Follow TV Tropes

Following

History UsefulNotes / Mercury

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Only two probes have made it to Mercury so far, both from UsefulNotes/{{NASA}} (Mariner 10 in 1974, and MESSENGER in 2008) — despite being close to Earth compared to the outer planets, it takes a lot of energy to cancel our home's orbital momentum and "fall in" towards the Sun.[[note]]The same reason that HurlItIntoTheSun is generally unrealistic.[[/note]] As a side note, features on Mercury are generally named after intellectuals — artist, painters, writers, and so forth. A third probe, the ESA and JAXA's ''[=BepiColombo=]'', is on the way there right now.

to:

Only two three probes have made it to Mercury so far, both from UsefulNotes/{{NASA}} (Mariner (UsefulNotes/{{NASA}}'s Mariner 10 in 1974, and MESSENGER in 2008) 1974 and 2008 respectively, and the joint UsefulNotes/{{ESA}}/UsefulNotes/{{JAXA}} venture ''[=BepiColumbo=]'' in 2021) — despite being close to Earth compared to the outer planets, it takes a lot of energy to cancel our home's orbital momentum and "fall in" towards the Sun.[[note]]The same reason that HurlItIntoTheSun is generally unrealistic.[[/note]] As a side note, features on Mercury are generally named after intellectuals — artist, painters, writers, and so forth. A third probe, the ESA and JAXA's ''[=BepiColombo=]'', is on the way there right now.
forth.



* ''[=BepiColumbo=]'' (UsefulNotes/{{ESA}}, launched 2018, visiting 2021–2028)

to:

* ''[=BepiColumbo=]'' (UsefulNotes/{{ESA}}, (UsefulNotes/{{ESA}}/UsefulNotes/{{JAXA}}, launched 2018, visiting 2021–2028)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

!!Mercury has been visited by:
* ''Mariner 10'' (UsefulNotes/{{NASA}}, launched 1973, visited 1974–1975)
* ''MESSENGER'' (NASA, launched 2004, visited 2008–2015)
* ''[=BepiColumbo=]'' (UsefulNotes/{{ESA}}, launched 2018, visiting 2021–2028)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Only two probes have made it to Mercury so far, both from UsefulNotes/{{NASA}} (Mariner 10 in 1974, and MESSENGER in 2008) — despite being close to Earth compared to the outer planets, it takes a lot of energy to cancel our home's orbital momentum and "fall in" towards the Sun.[[note]]The same reason that HurlItIntoTheSun is generally unrealistic.[[/note]] As a side note, features on Mercury are generally named after intellectuals — artist, painters, writers, and so forth. A third probe, the ESA and JAXA's [=BepiColombo=], is on the way there right now.

to:

Only two probes have made it to Mercury so far, both from UsefulNotes/{{NASA}} (Mariner 10 in 1974, and MESSENGER in 2008) — despite being close to Earth compared to the outer planets, it takes a lot of energy to cancel our home's orbital momentum and "fall in" towards the Sun.[[note]]The same reason that HurlItIntoTheSun is generally unrealistic.[[/note]] As a side note, features on Mercury are generally named after intellectuals — artist, painters, writers, and so forth. A third probe, the ESA and JAXA's [=BepiColombo=], ''[=BepiColombo=]'', is on the way there right now.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''WebAnimation/{{SolarBalls}}'': Mercury is one of the main protagonists.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In ''VideoGame/{{Destiny}}'', Mercury is somewhat visitable. A couple of Crucible maps take place there, and the Lighthouse social space is avaliable if you are lucky to go flawless on trials of Osiris, it might as well be the ButtMonkey of the game. It was converted into a machine planet by the Vex prior to the first game. In Destiny 2 it winds up being used as fuel for the Almighty untill you put a stop to it, however it's still been partially destroyed in the process.

to:

* In ''VideoGame/{{Destiny}}'', Mercury is somewhat visitable. A couple of Crucible maps take place there, and the Lighthouse social space is avaliable available if you are lucky to go flawless on trials of Osiris, it might as well be the ButtMonkey of the game. It was converted into a machine planet by the Vex prior to the first game. In Destiny 2 it winds up being used as fuel for the Almighty untill you put a stop to it, however it's still been partially destroyed in the process.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Mercury's future is a bleak one, as most projections have it [[http://www.skyandtelescope.com/astronomy-news/will-mercury-hit-earth-someday/ flinging itself outwards]] away from the Sun, with a strong possibility Earth will be in its cross-sights[[note]]The probabilities of Mercury going haywire are actually [[http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/09/good-news-earthlings-planet-mercury-probably-won-t-kill-us around 1%]], and even if that was going to happen that updated research suggests it would most likely crash into the Sun or Venus, so it seems much more likely the Sun will [[PlanetEater try how tastes Mercury]] once it goes red giant more than seven billion years from now.[[/note]].

to:

Mercury's future is a bleak one, as most projections have it [[http://www.skyandtelescope.com/astronomy-news/will-mercury-hit-earth-someday/ flinging itself outwards]] away from the Sun, with a strong possibility Earth will be in its cross-sights[[note]]The probabilities of Mercury going haywire are actually [[http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/09/good-news-earthlings-planet-mercury-probably-won-t-kill-us around 1%]], and even if that was going to happen that updated research suggests it would most likely crash into the Sun or Venus, so it seems much more likely the Sun will [[PlanetEater try how tastes tasty Mercury]] is once it goes red giant more than seven billion years from now.[[/note]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Mercury is very difficult to study from Earth, as it does not stray too far away of the Sun so it's almost always seen low in the sky thus suffering the effects of atmospheric turbulence appearing as little more than a featureless blob with a telescope, even if with lots of patience and observing it with large telescopes during daylight knowing where to look was possible to create [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mercury_albedo_features_adopted_by_the_IAU.jpg very rough maps of its surface][[note]]"Solitudo" is latin for "desert"[[/note]]. In fact, it was expected that the planet would be [[TidallyLockedPlanet tidally locked]] to the Sun, with one side always facing the Sun and the other always facing away, but the planet actually rotates in a 2:3 ratio with its orbital time. The ratio means that at times the Sun appears to move ''backwards'' in the Mercurian sky, and the orbit itself is unusually eccentric, which produces two equatorial "hot" poles (which always face the Sun at perihelion) and two "cold" poles (which never do). The orbit itself also precesses at a higher-than-expected rate; this was an unexplained mystery that was finally solved by general relativity. Because of this longstanding belief, most depictions of Mercury can be summed up as pre-1965 (Mercury as a tidally locked planet with permanent "hot" and "cold" sides) and post-1965.

to:

Mercury is very difficult to study from Earth, as it does not stray too far away of the Sun so it's almost always seen low in the sky thus suffering the effects of atmospheric turbulence appearing as little more than a featureless blob with a telescope, even if with lots of patience and observing it with large telescopes during daylight knowing where to look was possible to create [https://en.[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mercury_albedo_features_adopted_by_the_IAU.jpg very rough maps of its surface][[note]]"Solitudo" surface]][[note]]"Solitudo" is latin for "desert"[[/note]]. In fact, it was expected that the planet would be [[TidallyLockedPlanet tidally locked]] to the Sun, with one side always facing the Sun and the other always facing away, but the planet actually rotates in a 2:3 ratio with its orbital time. The ratio means that at times the Sun appears to move ''backwards'' in the Mercurian sky, and the orbit itself is unusually eccentric, which produces two equatorial "hot" poles (which always face the Sun at perihelion) and two "cold" poles (which never do). The orbit itself also precesses at a higher-than-expected rate; this was an unexplained mystery that was finally solved by general relativity. Because of this longstanding belief, most depictions of Mercury can be summed up as pre-1965 (Mercury as a tidally locked planet with permanent "hot" and "cold" sides) and post-1965.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The planet is geologically inactive today, mostly covered in craters, although a few remains of possible volcanoes and faults are found on the surface. Despite the inactivity, the planet has a magnetic field, although one much weaker than Earth's. Some activity may be due to the contraction of the planet over time. Evidence that Mercury shrunk lies in the presence of tall and long cliffs spread relatively evenly over its surface. These cliffs are called scarps, and are widely held to be the result of subduction zones. If Mercury were tectonically active, the presence of subduction zones on one side of the planet should be an indicator of rift zones on the other side. Instead, astronomers found more scarps, consistent with the hypothesis that the crust contracted planet-wide.

It was expected that the planet would be [[TidallyLockedPlanet tidally locked]] to the Sun, with one side always facing the Sun and the other always facing away, but the planet actually rotates in a 2:3 ratio with its orbital time. The ratio means that at times the Sun appears to move ''backwards'' in the Mercurian sky, and the orbit itself is unusually eccentric, which produces two equatorial "hot" poles (which always face the Sun at perihelion) and two "cold" poles (which never do). The orbit itself also precesses at a higher-than-expected rate; this was an unexplained mystery that was finally solved by general relativity. Because of this longstanding belief, most depictions of Mercury can be summed up as pre-1965 (Mercury as a tidally locked planet with permanent "hot" and "cold" sides) and post-1965.

to:

The planet is geologically inactive today, mostly covered in craters, although some smoother plains presumably covered by lava, a few remains of possible volcanoes volcanoes, and faults are found on the surface. Despite the inactivity, the planet has a magnetic field, although one much weaker than Earth's. Some activity may be due to the contraction of the planet over time. Evidence that Mercury shrunk lies in the presence of tall and long cliffs spread relatively evenly over its surface. These cliffs are called scarps, and are widely held to be the result of subduction zones. If Mercury were tectonically active, the presence of subduction zones on one side of the planet should be an indicator of rift zones on the other side. Instead, astronomers found more scarps, consistent with the hypothesis that the crust contracted planet-wide.

It Mercury is very difficult to study from Earth, as it does not stray too far away of the Sun so it's almost always seen low in the sky thus suffering the effects of atmospheric turbulence appearing as little more than a featureless blob with a telescope, even if with lots of patience and observing it with large telescopes during daylight knowing where to look was possible to create [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mercury_albedo_features_adopted_by_the_IAU.jpg very rough maps of its surface][[note]]"Solitudo" is latin for "desert"[[/note]]. In fact, it was expected that the planet would be [[TidallyLockedPlanet tidally locked]] to the Sun, with one side always facing the Sun and the other always facing away, but the planet actually rotates in a 2:3 ratio with its orbital time. The ratio means that at times the Sun appears to move ''backwards'' in the Mercurian sky, and the orbit itself is unusually eccentric, which produces two equatorial "hot" poles (which always face the Sun at perihelion) and two "cold" poles (which never do). The orbit itself also precesses at a higher-than-expected rate; this was an unexplained mystery that was finally solved by general relativity. Because of this longstanding belief, most depictions of Mercury can be summed up as pre-1965 (Mercury as a tidally locked planet with permanent "hot" and "cold" sides) and post-1965.



Mercury's future is a bleak one, as most projections have it [[http://www.skyandtelescope.com/astronomy-news/will-mercury-hit-earth-someday/ flinging itself outwards]] away from the Sun, with a strong possibility Earth will be in its cross-sights[[note]]The probabilities of Mercury going haywire are actually [[http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/09/good-news-earthlings-planet-mercury-probably-won-t-kill-us around 1%]], and even if that was going to happen that updated research suggests it would most likely crash into the Sun or Venus, so it seems much more likely the Sun will [[PlanetEater try the taste of Mercury]] once it goes red giant more than seven billion years from now.[[/note]].

Mercury being the innermost planet of course lacks the equivalent of an evening/morning star and lacking a natural satellite has no friendly moon shining on its skies. However this is compensated by having the best possible view of Venus, that appears as a dazzlingly bright white star considerably brighter than from Earth as from there is seen as a full disk and not as a crescent. With an apparent magnitude of -7.7, it is the brightest planet of any seen from the surface of another in the Solar System. Earth, meanwhile, would appear as a bright blue star, brighter than our view of Venus (-5 vs. -4.4) and thus the second-brightest object in the night sky. The Moon is far enough away from the Earth from Mercury's perspective that it would appear as a distinct (albeit nearby) object, brighter than Sirius at its closest approach to Mercury. Given its greater distance from them, all other planets would appear dimmer than they do from Earth.

to:

Mercury's future is a bleak one, as most projections have it [[http://www.skyandtelescope.com/astronomy-news/will-mercury-hit-earth-someday/ flinging itself outwards]] away from the Sun, with a strong possibility Earth will be in its cross-sights[[note]]The probabilities of Mercury going haywire are actually [[http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/09/good-news-earthlings-planet-mercury-probably-won-t-kill-us around 1%]], and even if that was going to happen that updated research suggests it would most likely crash into the Sun or Venus, so it seems much more likely the Sun will [[PlanetEater try the taste of how tastes Mercury]] once it goes red giant more than seven billion years from now.[[/note]].

Mercury being the innermost planet of course lacks the equivalent of an evening/morning star and lacking a natural satellite has no friendly moon shining on its skies. However this is compensated by having the best possible view of Venus, that appears as a dazzlingly bright white star considerably brighter than from Earth as from there is seen as a full disk and not as a crescent. With an apparent magnitude of -7.7, it is the brightest planet of any seen from the surface of another in the Solar System.System and would be able to cast shadows. Earth, meanwhile, would appear as a bright blue star, brighter than our view of Venus (-5 vs. -4.4) and thus the second-brightest object in the night sky. The Moon is far enough away from the Earth from Mercury's perspective that it would appear as a distinct (albeit nearby) object, brighter than Sirius at its closest approach to Mercury. Given its greater distance from them, all other planets would appear dimmer than they do from Earth.

Changed: 149

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Mercury isn't mentioned much in ''TabletopGame/Warhammer40000'', but it is a mining world of the Imperium, devoted for the harvesting of resources.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Mercury being the innermost planet of course lacks the equivalent of an evening/morning star and lacking a natural satellite has no friendly moon shining on its skies. However this is compensated by having the best possible view of Venus, that appears as a dazzlingly bright white star considerably brighter than from Earth as from there is seen as a full disk and not as a crescent. With an apparent magnitude of -7.7, it is the brightest planet of any seen from the surface of another in the Solar System. Earth, meanwhile, would appear as a bright blue star, brighter than our view of Venus (-5 vs. 4.4) and thus the second-brightest object in the night sky. The Moon is far enough away from the Earth from Mercury's perspective that it would appear as a distinct (albeit nearby) object, brighter than Sirius at its closest approach to Mercury. Given its greater distance from them, all other planets would appear dimmer than they do from Earth.

to:

Mercury being the innermost planet of course lacks the equivalent of an evening/morning star and lacking a natural satellite has no friendly moon shining on its skies. However this is compensated by having the best possible view of Venus, that appears as a dazzlingly bright white star considerably brighter than from Earth as from there is seen as a full disk and not as a crescent. With an apparent magnitude of -7.7, it is the brightest planet of any seen from the surface of another in the Solar System. Earth, meanwhile, would appear as a bright blue star, brighter than our view of Venus (-5 vs. 4.-4.4) and thus the second-brightest object in the night sky. The Moon is far enough away from the Earth from Mercury's perspective that it would appear as a distinct (albeit nearby) object, brighter than Sirius at its closest approach to Mercury. Given its greater distance from them, all other planets would appear dimmer than they do from Earth.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Mercury being the innermost planet of course lacks the equivalent of an evening/morning star and lacking a natural satellite has no friendly moon shining on its skies. However this is compensated having Venus, that appears as a dazzlingly bright white star considerably brighter than from Earth as from there is seen as a full disk and not as a crescent, and Earth as a blue star as bright as we see Venus accompanied by the Moon that would appear as a very bright star.

to:

Mercury being the innermost planet of course lacks the equivalent of an evening/morning star and lacking a natural satellite has no friendly moon shining on its skies. However this is compensated by having the best possible view of Venus, that appears as a dazzlingly bright white star considerably brighter than from Earth as from there is seen as a full disk and not as a crescent, and Earth as a blue star as bright as we see Venus accompanied by crescent. With an apparent magnitude of -7.7, it is the Moon that brightest planet of any seen from the surface of another in the Solar System. Earth, meanwhile, would appear as a very bright star.blue star, brighter than our view of Venus (-5 vs. 4.4) and thus the second-brightest object in the night sky. The Moon is far enough away from the Earth from Mercury's perspective that it would appear as a distinct (albeit nearby) object, brighter than Sirius at its closest approach to Mercury. Given its greater distance from them, all other planets would appear dimmer than they do from Earth.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The smallest of the planets (smaller even than the moons [[UsefulNotes/TheMoonsOfJupiter Ganymede]] and [[UsefulNotes/TheMoonsOfSaturn Titan]] in the outer solar system by volume, although not by mass, as it outweighs the two of them combined), and the closest to UsefulNotes/{{the Sun}}. The planet is mostly made of rock and metal, with a larger proportion of metal than the other inner planets, and as a result is the second densest of the large moons and planets. (UsefulNotes/{{Earth}} is more dense only because the large size compresses materials more.) A number of theories exist for the extra concentration of metal: the heat near the early Sun may not have allowed as many silicates to condense, the Sun may have blown off the other rocks early on, or an impact may have blown off most of the outer rocks.

to:

The smallest of the planets (smaller even than the moons [[UsefulNotes/TheMoonsOfJupiter Ganymede]] and [[UsefulNotes/TheMoonsOfSaturn Titan]] in the outer solar system by volume, although not by mass, as it outweighs the two of them combined), and the closest to UsefulNotes/{{the Sun}}. The planet is mostly made of rock and metal, with a larger proportion of metal than the other inner planets, and as a result is the second densest of the large moons and planets. (UsefulNotes/{{Earth}} is more dense only because the large size compresses materials more.more, and a current theory about the Moon's creation indicates the Earth has a larger core thanks to the collision with theoretical planet Theia.) A number of theories exist for the extra concentration of metal: the heat near the early Sun may not have allowed as many silicates to condense, the Sun may have blown off the other rocks early on, or an impact may have blown off most of the outer rocks.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Add trope list

Added DiffLines:

!!Tropes
* IndustrializedMercury
* MercurialBase
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


It was expected that the planet would be tidally locked to the Sun, with one side always facing the Sun and the other always facing away, but the planet actually rotates in a 2:3 ratio with its orbital time. The ratio means that at times the Sun appears to move ''backwards'' in the Mercurian sky, and the orbit itself is unusually eccentric, which produces two equatorial "hot" poles (which always face the Sun at perihelion) and two "cold" poles (which never do). The orbit itself also precesses at a higher-than-expected rate; this was an unexplained mystery that was finally solved by general relativity. Because of this longstanding belief, most depictions of Mercury can be summed up as pre-1965 (Mercury as a tidally locked planet with permanent "hot" and "cold" sides) and post-1965.

to:

It was expected that the planet would be [[TidallyLockedPlanet tidally locked locked]] to the Sun, with one side always facing the Sun and the other always facing away, but the planet actually rotates in a 2:3 ratio with its orbital time. The ratio means that at times the Sun appears to move ''backwards'' in the Mercurian sky, and the orbit itself is unusually eccentric, which produces two equatorial "hot" poles (which always face the Sun at perihelion) and two "cold" poles (which never do). The orbit itself also precesses at a higher-than-expected rate; this was an unexplained mystery that was finally solved by general relativity. Because of this longstanding belief, most depictions of Mercury can be summed up as pre-1965 (Mercury as a tidally locked planet with permanent "hot" and "cold" sides) and post-1965.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[caption-width-right:350:It's a dry heat.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* ''ComicBook/WonderWoman1942'': The denizens of Mercury are somewhat brutish giants, and Diana and the Holliday Girls fight the queen of Mercury alongside the Queen of Venus to eradicate the somewhat recent development of enslaving all the local men.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Density: 5.427 g/cm3

to:

* Density: 5.427 g/cm3g/cm³
Willbyr MOD

Added: 150

Changed: 123

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[quoteright:350:https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/merucry_planet_3101.jpg]]

to:

%% Image selected per Image Pickin' thread: https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=1587052828099209400
%% Please do not replace or remove without starting a new thread.
%%
[[quoteright:350:https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/merucry_planet_3101.jpg]]org/pmwiki/pub/images/mercury_2008.png]]
%%



The planet is geologically inactive today, mostly covered in craters, although a few remains of possible volcanoes and faults are found on the surface. Despite the inactivity, the planet has a magnetic field, although one much weaker the Earth's. Some activity may be due to the contraction of the planet over time. Evidence that Mercury shrunk lies in the presence of tall and long cliffs spread relatively evenly over its surface. These cliffs are called scarps, and are widely held to be the result of subduction zones. If Mercury were tectonically active, the presence of subduction zones on one side of the planet should be an indicator of rift zones on the other side. Instead, astronomers found more scarps, consistent with the hypothesis that the crust contracted planet-wide.

to:

The planet is geologically inactive today, mostly covered in craters, although a few remains of possible volcanoes and faults are found on the surface. Despite the inactivity, the planet has a magnetic field, although one much weaker the than Earth's. Some activity may be due to the contraction of the planet over time. Evidence that Mercury shrunk lies in the presence of tall and long cliffs spread relatively evenly over its surface. These cliffs are called scarps, and are widely held to be the result of subduction zones. If Mercury were tectonically active, the presence of subduction zones on one side of the planet should be an indicator of rift zones on the other side. Instead, astronomers found more scarps, consistent with the hypothesis that the crust contracted planet-wide.

Changed: 647

Removed: 468

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The smallest of the planets (smaller even than the moons [[UsefulNotes/TheMoonsOfJupiter Ganymede]] and [[UsefulNotes/TheMoonsOfSaturn Titan]] in the outer solar system by volume, although not by mass, as it outweighs the two of them combined), and the closest to {{UsefulNotes/the Sun}}. The planet is mostly made of rock and metal, with a larger proportion of metal than the other inner planets, and as a result is the second densest of the large moons and planets. ({{UsefulNotes/Earth}} is more dense only because the large size compresses materials more.) A number of theories exist for the extra concentration of metal: The heat near the early Sun may not have allowed as many silicates to condense, the Sun may have blown off the other rocks early on, or an impact may have blown off most of the outer rocks.

The surface gravity on Mercury is 0.38 g, which is 38% of Earth's gravity. Interestingly, it shares roughly the same surface gravity as UsefulNotes/{{Mars}} despite being smaller than it because it's more dense.

The planet is geologically inactive today, mostly covered in craters, although a few remains of possible volcanoes and faults are found on the surface. Despite the inactivity, the planet has a magnetic field, although one much weaker the Earth's. Some activity may be due to the contraction of the planet over time.

Evidence that Mercury shrunk lies in the presence of tall and long cliffs spread relatively evenly over its surface. These cliffs are called scarps, and are widely held to be the result of subduction zones. If Mercury were tectonically active, the presence of subduction zones on one side of the planet should be an indicator of rift zones on the other side. Instead, astronomers found more scarps, consistent with the hypothesis that the crust contracted planet-wide.

to:

The smallest of the planets (smaller even than the moons [[UsefulNotes/TheMoonsOfJupiter Ganymede]] and [[UsefulNotes/TheMoonsOfSaturn Titan]] in the outer solar system by volume, although not by mass, as it outweighs the two of them combined), and the closest to {{UsefulNotes/the UsefulNotes/{{the Sun}}. The planet is mostly made of rock and metal, with a larger proportion of metal than the other inner planets, and as a result is the second densest of the large moons and planets. ({{UsefulNotes/Earth}} (UsefulNotes/{{Earth}} is more dense only because the large size compresses materials more.) A number of theories exist for the extra concentration of metal: The the heat near the early Sun may not have allowed as many silicates to condense, the Sun may have blown off the other rocks early on, or an impact may have blown off most of the outer rocks.

It is named after [[Myth/ClassicalMythology the swift Roman messenger god]] because it moves the fastest across the sky of all the planets. The surface gravity on Mercury is 0.38 g, which is 38% of Earth's gravity. Interestingly, it shares roughly the same surface gravity as UsefulNotes/{{Mars}} despite being smaller than it because it's more dense.

The planet is geologically inactive today, mostly covered in craters, although a few remains of possible volcanoes and faults are found on the surface. Despite the inactivity, the planet has a magnetic field, although one much weaker the Earth's. Some activity may be due to the contraction of the planet over time.

time. Evidence that Mercury shrunk lies in the presence of tall and long cliffs spread relatively evenly over its surface. These cliffs are called scarps, and are widely held to be the result of subduction zones. If Mercury were tectonically active, the presence of subduction zones on one side of the planet should be an indicator of rift zones on the other side. Instead, astronomers found more scarps, consistent with the hypothesis that the crust contracted planet-wide.



One particularly unique set of features on Mercury is the Caloris Basin, its largest impact crater, and the hilly Weird Terrain ([[NotMakingThisUpDisclaimer that is the official name]]) found on the opposite side of the planet from it. The leading hypothesis is that the impact that created the Caloris Basin was so strong that it sent ripples through the entire planet, creating the Weird Terrain when the energy had nowhere else to go.

to:

One particularly unique set of features on Mercury is the Caloris Basin, its largest impact crater, and the hilly Weird Terrain ([[NotMakingThisUpDisclaimer ([[SincerityMode that is the official name]]) found on the opposite side of the planet from it. The leading hypothesis is that the impact that created the Caloris Basin was so strong that it sent ripples through the entire planet, creating the Weird Terrain when the energy had nowhere else to go.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

Mercury being the innermost planet of course lacks the equivalent of an evening/morning star and lacking a natural satellite has no friendly moon shining on its skies. However this is compensated having Venus, that appears as a dazzlingly bright white star considerably brighter than from Earth as from there is seen as a full disk and not as a crescent, and Earth as a blue star as bright as we see Venus accompanied by the Moon that would appear as a very bright star.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


One particularly unique set of features on Mercury is the Caloris Basin, its largest impact crater, and the hilly Weird Terrain ([[NotMakingThisUpDisclaimer that is the official name]]) found on the opposite side of the planet from it. The leading hypothesis is that the impact that created the Caloris Basin was strong that it sent ripples through the entire planet, creating the Weird Terrain when the energy had nowhere else to go.

to:

One particularly unique set of features on Mercury is the Caloris Basin, its largest impact crater, and the hilly Weird Terrain ([[NotMakingThisUpDisclaimer that is the official name]]) found on the opposite side of the planet from it. The leading hypothesis is that the impact that created the Caloris Basin was so strong that it sent ripples through the entire planet, creating the Weird Terrain when the energy had nowhere else to go.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Sorry. Confused that for the synodic period, not siderial.


* Rotational Period: 115 Days (3:2 Spin-Orbit Resonance)

to:

* Rotational Period: 115 58 Days (3:2 Spin-Orbit Resonance)

Added: 356

Changed: 15

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Adding data.



to:

[floatboxright:
'''Profile'''
* Diameter: 4,879 km
* Mass: 0.055 of Earth
* Density: 5.427 g/cm3
* Surface Gravity: 0.38 g
* Semi-major Axis: 0.39 AU
* Orbital Period: 88 Days
* Rotational Period: 115 Days (3:2 Spin-Orbit Resonance)
* Axial Tilt: 0.034°
* Average Surface Temperature: 167° C
* Notable Features: Caloris Basin, Caloris Antipodal Terrain
* Number of Total Missions: 3
]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** "Literature/Runaround"

to:

** "Literature/Runaround""Literature/{{Runaround}}"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The surface gravity on Mercury is 0.38 g, which is 38% Earth's gravity. Interestingly, it shares roughly the same surface gravity as UsefulNotes/{{Mars}} despite being smaller because it's more dense.

to:

The surface gravity on Mercury is 0.38 g, which is 38% of Earth's gravity. Interestingly, it shares roughly the same surface gravity as UsefulNotes/{{Mars}} despite being smaller than it because it's more dense.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The surface gravity on Mercury is 0.38 g, which is 38% less than Earth. Interestingly, it shares roughly the same surface gravity as UsefulNotes/{{Mars}} despite being smaller because it's more dense.

to:

The surface gravity on Mercury is 0.38 g, which is 38% less than Earth.Earth's gravity. Interestingly, it shares roughly the same surface gravity as UsefulNotes/{{Mars}} despite being smaller because it's more dense.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

The surface gravity on Mercury is 0.38 g, which is 38% less than Earth. Interestingly, it shares roughly the same surface gravity as UsefulNotes/{{Mars}} despite being smaller because it's more dense.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Several of Creator/IsaacAsimov's short stories, including:
** ''Runaround''
** ''The Dying Night'' has its plot twist of WhoDunnit hinge on the then-accepted idea that Mercury has a constant day and a constant night on one side or the other.
** ''Literature/LuckyStarr and the Big Sun of Mercury''

to:

* Several of Creator/IsaacAsimov's short stories, including:
Creator/IsaacAsimov:
** ''Runaround''
"Literature/TheDyingNight"
** ''The Dying Night'' has its plot twist of WhoDunnit hinge on the then-accepted idea that Mercury has a constant day and a constant night on one side or the other.
"Literature/Runaround"
** ''Literature/LuckyStarr and the Big Sun of Mercury''''Literature/LuckyStarrAndTheBigSunOfMercury''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


->''"I had rather be Mercury, the smallest among seven [planets], revolving round the sun, than the first among five [moons] revolving round Saturn."''

to:

->''"I had rather be Mercury, the smallest among seven [planets], revolving round the sun, Sun, than the first among five [moons] revolving round Saturn."''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The smallest of the planets (smaller even than the moons [[UsefulNotes/TheMoonsOfJupiter Ganymede]] and [[UsefulNotes/TheMoonsOfSaturn Titan]] in the outer solar system by volume, although not by mass.), and the closest to {{UsefulNotes/the Sun}}. The planet is mostly made of rock and metal, with a larger proportion of metal than the other inner planets, and as a result is the second densest of the large moons and planets. ({{UsefulNotes/Earth}} is more dense only because the large size compresses materials more.) A number of theories exist for the extra concentration of metal: The heat near the early sun may not have allowed as many silicates to condense, the Sun may have blown off the other rocks early on, or an impact may have blown off most of the outer rocks.

to:

The smallest of the planets (smaller even than the moons [[UsefulNotes/TheMoonsOfJupiter Ganymede]] and [[UsefulNotes/TheMoonsOfSaturn Titan]] in the outer solar system by volume, although not by mass.), mass, as it outweighs the two of them combined), and the closest to {{UsefulNotes/the Sun}}. The planet is mostly made of rock and metal, with a larger proportion of metal than the other inner planets, and as a result is the second densest of the large moons and planets. ({{UsefulNotes/Earth}} is more dense only because the large size compresses materials more.) A number of theories exist for the extra concentration of metal: The heat near the early sun Sun may not have allowed as many silicates to condense, the Sun may have blown off the other rocks early on, or an impact may have blown off most of the outer rocks.



It was expected that the planet would be tidally locked to the Sun, with one side always facing the Sun and the other always facing away, but the planet actually rotates in a 2:3 ratio with its orbital time. The ratio means that at times the Sun appears to move ''backwards'' in the Mercurian sky, and the orbit itself is unusually eccentric, which produces two equatorial "hot" poles (which always face the sun at perihelion) and two "cold" poles (which never do). The orbit itself also precesses at a higher-than-expected rate; this was an unexplained mystery that was finally solved by general relativity. Because of this longstanding belief, most depictions of Mercury can be summed up as pre-1965 (Mercury as a tidally locked planet with permanent "hot" and "cold" sides) and post-1965.

Mercury is a planet of massive extremes: the side facing the sun is incredibly hot, but the side facing away from the sun is incredibly ''cold'', up to -200 degrees. In fact, the only hot parts of Mercury are the parts directly in the path of the Sun's radiation. Since the planet's wisp of an atmosphere can't hold or convect any significant amount of heat, anything in shadow is very cold. How cold? There's ''ice'' in the nooks and crannies of the planet where the Sun doesn't shine. It's still not livable by any means, but it makes the planet far more interesting to astronomers.

to:

It was expected that the planet would be tidally locked to the Sun, with one side always facing the Sun and the other always facing away, but the planet actually rotates in a 2:3 ratio with its orbital time. The ratio means that at times the Sun appears to move ''backwards'' in the Mercurian sky, and the orbit itself is unusually eccentric, which produces two equatorial "hot" poles (which always face the sun Sun at perihelion) and two "cold" poles (which never do). The orbit itself also precesses at a higher-than-expected rate; this was an unexplained mystery that was finally solved by general relativity. Because of this longstanding belief, most depictions of Mercury can be summed up as pre-1965 (Mercury as a tidally locked planet with permanent "hot" and "cold" sides) and post-1965.

Mercury is a planet of massive extremes: the side facing the sun Sun is incredibly hot, but the side facing away from the sun Sun is incredibly ''cold'', up to -200 degrees. In fact, the only hot parts of Mercury are the parts directly in the path of the Sun's radiation. Since the planet's wisp of an atmosphere can't hold or convect any significant amount of heat, anything in shadow is very cold. How cold? There's ''ice'' in the nooks and crannies of the planet where the Sun doesn't shine. It's still not livable by any means, but it makes the planet far more interesting to astronomers.



Only two probes have made it to Mercury so far, both from UsefulNotes/{{NASA}} (Mariner 10 in 1974, and MESSENGER in 2008)--despite being close to Earth compared to the outer planets, it takes a lot of energy to cancel our home's orbital momentum and "fall in" towards the Sun.[[note]]The same reason that HurlItIntoTheSun is generally unrealistic.[[/note]] As a side note, features on Mercury are generally named after intellectuals--artist, painters, writers, and so forth.

to:

Only two probes have made it to Mercury so far, both from UsefulNotes/{{NASA}} (Mariner 10 in 1974, and MESSENGER in 2008)--despite 2008) — despite being close to Earth compared to the outer planets, it takes a lot of energy to cancel our home's orbital momentum and "fall in" towards the Sun.[[note]]The same reason that HurlItIntoTheSun is generally unrealistic.[[/note]] As a side note, features on Mercury are generally named after intellectuals--artist, intellectuals — artist, painters, writers, and so forth.
forth. A third probe, the ESA and JAXA's [=BepiColombo=], is on the way there right now.



* On ''WesternAnimation/InvaderZim'' its been turned into a giant spaceship by the (who else?) Martians. Zim and Dib proceed to have a space battle using Mars (which has also been turned into a ship) and Mercury, respectively.
* In ''Webcomic/{{Nebula}}'', Mercury is portrayed with a rather arrogant {{anthropomorphic personification}} who dresses like a WhiteCollarWorker and who gets into arguments with Venus about whether being close to Sun gives him any authority over the other planets. (It does not.)
* In Destiny Mercury is somewhat visitable. A couple of Crucible maps take place there, and the Lighthouse social space is avaliable if you are lucky to go flawless on trials of Osiris, it might as well be the ButtMonkey of the game. It was converted into a machine planet by the Vex prior to the first game. In Destiny 2 it winds up being used as fuel for the Almighty untill you put a stop to it, however it's still been partially destroyed in the process.
* In ''StarControl2'', Starbase Commander Hayes suggests you to go to Mercury to mine it for the radioactive elements Earth Starbase needs, warning you that it's a pretty unhospitable place (better look for them elsewhere in the Solar System).

to:

* On ''WesternAnimation/InvaderZim'' its been turned into a giant spaceship by the (who else?) Martians. Zim and Dib proceed to have a space battle using Mars (which has also been turned into a ship) and Mercury, respectively.
* In ''Webcomic/{{Nebula}}'', Mercury is portrayed with a rather arrogant {{anthropomorphic personification}} who dresses like a WhiteCollarWorker and who gets into arguments with Venus about whether being close to Sun gives him any authority over the other planets. (It does not.)
* In Destiny
''VideoGame/{{Destiny}}'', Mercury is somewhat visitable. A couple of Crucible maps take place there, and the Lighthouse social space is avaliable if you are lucky to go flawless on trials of Osiris, it might as well be the ButtMonkey of the game. It was converted into a machine planet by the Vex prior to the first game. In Destiny 2 it winds up being used as fuel for the Almighty untill you put a stop to it, however it's still been partially destroyed in the process.
* On ''WesternAnimation/InvaderZim'', it's been turned into a giant spaceship by the (who else?) Martians. Zim and Dib proceed to have a space battle using Mars (which has also been turned into a ship) and Mercury, respectively.
* In ''StarControl2'', ''Webcomic/{{Nebula}}'', Mercury is portrayed as a rather arrogant {{anthropomorphic personification}} who dresses like a WhiteCollarWorker and who gets into arguments with Venus about whether being close to Sun gives him any authority over the other planets. (It does not.)
* In ''VideoGame/StarControl2'',
Starbase Commander Hayes suggests you to go to Mercury to mine it for the radioactive elements Earth Starbase needs, warning you that it's a pretty unhospitable place (better look for them elsewhere in the Solar System).System).

Top