Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Website / TelevisionWithoutPity

Go To

OR

Added: 246

Changed: 37

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** This was most notably seen with the recappers war with fans of the US Queer As Folk; the show was even banned from being discussed, because fans of the show were upset at the negative recaps of the show by writers who considered it inferior to the UK version and never let up on their disdain for Showtime remaking it for the US market.

to:

** This was most notably seen with the recappers war with fans of the US Queer As Folk; Folk show; the show was even banned from being discussed, discussed in the forums for several years, because fans of the show were upset at the negative recaps of the show by writers who considered it inferior to the UK version and never let up on their disdain for Showtime remaking it for the US market. market.
*** Similarly, the site's general blackballing of FX falls into this, to the point that in the "Recapper FAQ" for Charmed, the recapper basically cursed out fans of Nip/Tuck and told them to "shut up" asking when the website would recap the show.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** This was most notably seen with the recappers war with fans of the US Queer As Folk; the show was even banned from being discussed, because fans of the show were upset at the negative recaps of the show by writers who considered it inferior to the UK version and never let up on their disdain for Showtime remaking it for the US market.

Added: 590

Removed: 338

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** While the show did lean liberal, Jacob Clifton ironically rage-quit recapping Dr Who over the crime of hiring a black actress to replace his beloved "goddess" Rose Tyler



** In a recap much shorter than his usual (which admittedly [[DoorStopper isn't saying much]]), Jacob Clifton dumped reviewing ''Series/DoctorWho'' midway through Series 6, because he preferred Creator/RussellTDavies' mythic arcs to Creator/StevenMoffat's interlocking puzzle plots, and objected to the characterization of Eleven and Amy.


Added DiffLines:

** Deconstructed in that fans cheered when Jacob was removed from recapping Doctor Who, as Jacob talked about nothing BUT Rose, Rose, Rose and pretentious (even for him) ramblings about Rose's "Hero's Journey" to the point that he barely fucking recapped the episodes and wholesale skipped the last two season because of Jacob being pissy Billie Piper opted to quit the series/not liking Martha because she was black.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In the {{Series/The OC}} recaps, Che was instead named "[[Series/{{Everwood}} Bright]]" after [[Creator/ChrisPratt Chris Pratt's]] character on ''Everwood''.

to:

** In the {{Series/The OC}} recaps, Che was instead named "[[Series/{{Everwood}} Bright]]" after [[Creator/ChrisPratt Chris Pratt's]] Creator/ChrisPratt's character on ''Everwood''.



** In a recap much shorter than his usual (which admittedly [[DoorStopper isn't saying much]]), Jacob Clifton dumped reviewing ''Series/DoctorWho'' midway through Series 6, because he preferred Russell T. Davies' mythic arcs to Moffat's interlocking puzzle plots, and objected to the characterization of Eleven and Amy.

to:

** In a recap much shorter than his usual (which admittedly [[DoorStopper isn't saying much]]), Jacob Clifton dumped reviewing ''Series/DoctorWho'' midway through Series 6, because he preferred Russell T. Davies' Creator/RussellTDavies' mythic arcs to Moffat's Creator/StevenMoffat's interlocking puzzle plots, and objected to the characterization of Eleven and Amy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* {{Irony}}: The season 4 recaps of ''Series/BuffyTheVampireSlayer'' (first recaps done of the show) have Sep and Ace totally crushing and in love with Spike, and want more of him. By late season 5, they're sick of the sight of him and their opinions keep dropping from there.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Strega and her ''Series/{{Angel}}'' recaps hated Wesley, but mostly because she knew people like him and commented a few times that for all his obnoxiousness, he was probably the best developed character of the show.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* BeCarefulWhatYouWishFor: Occasionally a recapper, like Sep with Spike/Buffy or Sara M with House/Cuddy, will wish for a pairing in early recaps but intensely regret it when it happens and it's badly written.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ResetButton: Sara M's ''Series/{{House}}'' recaps get steadily more annoyed with the show's doing this (like when season 6 backtracked from him being insane enough to commit himself) that she leaves at the end of season 7.

Added: 46

Changed: 2

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Keckler's recaps of ''Sereis/StarTrekEnterprise'' dubbed [[TheCaptain Captain Archer]]'s ready room porthole the "Weight Of The World Window" for his habit of staring contemplatively through it in times of momentous or weighty decisions. Somewhere late in the series, Archer turned away from it to [[TheEngineer Commander Tucker]] and said "Weight of the world, Trip", leaving Keckler briefly stunned in mid-recap.

to:

** Keckler's recaps of ''Sereis/StarTrekEnterprise'' ''Series/StarTrekEnterprise'' dubbed [[TheCaptain Captain Archer]]'s ready room porthole the "Weight Of The World Window" for his habit of staring contemplatively through it in times of momentous or weighty decisions. Somewhere late in the series, Archer turned away from it to [[TheEngineer Commander Tucker]] and said "Weight of the world, Trip", leaving Keckler briefly stunned in mid-recap.


Added DiffLines:

* StartToCorpse: Believed to be the TropeNamer
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* InterruptedBath: The site had the often-used phrase "God is in the tub." This phrase was typically used in association with contestants on reality shows such as ''Series/{{Survivor}}'' or ''Series/TheAmazingRace'' praying to God to help them in getting ahead on the show, the idea being that doing so is like interrupting your mother when she's trying to take a bath. Praying to God for a safe flight to the next leg of the race, or to calm your fears before a task? Okay. Praying that you beat the other teams? Not okay.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In one ''Series/{{Charmed}}'' recap, Demian refers to Chris's female sex partner as a man because he insists that Chris is gay.

to:

** In one ''Series/{{Charmed}}'' ''Series/{{Charmed|1998}}'' recap, Demian refers to Chris's female sex partner as a man because he insists that Chris is gay.



** Demian has at least two from ''Series/{{Charmed}}''- in one episode, Piper said "Fricking ever-useless Elders!" ("ever-useless Elders" was one of his catch phrases when recapping) and in another, the entire episode revolved around a Darklighter named Damien who was trying to kill Leo (Demian's least-favorite character). He was overjoyed.

to:

** Demian has at least two from ''Series/{{Charmed}}''- ''Series/{{Charmed|1998}}''- in one episode, Piper said "Fricking ever-useless Elders!" ("ever-useless Elders" was one of his catch phrases when recapping) and in another, the entire episode revolved around a Darklighter named Damien who was trying to kill Leo (Demian's least-favorite character). He was overjoyed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* ShapedLikeItself: One of the more infamous rules of the site was "No talking about the boards on the boards" -- namely, the intent was to focus on the show under discussion, not tangential conversations about the content of the recaps, the recappers, or other posters. As it was a bit of an unclear and circuitous rule to begin with, the recappers themselves were frequently the ones in-charge of enforcing it and it could be conveniently interpreted as preventing any disagreement or criticism of the views or running of the site, this gradually led to claims of unethical and overly draconian moderating. Many accusations arose that certain moderators / recappers ([[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement who will not be specified]]) exploited its nebulous nature to unfairly target and ban people whose only real crime was disagreeing with the mod's / recapper's opinion or otherwise bruising their ego.

to:

* ShapedLikeItself: One of the more infamous rules of the site was "No talking about the boards on the boards" -- namely, the intent was to focus on the show under discussion, not tangential conversations about the content of the recaps, the recappers, or other posters. As it was a bit of an unclear and circuitous rule to begin with, the recappers themselves were frequently the ones in-charge of enforcing it and it could be conveniently interpreted as preventing any disagreement or criticism of the views or running of the site, this gradually led to claims of unethical and overly draconian moderating. Many accusations arose that certain moderators / recappers ([[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement ([[Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment who will not be specified]]) exploited its nebulous nature to unfairly target and ban people whose only real crime was disagreeing with the mod's / recapper's opinion or otherwise bruising their ego.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CantTakeCriticism: As discovered to be the case on the message boards. Going against the grain or even questioning the recappers or board administrators [[FridgeLogic was worthy of]] [[DisproportionateRetribution being banned]].

to:

* CantTakeCriticism: As discovered to be the case on the message boards. Going against the grain or even questioning the recappers or board administrators [[FridgeLogic was worthy of]] [[DisproportionateRetribution was worthy of being banned]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ShapedLikeItself: One of the more infamous rules of the site was "No talking about the boards on the boards" -- namely, the intent was to focus on the show under discussion, not tangential conversations about the content of the recaps, the recappers, or other posters. As it was a bit of an unclear and circuitous rule to begin with, the recappers themselves were frequently the ones in-charge of enforcing it and it could be conveniently interpreted as preventing any disagreement or criticism of the views or running of the site, this gradually led to claims of unethical and overly draconian moderating, with many accusations that certain moderators / recappers ([[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement who will not be specified]]) exploited its nebulous nature to unfairly target and ban people whose only real crime was disagreeing with the mod's / recapper's opinion or otherwise bruising their ego.

to:

* ShapedLikeItself: One of the more infamous rules of the site was "No talking about the boards on the boards" -- namely, the intent was to focus on the show under discussion, not tangential conversations about the content of the recaps, the recappers, or other posters. As it was a bit of an unclear and circuitous rule to begin with, the recappers themselves were frequently the ones in-charge of enforcing it and it could be conveniently interpreted as preventing any disagreement or criticism of the views or running of the site, this gradually led to claims of unethical and overly draconian moderating, with many moderating. Many accusations arose that certain moderators / recappers ([[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement who will not be specified]]) exploited its nebulous nature to unfairly target and ban people whose only real crime was disagreeing with the mod's / recapper's opinion or otherwise bruising their ego.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ShapedLikeItself: One of the more infamous rules of the site was "No talking about the boards on the boards" -- namely, the intent was to focus on the show under discussion, not tangential conversations about the content of the recaps, the recappers, or other posters. As it was a bit of an unclear and circuitous rule to begin with and the recappers themselves were frequently the ones in-charge of enforcing it, this gradually led to claims of unethical and overly draconian moderating, with many accusations that certain recappers ([[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement who will not be specified]]) exploited its nebulous nature to unfairly target and ban people whose only real crime was disagreeing with the recapper's opinion or otherwise bruising their ego.

to:

* ShapedLikeItself: One of the more infamous rules of the site was "No talking about the boards on the boards" -- namely, the intent was to focus on the show under discussion, not tangential conversations about the content of the recaps, the recappers, or other posters. As it was a bit of an unclear and circuitous rule to begin with and with, the recappers themselves were frequently the ones in-charge of enforcing it, it and it could be conveniently interpreted as preventing any disagreement or criticism of the views or running of the site, this gradually led to claims of unethical and overly draconian moderating, with many accusations that certain moderators / recappers ([[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement who will not be specified]]) exploited its nebulous nature to unfairly target and ban people whose only real crime was disagreeing with the mod's / recapper's opinion or otherwise bruising their ego.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ShapedLikeItself: One of the more infamous rules of the site was "No talking about the boards on the boards" -- namely, the intent was to focus on the show under discussion, not tangential conversations about the content of the recaps, the recappers, or other posters. As it was a bit of an unclear and circuitous rule to begin with and the recappers themselves were frequently the ones in-charge of enforcing it, this gradually led to claims of unethical and overly draconian moderating, with many accusations that certain recappers ([[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement who will not be specified]]) exploited its nebulous nature to unfairly ban people whose only real crime was disagreeing with the recapper's opinion or otherwise bruising their ego.

to:

* ShapedLikeItself: One of the more infamous rules of the site was "No talking about the boards on the boards" -- namely, the intent was to focus on the show under discussion, not tangential conversations about the content of the recaps, the recappers, or other posters. As it was a bit of an unclear and circuitous rule to begin with and the recappers themselves were frequently the ones in-charge of enforcing it, this gradually led to claims of unethical and overly draconian moderating, with many accusations that certain recappers ([[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement who will not be specified]]) exploited its nebulous nature to unfairly target and ban people whose only real crime was disagreeing with the recapper's opinion or otherwise bruising their ego.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ShapedLikeItself: One of the more infamous rules of the site was "No talking about the boards on the boards" -- namely, the intent was to focus on the show under discussion, not tangential conversations about the content of the recaps, the recappers, or other posters. As it was a bit of an unclear rule to begin with and the recappers themselves were frequently the ones in-charge of enforcing it, this gradually led to claims of unethical and overly draconian moderating, with many accusations that certain recappers ([[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement who will not be specified]]) exploited its nebulous nature to unfairly ban people whose only real crime was disagreeing with the recapper's opinion or otherwise bruising their ego.

to:

* ShapedLikeItself: One of the more infamous rules of the site was "No talking about the boards on the boards" -- namely, the intent was to focus on the show under discussion, not tangential conversations about the content of the recaps, the recappers, or other posters. As it was a bit of an unclear and circuitous rule to begin with and the recappers themselves were frequently the ones in-charge of enforcing it, this gradually led to claims of unethical and overly draconian moderating, with many accusations that certain recappers ([[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement who will not be specified]]) exploited its nebulous nature to unfairly ban people whose only real crime was disagreeing with the recapper's opinion or otherwise bruising their ego.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ShapedLikeItself: One of the more infamous rules of the site was "No talking about the boards on the boards" -- namely, the intent was to focus on the show under discussion, not tangential conversations about the content of the recaps, the recappers, or other posters. As it was a bit of an unclear rule to begin with and the recappers themselves were frequently the ones in-charge of enforcing it, this gradually led to claims of unethical and overly draconian moderating, with many accusations that certain recappers ([[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement who will not be specified]]) exploited its nebulous nature to unfairly ban people whose only real crime was disagreeing with the recapper's opinion or otherwise bruising their ego.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CantTakeCriticism: As discovered to be the case on the message boards. Going against the grain or even questioning the recappers or board administrators [[FridgeLogic was worthy of]] [[DisproportionateRetribution being banned]]. [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment And that's all that'll be said about that.]]

to:

* CantTakeCriticism: As discovered to be the case on the message boards. Going against the grain or even questioning the recappers or board administrators [[FridgeLogic was worthy of]] [[DisproportionateRetribution being banned]]. [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment And that's all that'll be said about that.]]



* {{Hypocrite}}: It was frequently noted that several recappers ([[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement who shall go unnamed]]), despite being incredibly blunt and snarky when it came to their criticism of the works they recapped and their disagreements with the views of the people who created them (as was the whole ''raison d'ere'' of the site), could be incredibly thin-skinned when it came to people criticising and disagreeing with ''them''.

to:

* {{Hypocrite}}: It was frequently noted that several recappers ([[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement who shall go unnamed]]), recappers, despite being incredibly blunt and snarky when it came to their criticism of the works they recapped and their disagreements with the views of the people who created them (as was the whole ''raison d'ere'' of the site), could be incredibly thin-skinned when it came to people criticising and disagreeing with ''them''.

Added: 635

Changed: 765

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* GrammarNazi: The moderators.

to:

* GrammarNazi: GrammarNazi:
**
The moderators.



* IRejectYourReality: Lampshaded in the ''[[Series/BuffyTheVampireSlayer Buffy]]'' and ''Series/{{Angel}}'' reviews. Strega chooses to believe [[Creator/JamesMarsters Spike]] is off causing mayhem in some foreign nation, unaware that he's replaced by some dull lookalike named [[BadassDecay Brad]].

to:

* IRejectYourReality: IRejectYourReality:
**
Lampshaded in the ''[[Series/BuffyTheVampireSlayer Buffy]]'' and ''Series/{{Angel}}'' reviews. Strega chooses to believe [[Creator/JamesMarsters Spike]] is off causing mayhem in some foreign nation, unaware that he's replaced by some dull lookalike named [[BadassDecay Brad]].



* TheNicknamer: Tippi Blevins calls Clark "[[DarkerAndEdgier Emo Blur]]" and "[[DumbMuscle Super Doofus]]".
** Likewise, Marcia Cross's character Linda in ''Series/{{Everwood}}'' was nicknamed "[[IntentionalEngrishForFunny Rinda]]" due to her character working as a doctor in China.

to:

* TheNicknamer: TheNicknamer:
**
Tippi Blevins calls Clark "[[DarkerAndEdgier Emo Blur]]" and "[[DumbMuscle Super Doofus]]".
** Likewise, Marcia Cross's character Linda in ''Series/{{Everwood}}'' was nicknamed "[[IntentionalEngrishForFunny Rinda]]" due to her character working as a doctor in China.



* ShoutOut: PlayedForLaughs. Any line of dialogue which includes a name or reference to something the recapper is known for (no matter how obscure) is jokingly declared a "Shout out."

to:

* ShoutOut: ShoutOut:
**
PlayedForLaughs. Any line of dialogue which includes a name or reference to something the recapper is known for (no matter how obscure) is jokingly declared a "Shout out."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[BackFromTheDead However ...]] as of 2016, Tribune Media had acquired the rights to [=TWoP=] and was planning [[http://screenertv.com/twop/ a revival in 2017 as part of their Screener website]]. However, as of November 2017, references to the planned revival have mostly disappeared (the link you see there is broken) and the Screener site itself is out-of-date, still displaying content on its homepage from over a year ago. An [[https://www.thewrap.com/tribune-layoffs-screener-tv-shut-television-without-pity-relaunch-scrapped-exclusive/ article]] from [=TheWrap=] reveals that Tribune made major layoffs and the plan to revive the site was scrapped.

to:

[[BackFromTheDead However ...]] as of 2016, [[HopeSpot In 2016]], Tribune Media had acquired the rights to [=TWoP=] and was planning [[http://screenertv.com/twop/ a revival in 2017 as part of their Screener website]]. Screener.tv website. However, as of November 2017, by mid-2017, references to the planned revival have mostly disappeared (the link you see there disappeared[[note]]The [[http://screenertv.com/twop/ site]] in question is broken) now a broken link[[/note]] and the Screener site itself is out-of-date, still displaying content on its homepage from over a year ago. An it was soon revealed by [[https://www.thewrap.com/tribune-layoffs-screener-tv-shut-television-without-pity-relaunch-scrapped-exclusive/ article]] from [=TheWrap=] reveals TheWrap]] that Tribune made major layoffs and scrapped the plan to revive [=TWoP=], leaving it in DevelopmentHell for the site was scrapped.
foreseeable future.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[BackFromTheDead However ...]] as of 2016, Tribune Media had acquired the rights to [=TWoP=] and was planning [[http://screenertv.com/twop/ a revival in 2017 as part of their Screener website]]. However, as of November 2017, references to the planned revival have mostly disappeared (the link you see there is broken) and the Screener site itself is out-of-date, still displaying content on its homepage from over a year ago.

to:

[[BackFromTheDead However ...]] as of 2016, Tribune Media had acquired the rights to [=TWoP=] and was planning [[http://screenertv.com/twop/ a revival in 2017 as part of their Screener website]]. However, as of November 2017, references to the planned revival have mostly disappeared (the link you see there is broken) and the Screener site itself is out-of-date, still displaying content on its homepage from over a year ago.
ago. An [[https://www.thewrap.com/tribune-layoffs-screener-tv-shut-television-without-pity-relaunch-scrapped-exclusive/ article]] from [=TheWrap=] reveals that Tribune made major layoffs and the plan to revive the site was scrapped.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[BackFromTheDead However ...]] as of 2016, Tribune Media has acquired the rights to [=TWoP=] and is planning [[http://screenertv.com/twop/ a revival in 2017 as part of their Screener website]].

to:

[[BackFromTheDead However ...]] as of 2016, Tribune Media has had acquired the rights to [=TWoP=] and is was planning [[http://screenertv.com/twop/ a revival in 2017 as part of their Screener website]].
website]]. However, as of November 2017, references to the planned revival have mostly disappeared (the link you see there is broken) and the Screener site itself is out-of-date, still displaying content on its homepage from over a year ago.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* CouldThisHappenToYou: The ''Television Without Pity'' book that they released pokes fun at this in their entry on "News, Crappy Local."
-->...the broadcast segues into everyone's favorite local-news staple, the "Something Perfectly Innocent COULD KILL YOU"-slash-"Good God WON'T SOMEONE THINK OF THE CHILDREN" feature. First comes an assy graphic of, like, a bowl of oatmeal with fangs, subtitled something along the lines of "Quaker? MORE LIKE 'DAMNED LIAR'," and the revelation that oat bran is not all that good for you ''if'' you eat nothing but oatmeal, in which case you will get scurvy, which: doy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* HehHehYouSaidX: The ''Series/TwentyFour'' recaps had this for "debrief" or variants of it.

Changed: 19

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[http://www.televisionwithoutpity.com/ Television Without Pity]], formerly known as ''Mighty Big TV'', is a TV recapping and discussion site featuring '''very''' snarky commentary.

If you believe some TV shows are so good that they must never be made fun of, [=TWoP=] isn't for you. However, if you recognize that even your favorite show has much which is deserving of mockery, you'll like [=TWoP=].

to:

[[http://www.televisionwithoutpity.com/ Television Without Pity]], formerly known as ''Mighty Big TV'', is was a TV recapping and discussion site featuring '''very''' snarky commentary.

If you believe some TV shows are so good that they must never be made fun of, [=TWoP=] isn't wasn't for you. However, if you recognize that even your favorite show has much which is deserving of mockery, you'll like you would have liked [=TWoP=].


** In the {{Series/The OC}} recaps, Che was [[TheyJustDidntCare instead]] named "[[Series/{{Everwood}} Bright]]" after [[Creator/ChrisPratt Chris Pratt's]] character on ''Everwood''.

to:

** In the {{Series/The OC}} recaps, Che was [[TheyJustDidntCare instead]] instead named "[[Series/{{Everwood}} Bright]]" after [[Creator/ChrisPratt Chris Pratt's]] character on ''Everwood''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


[[BackFromTheDead However ...]] as of 2016, Tribune Media has acquired the rights to [=TWoP=] and is planning [[http://screenertv.com/twop/ a revival in 2017 as part of their Screener website]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Let's not forget his Charmed nicknames: "Raige" for Paige and "Big Gay Chris" for Chris. Also, Piper and Paige are sometimes referred to as "Phoebe's Fucking Backup Band."

to:

** Let's not forget his Charmed ''Charmed'' nicknames: "Raige" for Paige and "Big Gay Chris" for Chris. Also, Piper and Paige are sometimes referred to as "Phoebe's Fucking Backup Band."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Let's not forget his Charmed nicknames: "Raige" for Paige and "Big Gay Chris" for Chris. Also, Piper and Paige are sometimes referred to as "Phoebe's Fucking Backup Band."

Top