Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
The title can't actually be "stolen", but it can be "divided up" if it is the best chance of ensuring the Tree's existence. Seigen's partial title was fated, and Izaya's title being transferred completely to Rein confirms that Shigeo was ''never'' going to succeed in plundering it from Izaya.
to:
The title can't actually be "stolen", but it can be "divided up" if it is the best chance of ensuring the Tree's existence. Old Seigen's partial statement (that he only partly inherited his title was fated, because the Greed stole the other half of it from Izaya) is only his speculation, and Izaya's title being transferred completely to Rein confirms that Shigeo was ''never'' going to succeed in plundering it from Izaya.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
!Per wiki policy, Administrivia/SpoilersOff applies here and all spoilers are unmarked. Administrivia/YouHaveBeenWarned.
[[WMG: The "plundering" of a Guardian's title is actually part of the World Tree's system.]]
The title can't actually be "stolen", but it can be "divided up" if it is the best chance of ensuring the Tree's existence. Seigen's partial title was fated, and Izaya's title being transferred completely to Rein confirms that Shigeo was ''never'' going to succeed in plundering it from Izaya.
[[WMG: The "plundering" of a Guardian's title is actually part of the World Tree's system.]]
The title can't actually be "stolen", but it can be "divided up" if it is the best chance of ensuring the Tree's existence. Seigen's partial title was fated, and Izaya's title being transferred completely to Rein confirms that Shigeo was ''never'' going to succeed in plundering it from Izaya.
