Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
** ''Edmontonia'', ''Chirostenotes'', ''Hesperonychus'', and mammal ''Alphadon'' are not known from Prince Creek at all, nor are there any remains that could've been attributable to them unlike the three aforementioned species.
to:
** ''Edmontonia'', ''Chirostenotes'', ''Hesperonychus'', and mammal ''Alphadon'' are not known from Prince Creek at all, nor are there any remains that could've been attributable to them unlike the three aforementioned species.Creek.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* NoNameGiven: A rather odd example, as both the ankylosaur and pterosaurs are only identified as "ankylosaur" and "pterosaur" respectively, not even being acknowledged as a panoplosaur and azhdarchid (which they clearly are). It's not a case of trying to circumvent MisplacedWildlife either, since ''Hesperonychus'' and ''Chirostenotes'' do get properly named, despite neither being known from Alaska, while we do have one skull of a panoplosaurine from Alaska.
