Follow TV Tropes

Following

History UsefulNotes / Animals

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Predators of similar sized prey: These are the most famous predators, probably. T-Rex attacking a Triceratops, crocodiles dragging large animals into the water, sharks attacking seals. On a smaller scale, squid catching fish, spiders catching larger insects, some flatworms preying on earthworms also fit this category, among many others. While successful catches are most commonly shown, in practice most attempts fail, or few attempts are made. A similar sized prey animal is a ''lot''of food, just imagine a person dealing with about 100-150 ib/75 kg of meat. A person needs about 2-4 pounds of meat a day if that's the only food item, so a carnivorous version of a human could catch something like a deer or large fish roughly every couple weeks, and accounting for inedible parts, still have have enough food for themselves plus feeding a family, or group, or just leaving it for other animals if too difficult to carry, and people need more food for our body size than most other animals. With this much food, lots of missed hunting attempts are perfectly survivable, while prey facing death is under much more pressure to escape.\\

to:

* Predators of similar sized prey: These are the most famous predators, probably. T-Rex ''T. rex'' attacking a Triceratops, ''Triceratops'', crocodiles dragging large animals into the water, sharks attacking seals. On a smaller scale, squid catching fish, spiders catching larger insects, some flatworms preying on earthworms also fit this category, among many others. While successful catches are most commonly shown, in practice most attempts fail, or few attempts are made. A similar sized prey animal is a ''lot''of food, just imagine a person dealing with about 100-150 ib/75 kg of meat. A person needs about 2-4 pounds of meat a day if that's the only food item, so a carnivorous version of a human could catch something like a deer or large fish roughly every couple weeks, and accounting for inedible parts, still have have enough food for themselves plus feeding a family, or group, or just leaving it for other animals if too difficult to carry, and people need more food for our body size than most other animals. With this much food, lots of missed hunting attempts are perfectly survivable, while prey facing death is under much more pressure to escape.\\



* Predators of smaller prey, or other prey that can't fight back: Think anteaters or chimps eating an insect hive, baleen whales catching schools of fish, starfish attacking clams, birds eating worms, or similar. Obviously, such prey can't physically fight back effectively, but it may still have other defenses such as shells or poison that the predator has to work around. A big challenge is finding enough food, smaller prey can often hide, and requires much total individuals eaten. Colonies or clusters are good targets for predators. Nutritionally, smaller prey and larger prey are similar.\\

to:

* Predators of smaller prey, or other prey that can't fight back: Think anteaters or chimps eating an insect hive, baleen whales catching gulping entire schools of fish, fish or krill, starfish attacking clams, birds eating worms, or similar. Obviously, such prey can't physically fight back effectively, but it may still have other defenses such as shells or poison that the predator has to work around. A big challenge is finding enough food, smaller prey can often hide, and requires much total individuals eaten. Colonies or clusters are good targets for predators. Nutritionally, smaller prey and larger prey are similar.\\



* Roughage eaters, or grazers, browsers, leaf eaters, and such: Eaters of general plant material, in other words. Horses and cows eating grass, termites eating wood, leafcutter ants eating leaves....there's a lot of these. By mass, plants are the most abundant animals on earth, so these organisms have plenty of food to eat. However, outside some specific parts, plants are poorly nutritious, and are hard to digest. The main component of plants, cellulose, can't be digested by many animals, in human nutrition it is one of the main dietary fiber chemicals that pass through. Plants can't fight or escape, but can have poisons, and some are physically tough or have spines, needles, or other physical defenses.\\

to:

* Roughage eaters, or grazers, browsers, leaf eaters, and such: Eaters of general plant material, in other words. Horses and cows eating grass, termites eating wood, leafcutter ants eating leaves....there's a lot of these. By mass, biomass, plants are the most abundant animals organisms on earth, so these organisms have plenty of food to eat. However, outside some specific parts, plants are poorly nutritious, and are hard to digest. The main component of plants, cellulose, can't be digested by many animals, in human nutrition it is one of the main dietary fiber chemicals that pass through. Herbivores therefore depend on certain types of gut bacteria and fungi to do the hard work of digesting cellulose for them. A lot of herbivores do practice coprophagy (eating their own feces) to reabsorb nutrients otherwise expelled as dung. Plants can't fight or escape, but can have poisons, and some are physically tough or have spines, needles, or other physical defenses.\\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Earthworms and leeches, among others. Includes a number of deep sea worms, attached to the seafloor or nutrient sources such as sunken whale corpses or hydrothermal vents (including the red and white tubeworm pictures), polychaetes are the main group of these. Annelids grow in segments, each segment repeats some organs with a similar structure, with blood vessels, nerves, a digestive system running through, and similar connecting organs running through; they were once united with arthropods for this reason, but molecular analyses don't support this. Most have little hairlike things off the sides to help them move. The larger than normal ring you see on earthworms is a reproductive section, used to store eggs.\\

to:

Earthworms and leeches, among others. Includes a number of deep sea worms, attached to the seafloor or nutrient sources such as sunken whale corpses or hydrothermal vents (including the red and white tubeworm pictures), polychaetes are the main group of these. Annelids grow in segments, each segment repeats some organs with a similar structure, with blood vessels, nerves, a digestive system running through, and similar connecting organs running through; they were once united with arthropods for this reason, but molecular analyses don't support this. Most have little hairlike things structures called setae off the sides to help them move. The larger than normal ring you see on earthworms is a reproductive section, used to store eggs.\\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

Tropes:\\
ClamshellsAsMouths\\
\\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

Tropes:\\
SpeedySnail\\
\\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Coral, Sea Anemones, Jellyfish, and some others. Cnidarians have an unusual reproduction system, cycling between a fixed in place form and a free floating or swimming form; a few species can in theory live forever by changing between these forms. Cnidarians are radially symmetric, the same going around in a circle, and have a digestive system where food goes in and waste goes out through the same opening, many have some sort of tentacles or arms.\\

to:

Coral, Sea Anemones, Jellyfish, and some others. Cnidarians have an unusual reproduction system, cycling between a fixed in place form and a free floating or swimming form; a few species can in theory live forever by changing between these forms. Cnidarians are radially symmetric, the same going around in a circle, and have a digestive system where food goes in and waste goes out through the same opening, many have some sort of tentacles or arms.arms utilized in capturing prey. Cnidarians are also characterized by the possession of cnidocytes, cells that are shaped like tiny harpoons that serve to inject venom into their prey. \\



These days, with lots of ocean creatures dying off for various reasons (pollution, temperature, acidification, overfishing) jellyfish have been filling in the gaps. Not too economically useful, cause cause further problems if jellyfish eat too much larvae of other creatures, its one of many environmental issues going today. Though many sea turtles eat the things, so will be happy.\\

to:

These days, with lots of ocean creatures dying off for various reasons (pollution, temperature, acidification, overfishing) jellyfish have been filling in the gaps. Not too economically useful, cause cause further problems if jellyfish eat too much larvae of other creatures, its one of many environmental issues going today. Though many sea turtles eat the things, they too are negatively impacted by the ocean's changing climate and pollution, so will may not be happy.enough to curb the jellyfish.\\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Spelling/grammar fix(es), Misplaced, moving to the correct tab


To figure out how life is related, including animals, scientists look for certain types of similarities, preferably ones that are difficult to change through evolution, or are more or less random and don’t affect survival much. Physical structures might use shell or bone structure if the animal has one, or structures of organs where multiple forms can work well. Genetic studies use mutations, often in noncoding DNa or genes with minor effects, to measure the time between splits and similarity between animals; these assume that mutations are more or less random, and when groups split a different collection of mutations will build up over time.\\

to:

To figure out how life is related, including animals, scientists look for certain types of similarities, preferably ones that are difficult to change through evolution, or are more or less random and don’t affect survival much. Physical structures might use shell or bone structure if the animal has one, or structures of organs where multiple forms can work well. Genetic studies use mutations, often in noncoding DNa {{UsefulNotes/DNA}} or genes with minor effects, to measure the time between splits and similarity between animals; these assume that mutations are more or less random, and when groups split a different collection of mutations will build up over time.\\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Animals are Eukaryotes. All earth life is made of cells (viruses are borderline), some cells have lots of mini organs including a nucleus that stores genes, these are Eukaryotes, Eukaryotes also include fungi, algae, plants, many kinds of microbes, but not bacteria, or a group called Archea that has some chemical differences to bacteria.
* Animals are muticellular. Like plants, fungi, and some of the algae, animal bodies are made of lots of cells. These cells specialize, changing shape and other properties to fill specialized roles in the body. Most animals have distinct tissues, which combine similar cells into a larger structure,
* Animals need food: The word for needing to eat other living organisms, or artificial imitations, is heterotroph. Plants and some algae are autrophs, they can use nonliving sources of energy such as the to power themselves. All animals need to eat things is the result.

to:

* Animals are Eukaryotes. All earth life is made of cells (viruses are borderline), (apart from viruses, if you include them as life), some cells have lots of mini organs including a nucleus that stores genes, these are Eukaryotes, Eukaryotes. Eukaryotes also include fungi, algae, plants, many kinds of microbes, but not bacteria, or a group called Archea that has some chemical differences to bacteria.
* Animals are muticellular. Like plants, fungi, and some of the algae, animal bodies are made of lots of cells. These cells specialize, changing shape and other properties to fill specialized roles in the body. Most animals have distinct tissues, which combine similar cells into a larger structure,
* Animals need food: The word for needing to eat other living organisms, or artificial imitations, is heterotroph. Plants Plants, algae, and some algae bacteria and archea are autrophs, they can use nonliving sources of energy such as the sun to power themselves. All animals need to eat things is the result.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Animals need Oxygen: Aerobic is the word. Some organism can break down material with no oxygen to get enough energy. Some Animals can do this for short bursts, like your muscles when sprinting, but a=outside those short periods animals need oxygen for energy.
* Animal cells lack cell walls: Plants, fungi, and many bacteria have a rigid structure surrounding their cells. This provides support in plants and fungi, helping them stand up. Animals lack this, having flexible cells instead. In most groups, this flexibility allows movement.

to:

* Animals need Oxygen: oxygen: Aerobic is the word.word for this. Some organism can break down material with no oxygen to get enough energy. Some Animals animals can do this for short bursts, like your muscles when sprinting, but a=outside outside those short periods animals need oxygen for energy.
* Animal cells lack cell walls: Plants, fungi, and many bacteria have a rigid structure surrounding their cells. This provides support in plants and fungi, helping them stand up. Animals lack this, having flexible cells instead. In most groups, this flexibility This allows movement.
animals to move, which almost no other multicellular organisms can do quickly, movement is probably the most obvious animal quality for most people.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Earthworms and leeches, among others. Includes a number of deep sea worms, attached to the seafloor or nutrient sources such as sunken whale corpses or hydrothermal vents (including the red and white tubeworm pictures), polychaetes are the main group of these. Annelids grow in segments, each segment repeats some organs with a similar structure, with blood vessels, nerves, a digestive system running through, and similar connecting organs running through. Most have little hairlike things off the sides to help them move. The larger than normal ring you see on earthworms is a reproductive section, used to store eggs.\\

to:

Earthworms and leeches, among others. Includes a number of deep sea worms, attached to the seafloor or nutrient sources such as sunken whale corpses or hydrothermal vents (including the red and white tubeworm pictures), polychaetes are the main group of these. Annelids grow in segments, each segment repeats some organs with a similar structure, with blood vessels, nerves, a digestive system running through, and similar connecting organs running through.through; they were once united with arthropods for this reason, but molecular analyses don't support this. Most have little hairlike things off the sides to help them move. The larger than normal ring you see on earthworms is a reproductive section, used to store eggs.\\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


'''Amniotes in general'''\\

to:

'''Amniotes in general'''\\'''The Great Reptile Mix-Up'''\\



Land vertebrates that don’t need to lay eggs in water, or at least had an ancestor with this quality. Some have returned to water, but these are either live birthing in some way, possibly keeping eggs inside the body, or return to land for reproduction. Includes mammals, birds, and rep…actually…\\

to:

Land vertebrates that don’t need to lay eggs in water, or at least had an ancestor with this quality.quality, are called amniotes. Some have returned to water, but these are either live birthing in some way, possibly keeping eggs inside the body, or return to land for reproduction. Includes mammals, birds, and rep…actually…\\rept…actually, we run into some issues here.\\



No group has been more messed with by phylogenetic classification than “reptiles”. When the original linnean system was created, land vertebrates were divided into furry animals war blooded animals with milk (mammals), feathered warm blooded animals with wings (birds), thin skinned cold blooded animals laying eggs in water (amphibians), and cold blooded animals with drying resistant eggs often with scales, shells, or osteoderms (reptiles). This system still makes sense for vets and zookeepers and people working with modern animals. However, it is not phylogenetic, birds and crocodiles have a common ancestry that lizards don’t, turtles may be associated with this group also. \\

to:

No group has been more messed with by phylogenetic classification than “reptiles”. When the original linnean system was created, land vertebrates were naturally divided into furry animals war warm blooded animals with milk (mammals), feathered warm blooded animals with wings (birds), thin skinned cold blooded animals laying eggs in water (amphibians), and cold blooded animals with drying resistant eggs often with scales, shells, or osteoderms (reptiles). This system still makes sense for vets and zookeepers and other people working with modern animals. However, it is not phylogenetic, birds and crocodiles have a common ancestry that lizards don’t, turtles may be associated with this group also. \\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


As for higher and lower animals, The evolution link describes opinion well. All animals have had to face a similar set of challenges in living in an environment, finding food, etc., so anything that survives that is well evolved and adapted to its role: Sponges and jellyfish have adapted just as much as cuttlefish, bees, or whales. Complexity involves tradeoffs, more energy, more difficult growth and development are the big ones, so a simpler and less active animal may well work better in certain roles. Vertebrates scientifically are seen as just one group of animals, so invertebrate makes as much sense as nonarthropod or isntmollusc or other-than-cnidarian, though on sites like this one invertebrate gets some use as vertebrates are more more represented in pop culture and other areas. If an animal form has lasted a long time, it means it was very well adapted for an environment, and that said environment has also lasted a long time, so “primitive” animals are those which ended up with a long lasting, useful shape and way of living.\\

to:

As for higher and lower animals, The evolution link describes opinion well. All animals have had to face a similar set of challenges in living in an environment, finding food, etc., so anything that survives that is well evolved and adapted to its role: Sponges and jellyfish have adapted just as much as cuttlefish, bees, or whales. Complexity involves tradeoffs, more energy, more difficult growth and development are the big ones, so a simpler and less active animal may well work better in certain roles. Vertebrates scientifically are seen as just one group of animals, so invertebrate makes as much sense as nonarthropod or isntmollusc or other-than-cnidarian, though on sites like this one invertebrate gets some use as vertebrates are more more represented in pop culture and other areas. If an animal form has lasted a long time, it means it was very well adapted for an environment, and that said environment has also lasted a long time, so “primitive” animals are those which ended up with a long lasting, useful shape and way of living. "Backward" evolution, where an animal ancestor gained something and lost it again has happened often: Flightless ants and ostriches had ancestors who evolved and lost flying, whale ancestors moved from sea to land and back, slug and squuid ancestors gained and lost shells, flatworm ancestors gained and lost many internal organs.\\

Added: 429

Changed: 3644

Removed: 479

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Dinosaurs kept mammals in hiding. The Lion is the King of the Jungle. Culture often assumes that predators and large animals dominate over prey and smaller animals, and are overall more powerful and successful. Concepts such as higher and lower animals, or the great chain of being, are also common, where larger, more complex animals and vertebrates are considered better, more advanced, etc. than simpler and smaller ones.\\



A default way of thinking is often that larger animals, more complex animals, and predators “dominate”/”rule over” smaller ones. Mammals are described as scared of dinosaurs, Lions are seen as king, predators are rulers of their environment. At the bottom, we have the [[InvertebrateTropes invertebrates]].\\

to:

A default way of thinking This is often that larger animals, more complex animals, and not how scientists see it, as {{UsefulNotes/Evolution}} describes. While predators “dominate”/”rule over” and large animals are individually threatening, collectively prey and smaller ones. Mammals animals do quite well for themselves. Animals are described usually spread out enough that animals aren’t constantly under attack, as scared you’ll notice if you go hiking or spending time in a wild area, so most smaller animals and prey spend most of dinosaurs, Lions are seen as king, their time going about their business and occasionally running or hiding from something dangerous. Lions, Tigers, and Bears might be the big predators in modern environments, but plenty of smaller cats, lizards, birds, spiders, worms, etc. are rulers of living out their environment. At the bottom, we have the [[InvertebrateTropes invertebrates]].lives quite successfully. Likely this is true of dinosaurs and mammals, mesozoic mammals were filling similar roles to racoons, rats, squirrels, etc. that live in equivalent areas today.\\



As you can guess, especially if you’ve seen UsefulNotes/{{Evolution}}, this is not how scientists think. Individually, a predator or large animal is threatening to smaller ones or prey, but collectively the second groups do just fine, or there would be no prey left. In modern environments with Lions, tigers, and bears, there are plenty of moose, rhinos, gazelles, etc. for the predators to feed on, and smaller animals like raccoons, squirrels, wildcats, lizards, frogs, etc. live out their lives just fine, never mind even smaller things like ants spiders that may well far outnumber the larger ones, possibly outweigh them in total as well. So likely, as those big dinosaurs were walking around in the Jurassic and Cretaceous, mammals were living just fine as well, interacting with smaller creatures, and fossils suggest they started diversifying after an initial bottleneck even before the extinction. And in modern times, those very primitive, simple jellyfish are doing quite well for themselvesl, while bigger, more complex sharks are having problems thanks to various types of ocean pollution.\\

to:

As you can guess, especially if you’ve seen UsefulNotes/{{Evolution}}, this is not how scientists think. Individually, a predator or large animal is threatening to smaller ones or prey, but collectively the second groups do just fine, or there would be no prey left. In modern environments with Lions, tigers, for higher and bears, there are plenty of moose, rhinos, gazelles, etc. for the predators to feed on, and smaller lower animals, The evolution link describes opinion well. All animals like raccoons, squirrels, wildcats, lizards, frogs, etc. live out their lives just fine, never mind even smaller things like ants spiders that may well far outnumber the larger ones, possibly outweigh them have had to face a similar set of challenges in total as well. So likely, as those big dinosaurs were walking around in the Jurassic and Cretaceous, mammals were living just fine as well, interacting with smaller creatures, in an environment, finding food, etc., so anything that survives that is well evolved and fossils suggest they started diversifying after an initial bottleneck even before the extinction. And in modern times, those very primitive, simple adapted to its role: Sponges and jellyfish have adapted just as much as cuttlefish, bees, or whales. Complexity involves tradeoffs, more energy, more difficult growth and development are doing quite the big ones, so a simpler and less active animal may well for themselvesl, while bigger, work better in certain roles. Vertebrates scientifically are seen as just one group of animals, so invertebrate makes as much sense as nonarthropod or isntmollusc or other-than-cnidarian, though on sites like this one invertebrate gets some use as vertebrates are more complex sharks more represented in pop culture and other areas. If an animal form has lasted a long time, it means it was very well adapted for an environment, and that said environment has also lasted a long time, so “primitive” animals are having problems thanks to various types those which ended up with a long lasting, useful shape and way of ocean pollution.living.\\



Animals aren’t really trying to achieve anything, just living their lives, but the closest measures to ‘success’ are probably survival, maybe population size. Animals that haven’t changed much over time are called basal/primitive, and suggests they’ve evolved into a design that fits a role very, very well, or their build is very flexible and needs to change little. “Back evolution” is pretty common, flatworm ancestors gained, than lost lots of internal organs, slugs and the octopus/squid group come from ancestors that evolved a shell, ants and ostriches among others had flying ancestors and lost (mostly, for ants) the ability, crocodile ancestors likely had relatively fast metabolisms but these were lost as they became the river creatures we know today, and this writer is thinking of many other examples but the ist is getting long.. If something survives and reproduces, it lasts, whatever properties it may have.\\
\\
As for Invertebrates, it’s not any more useful a scientific term than, say, nonarthropod or other-than-cnidarian or isn’tmollusc. Vertebrates do have unique characteristics, maybe more than other animal groups depending on how you measure, but most groups are unique in some way and grouping everything else together in a big way doesn’t make much sense. Though since most people interact with vertebrates more obviously than anything else, it remains a useful Trope category\\

to:

Animals aren’t really trying to achieve anything, are just living their lives, not pursuing any larger goals, but the closest population, diversity in species or in roles a group fills, geographic spread, amount of time it has existed before going extinct, are all used as measures to ‘success’ are probably survival, maybe population size. Animals that haven’t changed much over time are called basal/primitive, and suggests they’ve evolved into a design that fits a role very, very well, or their build is very flexible and needs to change little. “Back evolution” is pretty common, flatworm ancestors gained, than lost lots of internal organs, slugs and the octopus/squid group come from ancestors that evolved a shell, ants and ostriches among others had flying ancestors and lost (mostly, for ants) the ability, crocodile ancestors likely had relatively fast metabolisms but these were lost as they became the river creatures we know today, and this writer is thinking of many other examples but the ist is getting long.. If something survives and reproduces, it lasts, whatever properties it may have.\\
\\
As for Invertebrates, it’s not any more useful a scientific term than, say, nonarthropod or other-than-cnidarian or isn’tmollusc. Vertebrates do have unique characteristics, maybe more than other animal groups depending on how you measure, but most groups are unique in some way and grouping everything else together in a big way doesn’t make much sense. Though since most people interact with vertebrates more obviously than anything else, it remains a useful Trope category\\
success.\\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Avoiding SmallTaxonomyPools is going to be tricky, there are about a million known animal species, and some estimates go to 5 million or tens of millions, mostly insects. But possibly these groups give you some ideas.

to:

Avoiding SmallTaxonomyPools is going to be tricky, there are about a million known animal species, and some estimates go to 5 million or tens of millions, mostly insects.insects, defaulting to the best known ones is understandable. But possibly these groups give you some ideas.

Top