Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added example(s)
Added DiffLines:
* FinalBossNewDimension: For the final confrontation [[spoiler:against Eris]], Tyrion and Celeste go to [[spoiler:the Court of Azathoth, an interplanar place where Blood Contracts can be disputed. However, there's another villain back in Wyverngarde to take down after Eris, though he goes down MUCH more easily and quickly]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Spelling/grammar fix(es), Fixing indentation
Changed line(s) 111 (click to see context) from:
*** Celeste is to Maya Fey, being the chippy companion of the main lawyer [[spoiler:that are the heirs to a powerful magical bloodline]]. Like Maya, she also has a tendency to get herself framed for crimes she didn't commit, being the defendant of the first case where she is accused of killing a family member. [[spoiler:In the final case, she's also brainwashed by Eris into believing that she is the the Patron that was controlling Aria.]]
to:
*** Celeste is one to Maya Fey, being the chippy companion of the main lawyer [[spoiler:that are the heirs to a powerful magical bloodline]]. Like Maya, she also has a tendency to get herself framed for crimes she didn't commit, being the defendant of the first case where she is accused of killing a family member. [[spoiler:In the final case, she's also brainwashed by Eris into believing that she is the the Patron that was controlling Aria.]]
Changed line(s) 114,115 (click to see context) from:
*** Beatrice Frega is this to Machi Tobaye, the third defendant of ''[[VisualNovel/ApolloJusticeAceAttorney Apollo Justice]]'', as they were both accused of a complex murder scheme despite them being blind. [[spoiler:A major twist in their respective cases is also that they both can actually see. In Machi's case, it was a marketing ploy to hide the fact that Lamiroir was actually the blind one, while Beatrice was using the eyes of her demon familiar to see anything. But unlike Machi, who was only an accomplice, Beatrice actually masterminded the murder she was accused of.]]
*** As such, she can also be considered an expy of [[spoiler:Matt Engarde]], both being [[spoiler: defendants that really are guilty of the crime they're accused of and used a third party to commit murder my proxy. However, unlike Matt who is defended by Phoenix, Beatrice is defended by Ruby instead of Tyrion, who instead takes the role of prosecutor in the trial. Beatrice is also generally much more sympathetic than Matt.]]
*** As such, she can also be considered an expy of [[spoiler:Matt Engarde]], both being [[spoiler: defendants that really are guilty of the crime they're accused of and used a third party to commit murder my proxy. However, unlike Matt who is defended by Phoenix, Beatrice is defended by Ruby instead of Tyrion, who instead takes the role of prosecutor in the trial. Beatrice is also generally much more sympathetic than Matt.]]
to:
*** Beatrice Frega is this to Machi Tobaye, the third defendant of ''[[VisualNovel/ApolloJusticeAceAttorney Apollo Justice]]'', as they were both accused of a complex murder scheme despite them being blind. [[spoiler:A major twist in their respective cases is also that they both can actually see. In Machi's case, it was a marketing ploy to hide the fact that Lamiroir was actually the blind one, while Beatrice was using the eyes of her demon familiar to see anything. But unlike Machi, who was only an accomplice, Beatrice actually masterminded the murder she was accused of.]]
***]] As such, she can also be considered an expy of [[spoiler:Matt Engarde]], both being [[spoiler: defendants that really are guilty of the crime they're accused of and used a third party to commit murder my proxy. However, unlike Matt who is defended by Phoenix, Beatrice is defended by Ruby instead of Tyrion, who instead takes the role of prosecutor in the trial. Beatrice is also generally much more sympathetic than Matt.]]Matt]].
***
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 111 (click to see context) from:
*** Celeste is to Maya Fey, being the chippy companion of the main lawyer [[spoiler:that are the heirs to a powerful magical bloodline]].
to:
*** Celeste is to Maya Fey, being the chippy companion of the main lawyer [[spoiler:that are the heirs to a powerful magical bloodline]]. Like Maya, she also has a tendency to get herself framed for crimes she didn't commit, being the defendant of the first case where she is accused of killing a family member. [[spoiler:In the final case, she's also brainwashed by Eris into believing that she is the the Patron that was controlling Aria.]]
Added DiffLines:
**** As such, she can also be considered an expy of [[spoiler:Matt Engarde]], both being [[spoiler: defendants that really are guilty of the crime they're accused of and used a third party to commit murder my proxy. However, unlike Matt who is defended by Phoenix, Beatrice is defended by Ruby instead of Tyrion, who instead takes the role of prosecutor in the trial. Beatrice is also generally much more sympathetic than Matt.]]
Added DiffLines:
*** Eugene the monkey is this to Polly the parrot. Both are [[MakeTheDogTestify animals that are called to testify]] with the intent of proving the guilt of their master. [[spoiler:But while Polly is a completely normal parrot that can only repeat certain phrases without understanding them, [[UpliftedAnimal Eugene is extremely intelligent thanks to having stolen the Armbands of Intellect]]. Eugene's master, Harold, also turns out to be innocent while Polly's master, Yogi, isn't.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 257 (click to see context) from:
* WhereAreTheyNowEpilogue: During the credits, we get a brief dialogue from the many characters of the game and what they're up to after case 5.
to:
* WhereAreTheyNowEpilogue: During the credits, we get a brief dialogue from the many characters of the game and a glimpse of what they're up to after case 5.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added example(s), Crosswicking
Added DiffLines:
* BanOnMagic: Necromancy is generally banned in Wyverngarde. The only people allowed to study and practice it are a select few noble houses (like House Asclepius) and Wallace Nightgrave. Wallace got special permission from the headmaster of the Imperial Academy, and later on became the pupil of Lazarick Asclepius to continue his studies. The reason for the ban is mainly because it was used in the past to raise armies of the dead. However, Lazarick and Wallace know that necromancy is the school of death ''and'' life magic, so they want to harness its power to save people.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added example(s)
Added DiffLines:
* DarkestHour: The tail end of [[spoiler:Beatrice]]'s trial, for Tyrion. For the first time in the game, his final Argument against the culprit [[HopelessBossFight cannot be won]], and his last resort (the Empowered Eye) is nullified [[spoiler:by Marrunath]]. His thoughts just before the would-be verdict show how he feels like he's alone and a failure, not able to trust anyone, convinced that he's being used by everybody (including Tymora and Celeste). He only gets out of this hopeless situation thanks to a DeusExMachina.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added example(s)
Added DiffLines:
* WhereAreTheyNowEpilogue: During the credits, we get a brief dialogue from the many characters of the game and what they're up to after case 5.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Spelling/grammar fix(es). Also fixed formatting.
Changed line(s) 124 (click to see context) from:
* FourthWallObserver: Eris comments on much of the ''Ace Attorney'' aspects, such as how exciting the legal battles are or not having any special dialogue written for irrelevant evidence presented to her, which [[AudienceWhatAudience confuses Tyrion. [[spoiler:As well as this, she comments before the final trial that she hopes that she made a good story, even if it's dervative. Don't need much to guess what that's referring to.]]
to:
* FourthWallObserver: Eris comments on much of the ''Ace Attorney'' aspects, such as how exciting the legal battles are or not having any special dialogue written for irrelevant evidence presented to her, which [[AudienceWhatAudience confuses Tyrion. Tyrion]]. [[spoiler:As well as this, she comments before the final trial that she hopes that she made a good story, even if it's dervative.derivative. Don't need much to guess what that's referring to.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added example(s)
Added DiffLines:
** By [[spoiler:sending hitmen after Aria]], [[spoiler:the Eyetaker]] was hoping to have the trial end prematurely with a Not Guilty verdict for Beatrice. However, this makes [[spoiler:Aria designate Tyrion as her stand-in, and his angelic lineage enables him to find the truth and manifest Beatrice's Blood Contract, which is the final piece of evidence sealing Beatrice's fate]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Deleted line(s) 29 (click to see context) :
* AsYouKnow: Early in the first case, Celeste is facing accusations from an unknown witness; the characters go out of their way to spell out the fact that witnesses aren't required to reveal their identity under the kingdom's laws, which everyone present should know perfectly well but which serves to make it clear to readers that this is a deliberate point divergence from American law (where the right to confront your accuser is enshrined in the constitution).
Added DiffLines:
* AsYouKnow: Early in the first case, Celeste is facing accusations from an unknown witness; the characters go out of their way to spell out the fact that witnesses aren't required to reveal their identity under the kingdom's laws, which everyone present should know perfectly well but which serves to make it clear to readers that this is a deliberate point divergence from American law (where the right to confront your accuser is enshrined in the constitution).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 29 (click to see context) from:
* AsYouKnow: Early in the first case, Celeste is facing accusations from an unknown witness; the characters go out of their way to spell out the fact that witnesses aren't required to reveal their identity under the kingdom's laws, which everyone present should know perfectly well but which serves to make it clear to readers that this is a deliberate point divergence from American law (where the right to confront your accuser is enshrined in the constitution.)
to:
* AsYouKnow: Early in the first case, Celeste is facing accusations from an unknown witness; the characters go out of their way to spell out the fact that witnesses aren't required to reveal their identity under the kingdom's laws, which everyone present should know perfectly well but which serves to make it clear to readers that this is a deliberate point divergence from American law (where the right to confront your accuser is enshrined in the constitution.)constitution).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Fixed in a recent update of the game.
Changed line(s) 201,203 (click to see context) from:
* PlotHole:
** [[spoiler:Beatrice]] used a powerful evocation spell to steal the Sword of Spell Eating, but [[spoiler:when you get her Spell Compendium in Case 5 there is no evocation spell listed]]. Possibly an oversight by the developers (like when [[https://steamcommunity.com/app/1590230/discussions/0/3800526046841058005/ Aria's Spell Compendium didn't contain Dispel Magic, which she used in Case 3, and was fixed later]]).
** If you present Tyrion's profile picture to Beatrice in Case 5, she says "...Why are you looking at me like this?", despite the fact that [[spoiler:Marrunath is not with her in that scene and therefore]] she's completely blind, so she wouldn't know how Tyrion is looking at her.
** [[spoiler:Beatrice]] used a powerful evocation spell to steal the Sword of Spell Eating, but [[spoiler:when you get her Spell Compendium in Case 5 there is no evocation spell listed]]. Possibly an oversight by the developers (like when [[https://steamcommunity.com/app/1590230/discussions/0/3800526046841058005/ Aria's Spell Compendium didn't contain Dispel Magic, which she used in Case 3, and was fixed later]]).
** If you present Tyrion's profile picture to Beatrice in Case 5, she says "...Why are you looking at me like this?", despite the fact that [[spoiler:Marrunath is not with her in that scene and therefore]] she's completely blind, so she wouldn't know how Tyrion is looking at her.
to:
* PlotHole:
** [[spoiler:Beatrice]] used a powerful evocation spell to steal the Sword of Spell Eating, but [[spoiler:when you get her Spell Compendium in Case 5 there is no evocation spell listed]]. Possibly an oversight by the developers (like when [[https://steamcommunity.com/app/1590230/discussions/0/3800526046841058005/ Aria's Spell Compendium didn't contain Dispel Magic, which she used in Case 3, and was fixed later]]).
**PlotHole: If you present Tyrion's profile picture to Beatrice in Case 5, she says "...Why are you looking at me like this?", despite the fact that [[spoiler:Marrunath is not with her in that scene and therefore]] she's completely blind, so she wouldn't know how Tyrion is looking at her.
** [[spoiler:Beatrice]] used a powerful evocation spell to steal the Sword of Spell Eating, but [[spoiler:when you get her Spell Compendium in Case 5 there is no evocation spell listed]]. Possibly an oversight by the developers (like when [[https://steamcommunity.com/app/1590230/discussions/0/3800526046841058005/ Aria's Spell Compendium didn't contain Dispel Magic, which she used in Case 3, and was fixed later]]).
**
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added example(s)
Changed line(s) 201 (click to see context) from:
* PlotHole: [[spoiler:Beatrice]] used a powerful evocation spell to steal the Sword of Spell Eating, but [[spoiler:when you get her Spell Compendium in Case 5 there is no evocation spell listed]]. Possibly an oversight by the developers (like when [[https://steamcommunity.com/app/1590230/discussions/0/3800526046841058005/ Aria's Spell Compendium didn't contain Dispel Magic, which she used in Case 3, and was fixed later]]).
to:
* PlotHole: PlotHole:
** [[spoiler:Beatrice]] used a powerful evocation spell to steal the Sword of Spell Eating, but [[spoiler:when you get her Spell Compendium in Case 5 there is no evocation spell listed]]. Possibly an oversight by the developers (like when [[https://steamcommunity.com/app/1590230/discussions/0/3800526046841058005/ Aria's Spell Compendium didn't contain Dispel Magic, which she used in Case 3, and was fixedlater]]).later]]).
** If you present Tyrion's profile picture to Beatrice in Case 5, she says "...Why are you looking at me like this?", despite the fact that [[spoiler:Marrunath is not with her in that scene and therefore]] she's completely blind, so she wouldn't know how Tyrion is looking at her.
** [[spoiler:Beatrice]] used a powerful evocation spell to steal the Sword of Spell Eating, but [[spoiler:when you get her Spell Compendium in Case 5 there is no evocation spell listed]]. Possibly an oversight by the developers (like when [[https://steamcommunity.com/app/1590230/discussions/0/3800526046841058005/ Aria's Spell Compendium didn't contain Dispel Magic, which she used in Case 3, and was fixed
** If you present Tyrion's profile picture to Beatrice in Case 5, she says "...Why are you looking at me like this?", despite the fact that [[spoiler:Marrunath is not with her in that scene and therefore]] she's completely blind, so she wouldn't know how Tyrion is looking at her.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added example(s)
Added DiffLines:
* LifeMeter: During Argument minigames, Tyrion and his opponent get a health bar that is drained when the player picks answers or presents evidence. If you get it right, your opponent loses HP. If you get it wrong, you lose HP. Unlike ''Ace Attorney'', no such health bar is present during cross-examinations, so the player isn't punished for presenting wrong evidence there.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Moving my previous entry to a "Trivia" tab
Deleted line(s) 60 (click to see context) :
* ContestWinnerCameo: While most of the characters were designed by the developer, three characters were designed by Indiegogo backers as a reward for pledging at high tiers. Specifically, the backer characters are [[spoiler:Stefanic Dracogen, the case 3 refinery owner; Mosourika Tudor, the case 3 {{Chuunibyou}} cafe owner, and Laefa Frega, the middle sister of the Frega family who first appears in case 4]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* ContestWinnerCameo: While most of the characters were designed by the developer, three characters were designed by Indiegogo backers as a reward for pledging at high tiers. Specifically, the backer characters are [[spoiler:Stefanic Dracogen, the case 3 refinery owner; Mosourika Tudor, the case 3 {{Chuunibyou}} cafe owner, and Laefa Frega, the middle sister of the Frega family who first appears in case 4]].
