Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 135 (click to see context) from:
to:
* {{Jossed}}. StarTrekIntoDarkness. Incredibly caustic review. I guess "Worst Movie" that year instead.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 129 (click to see context) from:
to:
* Confirmed
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 103,104 (click to see context) from:
[[WMG: WebSite/SFDebris is secretly... CHAD ROCCO of FamiliarFaces]]
to:
[[WMG: WebSite/SFDebris is secretly... CHAD ROCCO of FamiliarFaces]]
WebVideo/FamiliarFaces]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 133 (click to see context) from:
* Also, ''Full Moon,'' ''Escaflowne,'' and ''Kannazuki No Miko'' are unlikely candidates since they are being reviewed in chronological order, unlike the live action shows Chuck is currently reviewing.
to:
* Also, ''Full Moon,'' ''Escaflowne,'' and ''Kannazuki No Miko'' are unlikely candidates since they are being reviewed in chronological order, unlike the live action shows Chuck is currently reviewing.reviewing.
[[WMG: Shoulder Spider is the spirit of Shelob]]
[[WMG: Shoulder Spider is the spirit of Shelob]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 133 (click to see context) from:
* Also, ''Full Moon,'' ''Escaflowne,'' and ''Kannazuki No Miko'' are unlikely candidates since they are being reviewed in chronological order, unlike the live action shows Chuck is curently reviewing.
to:
* Also, ''Full Moon,'' ''Escaflowne,'' and ''Kannazuki No Miko'' are unlikely candidates since they are being reviewed in chronological order, unlike the live action shows Chuck is curently currently reviewing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added a guess
Changed line(s) 128 (click to see context) from:
In the same vein as the "Janeway Pie" award in Prime Factors, for the sake of the pun.
to:
In the same vein as the "Janeway Pie" award in Prime Factors, for the sake of the pun.pun.
[[WMG: Christmas 2017's Worst Episode review will be for either ''Stargate Atlantis'' or ''The X-Files'']]
''Babylon 5'' will probably not get an episode review stamped '''The Worst''' on the grounds that the two most likely candidates for that title (''Infection'' and ''Grey 17 Is Missing'') have already been reviewed.
* Also, ''Full Moon,'' ''Escaflowne,'' and ''Kannazuki No Miko'' are unlikely candidates since they are being reviewed in chronological order, unlike the live action shows Chuck is curently reviewing.
[[WMG: Christmas 2017's Worst Episode review will be for either ''Stargate Atlantis'' or ''The X-Files'']]
''Babylon 5'' will probably not get an episode review stamped '''The Worst''' on the grounds that the two most likely candidates for that title (''Infection'' and ''Grey 17 Is Missing'') have already been reviewed.
* Also, ''Full Moon,'' ''Escaflowne,'' and ''Kannazuki No Miko'' are unlikely candidates since they are being reviewed in chronological order, unlike the live action shows Chuck is curently reviewing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 51,52 (click to see context) from:
* Confirmed?
to:
* Confirmed?
Confirmed, with him doing "The Infinite Vulcan"?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 40 (click to see context) from:
** "The Infinite Vulcan" theory confirmed, as he does it for his 2016 Christmas Review?
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
** "The Infinite Vulcan" theory confirmed, as he does it for his 2016 Christmas Review?
Changed line(s) 50 (click to see context) from:
to:
* Confirmed?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 78 (click to see context) from:
to:
* Chuck also appear in a Review of a Voyager Comic, providing the voice of Parod Janeway?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
[[WMG: Chuck will do the "0" episode of "Star Trek: The Animated Series" for Christmas this year (2016)]]
Considering how many reviews of the Star Trek Animation, he's been doing in 2016 (More in a year, than he has in five years), and how he did a Zero Episode for SG-One by the reasoning of him doing a lot of them in 2014, it would make sense for him to do that one, Eh?
Considering how many reviews of the Star Trek Animation, he's been doing in 2016 (More in a year, than he has in five years), and how he did a Zero Episode for SG-One by the reasoning of him doing a lot of them in 2014, it would make sense for him to do that one, Eh?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 74,75 (click to see context) from:
* Chuck appearing on AT4W: confirmed as of episode 200. No word yet on the other half though.
to:
* Chuck appearing on AT4W: [=AT4W=]: confirmed as of episode 200. No word yet on the other half though.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 107,108 (click to see context) from:
** All {{Jossed}}. The Big Star Trek project was a review of ''Series/StarTrekVoyager's'' finale "Endgame" and his other two Surprise Gifts were reviews of ''Series/BlakesSeven's'' first episode and a review of ''Series/StargateSG1'' episode "Emancipation".
to:
** All {{Jossed}}. The Big Star Trek project was a review of ''Series/StarTrekVoyager's'' finale "Endgame" and his other two Surprise Gifts were reviews of ''Series/BlakesSeven's'' first episode and a review of ''Series/StargateSG1'' episode "Emancipation".
*** He did eventually get round to the worst episode of TOS in Christmas 2015: "And The Children Shall Lead".
*** He did eventually get round to the worst episode of TOS in Christmas 2015: "And The Children Shall Lead".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 39 (click to see context) from:
to:
** Yep. "And the Children Shall Lead" it is.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
...by playing "Go, Go, Power Rangers" when the new, multicolored Dalek designs appear. This would reference both the new design's FanNickname and Linkara's {{SF Debris}}-inspired History of the Power Rangers reviews.
to:
...by playing "Go, Go, Power Rangers" when the new, multicolored Dalek designs appear. This would reference both the new design's FanNickname and Linkara's {{SF WebSite/{{SF Debris}}-inspired History of the Power Rangers reviews.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 28,30 (click to see context) from:
* Potentially, but possibly not. Keep in mind that SFDebris is a father.
* Confirmed, sort of. He did say it was requested. And remember MLP:FIM has a large adult male audience. Like SFDebris.
* Confirmed, sort of. He did say it was requested. And remember MLP:FIM has a large adult male audience. Like SFDebris.
to:
* Potentially, but possibly not. Keep in mind that SFDebris WebSite/SFDebris is a father.
* Confirmed, sort of. He did say it was requested. And remember MLP:FIM has a large adult male audience. LikeSFDebris.
WebSite/SFDebris.
* Confirmed, sort of. He did say it was requested. And remember MLP:FIM has a large adult male audience. Like
Changed line(s) 33 (click to see context) from:
* SFDebris hasn't done a review of a ''WesternAnimation/StarTrekTheAnimatedSeries'' episode yet.
to:
* SFDebris WebSite/SFDebris hasn't done a review of a ''WesternAnimation/StarTrekTheAnimatedSeries'' episode yet.
Changed line(s) 35 (click to see context) from:
*** And so it begins... SFDebris is now doing TAS!
to:
*** And so it begins... SFDebris WebSite/SFDebris is now doing TAS!
Changed line(s) 60,61 (click to see context) from:
[[WMG: Somebody will make a SfDebris Star Trek fic or he will be referenced if they do another television show in the next five years]]
to:
[[WMG: Somebody will make a SfDebris WebSite/SFDebris Star Trek fic or he will be referenced if they do another television show in the next five years]]
Changed line(s) 73 (click to see context) from:
[[WMG: Chuck will appear again on Atop the Forth Wall or Linkara will make an appearance on an SFdebris Review at some point in the future]]
to:
[[WMG: Chuck will appear again on Atop the Forth Wall or Linkara will make an appearance on an SFdebris WebSite/SFDebris Review at some point in the future]]
Changed line(s) 97,98 (click to see context) from:
[[WMG: SFDebris is secretly... CHAD ROCCO of FamiliarFaces]]
to:
[[WMG: SFDebris WebSite/SFDebris is secretly... CHAD ROCCO of FamiliarFaces]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 117 (click to see context) from:
But then he made a Phoenix Wright reference in one of his latest reviews. So either Chuck passed up the easiest joke ever (not entirely impossible), or he had only recently become aware of the series. Which suggests that he's going to cover it, since it's been a while since a non-Gaidan entry in the series has shown up.
to:
But then he made a Phoenix Wright reference in one of his latest reviews. So either Chuck passed up the easiest joke ever (not entirely impossible), or he had only recently become aware of the series. Which suggests that he's going to cover it, since it's been a while since a non-Gaidan entry in the series has shown up.up.
[[WMG: Chuck will give a ''Lazarus of the Week'' award to ''The Alternative Factor'']]
In the same vein as the "Janeway Pie" award in Prime Factors, for the sake of the pun.
[[WMG: Chuck will give a ''Lazarus of the Week'' award to ''The Alternative Factor'']]
In the same vein as the "Janeway Pie" award in Prime Factors, for the sake of the pun.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 111,114 (click to see context) from:
Here's the evidence. There was a TOS episode which involved William Shatner giving us [[[{{Chewing The Scenery}} full-frontal Shatner at his most Shatner-iest]]. The tension of the episode turned on a courtroom scene, with [[{{Courtroom Antics}} antics a-plenty]]. And the name of this episode was... [[{{Theme Naming}} Turnabout Intruder]].
And yet, there was ''not a single'' [[Phoenix Wright]] reference in the entire review. Not a one. Not even the obligatory "Objection!"
And yet, there was ''not a single'' [[Phoenix Wright]] reference in the entire review. Not a one. Not even the obligatory "Objection!"
to:
Here's the evidence. There was a TOS episode which involved William Shatner giving us [[[{{Chewing [[{{Chewing The Scenery}} full-frontal Shatner at his most Shatner-iest]]. The tension of the episode turned on a courtroom scene, with [[{{Courtroom Antics}} antics a-plenty]]. And the name of this episode was... [[{{Theme Naming}} Turnabout Intruder]].
And yet, there was ''not a single''[[Phoenix [[Franchise/{{Ace Attorney}} Phoenix Wright]] reference in the entire review. Not a one. Not even the obligatory "Objection!"
And yet, there was ''not a single''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 107 (click to see context) from:
** All {{Jossed}}. The Big Star Trek project was a review of ''Series/StarTrekVoyager's'' finale "Endgame" and his other two Surprise Gifts were reviews of ''Series/BlakesSeven's'' first episode and a review of ''Series/StargateSG1'' episode "Emancipation".
to:
** All {{Jossed}}. The Big Star Trek project was a review of ''Series/StarTrekVoyager's'' finale "Endgame" and his other two Surprise Gifts were reviews of ''Series/BlakesSeven's'' first episode and a review of ''Series/StargateSG1'' episode "Emancipation"."Emancipation".
[[WMG: Chuck is going to review one of the Phoenix Wright games]]
Here's the evidence. There was a TOS episode which involved William Shatner giving us [[[{{Chewing The Scenery}} full-frontal Shatner at his most Shatner-iest]]. The tension of the episode turned on a courtroom scene, with [[{{Courtroom Antics}} antics a-plenty]]. And the name of this episode was... [[{{Theme Naming}} Turnabout Intruder]].
And yet, there was ''not a single'' [[Phoenix Wright]] reference in the entire review. Not a one. Not even the obligatory "Objection!"
That led me to believe that it was simply a game series that Chuck was unfamiliar with. Which was fine.
But then he made a Phoenix Wright reference in one of his latest reviews. So either Chuck passed up the easiest joke ever (not entirely impossible), or he had only recently become aware of the series. Which suggests that he's going to cover it, since it's been a while since a non-Gaidan entry in the series has shown up.
[[WMG: Chuck is going to review one of the Phoenix Wright games]]
Here's the evidence. There was a TOS episode which involved William Shatner giving us [[[{{Chewing The Scenery}} full-frontal Shatner at his most Shatner-iest]]. The tension of the episode turned on a courtroom scene, with [[{{Courtroom Antics}} antics a-plenty]]. And the name of this episode was... [[{{Theme Naming}} Turnabout Intruder]].
And yet, there was ''not a single'' [[Phoenix Wright]] reference in the entire review. Not a one. Not even the obligatory "Objection!"
That led me to believe that it was simply a game series that Chuck was unfamiliar with. Which was fine.
But then he made a Phoenix Wright reference in one of his latest reviews. So either Chuck passed up the easiest joke ever (not entirely impossible), or he had only recently become aware of the series. Which suggests that he's going to cover it, since it's been a while since a non-Gaidan entry in the series has shown up.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 93 (click to see context) from:
[[WMG: There will be an WebVideo/ObscurusLupa [=/=] Website/SFDebris crossover.]]
to:
[[WMG: There will be an WebVideo/ObscurusLupa Creator/AllisonPregler [=/=] Website/SFDebris crossover.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 104 (click to see context) from:
* A review of the ten-part finale of [[StarTrekDeepSpaceNine DS9]] like the one he did for the Dominion war arc.
to:
* A review of the ten-part finale of [[StarTrekDeepSpaceNine [[Series/StarTrekDeepSpaceNine DS9]] like the one he did for the Dominion war arc.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
The Blakes Seven review turned out to be a review of the 1st ep, so I decided to edit the sentence
Changed line(s) 107 (click to see context) from:
** All {{Jossed}}. The Big Star Trek project is a review of ''Series/StarTrekVoyager's'' finale "Endgame" and his other two Surprise Gifts are an introduction video to ''Series/BlakesSeven'' and a review of ''Series/StargateSG1'' episode "Emancipation".
to:
** All {{Jossed}}. The Big Star Trek project is was a review of ''Series/StarTrekVoyager's'' finale "Endgame" and his other two Surprise Gifts are an introduction video to ''Series/BlakesSeven'' were reviews of ''Series/BlakesSeven's'' first episode and a review of ''Series/StargateSG1'' episode "Emancipation".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 106 (click to see context) from:
* It is the Star Trek Online game review.
to:
* It is the Star Trek Online game review.review.
** All {{Jossed}}. The Big Star Trek project is a review of ''Series/StarTrekVoyager's'' finale "Endgame" and his other two Surprise Gifts are an introduction video to ''Series/BlakesSeven'' and a review of ''Series/StargateSG1'' episode "Emancipation".
** All {{Jossed}}. The Big Star Trek project is a review of ''Series/StarTrekVoyager's'' finale "Endgame" and his other two Surprise Gifts are an introduction video to ''Series/BlakesSeven'' and a review of ''Series/StargateSG1'' episode "Emancipation".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 105 (click to see context) from:
* A non-Trek review. He's ruled out ever doing the Star Wars prequels, but he hasn't ruled out doing the original films and there are three days of "Surprise Gift". he's doing the original Star Wars trilogy!
to:
* A non-Trek review. He's ruled out ever doing the Star Wars prequels, but he hasn't ruled out doing the original films and there are three days of "Surprise Gift". he's He's doing the original Star Wars trilogy!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 104 (click to see context) from:
* A review of the ten-part finale of [[StarTrekDeepSpaceNine DS9]] like the one he did for the Dominion war arc.
to:
* A review of the ten-part finale of [[StarTrekDeepSpaceNine DS9]] like the one he did for the Dominion war arc.arc.
* A non-Trek review. He's ruled out ever doing the Star Wars prequels, but he hasn't ruled out doing the original films and there are three days of "Surprise Gift". he's doing the original Star Wars trilogy!
* It is the Star Trek Online game review.
* A non-Trek review. He's ruled out ever doing the Star Wars prequels, but he hasn't ruled out doing the original films and there are three days of "Surprise Gift". he's doing the original Star Wars trilogy!
* It is the Star Trek Online game review.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Linking to the bit of the page with the discussion (so people don\'t have to scroll down). If this is a bad idea, remove it.
Changed line(s) 68,69 (click to see context) from:
*** Not true anyway. Star Trek fans were using that weeks before he picked it up in his wonderfully Trek-slamming reviews. See September 2014 note at http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Talk:Humanoid_Figure with links to them.
to:
*** Not true anyway. Star Trek fans were using that weeks before he picked it up in his wonderfully Trek-slamming reviews. See September 2014 note at http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Talk:Humanoid_Figure org/wiki/Talk:Humanoid_Figure#Lack_of_origin_citation with links to them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
OP here. Making correction after listening to the \"Tricksters\" review again.
Changed line(s) 99,100 (click to see context) from:
[[WMG: The Big Star Trek thing Chuck is working on for Christmas 2014]]
At the end of his review of ''Animated Series'' episode "The Tricksters of Magicks-Tu", Chuck said that he was working on a big Star Trek thing for Christmas 2014. This will be one of the following:
At the end of his review of ''Animated Series'' episode "The Tricksters of Magicks-Tu", Chuck said that he was working on a big Star Trek thing for Christmas 2014. This will be one of the following:
to:
[[WMG: The Big Star Trek thing project Chuck is working on for Christmas 2014]]
At the end of his review of ''Animated Series'' episode "The Tricksters of Magicks-Tu", Chuck said that he was working on a big Star Trekthing project for Christmas 2014. This will be one of the following:
At the end of his review of ''Animated Series'' episode "The Tricksters of Magicks-Tu", Chuck said that he was working on a big Star Trek
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 68 (click to see context) from:
to:
*** Not true anyway. Star Trek fans were using that weeks before he picked it up in his wonderfully Trek-slamming reviews. See September 2014 note at http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Talk:Humanoid_Figure with links to them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Typo
Changed line(s) 102 (click to see context) from:
* An fanfic which Chuck will read involving a crossover between various Star Trek series.
to:
* An A fanfic which Chuck will read involving a crossover between various Star Trek series.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 102 (click to see context) from:
* An fanfic which Chuck will read involving a crossover between various Star Trek series.
to:
* An fanfic which Chuck will read involving a crossover between various Star Trek series.series.
* A review of the ten-part finale of [[StarTrekDeepSpaceNine DS9]] like the one he did for the Dominion war arc.
* A review of the ten-part finale of [[StarTrekDeepSpaceNine DS9]] like the one he did for the Dominion war arc.
