, describing the constant changes and movements from the original Pinocchio novel). Likewise it served as BookEnds to the opening TimeSkip (20 months between the board meeting and the Swintons adopting David, 2000 years AfterTheEnd).



* FreudWasRight: David's entire journey is ultimately about winning the unconditional love of his mommy.

to:

* FreudWasRight: David's entire journey is ultimately about winning the unconditional love of his mommy.mommy and when he does, he goes "to that place where dreams are born".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* UnfortunateImplications: The Flesh Fair is essentially the lynch mob of the future, which, in the hands of an American filmmaker, makes it a little uncomfortable that the first robot executed onscreen resembles [[BlackDudeDiesFirst a black man]]. In what was probably a preemptive AuthorsSavingThrow, Spielberg includes a shot of a black human family cheering on the robot's demise from the stands.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The Flesh Fair scene; both the graphic destruction of the mechas and the unabashed sadistic glee displayed by the patrons as the violence unfolds.
** David finding another prototype of himself and smashing it with a lamp.

Added: 161

Removed: 161

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Editing.


* OlderThanTheyThink: ''Pinocchio'' with robots? The idea's been done as early as the 1950s, thanks to [[Creator/OsamuTezuka Osamu Tezuka's]] ''Manga/AstroBoy''.


Added DiffLines:

* OlderThanTheyThink: ''Pinocchio'' with robots? The idea's been done as early as the 1950s, thanks to [[Creator/OsamuTezuka Osamu Tezuka's]] ''Manga/AstroBoy''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Adding example.

Added DiffLines:

* OlderThanTheyThink: ''Pinocchio'' with robots? The idea's been done as early as the 1950s, thanks to [[Creator/OsamuTezuka Osamu Tezuka's]] ''Manga/AstroBoy''.

Added: 986

Changed: 1012

Removed: 509

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: Martin as a JerkassWoobie, think about it: the kid comes out of the cryogenic coma he was in, only to find out his parents have replaced him with a RobotKid. JerkAss tendencies may well be justified there

to:

----
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: AlternativeCharacterInterpretation:
**
Martin as a JerkassWoobie, think JerkassWoobie. Think about it: the kid comes out of the cryogenic coma he was in, only to find out his parents have replaced him with a RobotKid. JerkAss tendencies may well be justified therethere.



* HateDumb: There's a VERY common--practically ''default''--mindset that Spielberg "ruined" Kubrick's original vision for the film--holders of such view making a point to verbally speculate on WhatCouldHaveBeen, had Kubrick lived to see "his" vision through. Just one problem: Kubrick ''wanted'' Spielberg to do the film--and even when he ''had'' been considering directing the film himself, Kubrick would regularly consult Spielberg for insight, as Stanley felt the subject matter was more up Steven's alley.



* InferredHolocaust
* MisBlamed: Surprisingly, Kubrick was the mastermind behind the fuzzy Pinocchio subplot, while Spielberg introduced the dark grittiness of stuff like the Flesh Fair.

to:

* InferredHolocaust
* MisBlamed:
MisBlamed:
**
Surprisingly, Kubrick was the mastermind behind the fuzzy Pinocchio subplot, while Spielberg introduced the dark grittiness of stuff like the Flesh Fair.



* NightmareFuel: When David eats spinach, his face starts to droop and sag in the most '''unsettling''' way imaginable.

to:

* NightmareFuel: NightmareFuel:
**
When David eats spinach, his face starts to droop and sag in the most '''unsettling''' way imaginable.



* UncannyValley: Turned on its head here, as most of the humanlike robots are played by live actors - but used to very good effect with CGI-enhanced, partially-broken androids, and many scenes where David just doesn't... seem... quite... human. Like the one where he "breaks" after eating human food.

to:

* UncannyValley: UncannyValley:
**
Turned on its head here, as most of the humanlike robots are played by live actors - but used to very good effect with CGI-enhanced, partially-broken androids, and many scenes where David just doesn't... seem... quite... human. Like the one where he "breaks" after eating human food.



* VindicatedByHistory: The film was viewed as good, but not as highly received as Kubrick's previous films, [[MisBlamed with some of the blame being given to Spielberg's "meddling"]]. However, that response has softened since and the film has been received along with Kubrick's others as a masterpiece, a pattern that been carried with almost all of his filmography.

to:

* VindicatedByHistory: VindicatedByHistory:
**
The film was viewed as good, but not as highly received as Kubrick's previous films, [[MisBlamed with some of the blame being given to Spielberg's "meddling"]]. However, that response has softened since and the film has been received along with Kubrick's others as a masterpiece, a pattern that been carried with almost all of his filmography.



* TheWoobie: Oh, come on. Who didn't want to reach through the screen and give poor little David a hug?

to:

* TheWoobie: Oh, come on. Who didn't want to reach through the screen and give poor little David a hug?hug?
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
This Troper is explicitly forbidden anywhere on this wiki.


* UncannyValley: Turned on its head here, as most of the humanlike robots are played by live actors - but used to very good effect with CGI-enhanced, partially-broken androids, and many scenes where David just doesn't... seem... quite... human. Like the one where he "breaks" after eating human food. This troper recalls hearing that Osment suggested that David should never blink.

to:

* UncannyValley: Turned on its head here, as most of the humanlike robots are played by live actors - but used to very good effect with CGI-enhanced, partially-broken androids, and many scenes where David just doesn't... seem... quite... human. Like the one where he "breaks" after eating human food. This troper recalls hearing that Osment suggested that David should never blink.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Notably, Creator/RogerEbert initially gave it a score of 3 stars out of 4, and criticized the ending, but now has included it in his "[[RogerEbertGreatMoviesList Great Movies]]" list.

to:

** Notably, Creator/RogerEbert initially gave it a score of 3 stars out of 4, and criticized the ending, but now has since included it in his "[[RogerEbertGreatMoviesList Great Movies]]" list.

Top