Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Website / DarwinAwards

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* EnemyMine: Subverted by Ernst Thälmann, leader of the German Communist Party (KPD) during the WeimarRepublic. He refused to form a common front with Social Democrats (SPD), calling them "social fascists" (the Communist theory that social democracy was a moderate form of fascism). On the other hand, he was willing to ally with the Nazis, considering them to be "working people's comrades". His plan was to let AdolfHitler come to power, that then Germans would see that the Nazis have no real solutions to Germany's problems and would defect to the Communists. Except, when Hitler came to power, KPD was the first party to be banned, and Thälmann was sent to prison, then in August 1944 transferred to Buchenwald concentration camp and executed, under Hitler's personal orders.

to:

* EnemyMine: Subverted by Ernst Thälmann, leader of the German Communist Party (KPD) during the WeimarRepublic. He refused to form a common front with Social Democrats (SPD), calling them "social fascists" (the Communist theory that social democracy was a moderate form of fascism). On the other hand, he was willing to ally with the Nazis, considering them to be "working people's comrades". His plan was to let AdolfHitler come to power, that then Germans would see that the Nazis have no real solutions to Germany's problems and would defect to the Communists. Except, when Hitler came to power, KPD was the first party to be banned, and Thälmann was sent to prison, then in August 1944 transferred to Buchenwald concentration camp and executed, under Hitler's personal orders. However, he didn't remove himself from the gene pool, as he still had a daughter born in 1919.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* EnemyMine: Subverted by Ernst Thälmann, leader of the German Communist Party (KPD) during the WeimarRepublic. He refused to form a common front with Social Democrats (SPD), calling them "social fascists" (the Communist theory that social democracy was a moderate form of fascism). On the other hand, he was willing to ally with the Nazis, considering them to be "working people's comrades". His plan was to let AdolfHitler come to power, that then Germans would see that the Nazis have no real solutions to Germany's problems and would defect to the Communists. Except, when Hitler came to power, KPD was the first party to be banned, and Thälmann was sent to prison, then in August 1944 transferred to Buchenwald concentration camp and executed, under Hitler's personal orders.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


These exceptions didn't always exist, and the [[EarlyInstallmentWeirdness early days]] of the site included entries that fell under these exceptions. Some remain on the site under a GrandfatherClause, but others were removed.

to:

These exceptions didn't always exist, and the [[EarlyInstallmentWeirdness early days]] of the site included entries that fell under these exceptions. Some remain on the site under a GrandfatherClause, but others were removed.
removed. The Awards' veracity has also been put to doubt as a number of them either turned out to be {{Urban Legend}}s such as the JATO rocket car myth, and an incident involving agents from the Philippines' National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) smoking inside a munitions stockpile; while the site cites both CNN and the ''Philippine Star'', none of the two news outlets mention the use of tobacco as the cause of the explosion.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HarmlessElectrocution: One winner managed to fatally *invert* this, [[https://darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin1999-50.html accidentally killing himself with a 9-volt battery]].

to:

* HarmlessElectrocution: One winner managed to fatally *invert* ''invert'' this, [[https://darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin1999-50.html accidentally killing himself with a 9-volt battery]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* HarmlessElectrocution: One winner managed to fatally *invert* this, [[https://darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin1999-50.html accidentally killing himself with a 9-volt battery]].

Added: 415

Changed: 411

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* RussianRoulette: The site notes that simply participating in this game and losing is not enough on its own to be considered a contender for an award, as it is simply far ''too'' common a form of stupidity. In order to be eligible, the contender must have done something extra to push the already incredibly poor decision to blatantly gamble your life in a game involving loaded firearms and a one-in-six chance into the realm of ''truly'' outrageous idiocy. A highlight in this category is definitely a Houston man who not only decided to play the game, but ''also'' somehow failed to understand why a revolver is used, as he instead used a ''semiautomatic pistol'' for the game instead. An even dumber variation involves three guys taking turns stomping on a ''land mine''; fortunately, everyone else is smart enough to get the hell away before the inevitable kaboom.

to:

* RussianRoulette: The site notes that simply participating in this game and losing is not enough on its own to be considered a contender for an award, as it is simply far ''too'' common a form of stupidity. In order to be eligible, the contender must have done something extra to push the already incredibly poor decision to blatantly gamble your life in a game involving loaded firearms and a one-in-six chance into the realm of ''truly'' outrageous idiocy. idiocy.
**
A highlight in this category is definitely a Houston man who not only decided to play the game, but ''also'' somehow failed to understand why a revolver is used, as he instead used a ''semiautomatic pistol'' for the game instead. instead.
**
An even dumber variation involves three guys taking turns stomping on a ''land mine''; fortunately, everyone else is smart enough to get the hell away before the inevitable kaboom.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* RussianRoulette: The site notes that simply participating in this game and losing is not enough on its own to be considered a contender for an award, as it is simply far ''too'' common a form of stupidity. In order to be eligible, the contender must have done something extra to push the already incredibly poor decision to blatantly gamble your life in a game involving loaded firearms into the realm of ''truly'' outrageous idiocy. A highlight in this category is definitely a Houston man who not only decided to play the game, but ''also'' somehow failed to understand why a revolver is used, as he instead used a ''semiautomatic pistol'' for the game instead. An even dumber variation involves three guys taking turns stomping on a ''land mine''; fortunately, everyone else is smart enough to get the hell away before the inevitable kaboom.

to:

* RussianRoulette: The site notes that simply participating in this game and losing is not enough on its own to be considered a contender for an award, as it is simply far ''too'' common a form of stupidity. In order to be eligible, the contender must have done something extra to push the already incredibly poor decision to blatantly gamble your life in a game involving loaded firearms and a one-in-six chance into the realm of ''truly'' outrageous idiocy. A highlight in this category is definitely a Houston man who not only decided to play the game, but ''also'' somehow failed to understand why a revolver is used, as he instead used a ''semiautomatic pistol'' for the game instead. An even dumber variation involves three guys taking turns stomping on a ''land mine''; fortunately, everyone else is smart enough to get the hell away before the inevitable kaboom.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* RussianRoulette: The site notes that simply participating in this game and losing is not enough on its own to be considered a contender for an award, as it is simply far ''too'' common a form of idiocy. In order to be eligible, the contender must have something done extra to push the already incredibly poor decision to blatantly gamble your life in a game with loaded firearms into the realm of truly outrageous idiocy. A highlight in this category is definitely a Houston man who not only decided to play the game, but ''also'' somehow failed to understand why a revolver is used, as he instead used a ''semiautomatic pistol''. An even dumber variation involves three guys taking turns stomping on a ''land mine''; fortunately, everyone else is smart enough to get the hell away before the inevitable kaboom.

to:

* RussianRoulette: The site notes that simply participating in this game and losing is not enough on its own to be considered a contender for an award, as it is simply far ''too'' common a form of idiocy. stupidity. In order to be eligible, the contender must have done something done extra to push the already incredibly poor decision to blatantly gamble your life in a game with involving loaded firearms into the realm of truly ''truly'' outrageous idiocy. A highlight in this category is definitely a Houston man who not only decided to play the game, but ''also'' somehow failed to understand why a revolver is used, as he instead used a ''semiautomatic pistol''.pistol'' for the game instead. An even dumber variation involves three guys taking turns stomping on a ''land mine''; fortunately, everyone else is smart enough to get the hell away before the inevitable kaboom.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* RussianRoulette: The site notes that simply participating in this game and losing is not enough on its own to be considered a contender for an award, as it is simply far too common a form of idiocy. In order to be eligible, the contender must have something done extra to push the already incredibly poor decision to play the game into the realm of outrageous idiocy. A highlight in this category, is definitely a Houston man who decided play the game, but somehow failed to understand why a revolver is used, as he instead used a ''semiautomatic pistol''. An even dumber variation involves three guys taking turns stomping on a ''land mine''; fortunately, everyone else is smart enough to get the hell away before the inevitable kaboom.

to:

* RussianRoulette: The site notes that simply participating in this game and losing is not enough on its own to be considered a contender for an award, as it is simply far too ''too'' common a form of idiocy. In order to be eligible, the contender must have something done extra to push the already incredibly poor decision to play the blatantly gamble your life in a game with loaded firearms into the realm of truly outrageous idiocy. A highlight in this category, category is definitely a Houston man who not only decided to play the game, but ''also'' somehow failed to understand why a revolver is used, as he instead used a ''semiautomatic pistol''. An even dumber variation involves three guys taking turns stomping on a ''land mine''; fortunately, everyone else is smart enough to get the hell away before the inevitable kaboom.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* RussianRoulette: The site notes that simply participating in this game and losing is not enough on its own to be considered a contender for an award, as it is simply far too common a form of idiocy. In order to be eligible, the contender must have something done extra to push the already incredibly poor decision to play the game into the realm of outrageous idiocy. A highlight in this category, is definitely a Houston man who decided play the game, but somehow failed to understand why a revolver is used, as he instead used a ''semiautomatic pistol''.

to:

* RussianRoulette: The site notes that simply participating in this game and losing is not enough on its own to be considered a contender for an award, as it is simply far too common a form of idiocy. In order to be eligible, the contender must have something done extra to push the already incredibly poor decision to play the game into the realm of outrageous idiocy. A highlight in this category, is definitely a Houston man who decided play the game, but somehow failed to understand why a revolver is used, as he instead used a ''semiautomatic pistol''. An even dumber variation involves three guys taking turns stomping on a ''land mine''; fortunately, everyone else is smart enough to get the hell away before the inevitable kaboom.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* RussianRoulette: The site notes that simply participating in this game and losing is not enough on its own to be considered a contender for an award, as it is simply far too common a form of idiocy. In order to be eligible, the contender must have something done extra to push the already incredibly poor decision to play the game into the realm of outrageous idiocy. A highlight in this category, is definitely a Houston man who decided play the game, but somehow failed to understand why a revolver is used, as he instead used a ''semiautomatic pistol''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BestialityIsDepraved: One of the winners who was left alive but unable to reproduce ended up that way by attempting to have sex with a porcupine. Another man was kicked to death while attempting to acquire carnal knowledge of a cow.

to:

* BestialityIsDepraved: One of the winners who was left alive but unable to reproduce ended up that way by attempting to have sex with a porcupine.porcupine, proving that [[Literature/WyrdSisters the hedgehog can indeed never be buggered at all]]. Another man was kicked to death while attempting to acquire carnal knowledge of a cow.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ExactWords: All that one needs to "win" a Darwin Award is to remove themselves from the gene pool somehow. Death is not a requirement and there are several "winners" still alive but who have lost their ability to produce children.

Added: 484

Changed: 4555

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Making description flow better. (Also, "please note" and its ilk are *incredibly* annoying, because the turn the page from a romp to a lecture. Is there an exam at the end or something?)


The [[http://www.darwinawards.com/ Darwin Awards]] are a collection of stories of those that have given the best their DNA can offer to the gene pool. That is, [[HoistByHisOwnPetard they removed their DNA from the gene pool through such utterly stupid actions (of their own devising)]] that the fact they can no longer breed is worth an award. It is worth noting that, although most of the winners remove themselves from the gene pool in a fatal manner, there are a precious few who manage to leave the gene pool in a spectacularly stupid manner while still remaining alive, ([[CripplingCastration albeit... incomplete]]) afterward.

Although Internet-based, the Darwin Awards have released books authored by Wendy Northcutt detailing the "winners" of that year.

[[AC:There are four categories:]]
* Darwin Award winners: Those killed or unable to reproduce[[note]]Also occasionally includes people who are in jail for life or other long settings for similar reasons; the key element here is complete deprival of ''opportunities'' to reproduce[[/note]]. Further being classed as;
** Confirmed by Darwin: In reliable news sources.
** Unconfirmed by Darwin: Unable to find reliable sources, but not proved to be false.
** Debunked by Darwin: A story previously thought to be true is found to be false.
* [[strike:Honorable Mentions]] At Risk Survivors: Those that did their idiotic best to kill or sterilize themselves, yet defied the odds and failed to do so.
* Urban Legends: Those stories believed to be true yet have no basis in reality.
* Personal Accounts: Members of the internet put forth their own personal stories with no other proof.

See also ''Series/OneThousandWaysToDie'', which is based on a similar premise (the major difference is that ''1000 Ways To Die'' doesn't really care about the death being due to stupidity [[CruelAndUnusualDeath if it's spectacular and/or bizarre enough]]).

Finally, there was actually a film (''Film/TheDarwinAwards'') based off of some of the stories from this site. A few of the stories were also tested by the Series/{{Mythbusters}} (who, incidentally enough, made cameo appearances in the movie).

'''NOTE:''' People who take out innocents in the process of removing themselves from the gene pool are expressly disqualified from Darwin Awards consideration by the website, thus '''instantly''' disqualifying all drunk drivers if they hit someone. (This rule was not in the first version of their ruleset, thus some of the early Darwin Awards did mention the death or injury of bystanders.) This rule has its own exception, namely: [[DontAskJustRun if anyone in their right mind would flee the area if they saw what the contender was doing]], and a bystander stays to watch, then the contender can still get nominated on the grounds that the bystander will probably also get nominated. People with mental disorders are also disqualified as Wendy sees these deaths as just plain tragic (Diminished mental capacity due to alcohol or other drugs is permitted, because such people chose to diminish their mental capacity with drugs of their own free will). Youths under the age of 16 are generally disqualified unless a majority of the youth's peers agree the action taken by the nominee was incredibly stupid. Anyone who won before a rule change, that would have disqualified them, gets to keep the award as part of a GrandfatherClause. Finally, there was an unofficial rule change that says the nominees must have unintentionally caused the incident as to prevent people from [[NoSuchThingAsBadPublicity harming themselves to try to win]]. There are a few exceptions due to the aforementioned grandfather clause.

to:

The [[http://www.darwinawards.com/ Darwin Awards]] are a collection of stories of those that have given the best their DNA can offer to the gene pool. That is, [[HoistByHisOwnPetard they removed their DNA from the gene pool through such utterly stupid actions (of their own devising)]] that the fact they can no longer breed is worth an award. It is worth noting that, although most The vast majority of the winners time, the "winners" achieve their goals fatally; while it is possible to win without dying, this would require one to survive an event that leaves them [[CripplingCastration unable to procreate]].

The Awards are hosted on the Internet, but the website's owner Wendy Northcutt also periodically authors books detailing that year's "winners".

The site generally classes "nominees" into four categories:
* '''Darwin Award winners:''' Those killed or unable to reproduce. Inability to reproduce need not be a physical consequence; for instance, being jailed for life qualifies, as this completely eliminates the opportunity to reproduce. In turn, there are three subcategories of Darwin Award winner:
** "Confirmed by Darwin" (accounted in reliable news sources);
** "Unconfirmed by Darwin" (can't be found in reliable news sources, but also not proven false); and
** "Debunked by Darwin" (once thought to be true, but now found to be false).
* '''At-Risk Survivors:''' Those who fail to actually
remove themselves from the gene pool in a fatal manner, there are a precious few pool, but who manage to leave the gene pool in a spectacularly stupid manner while still remaining alive, ([[CripplingCastration albeit... incomplete]]) afterward.

Although Internet-based, the Darwin Awards have released books authored by Wendy Northcutt detailing the "winners" of that year.

[[AC:There are four categories:]]
* Darwin Award winners: Those killed or unable to reproduce[[note]]Also occasionally includes people who are in jail for life or other long settings for similar reasons; the key element here is complete deprival of ''opportunities'' to reproduce[[/note]]. Further being classed as;
** Confirmed by Darwin: In reliable news sources.
** Unconfirmed by Darwin: Unable to find reliable sources, but not proved to be false.
** Debunked by Darwin: A story previously thought to be true is found to be false.
* [[strike:Honorable Mentions]] At Risk Survivors: Those that
did their idiotic best to kill or sterilize themselves, yet and just defied the odds and failed to do so.
by surviving. In other words, "honorable mentions".
* Urban Legends: Those stories '''{{Urban Legend}}s:''' Stories believed to be true yet but which have no basis in reality.
* Personal Accounts: Members of '''Personal Accounts:''' Stories offered by the internet put forth site's users, which go into their own personal category because there's no way to verify them.

DeathIsASadThing, so the Darwin Awards can be a little tricky to navigate. As such, there are several more categories of "nominees" who are automatically disqualified from the Darwin Awards listings even if they meet the above categories:
* People who take out innocents in the process of removing themselves from the gene pool, including by default all drunk drivers. There's an exception to the exception here, where the bystander ''himself'' deserves a nomination for staying in the vicinity when anyone in their right mind who saw what the contender was doing would [[DontAskJustRun get the hell out of there]].
* People with mental disorders; Wendy sees such deaths as just plain tragic. The exception to ''this'' exception is AlcoholInducedIdiocy (or with other drugs), as such diminished capacity is a result of the contender's willful act.
* People under the age of 16, unless a majority of the youth's peers agree that the nominee's action was [[YouthIsWastedOnTheDumb monumentally stupid]] even by ''their'' standards.
* [[invoked]] People who are [[NoSuchThingAsBadPublicity trying to win a Darwin Award]]. That one's not ''official'', but the point of the Awards is to point out people who are TooDumbToLive, so their removal from the gene pool is best exemplified by something they caused unintentionally.
These exceptions didn't always exist, and the [[EarlyInstallmentWeirdness early days]] of the site included entries that fell under these exceptions. Some remain on the site under a GrandfatherClause, but others were removed.

There was also a film version called ''Film/TheDarwinAwards'', based on some of the
stories with no other proof.

from this site.

See also ''Series/OneThousandWaysToDie'', which is based on a similar premise (the major difference is that ''1000 Ways To Die'' doesn't really care about the death being due to stupidity [[CruelAndUnusualDeath if it's spectacular and/or or bizarre enough]]).

Finally, there was actually a film (''Film/TheDarwinAwards'') based off of
enough]]) and ''Series/{{Mythbusters}}'', which tested some of the stories from this site. A few of the stories were also tested by the Series/{{Mythbusters}} (who, incidentally enough, made cameo appearances (and who appear in the movie).

'''NOTE:''' People who take out innocents in the process of removing themselves from the gene pool are expressly disqualified from Darwin Awards consideration by the website, thus '''instantly''' disqualifying all drunk drivers if they hit someone. (This rule was not in the first version of their ruleset, thus some of the early Darwin Awards did mention the death or injury of bystanders.) This rule has its own exception, namely: [[DontAskJustRun if anyone in their right mind would flee the area if they saw what the contender was doing]], and a bystander stays to watch, then the contender can still get nominated on the grounds that the bystander will probably also get nominated. People with mental disorders are also disqualified
''Darwin Awards'' movie as Wendy sees these deaths as just plain tragic (Diminished mental capacity due to alcohol or other drugs is permitted, because such people chose to diminish their mental capacity with drugs of their own free will). Youths under the age of 16 are generally disqualified unless a majority of the youth's peers agree the action taken by the nominee was incredibly stupid. Anyone who won before a rule change, that would have disqualified them, gets to keep the award as part of a GrandfatherClause. Finally, there was an unofficial rule change that says the nominees must have unintentionally caused the incident as to prevent people from [[NoSuchThingAsBadPublicity harming themselves to try to win]]. There are a few exceptions due to the aforementioned grandfather clause.
TheCameo).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheMovie: A fictional film was made in 2006 about two investigators chasing Darwin Award-type stupidity for an insurance company, starring Joseph Fiennes and Winona Ryder. (Reviews were generally bad, according to [[Wiki/{{Wikipedia}} The Other Wiki]].)

to:

* TheMovie: A fictional film was made in 2006 about two investigators chasing Darwin Award-type stupidity for an insurance company, starring Joseph Fiennes and Winona Ryder. (Reviews were generally bad, according to [[Wiki/{{Wikipedia}} [[Website/{{Wikipedia}} The Other Wiki]].)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DumbwaiterRide: One story involves two guys who decide to take a ride in a dumbwaiter. Unfortunately, they both squeeze in at the same time, and their combined weight sends them falling to their deaths.

to:

* DumbwaiterRide: One story involves two guys who decide to take a ride in a dumbwaiter. Unfortunately, they both squeeze in at the same time, and their combined weight sends them falling to their deaths. Then their buddy sticks his head in the shaft and gets killed by the counterweight.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TooDumbToLive:
** The entire ''point'' of the Darwin Awards, and, [[WordOfGod according to the creator]], one of the biggest reasons why the incidents described are funny instead of morbid. This is also why minors aren't included on the list, as there's a big difference between "too dumb to live" and [[ChildrenAreInnocent merely ignorant]].

to:

* TooDumbToLive:
** The
TooDumbToLive: Basically the entire ''point'' of the Darwin Awards, and, [[WordOfGod according to the creator]], one of the biggest reasons why the incidents described are funny instead of morbid. morbid.
**
This is also why minors aren't included on the list, as there's a big difference between "too dumb to live" and [[ChildrenAreInnocent merely ignorant]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Bullying The Dragon: Mook Chivalry


** Extra credit has to go to the man who earned his Black Belt in karate and apparently believed the achievement meant he could kill a lion with his bare hands. So he got into a zoo after hours and entered the lion enclosure. As a writer who covered the incident observed, it didn't matter if he could have successfully defeated one lion. There were several lions in the enclosure and they saw no reason to fight fair...

to:

** Extra credit has to go to the man who earned his Black Belt in karate and apparently believed the achievement meant he could kill a lion with his bare hands. So he got into a zoo after hours and entered the lion enclosure. As a writer who covered the incident observed, it didn't matter if he could have successfully defeated one lion. There were several lions in the enclosure and [[MookChivalry they saw no reason to fight fair...]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ImprovisedZipline: One award winner decided to use a karabiner clip to slide down the cable of a disused chairlift. Too late he discovered that he had no way to arrest his acceleration and no to disengage himself from the karabiner. He collided fatally with a pylon. Prefaced by the last words "Hey, watch this!"

to:

* ImprovisedZipline: One award winner decided to use a karabiner clip to slide down the cable of a disused chairlift. Too late he discovered that he had no way to arrest his acceleration and no way to disengage himself from the karabiner. He collided fatally with a pylon. Prefaced by the last words "Hey, watch this!"

Added: 683

Changed: 172

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MachoMasochism: As noted under ChainsawGood, [[https://darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin1996-07.html two lunkheads trying to impress the female sex]] managed to maim themselves, one fatally.

to:

* MachoMasochism: MachoMasochism:
**
As noted under ChainsawGood, [[https://darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin1996-07.html two lunkheads trying to impress the female sex]] managed to maim themselves, one fatally.fatally.
** One entry (still pending as of late 2021, but well documented) is about a Russian guy who decided to show off his masculinity by surviving in the Siberian wilderness. His whole knowledge on the subject was a few forum reads, and he was close enough to a major road that a friend accompanying him got out in time and even arranged a (failed) rescue party. Not only did the friend fail to convince him to get out, but so did the members of a forum onto which he managed to post one last time from the forest.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** One of three Cambodian friends decided it was a good idea to bring [[https://darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin1999-07.html an unexploded anti-tank mine]] ''to a cafe'' and play RussianRoulette with them, stamping on the mine while tossing drinks. The people present at the cafe were quick to flee, which proved to be the right move as the mine eventually detonated, [[NotEnoughToBury obliterating all three]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** More recently, a terrorist who used consumer-grade drones to carry bombs was reportedly killed when one of these drones, recently upgraded with an auto-return function, helpfully reversed course and flew back to its launch point because its battery was running low.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The books also noted that being drunk when handling a pet snake led to the most Darwin-esque reptile accidents... [[{{Irony}} which is ironic]] since one way to make a snake let go of you/back off is to get alcohol in its face.

to:

** The books also noted that being drunk when handling a pet snake led to the most Darwin-esque reptile accidents... [[{{Irony}} which is ironic]] since one way to make a snake let go of you/back off is to get alcohol in its face.face, and many owners of large constrictors keep a spray bottle of alcohol within reach of the enclosure for precisely this reason.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* BoomHeadshot: One of the 2003 winners was a robber who tried to shoot his victim, only for his gun to not fire. He then tried ''looking into the barrel and pulling the trigger again.'' This time, [[KarmicDeath it worked.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The [[http://www.darwinawards.com/ Darwin Awards]] are a collection of stories of those that have given the best their DNA can offer to the gene pool. That is, [[HoistByHisOwnPetard they removed their DNA from the gene pool through actions (of their own devising)]] with such stupidity that the fact they can no longer breed is worth an award. It is worth noting that, although most of the winners remove themselves from the gene pool in a fatal manner, there are a precious few who manage to leave the gene pool in a spectacularly stupid manner while still remaining alive ([[CripplingCastration albeit... incomplete]]) afterwards.

Although internet based, the Darwin Awards have released books authored by Wendy Northcutt detailing the "winners" of that year.

to:

The [[http://www.darwinawards.com/ Darwin Awards]] are a collection of stories of those that have given the best their DNA can offer to the gene pool. That is, [[HoistByHisOwnPetard they removed their DNA from the gene pool through such utterly stupid actions (of their own devising)]] with such stupidity that the fact they can no longer breed is worth an award. It is worth noting that, although most of the winners remove themselves from the gene pool in a fatal manner, there are a precious few who manage to leave the gene pool in a spectacularly stupid manner while still remaining alive alive, ([[CripplingCastration albeit... incomplete]]) afterwards.

afterward.

Although internet based, Internet-based, the Darwin Awards have released books authored by Wendy Northcutt detailing the "winners" of that year.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
dewicking Famous Last Words per TRS


* ImprovisedZipline: One award winner decided to use a karabiner clip to slide down the cable of a disused chairlift. Too late he discovered that he had no way to arrest his acceleration and no to disengage himself from the karabiner. He collided fatally with a pylon. Prefaced by the FamousLastWords "Hey, watch this!"

to:

* ImprovisedZipline: One award winner decided to use a karabiner clip to slide down the cable of a disused chairlift. Too late he discovered that he had no way to arrest his acceleration and no to disengage himself from the karabiner. He collided fatally with a pylon. Prefaced by the FamousLastWords last words "Hey, watch this!"

Top